Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »
|
Bumpppp
I've still got a fully loaded one that I won in the raffle he did on here a decade ago. Not looking to sell yet but would be happy to make contacts for a possible future sale. You can find the raffle thread if you search for it.
|
|
|
What was the eventual outcome of this? Did OP recover his funds?
|
|
|
Guys.. just a little re-assurance. Im a long time QT user thinking to switch to Electrum.. been researching for a while now. So it seems I don't have to make scheduled backups of my wallet with Electrum (as I currently do with QT) at all. As long as I remember the generated seed to memory perfectly, thats all I will EVER need to rebuild my wallet and use spend my BTC in any scenario (other someone stealing my seed), correct? With QT now, the syncing with the blockchain, plus issues since I'm on OSX (random crashes and having to rebuild the block database or re-sync etc) has made me very paranoid and I've started backing up my encrypted wallet to external storage. It seems like Electrum would be an elegant alternative, with no need to download the entire blockchain and in the event I have to access my wallet on a new computer (or alternative machine of my own), I wont have to wait a day.. it's download Electrum, re-create from Seed, and boom. Is this correct? For added security, it allows the current wallet to be encrypted as well (but if I'm understanding correctly, once you recreate a wallet from a seed, the 'encrypted' part of it goes out the window and you must now re-encrypt otherwise the wallet is wide open to spend with, yes?) And in the unlikely event the Electrum servers all go down forever.. I would still be able to re-create my wallet from my seed? Where? And more importantly, where would my private keys be if that has to be the case? A little help from fellow Electrum OSX'rs would be awesome.. especially since it's a big switch and one always gets paranoid when trusting a new "place" with your money  FYI - Im on OSX Mavericks, and would be installing Electrum 1.9.4 (NOT 1.9.5 since I understand there are some issues with OSX and that version still being hammered out), and I'm also not too keen on offline paper wallet super cold storage either since I'm pretty secure (firewall, filevault, encrypted volumes etc). So.. yes? Send my BTC from QT over to Electrum in 1 swoop and never look back? Or nay? Thanks guys! In order, Correct, correct, correct, yes, using the program or the code from github or an application like carbonwallet.com, the same private keys can always be regenerated using the technique used by electrum but as long as the project exists on github you will be fine, Yes send them over but make sure to memorise that seed!!
|
|
|
However, in order to recognize seeds from version < 2, I plan to check if the number of words is 12. so it's probably not a good idea to create 24 words seeds now.
What will the default seed length in 2.0 be then?
|
|
|
yes, the seed is encoded using groups of 3 words, extra words are ignored.
(note that version 2.0 will use a hash of the seed phrase)
Okay thank you, cheers for the time spent coding all this.
|
|
|
If you restore from seed with these words "content scene son door spend plastic clothes talk reason" (9 words) The first address is this "13VfVDEPU4RDKPtLmQ3jhCsnrj9JwVpgkq" If you restore from seed with these words "content scene son door spend plastic clothes talk reason damn haunt" (11 words) The first address is this again "13VfVDEPU4RDKPtLmQ3jhCsnrj9JwVpgkq" It is the exact same wallet! What is going on...
|
|
|
Pending transaction = pending for broadcast on network.
It doesn't, it means waiting on confirmations. It has already been broadcast.
|
|
|
A super handy feature would be a small button in Lite mode which copies your next empty receiving address onto the clipboard. I am aware of the ability to right click and show receiving addresses but this takes away from the aesthetics of true Lite mode. The receiving address clipboard copy button could appear right next to the switch window button.
|
|
|
Is there any reason why Electrum (and Bitcoin-qt) doesn't support sendmany?
Bitcoin-qt does support sendmany. Just click the New Recipient at the bottom left of the Send screen or using the RPC console. And so does Electrum-1.9 if you use the Electrum console. I understand how to do it with CVS but how do I do it with console? Do I use paytomany?
|
|
|
It's kind of funny when a newbie comes along and tries a naive approach to cracking something.
In this case he doesn't seem to understand he can totally remove all the code related to guessing words, and decoding them, and simply generate a 128 bit random number as seed directly. That should speed this up somewhat but to go even faster he may as well just increment a counter and check seed values sequentially - it has the same probability and would be faster still and not run into a depleted entropy pool.
2^128 = 3.402823669×10³⁸
One billion balance checks / second (very unlikely even with 10,000 computers attacking) looking for a hit in one of 2 millions addresses (current number with non-zero balances in network), would still take,
3.402823669×10³⁸ / 1x109 / 2x106 = 1.701411835×10⁵³ seconds,
or 5.395141537×10⁴⁵ years.
I wish him good luck.
/thread
|
|
|
Awesome thanks, tickets have been bought 
|
|
|
Can you give a very brief explanation of the deterministic wallet in Armory, specifically how it achieves public key generation without needing the private keys. Also your thoughts on how this quote relates to Armory -- 'Visions of a fully homomorphic cryptosystem have been dancing in cryptographers' heads for thirty years. I never expected to see one. It will be years before a sufficient number of cryptographers examine the algorithm that we can have any confidence that the scheme is secure.' Bruce Schneier EDIT: Okay I see that this is discussed here https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BIP_0032.
|
|
|
Man how on earth did you generate this address? 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX
regex Regular expression?
|
|
|
Man how on earth did you generate this address? 1QBDLYTDFHHZAABYSKGKPWKLSXZWCCJQBX
|
|
|
50 FC available.
How much?
|
|
|
1391Rjne8ov3MmdSyaRF8sVPwLUAipWZ2o
You got it  Haha sick cheers, time to build the client I guess Client? I assumed it was this https://github.com/knotwork/old-devcoin-qt but now Im confused haha. I have read little into devcoin, so I will go do that first.. I'm confused. The desktop wallet... for devcoins
|
|
|
1391Rjne8ov3MmdSyaRF8sVPwLUAipWZ2o
You got it  Haha sick cheers, time to build the client I guess Client? I assumed it was this https://github.com/knotwork/old-devcoin-qt but now Im confused haha. I have read little into devcoin, so I will go do that first..
|
|
|
1391Rjne8ov3MmdSyaRF8sVPwLUAipWZ2o
You got it  Haha sick cheers, time to build the client I guess
|
|
|
Going for 201 seemed to risky to me. You know, psychological number marks and all.. 
|
|
|
1391Rjne8ov3MmdSyaRF8sVPwLUAipWZ2o
|
|
|
|