 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
Hey guys,
I'm playing with teamred miner with an RX570 and RX550.
The problem is: the cards alone are working well (expected 20 KH/s in chuckwa2 at 570 and 6KH/s in 550). But when i put both together it seems that kernel dont up one of them. For example, if 570 is the GPU0 it work well, if 550 is 0 also works well, but the second card always stays at 300 MHz clock and dont up, keeping an extremely low hashrate.
I'm running under debian buster, kernel 4.19 and amd opencl drivers. The GPU drivers are amdgpu (opensource).
Any tip of what can i do?
Regards,
Luiz
|
|
|
|
Hi all, I've relived an old Radeon HD5850 Black Edition 1 GB that i have here now using in my personal lab PC. Is there any algo (even in zpool, i have a friend (but in windows) that handle few units of Sol/s nowdays with an Quadro K420, so i think this card can perform better with correct miner) that i can try to mine? If yes, what miner you recommend to me in linux? It seems that all opencl stuff is working well: clinfo output: luiz@damalabs:~$ clinfo
Number of platforms 1
Platform Name Clover
Platform Vendor Mesa
Platform Version OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 18.3.6
Platform Profile FULL_PROFILE
Platform Extensions cl_khr_icd
Platform Extensions function suffix MESA
Platform Name Clover
Number of devices 1
Device Name AMD CYPRESS (DRM 2.50.0 / 4.19.0-14-amd64, LLVM 7.0.1)
Device Vendor AMD
Device Vendor ID 0x1002
Device Version OpenCL 1.1 Mesa 18.3.6
Driver Version 18.3.6
Device OpenCL C Version OpenCL C 1.1
Device Type GPU
Device Profile FULL_PROFILE
Device Available Yes
Compiler Available Yes
Max compute units 9
Max clock frequency 765MHz
Max work item dimensions 3
Max work item sizes 256x256x256
Max work group size 256
Preferred work group size multiple 64 glxinfo output: glxinfo -B
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer):
Vendor: X.Org (0x1002)
Device: AMD CYPRESS (DRM 2.50.0 / 4.19.0-14-amd64, LLVM 7.0.1) (0x6899)
Version: 18.3.6
Accelerated: yes
Video memory: 1024MB
Unified memory: no
Preferred profile: core (0x1)
Max core profile version: 4.3
Max compat profile version: 3.1
Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1
Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.1
Memory info (GL_ATI_meminfo):
VBO free memory - total: 1023 MB, largest block: 1023 MB
VBO free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Texture free memory - total: 1023 MB, largest block: 1023 MB
Texture free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Renderbuffer free memory - total: 1023 MB, largest block: 1023 MB
Renderbuffer free aux. memory - total: 1021 MB, largest block: 1021 MB
Memory info (GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info):
Dedicated video memory: 1024 MB
Total available memory: 2045 MB
Currently available dedicated video memory: 1023 MB
OpenGL vendor string: X.Org
OpenGL renderer string: AMD CYPRESS (DRM 2.50.0 / 4.19.0-14-amd64, LLVM 7.0.1)
OpenGL core profile version string: 4.3 (Core Profile) Mesa 18.3.6
OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 4.30
OpenGL core profile context flags: (none)
OpenGL core profile profile mask: core profile
OpenGL version string: 3.1 Mesa 18.3.6
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.40
OpenGL context flags: (none)
OpenGL ES profile version string: OpenGL ES 3.1 Mesa 18.3.6
OpenGL ES profile shading language version string: OpenGL ES GLSL ES 3.10 For now, mine grid tie system will handle it. I'm already have an ethereum rig with 2x 1060 6 GB. This old one is just for fun and curiosity. Thanks and dont laugh me hahaha |
|
|
|
I'm bought an GTX 1050 Ti OC, mining about 1400MH/s at 65W, for me is pretty good. For now, what is the best pool?
I am solo mining, works great for now. I'm trying solo mining with this ccminer config: { "_comment1" : "Possible keys are the long options (ccminer --help)", "_comment2" : "todo: support /* comments */", "algo" : "blake2s", "intensity": 24, "api-bind": "127.0.0.1:4068", "statsavg": 20, "quiet" : false, "debug" : false, "protocol" : false, "cpu-priority" : 3, "url" : "127.0.0.1:3791", "user" : "nevacoinrpc", "pass" : "mypassword" } but i get this error: HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 3791: Connection refused I need to edit iptables rules for this or something else? |
|
|
|
|
I'm bought an GTX 1050 Ti OC, mining about 1400MH/s at 65W, for me is pretty good. For now, what is the best pool?
|
|
|
|
|
Just a question, why in AikaPool have a miner with 500GH/s and the network doesn't incrase the hashrate?
