But it was thanks to Ronaldo's shot that he got the penalty, and scoring a penalty goal is not an easy task. It's true that people expect Ronaldo to score more goals that aren't penalties, but it's undeniable that Ronaldo's presence in the team has helped a lot. I really admire him because at his age he still plays very well, unlike many young players who can't help their country's national team.


I confess that I was shocked when I saw that Nigeria was unable to beat South Africa. It was supposed that with the squad that Nigeria has, they would be able to qualify easily in this group. This raises the following question: could the problem not be with the coaches that Nigeria has hired? because in my opinion it seems that the Nigerian Football Federation should consider hiring a coach who has shown that he has managed to win many titles both nationally and internationally. Someone who knows Nigerian players well.

When I read the thread, I wondered the following:

Gambling is a form of entertainment, but in the case of this doomscrolling, could it be classified as a form of entertainment? Who spends hours on social media scrolling through other people's photos and videos and finds it fun? It's acceptable to spend a few minutes browsing social media because there's news that people can be the first to see, they can also post things and interact with followers, in the case of people who make money from social media. Now, someone who doesn't make money from social media, spending 5 hours scrolling through other people's photos, honestly, how would that be fun?

I prefer to play in a casino, at least that way I have fun. I know that there are people who become addicted to gambling, but each person is responsible for themselves. So, you can't blame gambling. If people play in moderation, they won't become addicted and their lives won't be destroyed. Now, having an addiction to social media is extremely bad.

In my opinion, the first thing a person should do is ask themselves what sport they like. After that, start watching all the games of that sport they like, because only this way will the person get to know the players of each team and how each team plays. If a person really wants to bet on soccer games, for example, then they need to know which leagues they like and find it easier to watch the games and get information quickly, because in the world of sports betting, information about teams is very valuable.

Imagine there's a Chelsea vs Manchester United game. You don't know either of these two teams, so how will you know which one has the best chance of winning? If you only rely on the bookmaker's odds, you can make mistakes and lose money. It's true that bookmakers can place Chelsea as the favorite with odds of @1.30, for example. This is a very low odd that isn't worth it. However, if you know both teams well, you can choose to bet on the over or under goals market and get much better odds and win your bet.

In my case, I always prefer casinos that pay without problems. I don't focus on KYC. I know there's a risk of my documents being leaked, but this is a law that governments have decided, and casinos are simply obeying it. Therefore, there's nothing that can be changed. That's why I comply with KYC.

Now, accepting to use a casino that takes weeks to process a person's withdrawal and takes months to release people's winnings when they see that people played with little money but were lucky enough to win a lot of money is a bad idea. I honestly don't use this type of casino because it doesn't make sense.

Yes, the photo is not wrong, he left Tottenham and returned in a few weeks to another Premier League team.




https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11727/13427461/ange-postecoglou-nottingham-forest-set-to-appoint-former-tottenham-head-coach-after-nuno-espirito-santo-sacking

Sometimes I sit and ask myself: do most football managers take the time to watch other teams' games to stay up to date on the performance of other coaches in case they ever need to hire a coach? I confess that I tend to believe that the answer to my question is a big No. 

I say this because what I've seen in the world of professional football is not normal, and worse, coming from big leagues. How can you explain that a big team with a good coach, who fights for titles, hires a coach with few achievements? I'm talking about Inter Milan. Someone might think that this only happened in Italy, but no, it's happening in all leagues.

An example is the case of this news. The previous coach managed to make the team stable and strong, at least it was at the top of the table. The guy was fired and in his place they hired a coach who couldn't put Tottenham at the top of the table. I honestly can't understand what logic was used in the hiring of Postecoglou.

If someone isn't addicted to gambling, but they have a very limited budget and need to pay bills, they'll stop gambling because it's the best solution. But the day they have a very high budget, they'll start gambling again. In this case, they're acting very well and with a strong sense of responsibility.

Now, when we have a case where someone is addicted to gambling, goes to a rehab clinic, is cured, and a year later starts gambling again, what usually happens is that the person who was addicted to gambling, after leaving the clinic, must have encountered the same problem that led to their addiction, which is why they started gambling again.

It's true that in these first few games, the defense remains terrible. I say continues because last season we lost the European Champions League and the FA Cup because we had a terrible defense. Now, I haven't seen any major improvement in defense this season. Just look at the top teams, we have a staggering scenario:

1 - Liverpool = 3 games, 4 goals conceded

2 - Chelsea = 3 games, 1 goal conceded

3 - Arsenal = 3 games, 1 goal conceded

In other words, we're averaging 1 goal per game. Fortunately, we didn't concede a goal in the game against Arsenal. Maybe that means we've made some improvement in defense. We'll see how things go in this weekend's game.

I've also been using this strategy when I make my multi-bet bets and place many teams. As soon as I see that the profit exceeds 3x, I prefer to use the cashout option. I've been using another rule: after using the cashout option, I don't look at the results of the remaining games. This is to avoid feeling guilty if I've won all the remaining games. There was a time when I had made a parlay with 10 games, I won 8 games, and I cashed out because I didn't want to be greedy.

It turns out that later I got curious and went to see how my multi-bet was going and discovered that after all, I could have won the remaining games, and with that, I would have made a big profit. At that moment, I got angry with myself and created the rule that I shouldn't watch the remaining games after I cashed out.

I didn't watch the game, so it's very difficult to correctly analyze what happened. But the fact is that Turkey now needs to improve a lot in defense so that in the next game they don't concede many goals against a weak opponent on paper. Because in this group, Turkey is the team that has conceded the most goals

the humiliation that the players suffered could negatively affect them, especially the defense players who will feel guilty. What makes me even more shocked in all of this is seeing that the Turkish national team failed to score at least one goal.

