 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
 "gdtpool" delegate (a 100% shared forged rewards* pool) needs you, the community vote! At Rank 102 now! if community wants, this goal to reach 101 and activate forging can be ACHIEVED.GDTPool delegate is a 100% shared forged rewards pool which is designed to maximize a non-forger / community voters payouts. In fact, GDTPool excludes all GDT members from payouts**. Want More? Do you want to receive immediately a bonus? Read Below 😉If you vote for all the members of GDT + gdtpool (32 delegates, see https://pool.liskgdt.net/members) your account will start receiving: - single payouts from 23 independent pools (22 are active forging now)- an extra GOLD LEVEL VOTER BONUS! (bonus payouts are done on weekly basis when sum reaches 1 LSK). To see actual bonus payouts take a look here: https://explorer.lisk.4miners.net/address/1251806989552612274LVoters can check their status and their bonus balance here at https://pool.liskgdt.net/account and https://pool.liskgdt.net/stats*Once the Lisk SDK is developed, it will change to a 90% forging pool as 10% of the rewards will be used to support blockchain applications built on the Lisk Platform. **Known associated accounts will be excluded also. Global Delegate Team is a group of people working for lisk since the first testnet https://liskgdt.netGreat information. I am kind of new and i have voted all GDT 33 members. and rest of 66 votes i gave random people from top 1 to 200. Except the Elite. So my question now, If Elite still able to hold position in top 101 delegates, then i will not get the rewards for the rest of 66 votes? Little bit confused here, because i just tried a tool, it says your current lsk is 1 per month, but if you follow this optimize you will receive 3 lsk per month. The it ask me to vote the elite. Can anyone help me here? why are you voting for GDT members who share only 5% per delegate but not for Elite who share 25% per delegate? |
|
|
|
Hi all,
I had posted in other topic but got no answer, this one seems to be more active!
So... I'm new to Lisk pools, just voted for all group pools and some individuals and now received my first payment and got some questions...
1) How can I know from where is the reward? The sender address does not match any of my voted delegates.
2) I just received "0.03216006 (0.1)" (Ammount (fee)). Does that means that I paid more fee than I receive?? Did I just lose money?
1. You can check that in the lisk explorer 2. Tx fee is 0.1 so your original reward was 0.13216006 you still got something isnt it the sender who is paying the transaction fee? if you send someone 100 lisk you dont have to send 100.1 you just type in 100. and you pay the transaction fee. pretty sure about that. |
|
|
|
List of actively/very close to forging GDT members acting as Individual Share Pools - odsejen wrote in lisk chat that he is not sharing anymore. i unvoted him directly, please delete him from this list or otherwise voters get mad. thank you |
|
|
|
sounds great  you have my vote! |
|
|
|
Well, my bag is now near fully-loaded and I fear I'm losing patience already  sad but no more popcorn  if i can ask, how much is fully-loaded   |
|
|
|
To make this short. Please anyone who believe these words, please go and read the chat log posts from carolina about our conversations and build your own picture. Yes at one particular time I lost my manners and say some bad things .. more than just the a-word , but please read the logs and you will understand.
Thanks
Regards
What to say about this reptile. He is doing nothing for Lisk, says to donate 5% on his delegate proposal, but even that is not happening. Also claiming that “20% to cover the expense of the servers I’m using”. Really, can you back that up?? But he is not alone, most from GDT don’t post transparency reports, and many don’t donate what they pledged to do. its an absolute mess. a lot of delegates are doing nothing and the sad part is, the community can do nothing about it. |
|
|
|
what is diference pool service and where return percentage is diference another pool, what is advantage diference pool diference return There is no difference between pools. % is only pool's delegate decision. If you have low amount of Lisk, robinhood pool is good. http://robinhood.liberspirita.net/ . Big holders profits are capped in this pool. Please delete: LISKIT.me he is not sharing 70% of his forged rewards. i dont know why you put him there.. |
|
|
|
|
he tells at the beginning that he and oliver founded lightcurve gmbh to promote and develop things for various "companies" so lightcurve is not only for Lisk?
|
|
|
|
|
is there anyway to ban the GDT? maybe we have to publish all the involved names of the GDT more frequently in reddit and other threads that people know who those are...
|
|
|
|
and now we can wonder, how did he became a delegate, when the only thing he does is selling Lisks... yeah your right.. GDT mafia shit  |
|
|
|
voted, thanks for the info |
|
|
|
Can we stop the dogmatic discussion about pools? Because there are no new aspects.
