 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
...
muslim youngsters migrating to europe wants to breed your sisters and daughters. its a breeding war.
Oh come on! Your daughter loves it! What's not to love, amiright?  |
|
|
|
Actually, I don't think A is such a ridiculous choice. A tad simplistic and sensationalist perhaps, but if you don't have time for complexities or nuances and just want a paradigm that captures in a nutshell, the essence in which the global financial elites are driving the world, then A has it.
In other words,  Like I said, you seem like a bit of an ignorant, repugnant, tosser. People who use 'conspiracy theory' as a derogatory term nearly always are. And that, along with your batshit crazy beliefs and your infantile, lazy thinking, puts you smack dab in the middle of the paranoid loon fringe :- |
|
|
|
Actually, I don't think A is such a ridiculous choice. A tad simplistic and sensationalist perhaps, but if you don't have time for complexities or nuances and just want a paradigm that captures in a nutshell, the essence in which the global financial elites are driving the world, then A has it.
In other words, |
|
|
|
...
go long or go home.
"Unfortunately, once a gambling addiction takes hold, breaking the cycle is difficult. Severe addictions can take hold when someone feels desperate financially and wants to make back what they have lost. Once the person finally wins, while they may end up collecting a massive amount of money from that win, it is rarely enough to cover what has already been lost. Most gamblers never even come close to breaking even."  @Hyperjacked: you too. Don't judge me...This isn't a gambling site its discussion about the Bitcoin price and technicals ! why don't you go on one of those gambling threads or preach to someone who has a sponsored gambling link? Lol @ isn't a gambling site! TA of bitcoin is sadder than TA of shooting craps. Yah, gots me ah Cray crunching slots data, with upgraded sciences and a new bleep-blooper with flashing lights, serious shit! Gonna make me some serious scratch, baby! @marcus_of_ridiculous: Bitcoin is totally not gambling, you're right. It's just a coincidence that the premiere bitcoin forum has 5 gambling subs, one specifically for promoting ponzis. And also this sub, for closeted gamblers in denial, who like to pretend that they're not degenerate gamblers at all, but actually intrepid investors  |
|
|
|
...
go long or go home.
"Unfortunately, once a gambling addiction takes hold, breaking the cycle is difficult. Severe addictions can take hold when someone feels desperate financially and wants to make back what they have lost. Once the person finally wins, while they may end up collecting a massive amount of money from that win, it is rarely enough to cover what has already been lost. Most gamblers never even come close to breaking even." @Hyperjacked: you too. |
|
|
|
...
strap yourself in for 5-10 years MINIMUM understand that if all goes well you won't need to ever converted to fiat... and have a trading wallet for fun, HODL it like a MOFO, and HODL your trade like a MOFO as well.
your an idiot if you sell everything now and walk away and you know that. ... Gambling Addiction RehabAdwww.bhpalmbeach.com/ (844) 381-8670 Gambling Addiction Treatment and Substance Abuse Program. Get Help!High doctor-patient ratio · Evidenced based treatment "The road to mental health is right around the corner!" |
|
|
|
|
OMG Why is the price crashing like that? Is this normal?!
|
|
|
|
Private property goes pari passu with the state, more specifically with its laws. No state, no private property, because in the wild might is right: if someone stronger than you points at your property and says "that is mine" you can't do nothing but obey or be deprived coercively.
I could easily pay someone even stronger to protect my private property. Doesn't have to be state, does it? Hypothetical: 1. I'm the guy stronger than you, and you ask me to protect your private property in exchange for some money. 2. I take your money, and, being stronger (and, as quickly becomes apparent, smarter) than you, also take the private property you paid me to protect. 3. ? ? ? 4. Profit! |
|
|
|
It was probably because the post was off topic for the thread. Also it may have to do with the fact that it is just a link, not information whatsoever. You should actually write something and reference the article instead of just pointing a link to it.
At first glance, it looks like you are advertising MMM global. It would be better if you said something about how they are scammy (as the link describes) and had something like "see this link for more information" at the end of the post to direct users to more information.
