Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 06:12:00 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
1  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: March 12, 2020, 11:37:57 AM
MA on Feb. 02th on the private Blog

Quote
The Dow peaked precisely with the ECM, which often warns of a reasonable correction in the 20% range is possible.

Today the -20% has been achieved.




Trolls, it's your turn  Grin
2  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: February 19, 2020, 09:22:39 PM
Attn:  Moderator  -- would you please instruct Anonymous Coder and Traxo to stop posting the same thing over and over again.   Thank you.
Moderators here don't care that people changed to blind destruction mode
3  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: January 15, 2020, 11:53:12 PM
accuracy
MA and Socrates doesn’t work it’s a shameful scam on innocent people who have been conned out of there money
Is that accurate enough

yeahhhhhhh, icredible f..in accuracy madness!!!  Shall we tar and feder him tonight!?!!?!?  COME ON!!!
I just love these factual discussions. They are amazing  Cool
4  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: January 15, 2020, 10:42:36 PM
The argument was originally not about refunding but about accuracy and this is my main point
5  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: January 15, 2020, 10:13:43 PM
Quote
Well, there was this banner on ask-socrates.com that they are still migrating the data and there may be issues. So there was and still is a warning on the system.  ......
Same thing happened to me. When I noticed, I asked  for a refund.

That is the problem with you. It tells you there in a big red banner from day 1 but you simply ignore it  because of your greed. And then you complain afterwards.
It's just amazing how ignorant people can be. But  don't worry, you are not the only one....
6  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: January 06, 2020, 03:54:17 PM
did you make money of reversal trade. does it work, and are you a shill or not. please answer truthfully.
at the moment there is no trading strategy I can recommend to you with full confidence. If you are not sure about trading with Socrates, just don't use it for the next 6 to 12 month and check back later here in this forum or even better, in my forum (link in my profile).
7  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: January 06, 2020, 01:55:11 PM
I've done alot of empirical testing on it against real market data

you may have done your testing on inaccurate array data. You can forget about the arrays from Feb. 2019  - August 2019 on ask-socrates.com.  I'm sure they were completely faulty during that time.

This is part of the problem.  Even if the Socrates system did work, the roll out was quite unprofessional because the subscribers were basically the guinea pigs.
Well, there was this banner on ask-socrates.com that they are still migrating the data and there may be issues. So there was and still is a warning on the system.  I think MA just wanted to get the system released and grant access to the reversals. I don't want to discuss that things went wrong with the release of SOC Pro. This I've mentioned already numerous times. I just wanted to say that the arrays didn't make any sense before, but they do now. So your tests have been done based on inaccurate data (which was of course not your fault).  I'm also not talking about whether the arrays are good or not. That is a different question.
8  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: January 06, 2020, 01:32:34 PM
I've done alot of empirical testing on it against real market data

you may have done your testing on inaccurate array data. You can forget about the arrays from Feb. 2019  - August 2019 on ask-socrates.com.  I'm sure they were completely faulty during that time.
9  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: January 06, 2020, 04:58:23 AM
That's the trouble, you can't do many samples because those arrays aren't available via Socrates......I ran into the same issue back in 2016. Only way to get those are to wait for him to post them online in his blog or take them out of a report.  Find me more current ones and I'll be happy to run tests galore.

The Socrates arrays from the ask-socrates website were not working properly until September, but they are now working since about 3 month.
You can also see in the private blog posts that MA is recently posting only the new arrays and not the old arrays anymore (except the yearly arrays which are not available on ask-socrates.com)
10  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: December 02, 2019, 03:33:40 PM
@ Gumbi  -  good job. It looks like AnonymousCoder has lost it's mind over so many facts he can't handle.

@ Traxo @ debley  @Dan81 @ unwashed @S29
you don't seem to mind that Anonymouscoder has recently posted 12 almost identical messages in the forum with a lot of screaming (captital letters) and tries bullying other forum user.
11  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 29, 2019, 06:03:04 PM
I don't need that is at least, you have no trading/investor experience or you're lying.

If you look into the report every month, you will notice when a buy or sell signal is given.  The critical support/resistance numbers are NOT TA but Rev.
It's not that I tell you that you don't need the energy indicator, it's what Armstrong says.
Anyways, it looks like you are done with Socrates - so there is no point to continue the discussion.  It's a waste of time for both of us.
12  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 28, 2019, 10:21:12 PM
what is laughable is you think there can be absolute certainty in any trade you make. No investment/trade you will ever make can be 100% certain.

That's right, it's all about probabilities. E.g. what are the chances that XYZ is happening after ABC has happened...
It is an honest way of describing the model and conventional analysts do it similarly.
13  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 27, 2019, 08:33:27 PM
critical support and resistance is all you need.
Energy is not available (and not required) on the investor level.
14  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 27, 2019, 07:57:49 PM
1 year ago:
 
Quote
...On our timing models, it is possible to see a turning point is due come October in ...  Normally, this implies that the next turning point should be a low.
Critical support still underlies this market at .... and a break of that level on a monthly closing basis would warn of a further decline ahead becomes possible.

...was important given we did obtain three sell signals from that event established during September 2017.
...We have generated a sell signal, so some caution is required.

today

Quote
...A possible change in trend appears due come this month ....
...Normally, this implies that the next turning point should be a low...

Critical support still underlies this market at ....  and a break of that level on a monthly closing basis would warn that a sustainable decline ahead becomes possible.
We have generated a buy signal, so some caution is required

15  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 27, 2019, 06:38:52 PM
As of when?
at least 1 year, maybe longer.  Maybe more has changed in the last few month (as it did in the Pro Version).  I haven't followed the investor level lately.
16  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 27, 2019, 05:51:35 PM
So here's where my jaw hit the floor, the investor level gives nothing but commentary, no reversals, not arrays and no energy, even in the computer generated report there is no reversals and arrays on monthly levels.
I don't think this is correct anymore. It now mentions buy/sell signals, critical support / resistance and even turning points.
17  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 27, 2019, 05:19:41 PM
Can't you get it? Nobody wants

  BS !  nobody asked for you to spam this thread with aggressive,  repetitive and useless posts but you do it anyways!  Everybody can see that you want this thread only for yourself , just like MA_talk. Everybody who doesn't agree with your dictatorial opinion  shall leave.
I would rather say that you should leave this thread since you are not able to properly trade with Socrates or even understand it.  This would be the normal behavior. If I think that something is not good, I just move on. Every normal person would do that. Instead you continuously rant against Armstrong like crazy.
18  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 25, 2019, 07:35:50 PM
Armstrong mentioned that phase II of Socrates will add a backtesting feature to see what Socrates wrote on any given day.
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/products_services/socrates/progress-report-on-socrates-deployment/

Thanks for Posting this Gumbi. For some reason I missed it.
19  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 23, 2019, 04:38:29 PM
.....

You are saying this as if I would like to sell you something , but I don't have anything to sell Smiley
20  Economy / Economics / Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion on: November 23, 2019, 01:38:11 AM
....

It's not getting anymore true just because you keep repeating your mantra  all over again.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!