Every user should vote his favorite delegates.
at least you are not in this mafia GDT. ill take your work from now on.. all other on this thread fuck off and your GDT mafia rich getting richer shit  |
|
|
|
is it possible that someone could publish all the delegate names who are part of the GDT?
acheng atreides axente badman0316 bangomatic bioly bitseed cannabananadelegate cc001 cointrader83 corsaro crodam cad789 cryptostorms dafricash daoist densmirnov devasive digitron diplo distro djselery doweig eastwind_ja eclipsun fixcrypt forrest freiheitswelle goldeneye gordo gr33ndrag0n grajsondelegate grexx grumlin hagie hmachado hoop hua idealisk iii.element.iii kushed.delegate lamar liskgate litcoincollector malreynolds metal494_new movecrypto mrfrismint mrv nerigal ntelo odsejen ondin ottobene phoenix1969 popcornbag punkrock qbanow redsn0w rmelo samuray sgdias slasheks sonobit splatters staticinstance stoner19 techbytes tembo tharude thrice.pi_prometheus traderbill vega vi1son vipertkd vrlc92 wannabe_rotebaron will xujian lol some of them writed here just before how good delegates they are etc.  what a joke |
|
|
|
|
is it possible that someone could publish all the delegate names who are part of the GDT?
|
|
|
|
Recent developments however indicate that GDT is in a process of monopolizing forging rewards primarily for its own benefit and with a view to achieving insuperable voting power through accumulating most of the newly issued LSK. Well Carolina you're very brave. Thanks for bringing your concern to our attention. I also was introduced to GTD and even tried to get in myself but was denied entry due to the lack of weight and because of some divergences with other members. I must say the original intentions of GTD were good. We do need dedicated folks to run the mainnet and keep it as stable as it should be. However a group monopolizing 80 slots "for its own benefit and with a view to achieving insuperable voting power" is seriously wrong and unfair. Some GTD members even apologetically told me that they had to unvote me otherwise they would get evicted from this now corrupted group who has evidently deviated from its original plan. disaster... is max doing something about those fucking scumbags who do not care shit about Lisk and only want to get rich. |
|
|
|
Notice to the Lisk Community This post is about concerns with GDT (Global Delegate Team), the group of mutual voters that has 80+ members and accounts to a very significant percentage of forging delegates. GDT is in existence since the early testnet for Lisk. Its core comprises participants from the testnet as well as from the former Crypti community. It was always said or widely perceived that GDT is good for Lisk since it were supposed to invest forging rewards into the Lisk ecosystem. Within the concept for Lisk it is envisaged to fund various projects for Lisk by way of forging rewards, and it was expected that the benefit exceeds the inflation that comes with the comparably high figure for block rewards that characterizes Lisk. It is assumed by many that GDT would provide for an organizational structure that is beneficial for Lisk, for all of its community and the investors. Recent developments however indicate that GDT is in a process of monopolizing forging rewards primarily for its own benefit and with a view to achieving insuperable voting power through accumulating most of the newly issued LSK. GDT has no statute for its governance. Basically there is a single individual who creates a list of its members. Part of the conduct of GDT is maintaining a rather high number of 80+ members that keeps it ahead of any other potential competing group. In recent weeks the style of governance had changed in that members were pressed to vote each other (while before basically everybody had to go for his own votes), and in that GDT implemented a vote tracking database and regime of questionable practices in regard to improve its ranking and having a tight grip on its members. More details on this are to follow... This is not to say that all or the vast majority of its members are bad or untrustworthy delegates. For most there is no other choice than being part of GDT. This post is done with the intend to break up GDT and prevent it from finalizing its grip on forging rewards. It can become very important that the Lisk community and all outside voters use their voting weight against GDT and its established leadership. In this context there is also a warning on pools that promote certain delegates without saying why it is good to vote them or what their alliances are. Lisk has a great potential. It is important that the Lisk community makes use of its voting power and actively supports trustworthy candidates. Many delegates who are in GDT absolutely deserve votes from the community, as for instance they provide necessary technical support in order that the Lisk blockchain works. There are also many other important tasks done by several active delegates in promoting Lisk etc. A good indication for outstanding delegates is when they have the votes from both Max and Oliver. The more votes they get, the less dependent they are on GDT. Attached to this post are the logs from the relevant Slack channels of GDT for the last few weeks. It is seen as fair giving every Lisker access to information that has importance with the affairs of Lisk. With fairness seen as paramount, it should be attempted to break up mutual voting groups when they act as cartel and deliberately don’t let space to other groups or individual delegates. Acting for competitiveness can have a beneficial effect for the Lisk ecosystem and requires support from the community. https://yadi.sk/d/7L3krpjz3AWJYBhttp://carolinaliskdelegate.wordpress.comSadly nothing will change... rich delegates are getting richer, and when the price is high they will sell the 10 thousand of Lisk. i am sure. thats human nature, pure egoism. so, Fuck the GDT! |
|
|
|
This is a ABSOLUTE Desaster! The rich are getting richer and the normal LISK users have nothing. SO GUYS: VOTE ONLY FOR POOLS - or do you want that 101 guys earn and will get rich?! We need at least 80% pools in the network or LISK will go down in the long run, you will see |
|
|
|
All the delegates should share a percentage of their LISK income or LISK will go down very soon. They say, that LISK delegates do something like an app or promotion for LISK then just look at this LISK delegate proposal: absolute bullshit i say: https://forum.lisk.io/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=643 |
|
|
|
|
