Latest posts of: q6m

Show Posts
Pages: [1]

on: January 29, 2014, 10:23:26 PM

I am AML verified and requested a relatively small ~1.5 BTC withdrawal - should be a simple, automated process, right? Nope - 72 hours and 2 support tickets later... still radio silence. I don't know if Mt. Gox is 1) sinister or 2) utterly incompetent, or 3) both... But Mt. Gox expects the public to trust them with their hard-earned money? LOL. Any suggestions as to how to resolve this? Also, any suggestions as to a BTC exchange that doesn't make me feel like I am walking down a dark alleyway in Tijuana?

on: March 24, 2013, 09:32:07 PM

[edit] working with mike gokulski via PM to sort out issues with missing coins from app.bitlaundry.com

on: March 09, 2013, 07:46:52 PM

Great - thanks for the response Mike - I really appreciate it. Makes sense, as confirmations have indeed been taking longer than usual and I didn't realize it required 10 on the initial transfer. Thanks again and keep fighting the good fight! Quote from: mikegogulski on March 09, 2013, 02:37:08 PM I saw mention from Gavin (https://bitcoinfoundation.org/blog/?p=135) that some transactions in the past week have taken extra long to confirm due to the network transaction volume sometimes exceeding the 250kB/block size limit, so this may have added some delay to your scheme. I try to minimize my logging, so I can't tell exactly, but it looks like your tx took about 2.5 hours to reach 10 confirmations. All good? Peace, Mike

on: March 09, 2013, 06:12:45 AM

[edit] Worked with Mike Gogulski to fix this initial problem

on: March 07, 2013, 03:36:28 AM

And they don't deserve a single bit of it. Coinlab is probably rethinking that partnership... Quote from: chriswilmer on March 07, 2013, 03:24:18 AM Today is the day the bitcoin community traded so much that everyone ended up giving their bitcoins to Mt.Gox.

on: February 28, 2013, 02:47:09 AM

When I last used BitInstant, it automatically defaulted to ZipZap. What's the difference between the two?

on: February 28, 2013, 12:27:14 AM

Do they ask for ID when sending a moneygram, or is the process anonymous?

on: February 28, 2013, 12:26:28 AM

If they become more mainstream, I can only assume that they have more intrinsic value due to the fact that they are accept more widely. However, we have their value crash before, so I would be very careful, if I were you.

on: February 28, 2013, 12:25:16 AM

Nothing beats a brain wallet...

on: February 27, 2013, 11:11:14 PM

LVvNsBX5BjGKSovt9Ra7LN1GYQNbxGk6St Thanks much!

on: February 27, 2013, 10:49:12 PM

142BkUB3REAKPfndLZCje3VdvqG6DuzEZY Thanks much!

on: February 27, 2013, 10:05:53 PM

I sent BTC from my e-wallet to my Laptop Wallet via bitcoinlaundry.com, which I believe is developed by a user here... I was charged the "laundry" and transactions fees but there was no mixing performed at all... I received the BTC directly from the address I sent the BTC to... Has anyone else had a similar experience with this site? Blockchain.info also shows a 99+% taint level on that transaction. Please help! If anything, I'd like the fees back for the service.

Pages: [1]