Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
Nice concept bought myself a pair. Could be a new cryptokitties.
|
|
|
Can I run 1 masternode without vps/controller ?
|
|
|
What does the HW mean, on one chip it seems higher than the others??
|
|
|
correct chip just dies after a while at 600 seems more stable at a lower frequency
|
|
|
Chain# ASIC# Frequency GH/S(RT) HW Temp(PCB) Temp(Chip) ASIC status 7 63 600 4160.72 75 63 86 oooooooo oooooXoo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo ooooooo 8 63 600 4313.57 61 58 84 oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo oooooooo ooooooo
What does the X mean on the ASIC status for chain# 7, i lost some hash rate, it is minimal but still and how can i fix it?
|
|
|
Extractor fan. I use an inline 5inch fan (that's usually for hydroponics), with some ducting to draw the hot air away and out the window.
In your case dependant on room size an open air fan behind the miners blowing the hot air towards the window might work.
On a different note. How are you finding the R4 in terms of reliability?
Thanks! I have never had miners at home, i have them hosted up north so my experience is very low. However, I overclocked at 650 which give approx 9.2th/s, they are silent and are reliable since i have been running them.
|
|
|
I have 2 R4 in my basement with the window open, the temp outside now is approx 15 degrees. The temperature in my basement is like 36 degrees.
Any tips on cooling?
|
|
|
Holy... another month? The price will crash.
I was betting on this week.
Testnet can still come out this week, the prev post is speculation.
|
|
|
it looks like the wallet is under maintenance on polo
|
|
|
What I find surprising is that there are these problems on Polo (not sure about Bittrex, anyone?) since over 24 hours without them saying anything or "temporarily disable" it if they have to fix something. Just tried it again:  Even Paul snow github link that was posted in the past something changed we can't see his progress anymore since yesterday
|
|
|
Yes. I agree. Now Poloniex is saying: "Temporarily Disabled". That it might be a sign for M2 was more out of the thought that if transactions would generally be working, but no withdrawals and deposits on exchanges, that they maybe already got new software from Factom to be prepared. But that was more loud thinking - or wishful thinking. ;-)
Oh really? I raised my withdrawal with support before, and they said they can't see anything wrong. Like you said, it could be a sign, but i really have my doubts and polo support made no mention of an m2 switchover happening, it's all a bit strange, i'll send an email to Michael Beam and Brian just in case. I believe I've made a mistake. It's possible that it was Bitmark with "temporarily disabled". It's right above Factoids in my account ("hide 0 Balances") and it is temporarily disabled while Factom is not. Maybe I had a "kink in my optics" - right after waking up. ;-) Yea btm disabled
|
|
|
APW5, 1300W-2600W PSU Power chord is not included with the APW5. It requires a C13 chord with a minimum current of 16A. We advise all users to purchase it separately according to their local wall-socket standard
Does this mean that i cant run 1 machine on a 110v 15amps or 2 machines on a 220v 30amps circuits because the power chord requires 16A minimum??
|
|
|
I see FCT is up to something on Poloniex. Some hype in the trollbox.
Volume is high, mainly thanks to the recent dump...which doesn't make sense.
4,182 BTC in volume last 24 hours. 792,686 FCT
Who in their right mind is dumping that much. I always assumed Polo is shady in inflated volume on some coins.
Price has been creeping up for a month now.
Just now reading up on this coin as it's one of the cheaper coins and price is close to an ATH.
2 year old coin. 9 months ago there were 8,753,873 FCT. Today 8,753,219 FCT
So some were actual burned looks like this year.
If there is a reason for this to go up then the accumulation period should be done. Just waiting for the markup. If the large holders hold and all the BTC on Polo come pouring into FCT then this can go up, way up, very quickly and stay up if there is a reason for large holders to hold.
I'm glad I found this coin. Got a FCT alarm set on my phone so I don't miss the break out when it happens.
And I just found the FCT speculation thread and Reddit trading thread. Sorry for the off topic post. Will head over there and see what people are saying.
where is the speculation thread?
|
|
|
beside a new website and some bla bla i dont think u can expect anything to be delivered in september the market reaction is clear and we will see sub 500 maybe even sub 400 again
dont get me wrong i think FCT have a high potential
but the time to raise and stay high is not here now
coins who have lending added at poloniex
are way more vulnerable to massive sells
think my words when it happens
If btc spikes up i would agree but market cap at 30milion is fair for fct, once M2 releases than huge pump. Sub 400k if btc doesn't move I doubt it.
|
|
|
BTW, where did u find this. It s not on exodus.io web yet.
Not sure where the image is from ... the only mention of Factom on Exodus's website is: "We are visiting the Factom offices today in Austin, TX. Insert rumor speculation here." https://www.exodus.io/releases/David Johnston said in the interview that there will be a really beautiful and user-friendly wallet. But if I understood it right, it's about a third party who builds it while the Factom-team is working on M2. And both should come out at the same time. I have to watch the interview again. I was so damn tired that I'm not sure about anything I've heard there. ;-) He said wallet is not a priority because business won't need one they will get credits through factom. Investors are not the priority but the business are which makes sense. It would not be efficient if businesses would have to store coins in a wallet and then get credits.
|
|
|
Factom & Exodus wallet partnershipOne wallet for factoid? Is good!  Finally user friendly wallet. What kind of security this offers? BTW, where did u find this. It s not on exodus.io web yet. I can't find any info on this...
|
|
|
|