Bitcoin Forum
July 24, 2024, 11:33:36 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Stefan Molyneux: Lymphoma on: May 02, 2013, 06:45:00 PM
Chemo isn't cheap. If you want his work to continue put your dollars and bitcoins to good use:

http://freedomainradio.com/Donate.aspx
2  Other / Politics & Society / Breaking the Chains on: April 12, 2013, 12:20:24 AM
I wrote this essay Tuesday afternoon and it accurately reflected my perception of the mood at the time. It may be slightly inaccurate as of today but I am presenting it as written anyway.

Quote
In 2009 an unknown hero launched the second-most audacious plan in the history of our species. He announced it quietly in a nondescript, little-traveled corner of the Internet but to those of us with ears to hear it perceived it as a ringing bell, a call to action. So we gathered together and began working on the great project. Our ambition was nothing less than to boldly stride up to Leviathan and reclaim the power of money by plucking it straight from his demonic claws.

We weren't the only ones that gathered. Plenty of others came too, drawn by curiosity, greed, or cynicism. The peanut gallery filled up quickly with those who understood the project but could not overcome their own fear, so instead decided to mock. They were and still are a minor distraction at best to those of us who engaged in the Work. We know what needs to be done.

2011 was an exciting year. Our project was showing signs of progress and our excitement allowed us to believe our time had come. Intoxicated on optimism and shouting "Leeeeeroy Jenkins" as our battle cry we leaped into the fray - and promptly fell on our faces. The significance of our assaulted mattered to Leviathan less than a mosquito matters to an elephant.

In the aftermath many left the cause. Those of us who remained sobered up and took stock of the situation. Now it was easy to see what went wrong. We underestimated inertia. We underestimated logistics. Our tools were not ready, our infrastructure was still in its infancy. So we went back to work undeterred.

That work has now borne fruit and we are in the midst of a second attempt. The wild, intoxicating optimism has returned strong as the first time, but we aren't the same now as we were then. We are wiser, more experienced. Our tools are more refined, our intellectual and human capital is top notch and fully engaged. We've built alliances and made new connections. We are more resilient, better prepared, and completely dedicated.

I don't know what 2013 will bring, nor how the current skirmish will play out. I do not know if this is the year that Leviathan loses his grip on the power of currency, but I know he will.

Our quest is greatly aided by reality that Leviathan's health isn't what it used to be. The smug condescension of the Intelligentsia, the vapid propaganda of the media, and the cold brutality of the apparatchik are not enough to hide the truth: Leviathan is dying. Not only does the Emperor have no clothes, but we're all choking on the unmistakable stench of his rotting, gangrenous body. His organs are ravaged by cancer and he's run out of fresh victims to feed his colossal, ever-escalating hunger. Leviathan may be enormous and powerful, but time is most certainly on our side.

This may be the year we achieve success, or we may fall back to regroup and try again another day. In the end it doesn't matter because we know the ultimate outcome:

Leviathan. Will. Fall.
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why the Bitcoin rules can't change (reading time ~5min) on: February 24, 2013, 02:14:15 PM
they dont need to understand bitcoin inorder to understand that a promise was made to them. a promise that, for better or worse, the fundamental rules of the currency were concrete. let alternative cryptocurrencies solve this for us if it is infact a problem (which i think i can make a very good case for why it isnt).
Those of us who where paying attention in 2010 were promised the block size limitation was a temporary anti-flooding rule that would be removed when it was no longer needed so that Bitcoin could indeed support higher transaction rates.

If the devs changed their minds between now and then they should openly admit this. Publicly say the original plan changed, and why.  Stop lying by claiming 1 megabyte blocks were originally intended as an economic feature when anyone can debunk this by reading the old threads.

What's most appalling about this debate is the blatant dishonesty by those in favour of leaving the limits in place, even reaching up to some of the most prominent developers. Observing that dishonesty and evasion raises grave doubts in me about the viability of the project, much more so than any external attack.
4  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Classic arcade games on: May 23, 2011, 12:53:53 AM
I have him keep an eye out for one.
5  Economy / Marketplace / Re: Classic arcade games on: May 22, 2011, 10:44:18 PM
This business is now accepting BitCoins at a new web site: Abel'sFire.com. The owner expects to put a lot more effort into the new web site then previously so you can expect the number of products to increase dramatically in the near term.
6  Economy / Marketplace / Classic arcade games on: April 04, 2011, 09:24:18 PM
I am friends with the owner of garagearcade.com and he's expressed interest in accepting Bitcoins as payment. He sells restored arcade games in approximately the $500-$1500 range depending on rarity and amount of restoration work done.
7  Economy / Marketplace / Re: List of honest traders. on: July 28, 2010, 02:56:29 AM
This kind of problem is exactly what the PGP "web of trust" attempts to solve.

Perhaps that technology could be reused - people who wish to join the web of trust can publish a PGP/GPG key and every person who successfully trades with him or her can sign it.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!