Show Posts
Sorry guy's I can't support HAM on cryptsy any more. Some may want to trade on cryptsy but if we cant withdrawal I must inform our supporters that withdraws are not working any longer. 48 hours for a simple withdrawal is not an exchange I can support. Sorry for the bad news. Happy new years all..
Don't be sorry! IMHO, leading the community from a shonky exchange is the right decision. (Sooner the better, indeed . . . )
Future of community: I'm not a community member yet (trading a little). The tech background of ham-radio folk makes HAM a coin that could do well in the long run. The international dimension of the community ditto. It's also not a time in krypto history to leave a coin: alts should start lifting in price as the 'organic' lift in Btc price continues.
Whatever, I will hang out here just to see how it all pans out.
P2P? IndiaMikeZulu loves to P2P. PM me.
Mark (IndiaMikeZulu), Australia
IMZ: I'm going to send you a pm, maybe we can work on ideas with how we can help.
Looking at this project. Interested in knowing if there are any plans for it at this time other than abadonning it. I have a dev on my team that is willing to look at working with it. His first concern is the diff though. Also, we were Looking at the possibility of cross support with a new coinwe are developing that also supports dual algo. Just thought I would throw this out there and see if anyone is interestd or even responds. Thanks.
This sounds very interesting, Garmin had discussed adding merged mining at one time. Multi algo would be nice too however.
I agree that this coin won't be totally abandoned I am just a little bummed right now that Alex and Garmin have decided to give up so suddenly. My attempts to talk him out of it failed.
Looking at this project. Interested in knowing if there are any plans for it at this time other than abadonning it. I have a dev on my team that is willing to look at working with it. His first concern is the diff though. Also, we were Looking at the possibility of cross support with a new coinwe are developing that also supports dual algo. Just thought I would throw this out there and see if anyone is interestd or even responds. Thanks.
This sounds very interesting, Garmin had discussed adding merged mining at one time. Multi algo would be nice too however.
I agree that this coin won't be totally abandoned I am just a little bummed right now that Alex and Garmin have decided to give up so suddenly. My attempts to talk him out of it failed.
I have updated p2pool for HAM and im waiting to just build on my super low computer HAM itself then download the blockchain to be sure it is.
I have code available that can be coded to make hamradio coin a multialgo merged coin with scrypt and sha256d but I think we should consider rebasing it to the latestest bitcoin core so we can easily update.
I agree the ham community is one that woulddo a lot and could learn a lot from cryptos. My only question (any some other extra.expert class guys here could answer me this) is it legal to be sending coins over the air waves? I Am wondering because i can't ememver which rule it is says you can't do it for profit, but i would wonder if it would fall under selling equipment on air that can be done on occassion?
this coin can be a bit more "tchy"than bitcoin has to be, but it should be easy enough as many hammys are aging and are stuck in their resisters and capacitors age. But some are with the times.
We can talk more on the meshnet frorum i created if you want (pm me for info) so we can get more people able to read it. I am encouraging anyone trading this coin to get a license ($15) and a $35 handheld walkie, a $50 investment to see what you are supporting (or dumping).
Again, please pm me if you wish to talk more, otherwise i will just start rebasing the code tomorrow to latest bitcoin release to be in line. There's more im doing but i would rather have a mediun besides bitcointalk where coding discussion can occur before announcement if I'm truly gathering together a group to get this done
PM me for p2pool code as im not 100% its correct but I knnow clark will run it once it is verified