How is a claim that MMM is the reason for BTC price spike off-topic in a thread asking "why bitcoin price is growing'? >At first glance, it looks like you are advertising MMM global Because I linked to an article calling it a scam? Negative Land? @tarsua: Have you bothered to follow the link, or simply assume, like whoever deleted the post, that it was promoting MMM? @bitcoin revo: Little or no content? The thread seeks to find the reason for BTC price spike, I provide the answer, cite my sources, and it's not relevant enough? Go on. @alani123: My guess is you're right, I'm just a bit tired of lazy, knee-jerk moderation. The fact that MMM is a morally repugnant scam stealing from those who can least afford it is irrelevant to my point. No forum rules that I know of which have been broken. |
|
|
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. Edit: Deleted from this thread. |
|
|
|
Thanks. So itBit got 10k, and Cumberland Mining [probably] the lion's share. |
|
|
|
... His personal info will be on www.shamelist.it first second he breaks agreement we reached. ... Did you recently buy this account? Quite a gap in your posting right after this: two threads on this subject is a tad too much, for my taste. This threads are here as a warning to others, deebosch, it's no longer about you. If you are who you claim to be, and did lend the kid '8.5+ BTC' (lol?), kiss that money goodbye. |
|
|
|
|
^You're absolutely exceptional at turning [bored, basically neutral] bystanders [who drop by to rubberneck at this train wreck] into brand new enemies.
If there was only a way to monetize such a thing...
|
|
|
|
@acakf: strategies for figuring out the topic of a thread include:
1) reading the title
Original title: "How to contact tomatocage." Unenlightening 2) reading the OP
Let's give it a shot. OP [redacted]: UPDATE 16 Sept 2015:
All the latest indications are that the Wardick account was taken over by an imposter ...
UPDATE 7 Sept. 2015:
QS has joined Tradefortress in the realm of the completely discredited thanks to an escrow scam he was pulling off. ...
UPDATE 25 August 2015:
Quickseller has recently removed one of the trust sockpuppet ratings he has left on my account. ...
The original content of this thread's OP is below the horizontal line.
What's happened is that there are really three issues at play here and I had locked this topic and started three separate threads. ...
The overarching theme, clearly, is ... it's obvious that ... um ... do I get more than one guess? 3) reading the thread
I realize this thread has gotten a little long, so perhaps only (1) and (2) are feasible, but go ahead and start there. <snip> Listen, don't take this the wrong way, but I might have to pass. "I understood at last the look in his eyes. He was insane." |
|
|
|
... I trust the 'person' behind the forum account not the account (itself). ...
Playing Devil's advocate: Let's say you had a good trade with Quickseller. You leave Quickseller a positive trust rating, but no ratings to any of his long list of alts (which, being controlled by the same person, would all deserve identical trust, according to your "'person' behind the forum account" stance). Tomatocage is on the default trust, though (most of) his alts, presumably, are not. Correct? flawless_victory.gif strawman gibberish.txt FTFY. You're really trying too hard now. Raging without a clue as to what's being said: an affliction that's almost endemic to bitcointalk  @tspacepilot re. OT: the topic being what, exactly? dogpile on Quickseller, now that it serves no purpose beyond humiliating him / rubbing salt in wound? |
|
|
|
... I trust the 'person' behind the forum account not the account (itself). ...
Playing Devil's advocate: Let's say you had a good trade with Quickseller. You leave Quickseller a positive trust rating, but no ratings to any of his long list of alts (which, being controlled by the same person, would all deserve identical trust, according to your "'person' behind the forum account" stance). Tomatocage is on the default trust, though (most of) his alts, presumably, are not. Correct? flawless_victory.gif |
|
|
|
...
There seems to be very few "hard" rules here. Many of the things that are impossible to enforce (like account selling)
...
Nothing is impossible for Bitcointalk A Team!* If the mechanics of banning the sale of bitcointalk accounts on bitcointalk are unclear, feel free to PM me.
|
|
|
|
|
