 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Didnt try it myself, but maybe you got to sign up?
Yep, thought about that and signed up. Still doesn't work. |
|
|
|
Their cart link's not working for me. |
|
|
|
Not that I'm happy with the situation with LRM but the law suit was filed on the 26th of August so technically Labrat wasnt lying when he sent out the email at the end of July.
Problem still revolves around trust - even with the law suit filed after he sent that email itd be difficult to trust him not using the funds from the new sales to fuel the lawsuit given the lack of transparency of everything else...
I see, was my fault to accuse him for that...but still i feel goxed  We're all goxed! |
|
|
|
|
Not that I'm happy with the situation with LRM but the law suit was filed on the 26th of August so technically Labrat wasnt lying when he sent out the email at the end of July.
Problem still revolves around trust - even with the law suit filed after he sent that email itd be difficult to trust him not using the funds from the new sales to fuel the lawsuit given the lack of transparency of everything else...
|
|
|
|
does this business have a mining page that explicitly shows mining stats yet?
or are we just supposed to trust that the 100mh is real, and whatever lrm decides to kick back to holders is also real?
It's all about trust  |
|
|
|
Didn't Zack say he was going to put a Dividend breakdown up on sunday?
He was suffering from a nasty migraine and probably still suffering now...  |
|
|
|
If LR can pull off getting LRM to 1PH... it could arguably make up for all this.... that's an if....
Why do I think this? Correct me if I'm wrong... current network hashrate is ~30PH....
Difficulty looks like it may have went to a linear increase. Ifso, that projects to about ~100PH by year end.
1PH would be ~1% of the network. Currently that (1%) would yield ~BTC1057/mo ... or ~BTC0.0176/month/bond (not bad).
This doesn't count halving of block size. And I might be underestimating the difficulty.
It's an awesome " If". Man, that would be sweet! If he can get LRM up and over 300TH right now, then it would be the equivalent. This month is suppose to bring in 150+TH - which would be getting closer. Still running at ~18Th/s on ghash according to the banner stats shown on lrm site - which is not the total hash rate..... It's the 7th March and keen to be surprised..... |
|
|
|
Right after being pointed out that labrat still comes online, he's now offline for ~2 days in a row. I'm going take a guess that he's had btc held in mtgox which are payment for the gear(s) but now got stuffed over and lost them all.  |
|
|
|
Does anyone know the total div's sent to date, or where is a list of the div's sent since first bond issue?
This should at the very least be posted on lrm's web site. It's not like labrat has been completely MIA, he logs on almost everyday or every second day. I'm sure he's reading all this so perhaps he's got something he doesn't want to tell us - like losing funds in Gox.....? The obvious one is no new hardware have arrives, nothing new here. |
|
|
|
What were dividends over the weekend?
That info no longer seems to get released, can't remember exactly what the pre-cursor to that was . . . anyone? Hmmmm some vague memory of Noteplant, Coinplant, PlantSeed something like that and oh yeah Zach got a new job and now has no time for LRM. This adds fuel to debate on why should cryptocurrencies be regulated. Someone sets up an investment vehicle and then ignores their contracted or expected obligations to the investors. Labrat's status shows he comes online regularly but can't spare any time to even outline the weekly payout - let alone providing any update on the receipt of equipment or updates on that seed thingy. |
|
|
|
The last trade for LRM was BTC .066 per bond for current hash rate of .318 GH/s
Cex.io is currently selling 1gh/s for BTC .0338( 3 times the hash rate for half BTC cost)
Is LRM still good value against Cex.io?
Does anyone have the cumulative return that LRM has made so far per share?
I think the difference is the per bond hash rate for LRM is increasing over time and based on the forward looking statements by Labrat it will continue to go up. Obviously have to weigh out the opportunity cost and risks associated with any sort of investments. |
|
|
|
ok so can i buy some more shares now, i was going to buy a large quantity just before the migration.
Same here, question is how do we buy that now? Who's willing to sell for 0.01 BTC / share? PM me and I'll take care of ya |
|
|
|
|
Labrat - Sent a couple emails due to changes of holding.. please use the latest one. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
Some pool is probably exploited and doesn't know it. There have been several sites that have previously disclosed intrusions. Where else did you use your mtgox password, you must discover the source of the hack (and not use the same password twice!)
