 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
anyone know the speed of 1080ti founder edition? is it 750 sol/s?
It's around there yeah, but if you want better efficiency, try aiming for 700 Sol/s, with that i get around 3.75Sol/w.  ok thanks mate |
|
|
|
|
anyone know the speed of 1080ti founder edition? is it 750 sol/s?
|
|
|
|
is it good enough for 980ti g1 gaming?  |
|
|
|
|
need info guys. if i had 2 or 3 different card on my rig, how do i overclock each one of them? will afterburner detect all 3 and i can choose card A with "this" setting and card B with other oc setting?
i plan to get 3x 1050, and already had 1 980ti.
|
|
|
|
|
GPU's MODEL NAME: Zotac GTX 1050Ti OC Dual Fan
VRAM: 4Gb
CORE/MEMORY CLOCK: 1860 (+85 Core) / -100 memory
HASHRATE: 177-182
MINER SOFTWARE: EWBF 0.3.4b
OS: Windows 10 x64 Anniversary Edition
TDP(OPTIONAL): 90% (ewbf miner show 66-68 watt)
|
|
|
|
|
with the same price which one is better for mining guys?
2nd handed 980ti poseidon, 980ti lightning, 980ti G1 gaming, or a brand new galax 1070. ?
|
|
|
|
if 1050 can get 150 sol/s then 5 of them would be 750 sol/s is it better 5x 1050 or 2x 1060 3G + 1x 1050 instead? or 2x second hand 970 + 1x 1050... or even a single 1080ti? in dilemma right now...  any opinion? anyone? why not 2 x 1070?  can't afford that yet. best i can get is 2x 1060 + 1x 1050 from the money & power wise. but yesterday i check 980ti can get around 480 sol/s which is on par with 1070. i can get 2nd hand 980ti in here around $400 so maybe that one is better? new zotac 1060 6gb is $290 in here so x2 = $480 but that can get me maybe around 600 sol/s haha... dizzy... need a beer...  |
|
|
|
if 1050 can get 150 sol/s then 5 of them would be 750 sol/s is it better 5x 1050 or 2x 1060 3G + 1x 1050 instead? or 2x second hand 970 + 1x 1050... or even a single 1080ti? in dilemma right now... any opinion? anyone? |
|
|
|
if 1050 can get 150 sol/s then 5 of them would be 750 sol/s is it better 5x 1050 or 2x 1060 3G + 1x 1050 instead? or 2x second hand 970 + 1x 1050... or even a single 1080ti? in dilemma right now... |
|
|
|
guys... what is the factor for mining speed in equihash? is it bigger core clock or memory clock? and is that true that 280X is perform the same to 1060? and one more... is it better mining in win 7 or win 10? thanks before  |
|
|
|
burst is enabled now on POLO yaay |
|
|
|
either buy AMD card like 280X and above & mining ETH or buy NVIDIA card like 960 and above & mining Lyrav2Rev2 algo using nicehash if you want a single gpu still make some profit. my gtx 970 can mining lyra2 @ 23MH/s and get about 0.0033 BTC per day. pretty good comparing mining other coin (except ETH, but that's best using AMD card). again... when using single gpu it's more like you having some fun with this mining thing rather than profit. |
|
|
|
sir. is this cpuminer support vanilla coin mining? |
|
|
|
guys... anyone know please help.
how big is ether blockchain? i connect with geth --rpc and it's been 5 days now sill not finish. the size of ethereum folder in \local\ethereum about 5.6 GB. and the synchronization is bad, many times just hang and need to restart the command again in new cmd.
and...
can't we just mining in pool (example eth.pool) and using deposit address from trading site? (for example Poloniex) so i don't have to made those geth and stuff again.
thanks.
I tried to sync geth yesterday and at first it I stopped it after about 6 hours of syncing and barely getting anywhere then I find that there's the --fast option which is basically an online bootstrap kind of syncing as far as I understand it and it took me like 20 minutes to finish from 0. It also only takes up 800 MB for me fully synced and it's working flawlessly. i solved the problem. i'm using new released Ethereum-Wallet-win64-0-3-9 which is make my life easier million times. it show the progress how many block we sync, and GUI just like regular coin wallet. great tools. mining with my 970 in windows 7 @ 18 mH/s. i'm pretty happy with the result |
|
|
|
|
guys... anyone know please help.
how big is ether blockchain? i connect with geth --rpc and it's been 5 days now sill not finish. the size of ethereum folder in \local\ethereum about 5.6 GB. and the synchronization is bad, many times just hang and need to restart the command again in new cmd.
and...
can't we just mining in pool (example eth.pool) and using deposit address from trading site? (for example Poloniex) so i don't have to made those geth and stuff again.
thanks.
|
|
|
|
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78 ask: why nicehash accepted share is always lower than the reported? for example, Lyra2 is accepted around 9600~ kH/s but nicehash only accepted 8.9 mH/s, no matter how long i mine, it always lower than my mining speed. and what is the best intensity for lyra2 in 78 release? i'm using 970. Wich version of ccminer are you using? You should mine lyra2v2 and not lyra2. i'm using your version. 1.5.78 this is my bat: ccminer.exe -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://lyra2rev2.jp.nicehash.com:3347 -u 1AwFc6m5evP5a8csDWsb6S3joSaBx8ia1e -p d=4 -i 16
is 1.5.74 give better hash rate for lyrav2 than 78? |
|
|
|
Version 1.7.1 is not my fork. My version is 1.5.78 ask: why nicehash accepted share is always lower than the reported? for example, Lyra2 is accepted around 9600~ kH/s but nicehash only accepted 8.9 mH/s, no matter how long i mine, it always lower than my mining speed. and what is the best intensity for lyra2 in 78 release? i'm using 970. |
|
|
|
Guys what do you think?Buy now at this price or in the next days the price will fall and it's better to buy then?
haha... i've been thinking the same as you few days back... and decides to buy dash instead... bad choice for me. haha.... *sigh  |
|
|
|
i'm new here, but this thread in almost unreadable because of trolls, what's up with it?
i guess dash is really the best alternative to BTC otherwise no troll would be around lol
what troll? you mean this?  |
|
|
|
the nosync refers to the command __syncthreads() which should be used when initializing the shared memory. However in some case (and some card) it isn't really needed and as it tends to slow down the kernel and removing it may increase the hashrate. however on some card it may cause some cpu validation issues.
i notice sir. already try it and it does give about 10 kH/s more than standard cuda65 version but yes it also give many cpu validation in my card. i think i will stick with cuda 65 default version. i sincerely thank you for your work and all the donator that make this happen PS: sorry i can't afford any donation, i'm doing this as a new hobby to run from the stress of my daily work for the past 8 weeks, i mine only about 4-5 hours and not every day, and only get about 0.001xxx BTC once a week on nicehash. purely to make me feel i can achieve something... even for that small amount.  |
|
|
|
|
