Someone from Cerberus-NG discord has sent me the following msg regarding the blockchain explorer which I've been running since Cerberus fork and which became unavailable after VPS provider-initiated IP address change:

This was, actually, painted as I stopped it intentionally. For those who concerned, here is the full story:

I helped to the new owner to make NG releases 0.12.2.0 and 0.12.2.1, polishing every bit or comments, not talking about git commits and code changes. Also I provided a blockchain explorer for it and wrote a bot to estimate version breakdown and check if NG release overrides the old one.

After some time I decided to give up an active developer role, still being around for discussions and technical help. Soon the new CBS owner found a "very experienced" developer. The latter has published NG release 1.0.0 without any discussion with the team. I was crying looking at what was called a new major release (0.12.2.1 to 1.0.0).  There was no changes in functionality except release version number, internal protocol number and spork key (this changed nothing in the way it works, just few numbers). Actually all was senseless, especially to call it a major release and not even changing to new logo.

I talked to the owner about weird git commit comments like 'dsfadfgasf', and he said he will ask to fix this bullxxxx. Instead, a next "release" 1.0.1 was published in 5 days with the same useless changes and still no new logo. In addition, it was accompanied with senseless statements like "mandatory for pools only" - it is senseless because the way of how blockchain works. No matter what blocks mining pool provides, they ALL are being validated by EVERY wallet and EVERY node. So if pool provides inconsistent block (from point of view of "old" network) - such blocks will be refused. If no "valid" blocks is provided by pools - no blocks will be created at all. This is the ABC of blockchain, and every "experienced developer" must know that.

When I argue, I always give facts. The facts are git commits (compare comments by os and mrmetech here https://github.com/cerberus-ng/cerberus/commits/master), and release comments from 12.2.x and 1.0.x (here https://github.com/cerberus-ng/cerberus/releases). They even were too lazy to fix "Added New Sprok thank you to Mrmetech" when people on discord pointed on that (sprok should be spork, and no any spork was added - just a key changed - another senseless statement, and how not to praise yourself, beloved).

I asked on discord what happens, and what the f.. is this senseless "release". Maybe a bit sharp, but quite reasoned assuming the work I did for past releases before. Instead of making valid proof statements, I was asked by new "dev" what have I done for CBS at all. And when I was writing how governance in Dash works answering him, I was banned from discord without any warnings. It was painted like I left by myself.

I found a way to talk to the new owner outside of discord, who didn't even know about my ban. We talked quite well, I spent a lot of time providing my view to how to recover all this s..t published and make a decent release. I confirmed that I am always around to help. But even being unbanned, I will not back to discord until an apology from that who has banned me. But I still continued running the explorer and the bot even if I sold out almost all my CBS after such "releases". Also I have built them a MacOS release 1.0.0 that they were unable to build for a week. After I fixed in my release all gitian descriptors to build all 5 platforms with just 3 commands, it took only 30 minutes (compare the git hash eb0eefa in MacOS version About dialog with this one: https://github.com/BlockchainWorks/cerberus/commit/eb0eefad97bec13d5b4449412ac88c03aa199295). And if new "dev" was willing to learn, he could do exactly the same asking me how instead of banning me and adding weird scripts to the repository. I doubt that they even know who has built it, except the owner who has published it. I had no intention to harm to reborn project and continued to support it running services.

June 28th, the CBS explorer and bot stopped working. I found that my VPS provider has changed the IP address of my server. I fixed the bot using new IP, but had no access to change the domain name which I don't control. I expected that the reason what's up will be asked and explorer IP changed in the DNS. But instead I found that explorer domain was redirected to another explorer (which does not provide the info required by my bot).

So facts are:
- the dev who actually reborn the project by making first NG releases, and did not agree with s..t releases, was banned by "experienced dev" who doesn't know how blockchain works and too busy to make a comment in the repository (I would be ashamed to put such "dsfadfgasf" in the repository);
- I still was running supplemental services for the coin which I don't have, but was actually accused in stopping them when it was just an IP change. No one asked me what happened.
- the explorer still is available under the name http://cbs.exp.osnwt.site/. But bot is stopped now, they, obviously, don't need it anymore. It was matter of seconds to ask me what has happened, and instead they start moving explorers and talking about team member that stepped out...

I did not leave discord, and I did not stop services intentionally, no matter what was said on discord.

I gave up the dev role due to lack of trust in the new team (or how I felt it). And this case just has proved me that I was right leaving it.

