Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 08:28:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Passive Bits Faucet 250 to 1000 Satoshi / Hour on: May 01, 2016, 03:58:25 AM
Why is adsense the main concern of this thread?
If you all care more about adsense than the faucet, I'll simply shut it down if that's what you all would prefer.

because 2-3 month later, adsense banned the majority of faucet in the forum and all owner cry "why ban me" , if you start a faucet and you know your violation of rules (because rules don't write "you can have 1 page with content", but all page when you have insert adsense get have content

Very well, I'll shut it down and release it later with adequate content.
2  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Passive Bits Faucet 250 to 1000 Satoshi / Hour on: May 01, 2016, 03:18:54 AM
Why is adsense the main concern of this thread?
If you all care more about adsense than the faucet, I'll simply shut it down if that's what you all would prefer.
3  Economy / Micro Earnings / Passive Bits Faucet 250 to 1000 Satoshi / Hour on: April 30, 2016, 05:10:20 PM
Faucet: http://passivebits.com/faucet/
Blog: http://passivebits.com/

Rewards: 250 (30%), 500 (30%), 750 (30%), 1000 (10%) satoshi every 60 minutes.
Processor: Faucetbox
Referral: 15%

Subscribe to the newsletter on the blog for faucet updates, new blog posts, and more!
4  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 26, 2016, 04:15:51 PM
Saw a blog that has his 1337 staking stats: https://passivebits.com
5  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 23, 2016, 04:58:09 PM
1337 wallet seems to be currently 'delayed' on yobit.

Nice wallet update, testing it out now.
6  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 21, 2016, 09:54:15 PM
Why is the Windows download for 1337 wallet no longer available?

The file you are trying to download is no longer available.
This could be due to the following reasons:
The file has been removed because of a ToS/AUP violation.
Invalid URL - the link you are trying to access does not exist
The file has been deleted by the user.
7  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 07, 2016, 06:57:18 PM
I got a stake payout from stakeit.online

I deposited 58,625 1337.
2016-04-07                         0.00001361 Bitcoin                 Stake Payout
8  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 07, 2016, 03:18:53 AM
Saw an ad on btcclicks for a 1337 staking pool, testing it out.
http://stakeit.online/

Seems neat so far, says daily payments, I'm going to deposit and post tomorrow if it pays.
Supposed to pay in Bitcoins.

Careful with that bro

What is stopping them from just running with your coins?

Any place can simply 'run with someones coins'. I'm choosing this place over juststake.online as over half of juststake.onlines website is just filler text: Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Aenean commodo ligula eget dolor.
9  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 07, 2016, 12:54:01 AM
Saw an ad on btcclicks for a 1337 staking pool, testing it out.
http://stakeit.online/

Seems neat so far, says daily payments, I'm going to deposit and post tomorrow if it pays.
Supposed to pay in Bitcoins.
10  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 04, 2016, 12:25:38 AM
Everything looking fine so far. both yobit and c-cex are on the new wallet now! I need to make a few new stake blocks to test the current APR, will update on that asap

did a withdrawal from yobit 45 minutes ago still not arrived, gonna give it til morning too tired to try and deal with yobit atm

Same, withdrew a few minutes ago and it never arrived.
11  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] 1337 [Pure POS] MANDATORY WALLET UPDATE BEFORE APRIL 3Rd '16!! on: April 01, 2016, 06:56:09 PM
Is there a way to set the stake size in the conf?
12  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development on: March 13, 2016, 12:45:18 AM
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cygnus/

13,787,689 CYG Available Supply.

A whale could easily scoop all this up.

I am under the impression that one/a few basically have. However I could be wrong.

Technically no, the most in one address is : 4778096.51860200 CYG which is assumed to be held by an exchange.
Other than that the top 20 accounts do not even hold more than 1 Million CYG in one single account.

#1 : 4778096.51860200 CYG
#2 : 763086.63105030 CYG
#3 : 729449.87370954 CYG
#4 : 571958.73865366 CYG
#5 : 438200.64000000 CYG

From here it drastically lowers. Excluding the #1 wallet, the other top 19 have a total of around 5,670,754 CYG. That's 10 Million + controlled by 20 addresses, and a majority of the addresses are not staking. Also the dev stated, the 410000.00000000 wallet is the airdrop wallet, which hasn't been touched.

At current prices from people dumping, you can easily pick up 100K + for around 0.15 Bitcoin, doesn't take a whale to do this.
13  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development on: March 12, 2016, 10:30:14 PM
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cygnus/

13,787,689 CYG Available Supply.

A whale could easily scoop all this up.
14  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development on: March 12, 2016, 10:08:45 PM
I'm having a 500k sell wall at 300. This coin will never fly, understand?

