I have developed an alternative secure mail system designed for easy of use (it does all the key generation and signing under the hood, it should be easier to deploy than standard SSL certificates and PGP signatures) You can find an alfa of it on http://resomail.com, the secure domain generation is not yet ready, but I thought that bitcoin crowd might be interested in an alternative secure mail system and I could sell domains for bitcoin and protect against bots by offering *.free domains for value of Bitcoin Faucet (now 0.001 bitcoin), there also will be not free domains like *.usa or *.can .
Before starting to implement this feature I need to know – would anyone purchase alternative domains for ResoMail?

I think you posted in the wrong forum, the right forum in my opinion would be economic or technical.
Here people do real trade.

Let's say that person A mined some bitcoins, so now all the payment fees for those bitcoins goes to him. Person B wants to buy from person A the right to receive those payment fees.
Is it possible to safely transfer "mined rights" from person A to person B?

I'll throw a good business idea: the best way for such polls will be bets with bitcoins.

Actually the ecological impact of generating BitCoins is mitigated by the easiness of transfer, you don't have to fly to another location to pay, by using bitcoins you'll do it more ecologically.

I don't like siting on IRC so it will be a good thing to post best ideas here on forums.

Actually I think the governments now have enough resources to disrupt bitcoin if they want, even without crypto breakthroughs.

I have a plan, which if I'll implement correctly will be the best way to spend your Faucet BTC.
For now I'll keep it a secret

I think it will be great if you'll make some art before people start paying for your game.

Stocky
Freedom Stock Exchange
Stock Now

The question is not about making money, the question is about maintaining the network, basing entire network only on miners is bad because real serverless p2p networks are better with more permanently online members, so that the network will be more resistible to attacks.

The question is about motivation, should I keep running bitcoin client with mining enabled or not? I think the more people run their clients the better for the network, but does the network motivates somehow people to keep their bitcoin clients running?

Sorry, then I'm afraid I didn't understood something in how bitcoin p2p system does work.

Previously I thought that miners solve some difficult problem, when they solve it - they generate some bitcoin amount. When in your transaction you use part of that generated bitcoin amount the payment fee goes to the miner who generated that bitcoin amount. Now you're saying that payment can go to another miner who is online now and mining.

I have launched bitcoin client for few days and mining constantly with about 2.5Mhashes/s, with this speed the calculator says that I'll have  some bitcoins mined in more than a year, now it seems that electricity costs are higher than those mined bitcoins. Does it mean that if I continue mining I might receive from time to time payment fees?

I think an escrow will be better and simpler, your solution seems too complicated.

So all the network confirms the transaction, transaction fee only makes you to the top of the queue and even if at that time the miner is offline it will receive the transaction. Is it correct?

So who then receives the transaction fee?
Thank you.

How does it work?
From the wiki I've read that it will go to the miner who mined the coins you're transferring. What will happen if the miner is not online?