I was not going to put this on public. But since they still allow themselves to show me as a bad guy, I had to explain, they forced me to do so.

This thread is not self-moderated, so you, the "experienced developer Mrmetech", unable to ban me here and remove all I said, like how you have done on discord. And you should learn from the people who has some knowledge instead of banning them for words you don't like to hear, being so "busy" to write a 3-5 words git comment instead of "dsfadfgasf" but making absolutely senseless major "releases" thanking yourself for things you didn't.

And I could only repeat to the new owner: find a REAL developer or sell your coins while it is not too late. I could help you with new decent release in one day, but you preferred to keep that guy around and move explorers instead of asking me about explorer failure. Well, it is your project, your choice and your team.


PS. I have never thought that Crypto at discord is a lier, intentionally writing half-truth.

Crypto wrote:

But that is a half-truth. I may be not banned now. But I was banned, and said to project owner that I will not go back until an apology for unreasonable ban. Sorry, Joeldo (new project owner), but I have to put your words here as a proof of my words:


Arguing about that "release", I exactly wanted to make this project work. It was said sharply, yes, but for the reason. Crypto said they don't take abuse. But my "abuse" was in that I called things with their names: I said "shit release", and that is worst word I said. But it all was said about the shit code. No one was personally insulted.

I am not going to go back to discord to be banned again at your wish. If there is any word of untruth in the above, come and prove it here, in unmoderated topic. But until that you, Crypto, are a lier.

Yes, but only if your wallet computer has a real IP address accessible from the outside (from any other internet servers).

- Make a new receiving address called mn1 (not mandatory, but useful).
- Send exactly 1000 DAC to this address and wait for at least one confirmation.
- After single confirmation in the debug console type 'masternode outputs' - you've got collateral tx hash and index (usually 0 or 1)
- In the same console type 'masternode genkey' to get a masternode key.
- Edit masternode.conf file (you may open it using Tools menu or any editor) and add a new line by template provided:

mn1 your-ip-address:56000     masternodekey collateral-tx-hash collateral-tx-index

Here mn1 is any alias, usually the same as your mn address label from step 1, but can be any string.
your-ip-address is your wallet address accessible from outside.
56000 is DACash main port number.
masternodekey is the result of getnkey command.
collateral-tx-hash and index are results of outputs command.

- Save masternode.conf.
- Edit dacash.conf and add two lines:

masternode=1
masternodeprivkey=masternodekey # The same key as above, result of genkey command

- Save dacash.conf
- Close and restart wallet.
- After sync you should see your masternode on masternodes tab (enable tab in options if not shown)
- After you have at least 15 confirmations of collateral tx, start your masternode. It should change to PRE_ENABLED.
- In 15 minutes it should become ENABLED.

To be sure that your masternode will work, check that its port accessible from outside.
https://networkappers.com/tools/open-port-checker

Enter your IP address and port 56000, it should report that it is open. If it is not, your masternode will expire soon, you need more tweaks to make it working.  If you are behind NAT, you have to do some more changes (forward port and maybe some others - depending on your router model, but that is outside of this short guide).

Hope it helps. Same is applicable to almost any other masternode coin.

Wonder how many coins/day you think is "profitable and attractive" to be happy? For me it depends on the actual price which still is unknown. If a coin cost 0.00000015 BTC, then 1 DAC is nothing, and masternodes at 10000-50000 coins are quite affordable. But what if cost is 0.0001 BTC or even 0.01 BTC?

I have no personal plans to revive it, but for those who concerned (Discord channel was removed):

Here is a working DesignCoin blockchain explorer which is in sync with Graviex exchange node.

It still may be traded, and if you need some boot nodes, the explorer has a network page with a hundred of active nodes listed.

Here is a 3rd party DSN explorer with masternodes page.

Some screenshots

Supported coins with blockchain statistics and profit calculators. More info is available by hovering over the coin:



Regional servers:



Select coin and mode for your worker. Currently selected is a private mining group:



Pool statistics (check hash rates for every coin and mining mode):



Single account statistics:



Of course, there are many other info on the pool. Just click login via link in the upper right corner and start exploring!

Let me introduce a new mining pool with many unique features you have never seen before: CoMining.io.

