Latest posts of: danbrown

Bitcoin Forum

June 23, 2024, 10:59:05 PM

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

News: Voting for pizza day contest

Home

Help

Search

Login

Register

More

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

1

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

on: May 01, 2016, 07:09:56 PM

Quote from: xpoolx on May 01, 2016, 05:35:55 PM Quote from: danbrown on April 27, 2016, 05:19:51 PM xpoolx has problems in recent days? I can't mine properly on mining.xpoolx.com:5000. The site is down but a lot of cpu power mining here! You are not mining on xpoolx, simba. Stratum it's working perfectly, only the website is down till i finish some changes. You still continue to call me Simba? Can I give you my 3 ips and the account on the pool and see that 9 times out of 10 xptminer does not connect to the server (Connection server lost)

2

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

on: April 27, 2016, 05:19:51 PM

xpoolx has problems in recent days? I can't mine properly on mining.xpoolx.com:5000. The site is down but a lot of cpu power mining here!

3

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

on: January 27, 2016, 06:56:16 PM

Quote from: xpoolx on January 27, 2016, 06:46:37 PM Quote from: danbrown on January 27, 2016, 05:25:19 PM Quote from: danbrown on January 16, 2016, 03:56:52 PM Hello everyone I'm Daniel and I'm a Riecoin fan. I was trying to mine on two pools, xpoolx and riepool Here there is something wrong! First of all, you can improve the performance of mining directly by servers or by the pool as stated by xpoolx because it's the miner who works on a particular algorithm that produces the work! My test system consists of an Intel i7-4790 CPU with 8GB of ram and tried both the pool for about 30 minutes with xptminer 1.7dga c16 for stratum with current difficulty equal to 1426.0 See the results below! XpoolX http://imageshack.com/a/img907/2600/U2FIN5.jpg RiePool http://imageshack.com/a/img907/1584/q87SfH.jpg Riepool shows the correct Shares/sec values as 4ch/s on xptminer while xpoolx seems rigged in Hashrate values!!! Why with the same REAL Shares/sec riepool shows a concrete Hashrate of about 3600 KH/s while xpoolx shows a value of nearly 5000 KH/s Someone, or rather administrators of the respective pools can give me some logical explanation? I finally tested xptminer 2.0 downloaded from riepool and with this miner will get really superior performance from 0.21 to 0.28 Shares/sec!!! Below the link of my dashboard on riepool http://imageshack.com/a/img911/3411/e3ECjE.jpg I conclude to congratulate those who have improved the algorithm of miner and remember that the true values are those indicated by the miner himself and not the data shown by some pools...... Hello Pool Admins what about my request of explanation? You are so ridiculous simba. Stop creating fake forum members trying to untrust xpoolx Do so with all users who want answers on valid considerations ? Please respond and clarify the thing does not think I'm the only one here who wants to know

4

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

on: January 27, 2016, 05:25:19 PM

Quote from: danbrown on January 16, 2016, 03:56:52 PM Hello everyone I'm Daniel and I'm a Riecoin fan. I was trying to mine on two pools, xpoolx and riepool Here there is something wrong! First of all, you can improve the performance of mining directly by servers or by the pool as stated by xpoolx because it's the miner who works on a particular algorithm that produces the work! My test system consists of an Intel i7-4790 CPU with 8GB of ram and tried both the pool for about 30 minutes with xptminer 1.7dga c16 for stratum with current difficulty equal to 1426.0 See the results below! XpoolX http://imageshack.com/a/img907/2600/U2FIN5.jpg RiePool http://imageshack.com/a/img907/1584/q87SfH.jpg Riepool shows the correct Shares/sec values as 4ch/s on xptminer while xpoolx seems rigged in Hashrate values!!! Why with the same REAL Shares/sec riepool shows a concrete Hashrate of about 3600 KH/s while xpoolx shows a value of nearly 5000 KH/s Someone, or rather administrators of the respective pools can give me some logical explanation? I finally tested xptminer 2.0 downloaded from riepool and with this miner will get really superior performance from 0.21 to 0.28 Shares/sec!!! Below the link of my dashboard on riepool http://imageshack.com/a/img911/3411/e3ECjE.jpg I conclude to congratulate those who have improved the algorithm of miner and remember that the true values are those indicated by the miner himself and not the data shown by some pools...... Hello Pool Admins what about my request of explanation?

5

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

on: January 16, 2016, 05:05:23 PM

simba?? I asked for a technical explanation sir

6

Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record

on: January 16, 2016, 03:56:52 PM

Hello everyone I'm Daniel and I'm a Riecoin fan. I was trying to mine on two pools, xpoolx and riepool Here there is something wrong! First of all, you can improve the performance of mining directly by servers or by the pool as stated by xpoolx because it's the miner who works on a particular algorithm that produces the work! My test system consists of an Intel i7-4790 CPU with 8GB of ram and tried both the pool for about 30 minutes with xptminer 1.7dga c16 for stratum with current difficulty equal to 1426.0 See the results below! XpoolX http://imageshack.com/a/img907/2600/U2FIN5.jpg RiePool http://imageshack.com/a/img907/1584/q87SfH.jpg Riepool shows the correct Shares/sec values as 4ch/s on xptminer while xpoolx seems rigged in Hashrate values!!! Why with the same REAL Shares/sec riepool shows a concrete Hashrate of about 3600 KH/s while xpoolx shows a value of nearly 5000 KH/s Someone, or rather administrators of the respective pools can give me some logical explanation? I finally tested xptminer 2.0 downloaded from riepool and with this miner will get really superior performance from 0.21 to 0.28 Shares/sec!!! Below the link of my dashboard on riepool http://imageshack.com/a/img911/3411/e3ECjE.jpg I conclude to congratulate those who have improved the algorithm of miner and remember that the true values are those indicated by the miner himself and not the data shown by some pools......

Pages: [1]

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines