Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
r3ZTbWNQBiQZb4W5PgDh6WoaA57M5vyPUw
|
|
|
1. I cannot run it on my computer (windows 7 64bit). Whenever I open it it says "bitcoin-qt.exe has stopped working"
edit: problem fixed by deleting bitcoin folder in appdata..I'll se if I can bootstrap.
2. I tried runnning it on a virtual machine. I downloaded bootstrap.dat through a torrent, put it in the bitcoin directory, and when I open the client it simply says (out of sync). Nothing else seems to happen.
A fix to either one of these problems would be super helpful, I just need the qt client to test an app I'm making.
|
|
|
It's gonna tank, all the people claiming it wasn't a bubble are hilariously naive.
But down to single digits?? I have a reeaally hard time believing that.. With all the new business with bitcoins? I think it could easily settle at $25.
|
|
|
Anyone that doesn't sell now is a retard IMO. There's a time for fundamentals and there's a time for common sense. Bitcoin is heading for the stars but not overnight. The bearish bulls shall rule in the meantime! Panic is spreading. See you at 15 where it belongs.
Completely agree, I sold all (3) of my bitcoins at $46.50, made a nice profit. I can't believe the amount of people I have seen calling those who sold at ~45 idiots..Anybody who is in denial about this being a bubble is an idiot. Bubbles happen, especially with such a new, unestablished currency.
|
|
|
Any and every PayPal payment is reversible, if you claim you are a victim of a crime.
Well, looks like I'm reduced to using eBay unless a trusting soul will escrow.
|
|
|
Aren't payments sent as gifts irreversible? I had an offer to escrow for me last time I posted a similar thread (with Amazon payments)
If the gift was funded through CC, yes, it's reversible. It would be funded through PayPal balance, but I guess there's no way to verify that?
|
|
|
Aren't payments sent as gifts irreversible? I had an offer to escrow for me last time I posted a similar thread (with Amazon payments)
|
|
|
I can do a 47.56390 voucher
I'll offer $50 for it
|
|
|
Make me an offer on a fee. If you are trusted I'll go first, otherwise let's do escrow (anyone down?)
|
|
|
keep in mind that according to the link in OP the refund has to be approved by customer service and can take a few days
edit: oops didn't realize it was sold already, my bad
|
|
|
Would do this at 90%.
Sorry, looking for someone more trusted since I would go first edit: We could do it if a trusted member could middleman the Amazon Payments money or the BTC
|
|
|
Buying BTC with amazon payments balance. Amazon payments balance can be used for Amazon.com orders, but only on the account connected to your Amazon Payments account.
I'll go first, so trusted members only, make me an offer rate-wise.
|
|
|
when they go to sell those alt-coins they are selling for BTC Thats not for all alt chains the case, in fact Devcoin is in a legalization process caused by devda.ch. Direct exchange for fiat (swiss bank transfer, sipa, phys. gold and silver etc) is planned for 1. quarter 2013. This means legal cover of a swiss cooperative for devcoin, but means aswell that atacking alt chains is not just a game anymore - In fact it is a hostile act. Since devda.ch builds on a alt chain, to atack alt chains will be prosecuted by the swiss legal authorities, since it is the equivalent of a atacking the infrastructure of a swiss legal institution. For the atack on a blockchain are two steps needed: 1. You need to dominate the total hashrate of a chain by more then 51% 2. Then You have to follow a certain value transfer pattern, that is causing fraudulent transactions Just to gain the dominance over a chain, doesnt mean that you attack a chain, or automaticaly do fraudulent transactions. It is not possible to kill a chain as long there is hashingpower. But yes, how you can know when you never dominated a chain. To say that alt chains are dangerous for btc is simply a expression of not understanding as it is to say to atack an chain is simply done by just dominating it. Besides all that such activity is disrespectfull to the developers!! It was the opensource developers that brought you not only FPGA early this year as first (no it wasnt BFL) and they now are about to bring you ASIC. So many wonderfull developments was made.. and Bitcoin did strongly profit from that activity as you can see on the actual exchange and hash rate. I remember when BTC was worth like 2 USD a year ago, then FPGA started to rise. Prior to the activity for example there was far less hashpower to secure the btc infrastructure, today we more then doubled the hashspeed. Guys dnt you realy remember wasnt bitcoin 2011 aswell called dead ?? Devcoin is the chain of the Developers, its build protected by cryptochain hardware and software developers (yes BTC developers too), and im sure we will hold against the atacking or even destroying of alt chains. One World one Chain is not the way i see cryptochains working, diversification is the key to stability of crypto. But this hostile thinking and activity shows me one thing, there could be far more hashpower donated to the altchains. Pool operators why dnt you do something for your miners like offering them merged mining benefit ?? Instead of atacking, you could protect and profit! Attacking a cryptochain is waste of power, and in the long run just expensive and legaly dangerous for the attackers and the pool. I doubt VERY much that anyone is seriously considering attacking Devcoin as the developers are the backbone, blood, guts and organs of this community, but I do agree with your last paragraph, mining pools could really help solve the problems of security issues by increasing the network hashrates of the alt-chains by offering more merged mining. Right now BitParking seems to be doing the best in that area offering merged mining of BTC, NMC, IXC and DVC (they were supporting merged mining of I0C as well up until a few days ago). But BitParking can't support all of the alt-chains alone, there's simply just not enough hashing power there. I think ALL of the exchanges should strive to offer merged mining in as many coins as possible as it will bring more users to their pools and it will bring more hasing power to the alt-chains which can greatly help to protect all of the chains from >51% double-spend attacks. I didn't know what merged mining was until I went to the bitparking site lol, thanks for your post. Is there any reason for a miner to NOT do merged mining? Do you normally get less BTC than just using a normal pool?
|
|
|
I can pay as gift. I'm new, so I'll go first, but trusted members only.
I'll pay Mt. Gox high price + 5%
|
|
|
Just bought the MSP from MS store using the $25 credit from pre ordering Halo Reach. I'll go first if you are trusted.
|
|
|
Running DeepBit with a GTX 560ti 448 with flags -v -w 128 in GuiMiner and getting 142MH/s.
Any suggestions besides "Get better hardware"?
If your GPU temps are still ok when running the miner you can always try to overclock to get a few more Mhashes
|
|
|
Just how you would normally I suppose  They can be shipped via airway to most airports. Also if within a reasonable area they can be picked up/delivered. The shipping or delivery costs can be calculated and included into the price the buyer pays. Oh, that's interesting, never new you could mail animals other than like..ants for ant farms. I'm sure somebody with BTC would want one, the more products available for BTC the better
|
|
|
|