Some of CoMining.io features:

• single address and port for all supported coins
• SOLO/PPLNT/GROOPS (private pools) mining modes for all supported coins
• instant switch to a new coin/mining mode via web interface
• coin/mode selection based on worker name (few workers may mine different coins)
• no need to change miners/rigs configuration to switch coins/modes
• no need to restart your miners/rigs to switch coin/modes
• instant addition of new coins for all modes (SOLO/PPLNT/GROUP)
• new coin may be added by your request in minutes, just point to the site/source and ask admin
• mine first, add wallet address later - start mine new coins ASAP
• full support for NiceHash mining (EthereumStratum protocol and high diff are supported)
• low 1% fee for all coins and mining modes with referral system
• JSON API for controlling pool options remotely (profit switchers are in your hands)
• pool servers all around the Globe (US, EU, RU, Asia servers)
• very popular for solo mining of new coins at low difficulty

At the moment it supports ETHash coins only. Other protocols are coming soon.

FEATURES EXPLAINED

Single address and port for all coins

This pool has unique feature: single miner/rig configuration for all coins. You login to the pool using Google account (Facebook and others are coming) and receive unique account ID. Then you setup your rigs using one address and port with your ID as a wallet address. Rig names (workers) are mandatory to start mining since you have to assign a coin to mine via web interface to every worker. In drop-down menu for worker you select which coin this worker should mine, will it be a SOLO or PPLNT or GROUP (see below about private groups). That's all. You may also set a default coin for new workers. If no default was set, you should add coin for every worker to start mining.

Instant coin/mode change

If you want to switch one or more of your workers to another coin, you don't have to change configs or restart miners. Just login to the pool, choose your workers and select a coin/mode from drop-down list. Your workers will switch instantly to the new coin, miners receive new DAG and new job for new coin, no config change or restart is necessary.

New coins added often, also by your request

New coins are usually added very quickly. If you know about new coin just launched or to be launched soon - just tell admin. New coins may usually be added in few minutes, and all 3 mining modes (SOLO/PPLNT/GROUPS) are provided. Then you switch your workers to mine this coin when difficulty is low and enjoy looking how it rises in few hours. Be an early bird.

Mine first, add wallet last

All mined coins are assigned to your pool ID. You may start mining ASAP and don't waste time looking for a wallet address. After you mined some coins, you may add one or more wallet addresses later (no expiration, even next year) and enable it to withdraw. Start mining new coins now, add wallet later.

Mining groups (private pools)

You hate pool hoppers. But now you can have your own private pool to mine with your friends. To do so you create a private mining group and set coin for it. Then you select a distribution mode inside of the group. It can either be PROP or PPLNT. Then you may invite your friends by adding their IDs to the group. Friends can select your group from the same list as normal SOLO/PPLNT coins. All blocks mined by a group will be distributed within that group. Since it is invite-only, you will have a private pool with no pool hoppers.

Pool servers all around the Globe

This pool provides few servers in US, EU, RU and Asia regions.

Full NiceHash support

Poll is fully compatible with NiceHash. Besides of high difficulty, it also supports EthereumStratum protocol (-esm 3 in Claymore Dual miner). This protocol supports extranonce parameter which guarantees unique jobs for all pool workers with no work duplication. Other stratum modes have no such guarantee. This mode is recommended but not mandatory.

JSON API

You have total control on your mining. By adding some simple scripts you may not only check your progress, but also switch coins based on your wishes. Some may select a most profitable coins (the pool provides you the info), some other want to mine coins with lowest difficulty. The ways are countless, and you are in control. Switch coins based on your criteria, not one of the pool owner.

Best practices

This pool is a bit different from many others. But it was written from the ground and has many have never seen features.

It has been running just few months but it is very popular now due to its low time to add new coins. New coins are added often, and you even can request to add new one. Then you may start mining in SOLO mode what most miners prefer while difficulty is low or use PPLNT as most pool do. For instance this pool mined Callisto (CLO) when its difficulty was few MH (yes, MH - do you believe it?) - now it is 17.5 TH...

Ethereum mining notes

Some people try to mine ETH on it and wonder why there are no blocks for long time. The answer is that the pool is young and did not exist when ETH was rising. Since it had no advertisements yet, the pool ETH hash rate is low, and Ethereum blocks are rare. Mine even in PPLNT with low hash rate means almost mine solo. So, when you want to mine high difficulty coins - check the pool stats to see how many miners are mining the same coin at what hash rate. All other coins are usually relatively ease to mine and can be mined even solo.

About me

I am not a pool admin, just a miner. If you think this post was useful for you, please use my referral link to login to the pool. No doubt you will like all these features as I like them.

If you have any questions, please ask me, I am always ready to help.

