I would like to add the following comment into the '
'Will deflation be the fatal weakness of bitcoin?' discussion but I'm still marked as a newbie and can't reply there so I have to write it down here. It would be nice if someone can quote my comment there.
The deflationary property can be a threat. But I see a much bigger problem: With the 21M limit there is a chance that someone can hoard nearly all the coins and make sure Bitcoin become useless. As long as people believe in some value of any FIAT currency and support them by using it, the once who can print that money are able to buy nearly all the Bitcoins over time and make sure this great creation is no longer a threat for the elite. Without the 21M limit it's more difficult for them to hoard 'all' but the problem isn't really solved. A way to keep Bitcoin alive would be keep it in the geek world and make sure it will never be a threat for the elite. I would like to see a solution for our financial mess and Bitcoin seems to be a step in the right direction but it's by far not the solution. It doesn't really matters if there is the 21M limit or not. This is just my opinion. Some will agree, some will disagree
![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
. The question is how a creation should look like that is able to dis-power the elite? It has to be something like 'free money' (free like free software, free speech, instead of free beer). This is kinda difficult, right?