 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
I'm telling people to buy for over a week now... Price is over $8 right now (+30%~ since my first post).
Alt investors are truly clueless they have no idea how to pick winners.
ZCoin is going to enter the top 20 easy, $50+ until the end of this year. Don't cry later if you don't have the balls to invest right now.
I also caught PIVX when it was at $0.015-$0.02, and I'm telling you ZCoin is a solid investment.
Ever heard of the Dunning Kruger Effect? Nevertheless, I agree that ZCoin is an investment worth considering. That is not due to your "track record of investments", but due to the fundamentals of ZCoin. Investors, make your own research/due diligence before risking money! If an investor doesn't make his own research before risking money, he shouldn't 'invest' in anything. There's no such thing as a 100% safe investment. Also, the insult wasn't necessary. I have made some good investments, but I have made horrible ones as well. I own some XZC, because I see potential in this tech. Yet I rather tell others to focus on the fundamentals than listen to others. I beg your pardon. My intention was not to insult or offend you, but to issue a warning to others, before some consider a bet on ZCoin safe based on the experience of others. |
|
|
|
I'm telling people to buy for over a week now... Price is over $8 right now (+30%~ since my first post).
Alt investors are truly clueless they have no idea how to pick winners.
ZCoin is going to enter the top 20 easy, $50+ until the end of this year. Don't cry later if you don't have the balls to invest right now.
I also caught PIVX when it was at $0.015-$0.02, and I'm telling you ZCoin is a solid investment.
Ever heard of the Dunning Kruger Effect? Nevertheless, I agree that ZCoin is an investment worth considering. That is not due to your "track record of investments", but due to the fundamentals of ZCoin. Investors, make your own research/due diligence before risking money! |
|
|
|
Nothing here sounds anonymous at all. I can't understand why it is so important to know the devs wallet balances - sounds like a twist on an MLM scheme.
I find it very hard to believe that Roger Ver or any other investor wants his account balance known, or that it means a damn thing anyway - since any one of the devs could open up any number of anonymous accounts.
It is sounding more and more like a complete scam
Anonymity is not mandatory, but an option at Zcoin. If you want to make your XZC anonymous, you send them to the accumulator and receive XZC with no transaction history back. You can't hide balances at Zcoin. That's what helps you ensure that no flaw was found and abused to create tons of XZC in secret. It's not bad to see that the devs and investors are holding (at least most of them). Despite all the trouble, the design and implementation of Zcoin are great and there's some real development going on: implementing MTP right after having implemented the Zercoin protocol. Zcoin doesn't tingle my scam sensors. |
|
|
|
Please vote which version you want to mine.
If you want to have a meaningful vote, you should consider offering both forks in pools and look where's more hash rate. A forum vote has nothing to do with mining ZCoin, right? |
|
|
|
Is Bittrex on track ? Will they be using the same version ?
What version will suprnova use? |
|
|
|
Why won't Roger Ver even fire off a simple tweet about Zcoin?
Maybe he wants to grab more cheap XZC? Within 3months price will be - let's see - maybe 1-3k satoshi.
Where did you see that? Do you have a crystal sphere? Can I rent it?  It's remarkable that a lot of people are hunting for a quick return, but don't even try to invest in projects that have the basis for getting big in the future. I think blockchains that deal with infrastructure and associated services have future. That's why I've invested in BTS, SJCX, EMC, ETH, SYS - even a little money in fancy ICOs like WAVES and HEAT (but not too much, because I don't see them succeed). I think blockchains that deal with anonymization of transactions have future. That's why I've invested in DASH, XMR, SDC, XZC. They all try more or less different ways. The one of Zerocoin is conceptually the one that's easiest to grasp, if you know crypto coin tumblers/mixes and are happy that you don't have to rely on external parties, but on a blockchain protocol. I'm not talking about the math behind the accumulator! Things that can be understood to a certain degree create confidence whereas complicated things make hesitant. I might be wrong, but that's my stance. And no, I haven't bought ZEC. I appreciate the concept that was implemented in Zerocash (although I find some attributes inferior to Zerocoin), because it's complementary to Zerocoin and I like diversification, but the price is just too high. XZC's rate is far below DASH, XMR and below SDC. That's why I continue to accumulate XZC |
|
|
|
i did not find anything using google and the faq, i accidentally minted a zerocoin, does this apart from the transaction fee result in a loss of xzc when converting back after 7 confirmations?
