Yeah, thanks for that asshat - didn't really occur to you that I might be sleeping after 2AM? I have zero confirmation that you did what you claim you did, since all the trails from your IP stop at you looking at the offers (like I PM'ed you) and since you have been the only one accessing the site and there are no recorded leads I have no reason to believe that you did what you say you did.
Also when I'm asking you to test something "I don't know what I did" isn't really what I want to hear...

However I have paid you now (for nothing, I might add) and I expect you to remove your message. In case you try to scam me again which I would assume you'd try here's the payment: https://blockchain.info/tx-index/0135b54b5c2eb3e07365dec148c0b3370c0e3e44e330321995f40436ddda0eab

PM'ed you.



Depends really on the offer, but they're mostly like PIN submits and the likes in many countries. Also lots of app installations.

I've been working on an offerwall for people to earn BTC and now I'd need couple people testing it out to see that the technical side works before I continue with the rest. I will pay 10,000 satoshi per completed offer (only need one per person though, but all the rest will be paid as well if you want to fill more).

PM me for more info, your country of residence doesn't matter (most likely, let me know where you're from and I make sure that I got ads for you as well).

Trying to generate the vanity address on MacBookPro9,2 fails when trying to use integrated Intel HD 4000 GPU. Works fine with CPU, it's just very slow when it comes to more than four character long addresses

Yeah guys, I can also Google up "vps+bitcoin", but that doesn't really answer my question 

Let's say that a person would like to run a private torrent tracker on a VPS and pay with BTC, where would s/he have to look for viable sellers? S/he might also be interested in a domain name.

But to be honest they're not even meant to be a replacement for your day job. Still, not really even worth to tinker around to get the feel of it, unlike few years ago.

Just keeping them to myself in MultiBit. Already lost some wallets because of... hmm, changing credentials, so better this way. Luckily not a lot of money was lost before.

While some (end users) might see not having chargebacks as a negative trait, I somehow feel that they're mostly used to scam people out of their money in the first place...

Seems to work now! Back to getting links 

The main site (or well, the whole domain) shows 404 - what happened 

+1

"Stealing" users' computing power for practically nothing makes no sense at all. People who can and will donate something, will do it via your address - not by lending their computers for you.

Also, for crying out loud put some content to the site! Now it's just a black login screen (and black registration screen). How would anyone know what they're even registering for? Few screenshots, some explanation what's going on and such for the starters.

They've stopped paying that a long while ago...

Most recently /dev/null - gladly it was just 0.001 BTC, but need to be more careful from now on

That's my impression also, but it's still quite a lot behind Windows 7 x64 in terms of performance - although major improvement over 10.6.

I have GeForce 9400m with 256 MB of VRAM, so not exactly a beast of a GPU 

Yup, indeed it does - just ran it. Although I do get slightly better results (188KK/s vs. 170KK/s) with just CPU vs. GPU. But it's still bit under what I get in Windows, but that was in the 64 bit vanitykeygen - so I still want to know, how it's possible to run OSX version in 64bit mode?

Oh, sorry. I use the device parameter to point to GPU in Windows, in OSX 10.6 it either froze the system completely or gave up an error message. I've just installed 10.8 as my previous installation got completely messed up for some reason, so I've yet to try it under this one.

I have GF 9400m.

I use just "./vanitygen 1Name" without any bigger parameters (besides the oclvanitygen required -D). Did the same in Windows also.

Just tried the Windows version (both 32/64 bits), and they just blew away anything I get under OSX (10.6., so I have few questions:

For the reference, I'm running 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo in early 2009 macbook.
Just running vanitygen (in OSX - uses one core), I get like ~60 KKeys/s, so even four letter word takes a minute+.
Running oclvanitygen with CPU (runs on both cores) I get 90 KKeys/s - trying to run with GPU freezes the system.

First I was under the impression that these were quite okay results for such old laptop, but then I ran the Windows (7 64bit) versions:
vanitygen32: 160 KKeys/s
vanitygen64: 200 KKeys/s

Only tried oclvanitygen for GPU, but didn't have that much more out of it, 230 KKeys/s maybe.

So why such a great difference?
How do I run vanitygen in OSX in 64 bit mode? I need to recompile it I guess?
Also I get the following error when running:
WARNING: Built with OpenSSL 0.9.8l 5 Nov 2009
WARNING: Use OpenSSL 1.0.0d+ for best performance

But the version of OpenSSL I have is OpenSSL 1.0.1c 10 May 2012. Did I overlook something when compiling it the first time?

Not a miner, nor a very green person to begin with, so my views might be a bit biased, but I just cannot see bitcoin mining having any effect really.
Sure if there was no bitcoin, the electricity wouldn't be used to mine bitcoins -- but it surely would be used to some other stuff nonetheless.