 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
I've been making profit here since day 1  This can go on forever if it gets more deposits. C'mon people invest |
|
|
|
|
So far so good 1st payment 2 more to go
To ponzi police: I am not promoting this site just saying I have my first payout from them
|
|
|
|
So after ETH becoming successful, IOTA emerging, LISK managing to collect over 3000 btc during ICO, now you fuckers want a piece of the action, eh?
A Newbie account created 6 days ago that come just to insult without knowing why this new platform is being created. Sound legit yep. Is that the best you could come up with? "A Newbie account created 6 days ago" ? and yeah, I do know why "this new platform is being created".. to collect as much BTC as possible, duh |
|
|
|
presale just started but already 126 btc?  suspicious Hi, Bank_sy The announcement was also published on other media not only in the forum and there were people already waiting for the start  . Make the presale address public or you're full of shit and your numbers are fake !!! |
|
|
|
|
So after ETH becoming successful, IOTA emerging, LISK managing to collect over 3000 btc during ICO, now you fuckers want a piece of the action, eh?
|
|
|
|
New commercial bitcoin game http://win.10x.es. Burst bubbles - earn bitcoins. Adaptive design, music,sound fx. Payment/withdrawal fully automatic. Binding to the account using cookies. Registration is not required. For the bursting of the bubble - random reward: your bet multiplied from 1.1 up to 10 times. This is first public run, consider the game is still in beta status. Built-in demo: firs 20 bubbles free of charge. Where is the information on how this game actually works? How can I lose here? How can you prove the game is fair? |
|
|
|
|
@spendulus, would you be so kind to provide your "math and physics" explanation for wtc building 7?
|
|
|
|
The Towers were filled with asbestos. Burning fuel burns only at a max of 1200 degrees F. You need special configurations to get blow-torch effects out of the burning fuel. Tons of concrete insulation ward off heat convection. Little heat as shown in the pictures above. The heat was far from sufficient to take the towers down.  None of that above statements is accurate. It only shows Baddecker's ignorance. Insulation concentrates heat, rather than reducing it. Ovens and such are...insulated. Lots of wind blowing into that fire means lots of oxygen. And we can easily calculate the joules of energy released by these planes' fuel burning, and see if it is sufficient to weaken the tower structure (Hint: I already did this in the other thread. So I can just copy and paste, duh). Two words for you:
Controlled Demolition
All three buildings were simply "pulled" as Larry Silverstein said. It was all planned moths before the "attack" on US soil, attack by it's own government.
Buildings "pulled?" Really? Why don't you go try to pull a building? I'll loan you a rope. Silverman explains this stupid misinterpretation of his comment, as I recall, he was talking about getting the firemen out of there. Great idea, they wouldn't be dead if he had. Regardless, if you want to make the claim of controlled demolition, why not support it? Some actual evidence? Start with the claim that the US government was involved just for grins. Oh man, I can't believe what I'm reading here. I don't know if you're so stupid or just too lazy to use your own brain. .... Lol, no, we're not going for "facts and evidence" from Youtube videos. Let's start with the problem of the steel. You think the fire from the kerosene was insufficient to weaken the steel to the point where it was very weak, right? That's what leads to the "need to talk about thermite" and in turn that leads to a "need for a conspiracy." This is a simple problem at the high school level of physics and chemistry, so tell me if I understand this objection correctly. RE the "involvement of the US Government" I assume that if there is no need for a conspiracy theory, then the US Government were not conspirators. Take your pick, either that view or the US Government was involved in hiring/coercing "innocent Islamic Jihadists" to take lessons in flying planes and then crashing them into the towers. Either or both is fine just let us know. Why? Don't you think Youtube videos hold more than enough evidence for people to realize what really went down that day? or would you say youtube videos are a hoax, that we shouldn't ask questions but instead believe what US government and media is telling us? The truth is right out there for anyone wiling to search for it. I did my research extensively and I can tell you the US government and media lied to us. Many people died that day, it's unforgivable. Even if the steel was weakened by the jet fuel this would not have dropped the entire building! Sky scrapers don't just get thrown together and collapse in free fall, they have a very strict building code. One of which relies on the build being able to take impacts from flying objects. When the steel at the