Last season, PSG had a lot of difficulties in the first games of the Champions League, they had defeats, strangely enough, even so, because of the new format, they managed to reach the final and become champions, but if it were in the old format, I highly doubt they would be able to be champions, for this season I don't know, I say this because it could be that they start very badly again in the European Champions League but then reach the final and become champions again. This is because many big teams in Europe are going through a bad phase, it makes things much easier for PSG

I have also defended the same thing, I even gave the example that Mbappe was a Monaco player, and with Monaco he did not win Ligue 1 consecutively, he was not even famous at Monaco, and was sold to PSG where he was more valued and became popular, at PSG he was not valued because the club is rich, in my opinion

he was valued because PSG has managed to hire good coaches who knew how to guide Mbappe well, and that is what the other Ligue 1 teams are missing, they need to have good coaches and management that is committed to winning titles and not just thinking about selling players to have a lot of money and not doing anything relevant for the club

After my country Mozambique suffered a great humiliation in the last game against Uganda in which we lost and conceded 4 goals, in a game in which we did not score any goals, today we managed to win and score 2 goals



Knowing how crazy people are who run my country's football, I honestly wouldn't be surprised if they had sold the game to Algeria. The way my country lost is very strange. The coach didn't put the team captain in and only announced this just one day before the game. This immediately raised a red flag in my head.

I could be wrong, but it's very obvious that the president of my country is in Algeria, and my country loses 4-0 and loses the chance to fight for qualification. My country's leaders are corrupt, bloodthirsty, and do everything for money. Those gentlemen never thought about the people.

I confess that I didn't understand what it means to bet on "XorG"? I agree that betting on Atlético Madrid's victory is a high risk, although I believe that those who like to bet on the underdog will bet on Atlético Madrid, because of their history and reputation. But Villarreal doesn't seem to have a guaranteed victory in this game; in my opinion, it's more of a draw.

I wouldn't bet on both teams. I'd rather bet on other good games this weekend. There are many games, but the question is whether I'll be able to get it right because I'm reading news about players from big teams getting injured. That's another problem, which is why I haven't bet on any teams yet. I'm waiting for the national teams' games to finish and see which teams are affected by injuries.

But Al Littihad has Karin Benzema, who was a goal-scoring machine at Real Madrid. He left Real Madrid on his own accord. He could still be playing there today. I consider him a Real Madrid hero. When we were losing and the coach brought in Karin Benzema, I immediately had high expectations for him, and he didn't disappoint.

He managed to score an equalizer and a winning goal. He was always a great player. He stopped playing for the Franca national team because of a disagreement with the Franca national team coach. If Benzema had a lot of media attention, he would be getting a lot of attention today. Consider that this season, he played one game and scored three goals.

In my opinion, both coaches would be a terrible option. I say this because, looking at the history of both coaches, they are not coming from successes in other teams; on the contrary, they are coming from failures. It is very difficult for a coach who is coming from failure in another team to be able to make a team that is doing well achieve great results.

Everything gets worse when the coach failed in a rich team and comes to a failed team with few financial conditions. This coach is doomed to fail. In my opinion, Leverkusen, having sold some of their good players, became a weak team. Now, with the dismissal of the coach who made the new signings and with the market closing, the new coach will not be able to sign new players. Therefore, these two coaches will fail.

the news is true and the problem with this is the amount he will receive as salary:


https://www.instagram.com/p/DOVVeRZiJLc/

Analyzing the cost-benefit ratio, it doesn't make sense. I say this because he's not a goalkeeper who performed well, so why the hell would he have to earn a higher salary than Trabzonspor's current players? That doesn't make sense to me. I even see Trabzonspor leaving with financial losses and they could also lose games due to the goalkeeper's mistakes.

In my opinion, what should have been made was an agreement based on objectives. He would start with a low salary, and when he proved his worth, they could then raise his salary, but the increase should be gradual. I don't understand why Trabzonspor's management didn't do this.

There were games that really shocked me with their results, for example:

Lithuania 2 - 3 Netherlands

Honestly, I didn't expect the Netherlands to concede 2 goals in that game, because they weren't playing against a strong opponent; on the contrary, they were a very weak opponent. That was another game.

Turkey 0 - 6 Spain

How the hell did Turkey concede 6 goals? We are talking about a very important game, a World Cup qualifier, but they conceded 6 goals, they couldn't score at least 1 goal. How was that possible? Turkey was supposed to be the second strongest team in that group, but after that defeat, I see them with little chance of qualifying.

In my opinion, the only one to blame is the coach. This is because he's the one who hires the players, designs the entire strategy during the game, creates the team's formation, and decides which position each player should play on the field. Players don't decide to play in whatever position they want, so when a team loses, the only one to blame is the coaches. There are many examples of teams that had many losses, but when they changed coaches, those same teams started playing well and achieved good results, proving that a team's success depends on the coach.

Quitting addiction is not an easy task. I've had addicted relatives who took years to recover. We spent years chasing them to recover. When we put them in a rehab clinic for months, they were cured. It turns out that when they met with an addicted friend, they would return to the world of addiction and disappear from home. We spent months searching for them until, when we found them, it was a sight that made our eyes and head hurt because his body was so thin.

We would pick him up and put him back in a rehab clinic. This cycle only ended the day he died. Months ago, I realized that one of my relative's employees was an addict. The guy doesn't want to quit the addiction even though he sees that his body and mind are slowly failing.

I see that if a company is profitable and also thinks about seeing people mentally healthy, then taking measures that enable a reduction in cases of addiction is always very welcome. I just hope that the company is really being serious and not just making statements in the press to gain people's attention while behind the scenes they make other decisions. Because I've seen many cases where companies pose in the media as companies that want the well-being of people while behind the scenes they are acting badly.