There have been big differences in the past when there were large BTC price movements. People run arbitrage bots but they fail in various ways.


Or you could try to read the market situation as the poster above me has already done.

You may have a point. But perhaps you must consider that Satoshi et. all could have made a lot of money off BTC at a perhaps unjustifiable value.

Perhaps a better fix would be to have actual standards about what features/premine ratios were acceptable and throw the ones that weren't into another category. But that requires specific details on a classification scheme and not vauge feelings that something is a "scam", or that its participants were too profit motivated.

That doesn't seem like a smart response. Isn't there some way to add an exception? Also
https://www.microsoft.com/security/portal/threat/encyclopedia/entry.aspxname=Trojan%3aWin32%2fSkeeyah.A!bit&threatid=2147695505&enterprise=0
I don't know how common false positives for Trojans are. I have not heard of such problems from official Ethereum CLI or genoil. If that is borne out it would be interesting and not exactly reassuring.

As of today windows defender is calling this a virus. Just a heads up.

It seems like the temperature/find GPU ID numbers do not match up with the hash rate ID numbers. GPU3 for temp/fan seems to correspond to GPU2 for ETH hashrate.