point of impact was heated (btw jet fuel burns at 980C in a controlled environment) it may have been heated enough for enough amount of time to change it's crystal structure but that would not have weaken the massive steel pillars below or above it. Also, to mention the pools of melted metal, STILL glowing red hot weeks after the initial collapse. Are you trying to say that jet fuel burns hot enough and long enough to melt enough metal to create pools of lava like liquids to last at least a week? These were found by fire fighters when they were removing ruble searching for bodies. This is not a conspiracy theory, it's god damn fact laying on the floor in front of you. The only conspiracy theory is that bullshit the government fed us so we would want to go invade the middle east and implant our own seeds of governmental dominance so we can have a foothold on that economy as well. |
|
|
|
The Towers were filled with asbestos. Burning fuel burns only at a max of 1200 degrees F. You need special configurations to get blow-torch effects out of the burning fuel. Tons of concrete insulation ward off heat convection. Little heat as shown in the pictures above. The heat was far from sufficient to take the towers down. None of that above statements is accurate. It only shows Baddecker's ignorance. Insulation concentrates heat, rather than reducing it. Ovens and such are...insulated. Lots of wind blowing into that fire means lots of oxygen. And we can easily calculate the joules of energy released by these planes' fuel burning, and see if it is sufficient to weaken the tower structure (Hint: I already did this in the other thread. So I can just copy and paste, duh). Two words for you:
Controlled Demolition
All three buildings were simply "pulled" as Larry Silverstein said. It was all planned moths before the "attack" on US soil, attack by it's own government.
Buildings "pulled?" Really? Why don't you go try to pull a building? I'll loan you a rope. Silverman explains this stupid misinterpretation of his comment, as I recall, he was talking about getting the firemen out of there. Great idea, they wouldn't be dead if he had. Regardless, if you want to make the claim of controlled demolition, why not support it? Some actual evidence? Start with the claim that the US government was involved just for grins. Oh man, I can't believe what I'm reading here. I don't know if you're so stupid or just too lazy to use your own brain. Do you even know how the twin towers were build? Twin towers were build with the intention to withstand multiple plane hits. I say it again, MULTIPLE plane hits! it is just impossible for thse towers to collapse like your government is telling you they did, their explanation is defying the laws of gravity. Both of the twin towers as well as wtc building 7 were demolished using explosives mixed with thermite, not because of the burning fuel LOL Explosives were placed days before the incident. Yes, all three buildings were "pulled" meaning they were demolished following carefully planned execution. "Pulled" is a word used by people doing controlled demolition. Silverstein did used that word himself and he was talking about the wtc building 7, not the firefighters LOL. Seriously, you should do your own research on the subject instead of believing what the media is telling you. Did you know that Larry Silverstein, the owner of wtc complex bought and insured twin towers months before they collapsed? Coincidence, right? Want evidence? http://realitieswatch.com/larry-silverstein-bought-wtc-months-911-got-4-55-billion-insurance-buildings/http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html"Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed, ... The building structure would still be there." "The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707—DC traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact" http://wtfrly.com/2012/08/10/911truth-wtfact-no-33/#.VuM5OvkrLIUhttp://investigate911.org/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xu_qct5gp-Mhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfxkcBmZfK0Just watch this video above and listen to people who were actually there and heard all explosions going off at ground floors and below, those explosives were placed there to weaken the whole structure of the building before the main pillars could be "pulled" Now watch this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pjmktbt-F_Qand finally take a look at how the wtc building 7 collapsed and listen carefully to what Larry Silverstein said, he said "PULL IT" as in "pull" the building and not "pull them" as in pull the firefighters out as you suggest. Your claim is actually impossible because there were no firefighters at building 7, they were ordered out at 11:30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iEuJimaumW4 |
|
|
|
This is by far the ugliest doubler site I've ever seen
for you this is the ugliest doubler.. but check our site.. we are real paying bitcoin doubler.. we will upgrade everything as our business grows..