That's the way to obfuscate the originating UTXO! You sent your coin to the accumulator, made a Zerocoin and once you convert it back to XZC you have a brand new looking, shiny XZC (minus tx fee). At least that's how I understood the white paper. |
|
|
|
@ocminer, pool ddos'ed? My log is full of: [2016-10-19 15:44:14] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2016-10-19 15:44:29] stratum_recv_line failed
[2016-10-19 15:44:29] ...retry after 10 seconds
[2016-10-19 15:44:45] stratum_recv_line failed
It started at approximately Time stamps are UTC. |
|
|
|
XZC trades on https://liqui.io/ as well. I've never used it and have no idea whether it's a legit exchange; I recommend due diligence before using it. Plus the spread is crazy. ...but there's a XZC/BTC pair... |
|
|
|
Im looking for the wallet address, immature balance and confirmation as shown by but it is unknown command in zcoind. I want to show which address i will use for my deposit. Now I understand what you're wondering about. gives you a list of available RPC commands. shows your available accounts and zcoind getaddressesbyaccount <account> displays the address(es) per account. I don't know how to display the immature balance. |
|
|
|
How do get your wallet info?
What info do you mean? I don't understand your question. You aren't asking for are you? |
|
|
|
dev branch  so..waiting Wallet reindexing issue fixed?
reindexing block after restart again.Or only for me?
Today download from Github..
I compiled the dev branch version of zcoind and started it on an old low performance laptop (where I already had the former version of zcoind running and the blockchain synced). It started in approximately 3 minutes and besides "Verifying last 288 blocks at level 3" had no delay. From debug.log: 2016-10-15 10:20:47 Opened LevelDB successfully
2016-10-15 10:20:47 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file = 0
2016-10-15 10:20:47 LoadBlockIndexDB(): last block file info: CBlockFileInfo(blocks=3253, size=8685018, heights=0...3238, time=2014-10-31...2016-10-15)
2016-10-15 10:20:47 LoadBlockIndexDB(): transaction index disabled
2016-10-15 10:20:47 LoadBlockIndexDB(): hashBestChain=852c4e1bf39171d104f69ec7acab0740105b1b6b1bb8791f60766faadaeecadb height=3238 date=2016-10-15 10:05:53
2016-10-15 10:20:47 init message: Verifying blocks...
2016-10-15 10:20:47 Verifying last 288 blocks at level 3
2016-10-15 10:23:58 No coin database inconsistencies in last 289 blocks (2129 transactions)
2016-10-15 10:23:58 block index 191412ms
2016-10-15 10:23:58 init message: Loading wallet...
2016-10-15 10:23:58 nFileVersion = 80702
2016-10-15 10:23:58 wallet 117ms
2016-10-15 10:23:58 init message: Loading addresses...
2016-10-15 10:23:58 Loaded 1890 addresses from peers.dat 13ms
2016-10-15 10:23:58 mapBlockIndex.size() = 3253
2016-10-15 10:23:58 nBestHeight = 3238
2016-10-15 10:23:58 setKeyPool.size() = 104
2016-10-15 10:23:58 mapWallet.size() = 5
2016-10-15 10:23:58 mapAddressBook.size() = 16
2016-10-15 10:23:58 init message: Done loading
zcoind is responsive after those 3 minutes (and I bet it could be faster on a device with better performance): zcoind getinfo
{
"version" : 80702,
"protocolversion" : 90014,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 3238,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 2,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 0.02306960,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1476271387,
"keypoolsize" : 104,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"mininput" : 0.00001000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : ""
}
No its not fixed at the moment.
I am waiting too, before i buy back XZC again.
It's fixed, if you use the right branch. On linux (assuming you have all dependencies installed; regarding dependencies please have a look here: https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.md): git clone https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin.git
cd zcoin/src
git checkout dev
make -f makefile.unix
|
|
|
|
|
