Sadly, last exchange where PLC was listed is dead. My node connect only to 2-3 others. Looks like only one miner supports network
|
|
|
This topic should be LOCKED and say, that there is NO COPICO [XCPO] anymore. If you have any XCPO they are worthless, no exchange and no working nodes to connect. XCPO network is dead.
|
|
|
Where you take source from? I wanted p2pool really, not to mine on someone elses pool.
p2pool: stratum+tcp://pool.futurocoin.org:7903 WorkerName: Walletaddr. password: any It was somewhere in the news or on twitter, donīt remember Code? this is the Github from the UI, but there you find the links to the P2p source, too https://github.com/justino/p2pool-ui-punchyNo, there is no P2Pool code, just UI. This P2Pool have zero other nodes, it can be modified in many ways and steal from miners. rav3n_pl Do you suggesting what I was thinking ? That futurocoin is stealing hashing power from miners and also they using they using tricks to refuse block you mined ? Thanks Pozdrawiam WE don`t know that, also w/o pool code and other nodes connected we cant verify that. P2Pool meant to be decentralized - should be at least 3 nodes on same code.
|
|
|
Node Peers: 0 / 0 Node p2pool Version: 237c60c-dirty It mean that node has not other nodes connected and code is not same as on source (github or whatever).
|
|
|
Where you take source from? I wanted p2pool really, not to mine on someone elses pool.
p2pool: stratum+tcp://pool.futurocoin.org:7903 WorkerName: Walletaddr. password: any It was somewhere in the news or on twitter, donīt remember Code? this is the Github from the UI, but there you find the links to the P2p source, too https://github.com/justino/p2pool-ui-punchyNo, there is no P2Pool code, just UI. This P2Pool have zero other nodes, it can be modified in many ways and steal from miners.
|
|
|
Where you take source from? I wanted p2pool really, not to mine on someone elses pool.
p2pool: stratum+tcp://pool.futurocoin.org:7903 WorkerName: Walletaddr. password: any It was somewhere in the news or on twitter, donīt remember Code?
|
|
|
Small updates: - need .Net 4,5 now - updated newtosoft.json library - pull unconfirmed outputs - speedup in drawing (hide elements to avoid system redraws) Have fun
|
|
|
Hello. As this is SCRYPT coin do NOT mine using CPU nor GPU! Using cgminer/minerd is POINLESS. You waste 100x more $$$ for electricyty than you mine. For mining this coin ONLY use ASICs for SCRYPT, like Andminer L3.
|
|
|
"It would be not good for DBL investors believing in 8M coin limit"
Yarrrr!
|
|
|
@rav3n_pl as the resident guardian of the github repository do you have a plan for how to deal with this? As the entire network consists of a literal handful of people right now it shouldn't be too difficult to hard fork especially as the few currently mining probably won't want to see their own holdings devalued ninefold if we sit back and do nothing. Not sure what the best plan of action is myself as I haven't been following evolution of cryptocurrencies for the last 2 years. Based upon my knowledge a couple of years back I would have suggested POS (Proof Of Stake) post block 1,181,683 (8 million coins generated point) as it's very low effort mining and anyone staking will find their coins increase in line with the overall inflation just by holding on to them and unlocking their wallet to allow their coins to stake every so often. I'm not sure what other alternatives have come about in the last couple of years though.
It (change reward system) require a hardfork. It is doable. It is possible to change LTC v0.14 code into working DBL, but need to be chosen block in near future to allow blocks v3 and v4 and it will start voting for segwit. So miners NEED to use new version as soon it will be released, or network will split. Also, new versions will have trouble to accept transactions generated by older code (because of strict-DER-signing). I`m not a fan of PoS, it is mostly killing coin and only make coin rich ppl richer. Also I have zero experience in coding it.
|
|
|
okey, thanks. i will take a look these days. would by nice to get it run on Win10 with Pyton 2.7 (pypy does not run here ...)
I was able to get pypy running on Windows 10 by using the Linux Subsystem for Windows: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg21025074#msg21025074However, the reason I made these CPU improvement changes was in the hope that it would allow people to run CPython on medium-speed CPUs without crazy orphan rates. I'm very much interested in hearing whether it works. This "linux subsystem" is like 5-10x slower than you make a Vitrualbox VM and run Ubuntu in it. Tested on cross-compiling coin daemons. It would be way better choice to install Ubuntu desktop in VM, run it in seamless mode and use for whatever you want.
|
|
|
You do realize, that data in torrent are WAY outdated and new node need get lots of data anyway? It is NOT good way to bootstrap node.
|
|
|
IMPORTANT NOTE: As of Bitcoin Core version 0.10.0 or later, this torrent is slower than a direct download using the bitcoin P2P protocol & client. This torrent is now only maintained for research and development purposes as a secondary option. Please use Bitcoin Core directly to download the blockchain. This topic can be closed? Some people still asking about thing that is not need for like year.
|
|
|
If there is some ppl intrested in this coin, we should hardfork to: - new codebase (litecoin v0.14 or smth) - adaptive diff (ie DGW) - fix minig subsidy to "how it has been told" (or leave it like it is)
|
|
|
The switch to BIP91 worked well ...
https://blockchain.info/block-height/476729"Kano CKPool"/"KanoPool" Is your poll not signaling SegWit? Ot it is not your block? If it is yours, update daemon ASAP, because in 2 days block like that will be orphaned.
|
|
|
I did change keys, but my miner is still not shown in active list. It have to wait some time running? miner name is "uabc7b4e3b08935a9bb732253f01d8f76" id is 1.4.13 Tried to made second one: ua1aa0a62214b5f26235c819052f43d23 1.4.128 but also not visible in info. Both voted by some coins.
|
|
|
|