|
|
|
|
|
Just a off topic question: someone experiencing problems to compile ccminer blake2s on new OS updates (like debian ones?), because here i'm getting an error at ssl library init... Like:
"checking for SSL_library_init in -lssl... no
configure: error: OpenSSL library required"
I already checked if libssl or openssl is already installed, i'm will put another pc with an nvidia quadro to give extra mining but this machine contains Kali linux (based in debian) with a lot of libs installed for dailly use too...
|
|
|
|
|
@staysecure really thanks! =D
|
|
|
|
@staysecure, thanks! @krile, thanks too! Sure the swap can affect negatively in the wallet processing? I'm using an class10 sdcard and now i've been incrased the cpu clock to 1,1GHz all seems very stable, the room temperature is controlled to stay at 22ºC. I'm using another setup as you can see: Clock generator:  Primary frequency standard (for all system clock reference, works with cesium beam):  System setup (counters, syntethyzer, GPS, NTP server):  The Pi:  Clock for my BR NTP server:  Raspberry time synchronization:  Raspberry CPU Clock:  This cesium frequency standard feeds a NTP server, Raspberry with NEVA wallet, a GPS for research with time and a counter for contabilize the time difference between the GPS clock and the generated clock by cesium beam clock. All the system is locked with the cesium beam frequency standard. I think high cpu usage will be the problem too, but for now i only have this pi   when the univesity buy more new raspies i will pick one for this xD |
|
|
|
Hi everyone! I'm starting new tests for my Raspberry PI node... I'm using a very precise signal generator to run my RPI replacing the generic Crystal Oscillator with this good one, my tests show good results for overclock too. But i need some ways to tests this experiment, if all runs with success i will try to keep this node running for a long time (it was in a electronics research lab what i work), this signal generator have an rubidium oscillator internally, what makes the generated signal very precise, please someone knows some way to test if the node is really good (i already have done some stress tests with success). The setup is: -Raspberry Pi model B; -SMB 100A Rohde & Schwarz Signal / Microwave generator; -Raspbian Jessie with 4.9.24+ RT kernel; -BNC cable to transport the signal to RPI board; -100MB Bandwidth connection but the RPI 1 limits to 10MB/s the BW; -700MHz to 1033MHz overclocked BCM2835 CPU. -> In the future I will start to play with RPI 3 Model B+, but for now RPI 1 sounds ok. -> The node IP is 143.107.228.226 - Running client v1.4.0 and staking ok. And, some pics for you: The board:  The replacement of the internal oscillator for one external (from generator):  The external generator setup:  Powered on:  Succefully overclocked RPI:  And the wallet running:  Thats all folks! xD |
|
|
|
|
I saw the another post just now (yes, i finded the answer haha), thats cool, i'm tracking the develop of this coin since the first post here, but for busy time questions i'm very lazy to read another answers hahaha, sorry. Now I'm mining with old video card on my computer at university lab... (GTX470 with some overclock) and... I'm very impressed, i just saw the block explorer right now and the net hashrate is arround 73.236 GH/s!!! Is the biggest hashrate? Becasue, omfg! Thats awesome, the coin is starting to be popular i think!
|
|
|
|
|
Just another question... why my wallet is showing staked blocks as "in conflict"? These blocks is the biggest part of staked blocks... Why?
|
|
|
|
|
Please, can i run staking node on a raspberry pi 3? How can i do it? I already put my wallet.dat file with my wallet info and nevacoin.conf with addnodes from current network on .nevacoin folder. So, can i run a GUI client? If not, how can i monitor the connection and the wallet activity (blocks, stakes)?
|
|
|
|
|
But when them update the wallet i will receive?
|
|
|
|
|
@killdemon , i don't know why, its because their wallet is outdated? I've been bought 1300 NEVA, but I don't received yet. My addres on deposit is correct, but I don't know why, their dont send. On Yobit shows "Confirmed" but nothing on my wallet or blockexplorer... How we can have another exchange? I've also notified them too, but nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
I bought 1370 Nevas on yobit for more than two hours and nothing has sent to my wallet! And I don't see anything on blockexplorer with my address, only a payout from aikapool and suprnova, but nothing from yobit! I requested support and they say: "Coins sent from the exchange correctly. The transaction rate depends on the network of the coin." I think it should not take as long, i tried another payout to another address, but same occurs! Some idea? Thanks.
I think they haven't updated the wallet! The site shows wrong POS difficulty
|
|
|
|
Olá pessoal, estamos criando a comunidade NEVA Brasil com o intuito de divulgar a moeda que possui uma boa proposta e alogritimo eficiente para hardwares mais simples, criei um grupo de discussão no facebook, caso queiram participar e desejem contribuir com a comunidade entrem no grupo, pedimos que vocês, se possível espalhem e divulguem a ideia para que além de valor, cresça também o número de usuários e adeptos à moeda: https://www.facebook.com/groups/286310908400091/ o grupo possui poucos membros, mas estes já são usuários da moeda! Divulguem serviços, invistam... Tópico oficial de anúncio NEVA: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1388222.0 |
|
|
|
|