These coins (as well as many other MNs coins) are examples of Ponzi or Pyramid schemes which are illegal in most countries. If it happened to you to be on the top of pyramid does not mean everyone will be so happy in the end.

Bitcoin provided the 1st cryptocurrency and introduced the blockchain. Ethereum provides the fuel for smart contracts. Dash invented the community governance model and widely supported. So they add a real value. But coins like Crop or BePay provide nothing revolutionary new except well-known fraudulent schemes. And those who will be last, will pay for your success.

This topic is not about coins, BTW, if you ever read it.

In Bitcoin, every feature serves to a particular purpose. In these coins every new "feature" serves the only one: attract newcomers to the coin. Let's have a look:

1) Masternode one click setup.

In DASH masternodes serve to the network providing a lot of functions. Some of them are: InstantSend, PrivateSend, Governance. These services are necessary to work 24/7/365, and masternodes are paid for these services.

In CropPay (and most of other clones) masternodes are only way to earn money. They still can do PrivateSend and InstantSend. but Governance is not used (and even does not exist in that old code). Many people know what the Dash Governance is? Masternode operators VOTE for independent developers offers and if most voted for a feature, the originator of request is paid by a network without any airdrops or gifts. This means that masternode operators should vote. How many people who use "one click setup" will do that? How does it help to network?

2) Tiered masternodes.

They have no service to the network at all. They only provide undefined emission since no one knows how many of each kind will exist. Do you think that random emission is good for a coin? They only serve to make entrance cheaper. But this is only to make money, not to provide network services including governance.

3) HODLbank.

There are other coins which introduce it. One example is PegasCoin with its DOB (Deposits On Blockchain), where you can freeze some amount for some fixed time, and get interest on that. But PGC has a lot of code to provide that. There is no any real use to the network from that feature. It is almost the same as staked coins, where you can stop it at any time.

It was said that CROP has a kind of escrow address where most dev premined coins were held. As you see, there is no any support for escrow in the code, and there is nothing which prevented full dump of that address.

4) Undefined emission.

The only one way to change it is to change the code and make a fork. This way was tested on CROP when after 20 coins it was raised to 100, then changed again. It was said that "community will vote for best rewards". But when was time to release, and many (including me) asked "when will we vote for it", the answer from cropdev was: "We set the best rewards", and no any vote was conducted.

So the only way to change it is the arbitrary decision of one person, the "dev". Do you think it will help to make a coin popular when at any time you may find it was forked a week ago and all your latest coins are not spendable? That exactly what happened with many CROP holders. Do you think Bitcoin was so popular if it changed blockchain parameters once a week or month?

ALL THESE tricks are to attract people who wants to make money. In that case the CropPay is the best of most shitcoins around. But if you think these coins may be used for long term investment, you are blind.

First, thank you for the answer. Just because not too easy to find people who can stand behind his words and argue with some facts.

Funny that you did not reply in the coin thread to legit questions "which exchanges have it for trading", "when promised Binance listing will occur" and "should I buy the coin now". Sure not because it is SPAM/FUD, but because you knew it will be removed instantly (and my questions were removed in 5 minutes). So you replied in non-moderated topic instead.

Here is the deleted message:


In your reply you made an assumption that I lost money with CROP. CROP was my 2nd masternode coin, so I was not experienced on entry. When I entered this, I looked mostly on the instant ROI as most of newcomers do. When I realised that this coin is a purely speculative one, I had some coins bought at high price (early on the start at 39000 satoshi). I was trying to do everything I could to keep it running at good price. When found that the coin has issues from old codebase to support (missing explorer, missing dev team, bad dev attitude), I offered some help like providing automated builds for all platforms ("just give me missing source images"), making a FAQ in my section, etc. It was completely ignored or censored (removed) since I asked too many questions and exposed weak issues.

Then I start trying to recover money from it. I spent a month helping people on discord, made an explorer when the only one was broken after hard fork and neither "dev" nor his contracted coder were online at critical time, I made a page with masternode stats, and I was trading at the same time. So finally I even made some money and exited at 6000 sat price and some profit. So I haven't lost a cent on it and also learned a lot.

No problem with CropPayDev that he runs SCAM coins by definition. The issue is that he lies people around. I don't like when people are not informed what they should expect. I exited well, but many others at high losses. So this thread was not started by me, but it has a purpose to warn newcomers (like I was a month ago) to be careful.