Thats a laughably small amount. I won't do it, but you do realize I could eat a 500K sell wall and not even move a fraction of my BTC. Its hilarious when people try to play whale.

It's hilarious when people are boasting about how "rich they are"

Prove how rich you are......

Donations are welcome  Roll Eyes Grin

Fine, I just market bought 200K CYG on YOLObit, because I can Wink

you whale you Wink

I'm no whale those are the guys with 10,000+ BTC. That was my point, when someone like me can easily eat up a large amount of the coins. Statements like "This coin will never fly, understand?" In reference to 1-2 BTC sell walls, is absurd.

Yep, people fail to realize that unlike most POS coins that have hundreds of millions to billions of coins released, CYG only has 13 Million at the moment. Someone can easily buy up the available supply and control the price from there.
15  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development on: March 11, 2016, 06:40:52 AM
Is there only 1 CYG faucet?
16  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development on: March 09, 2016, 04:53:08 AM
Why did the supply just drop 3 million coins?

Dropped from 13 million to 10.2 Million
10 Minutes or so later, went from 10.2 Million to 10,920,569 CYG
Then back up to 13,170,660 CYG
17  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] • CYGNUS • [CYG] • X11 POW/POS • Consensus Polls • Dynamic Development on: March 09, 2016, 04:26:21 AM
Why did the supply just drop 3 million coins?
18  Economy / Digital goods / Buying EOBOT Accounts on: March 07, 2016, 11:13:19 PM
Buying EOBOT Accounts

GHS 2.0 : $0.009 / GHS
GHS 3 : $0.25 / GHS
19  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 3 BTC BONUS on: February 24, 2016, 11:29:46 AM
The dealer did not Blackjack also.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.

I know. The second part is just a mistake I found.

Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push
Player BJ + Dealer 21 = Player Win

We know this, they don't.
Everyone know about that basic rules. I think it's more likely to technical fault which it's accidentally or we can say it's a bug? Mistaken algorithm.
Never happened to me the case like this btw, i just wish fj could clarify and solve this problem asap .

This was the case with the player: Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push. We checked the hand ID provided and gave the answer.

You are mixing withe the previous hand when you had 8 and 6 and the dealer had 6, 7 and 8.

I am not mixing anything up.
Provide proof.

I want the hash, screenshots, everything.
Stop wasting time and provide the evidence.

Since your check bet does not work, and it provides a player nothing but a 'bet number' you can fabricate any evidence you want. There is NO transparency here.
Your system cannot be trusted.

I know for a fact the dealer did not have a Blackjack, that's the whole reason I'm pissed off. The system cheats and you're just trying to cover it up.
I had Blackjack and the dealer had 6,7,8 , which is the 3 card 21.

You've basically clarified the fact that I stated the dealer did have a 3 card 21, just you're lying about the rest!

Once again, the Hand ID that you submitted for examination we gave you the answer that you had the push. The previous game you lost because you had 14 and the dealer 21. Please read carefully our text and refrain from disseminating the wrong information. You have to accept the fact that you had the push.


Provide the evidence, fix your bet id system on the website, provide the hash so it can be checked.
Stop trying to cover your asses  over a 0.053 Bitcoin Blackjack and hiding the fact your system cheats.

You're hurting your reputation.
20  Economy / Gambling / Re: FORTUNEJACK.COM | No.1 for Cryptocurrency Gambling | Provably Fair | 3 BTC BONUS on: February 24, 2016, 11:03:57 AM
The dealer did not Blackjack also.
The dealer had a 3 card 21, not a Blackjack.

I know. The second part is just a mistake I found.

Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push
Player BJ + Dealer 21 = Player Win

We know this, they don't.
Everyone know about that basic rules. I think it's more likely to technical fault which it's accidentally or we can say it's a bug? Mistaken algorithm.
Never happened to me the case like this btw, i just wish fj could clarify and solve this problem asap .

This was the case with the player: Player BJ + Dealer BJ = push. We checked the hand ID provided and gave the answer.

You are mixing withe the previous hand when you had 8 and 6 and the dealer had 6, 7 and 8.

I am not mixing anything up.
Provide proof.

I want the hash, screenshots, everything.
Stop wasting time and provide the evidence.

Since your check bet does not work, and it provides a player nothing but a 'bet number' you can fabricate any evidence you want. There is NO transparency here.
Your system cannot be trusted.

I know for a fact the dealer did not have a Blackjack, that's the whole reason I'm pissed off. The system cheats and you're just trying to cover it up.
I had Blackjack and the dealer had 6,7,8 , which is the 3 card 21.

You've basically clarified the fact that I stated the dealer did have a 3 card 21, just you're lying about the rest!
Pages: [1] 2 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!