keep tuning: http://bitcoinprofit2.webnode.com/
Not only it's the ugliest doubler site, the operator seems to be a complete imbecile |
|
|
|
The Towers were filled with asbestos. Burning fuel burns only at a max of 1200 degrees F. You need special configurations to get blow-torch effects out of the burning fuel. Tons of concrete insulation ward off heat convection. Little heat as shown in the pictures above. The heat was far from sufficient to take the towers down. Two words for you: Controlled DemolitionAll three buildings were simply "pulled" as Larry Silverstein said. It was all planned moths before the "attack" on US soil, attack by it's own government. |
|
|
|
|
This is by far the ugliest doubler site I've ever seen
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever thinks 9/11 was a terrorist attack on US and twin towers collapsed because of those two planes is a fucking retard! Same goes to people who think another plane went in to pentagon and wtc building 7 collapsed because it caught on fire LOL
It was all staged, it was carefully prepared months prior the incident, it was then executed with absolutely no remorse.
|
|
|
|
Will this be available to trade right after ICO?
There's no exchange yet that has agreed to carry Lisk...but there will be soon. Ok, thanks. When does the ICO ends? |
|
|
|
How the hell did this managed to raise over 3000 BTC What's so special about this entity Javascript language simplicity vs Solidity language complexity Like I said ... easy to write a Javascript compiler to Ethereum bytecode Let me know when it's done...or even started. Even if an Ethereum JavaScript compiler existed, Solidity is still a new, experimental, unstable language - why paste a compiler on top of it? See:
https://docs.erisindustries.com/tutorials/solidity/solidity-1/100,000+ JavaScript programmers vs. few Solidity programmers The above argument eliminates this so called advantage of liskThe above argument is vaporware. JavaScript programmers can start coding Lisk dapps right now.Single hash generated vs. trillions of valid but discarded hashes generated to secure blockchain in one blocktime Makes no sense at allI've explained this several times. Churning out trillions of wasted hashes means lots of wasted electricity - like literally a nuclear powerplant's worth for Bitcoin - and is an exponentially-growing financial overhead that will ultimately kill the coin. See:https://blockchain.info/charts/hash-rate?timespan=all&showDataPoints=false&daysAverageString=1&show_header=true&scale=0&address=Cooperative, efficient blockchain generation vs. competitive, wasteful blockchain generation looks like the same as aboveNo, it's the key reason Lisk can run its nodes on a $9 CHIP computer and Ethereum can't. Economies of scale hugely favor Lisk over BTC/ETH. See:http://getchip.com/pages/chipStable roundtable clockwork forging vs. unsustainable, exponentially growing free-for-all mining Forging is no different than mining ... just different ways to make the currencyIt is so sad to see people that don't understand enough math to get why exponential growth is unsustainable, or why a stable system is different and better from an unstable one.Dapps on individual sidechains vs. dapps on bloated mainchain Ethereum dapps are also sidechains .. lol .. you seem to be uninformedThe Ethereum Guide says its dapps are deployed on the mainchain ( https://gavofyork.gitbooks.io/turboethereum/content/dapps_deployment.html ). Practically, in Ethereum dapps are just specialized "contracts". There's my showdown cards in this poker hand - what's your counter-reference to prove what you are saying about Ethereum sidechains? Prove to me that each dapp in Ethereum has its own separate blockchain as they do in Lisk.Min of 2-4 to max of 101 cheap $35 Pi2 / $9 CHIP microcomputers needed for each sidechain backbone vs. large, unlimited numbers of expensive GPU systems needed for mainchain backbone The GPU rings will not be used once POS for eth sets inSo...PoS for ETH is vaporware, got it. How can you know that ETH PoS will run on microcomputers like Lisk does even if ETH PoS finally shows up? What happens to all those sad little GPU miners whose income stream will be cut off?Sidechain dapps permanently free vs. mainchain perpetual "gas" payments required Ah ... What can possibly be the use of the beloved LISK then ... What part of "free" vs. "paying for ETH gas" is so hard to understand? Free is better. Lisk is still the exchange coin of choice within the dapp itself.Will this be available to trade right after ICO? |
|
|
|
How the hell did this managed to raise over 3000 BTC What's so special about this entity |
|
|
|
|