I don't care much that CropDev made at least 500,000 USD on CROP. What I care is he promises features which will never be delivered. CROP will never have marketplace (just no need when BTC fees are at $0.02 now), neither listed at Binance as promised. BytePay will never have HODLbank just because it is nonsense. The dev dumps all premine from coin and starts making another one. He doesn't need any hold/lock features for his coins. And people already have stakes which is a kind of bank interest. So all those tiered masternodes and hodlbanks are pure marketing bullshit. Quite successful one, I must admire.

So you are absolutely correct that this coin may be used to make profit (as many others). And actually CROP is one of successful projects, I never said the other. But for long-term hold it is not the coin to keep and expect a brilliant future. As much as this is truth, the same truth is that BytePayDev lies that he has no relation to CropCoinDev - too much coincidences can't occur. And the goal for this thread is to show people that he lies.

People still tell me that he uses my name on discord to put into mud. He tells I demanded some ransom from him. But that is pure lie, and it was never confirmed by a single screenshot. That is not the behaviour which a good dev team should expose. That IS the real issue between me and him: I hate liars.

It is perfectly fine when people make money on this knowing that it is a Ponzi or Pyramid schema coin. But please call it like yet another one masternode coin. I like the attitude which Nikonium (NUKO) developers use: "This is a coin with no value made for education, don't expect much from it". It still is being traded very well, and no one tells that he was fooled. That is what I accept.

So this is not the fight with a coin, it is the fight with the liar who removes everything undesired instead of giving explanation a bit better than "they are haters and blackmailers asking for ransom".

Don't you agree?

Can't agree with that: he is NOT an idiot. He does exactly what he wants: he makes money. And here he is very good.

CryptoExpose,

everyone has own expectations 

Everyone knows that CrapPayDev offers airdrops for positive talks on BitcoinTalk and Discord. That is ok if not being moderated.

The purpose of this thread is not to stop anybody from holding or trading crop or bypay. As it was said many times, everyone can make a lot of money on this. The purpose is to make investors well informed what stands behind, and why these coins are the high risk investment (even being a profitable one). The are good short-term, but in the long run there is nothing behind, apart from a mystic BEPAY HODLbank which I believe never happens, same as promised CROP marketplace... To do this should be a real TEAM.

It was funny to see how that "dev" asked for id from a community member (see the link above). If there is anyone besides him in his "team", why not use his id then? Don't you think it looks very funny? Or maybe he has no team at all?

Every statement in this thread has proof links which everyone can check. Difficult to say the same about the original thread, see questions above.

More questions: it was said on crop discord that after tiered masternodes go live, crop will be listed on Binance ($100,000 worth for the listing) using premined coins. I have no crops but still wonder WHEN I see it there... Or maybe recent massive CROP dump was to get BTC for the listing?

And finally, the FUD word now is being used by everyone, and if you say something unpleasant to the thread/channel owner, it is easy to tell you spread the FUD. But look at what the FUD actually means (Wikipedia). It is Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. In this thread there is no any Uncertainty and Doubt. Instead, it provides you with a lot of information and facts which you can and should check if concerned. It is quite certain about these facts, and there is no any doubt that almost every fact here everyone can verify. As for the Fear, then maybe. But the purpose of the thread is to provide a lot of background information so everyone who invests, does it with full understanding and without fear. If you still have concerns, check, investigate and make a well informed decision. That's it.

The answer is simple, and I never hid it:


And also:


You should ask my order table to see, there is nothing to hide (actual price is around 1000 satoshi):


Yes, I mined (not bought) 151 BEPAY coins (arcpool and a little 0.1 at another one), and even set buy orders of high amounts of BEPAY at few satoshi for the total of 0.00763884 BTC ($65 USD) which remaining after I sold some Cerberus coins from low cost CBS masternode. Not a big investment and I agreed: it probably will never happen. And if I wanted to hide this, I would use another login on CB.



At the same time I never wrote ANY SINGLE word to Bytepaydev except on this forum. Maybe other demanded something from him, I don't know.
Unlike him, who is proven to be the same as cropcoindev, but insists on opposite:


So actually you, CropPayDev, added nothing new, and did not reveal anything I said wrong. Right?

But the final thought of all my messages always was:

• I said I have no single CROP now, and that is truth (last donated was sold 2 weeks ago).
• I never said I have no single BEPAY, and that is truth (I mined and have 151 coin).
• No one said you can't make money of it. You CAN make money on every coin. But should be aware of all details.
• Never invest in crypto more than you can afford to lose. My $65 is the price I value this coin. And not going to invest more.