Yeah, learn from mistakes eh? I thought I did that when I learnt the importance of backing up stuff. (oh, better reset passwords to the backups too, hehe, j/k) Anyhow, it's probably too late to bait them which is a bit annoying. I've tried and asked Mt Gox for info around the 2-3 failed logons to see whether they can supply the passwords used or the hash generated (assuming they don't store passwords in clear text). I wasn't surprised when the request was denied - until I have filed a police report. *boggles mind* |
|
|
|
|
After a bit of back & forth eventually MtGox gave in and shown me the login logs. Whoever hacked in has managed to logon after 3 attempts, so I suspect they've drawn from the passwords I have used on one of the Bitcoin sites which I won't name here. It seems that they could either 1) withdraw funds from my account if it wasn't protected or 2) use my account to somehow manipulate the market or 3) simply to trade the account "out". (2600 transactions in 30 mins can't be manual).
I haven't really dug into the info that much, but can someone tell me whether it's possible to trade using API without generating an API code on Mt Gox?
|
|
|
|
These may be trades executed with the API: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/MtGox/API/StreamingOne should investigate if API trades do not show a login, and if they don't, then that is likely the method used. It is very possible that someone found a way to exploit persistent data, cookies, or some other way that a users session or identity can be hijacked in the MtGox interface. Marcus from Mt Gox have responded back saying they are not able to differentiate whether trades are executed via API or not. Given there were 2600 transactions on my account over a mere 30 mins, I cannot see that being executed manually. I have also asked for login logs for my own account (without saying whether I need to see IP addresses or not), and have been declined due to their privacy policy. I'm seeking further clarification on exactly which part of the privacy policy is he referring to. After I posed the question on which part of the privacy policy he's referring to, he's now replied saying he's going to have this checked with their developer and get back to me. Marcus, Oct 15 20:51 (JST): Hello Yuhann, I will have this checked with our developer and we will get back to you. Thanks, MtGox.com Team Yuhann Liu, Oct 15 20:28 (JST): Hi Marcus, Sorry to dig further. This appears to be very inconsistent to others who requested for this information and have received them. Can you refer me to which part of the privacy policy that states you cannot disclose the login times of my own account? I have it open right now. Regards, Sent from my iPad Marcus, Oct 15 20:10 (JST): Hello Yuhann, We will not be able to provide the information as per our privacy policy and we will not be able to differentiate the API trades and you have also advised that this you have not used an API before. Thanks, MtGox.com Team Yuhann Liu, Oct 15 20:04 (JST): Marcus, are you able to advise reason behind not being able to supply me with access logs of my own account? |
|
|
|
These may be trades executed with the API: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/MtGox/API/StreamingOne should investigate if API trades do not show a login, and if they don't, then that is likely the method used. It is very possible that someone found a way to exploit persistent data, cookies, or some other way that a users session or identity can be hijacked in the MtGox interface. Marcus from Mt Gox have responded back saying they are not able to differentiate whether trades are executed via API or not. Given there were 2600 transactions on my account over a mere 30 mins, I cannot see that being executed manually. I have also asked for login logs for my own account (without saying whether I need to see IP addresses or not), and have been declined due to their privacy policy. I'm seeking further clarification on exactly which part of the privacy policy is he referring to. |
|
|
|
Beside the api thing, did you guys use a wireless lan connection?
If somebody logged in from your ip its just logical that there cant be logs except for the mac address and even that can be spoofed.
An attacker can indeed hack the wlan network and from there into your pc, and no, this is not fiction.
Totally agree that's no fiction, and whilst I cannot comment for the OP, I find it hard to understand how someone could hack my pc (no PC anyway), hack my iphone, hack google authenticator, change API security, create API keys and then execute 2600 transactions. |
|
|
|
|
My account was somehow hacked in on the 5th of Oct, where a large number of transactions (2600) occurred within a 30 min window. All of these transactions were for buy & sell orders that ultimately cleared my account down to less than 1c.
As per OP, notifying Mt Gox yields a response requesting me to file report with police,etc.,and we all know what means.
Except for logging onto the account, 2 factor auth have been used.
I suspect there's some serious flaw in the APIs that could have caused this.
I'm requesting login logs from mt Gox to see what they come back with.
/edit - just to note that I do not have any API keys and have 2 factor auth for withdraw and security center. So if they could execute trades via API without being able to create an API Key then there are some serious flaws!
|
|
|
|
|