So, junk price for the junk coin (and $65 are not invested yet, probably never happens). And unrealistic sell price for 151 coins is because I consider them lost (the rule above). But shit happens, and they can be sold one day, who knows...

The main idea of this thread was that:

• The premine for CROP was dumped, this dropped price from 39000 satoshi (I bought my CROP MN at) to 5000 now.
• The premine for BEPAY is 4% vs 2% for CROP.
• Both coins have the same founder (see the thread) who still says they are different people/teams (decide for yourself is it truth or not).
• His team still has no OWN blockchain explorers. Two known (for crop and bepay) are run by this service (link) where all explorers are on the same IP address (ping and check). I think that CropPayDev has no explorer source to run on own site (while no problem to give it own domain name).
• His HODLbank has no any code to lock coins like escrow. They are locked as long as he wants they are there. Be aware, though, that explorer service can add any label to any address. So if you see one day "HODLbank" at explorer site, it is nothing else but text label for an address.

Anyway, he learns lessons. At least, he now has explorers (made at the same time for both coins). He has masternode stats also made at the same time (so I can finally shutdown mine). He has a nice looking site for bepay (I like its moving network)... The last he needs is to stop lying people about different teams, and all will be good! Maybe it will be the next lesson learned by him?

I was not going to post anything, all was already said. But I hate when someone lies to me.

Bytepaydev (aka kevinmark1) wrote me on Discord in PM that he has nothing common with cropcoindev (aka jhonson222) and demanded to remove FUD from my site. He also stated on forum that Bytepay just forked CropCoin.

Please compare two messages from two "unrelated" developers on forum and make own opinion. Pay attention to the:
- whole pattern (Hi, message, thanks)
- missing spaces around full stops in almost every message (Hi.Text.Thanks)

You may compare more messages in both threads (crop, bepay) not trusting me.

Do you still think they are different people?
Are you still ready to invest in something, whose author lies you?
Regardless, you may make money from it, but be aware of it.

This is the distinguishing feature of these projects - negligence to detail.

Looking at the goals, yes.

But since I am a tech guy, I look deeper and was surprised how bad it was established, and how easy was to buy its coins to be hooked. 99% of people do not look at this until they have issues. And then they start asking, and then...

So better be informed now, than regret later. At least, people know what they should look at to make an informed decision.

GreenPanda,

playing with the crop code a lot to find out what can I do to help fixing it, I found around 4 kinds of code most of coins are based upon. It uses the oldest one, there are few others. Now just looking at the source, I can tell you which issues I might expect from that code. But it does not even include the overall project look and support level. I would never invest in a project which can't run own blockchain explorer. This was my 1st MN experience, and I've learnt a lot. Now is time to go ahead and don't look back.

Still, I just wanted to warn new users what they should expect from this new "project" since I know internals. They still can invest and make a lot of money. But they should be aware of no future for this coin after dump just because there is nothing behind it, JAM (Just Another Masternode).

No-no-no!

Let's compare with Cerberus (since I run it's masternode, I know that code). It is MUCH better from tech (source code) point of view. Let me show some differences:

• Cerberus has own explorer http://exp.cerberuscoin.com. It is 15 minute task to install, but crop did not bother doing that at all.
• Cerberus has all 3 platform GUI wallets released https://github.com/cerberuscore/Cerberus/releases.
• Cerberus has full source code with configure/auto-tools build system to build for all 3 major platforms. I personally built the Mac distribution for my MacBook Pro and confirm that it is easily buildable.
• Compare sources for Cerberus https://github.com/cerberuscore/cerberus, CropCoin https://github.com/Cropdev/CropDev and BytePay https://github.com/bytepaydev/Bytepay. That is exactly what I meant saying that CROP/BEPAY uses very old and problematic codebase which doesn't allow you to build GUI unless you add something extra from other projects (actually just images and string resources, but WTF do not add them if you are dev and not "dev"?)
• Cerberus has no issues with masternode payments. Crop and similar coins had them a lot, but due to work by Sergio (the real contractor-coder used by crop "dev") they were fixed somehow. Still, try "masternode winners" command and you find that there is an empty list for both Crop and BePay, and populated list for Cerberus.

All this neither Crop nor BePay has.

From SCAM point of view I do not argue. But, at least, a new code could be taken for new coin, and since that "dev" can't "dev", he uses and reuses the same crappy code which no one of new coins use. Again, doing a new coin for the real use why base the development on a very old codebase and then lie on public that "90% of coins use the same code"? The answer was given above: premine, MN sale, dump with least efforts.