If you use escrow I would like to sell amazon.de cards bought offline in the store.

I bought one of the rdp:
Very friendly seller, who offers a great customer support.
RDP: It works as described. There are a little more than 9 GB left on your drive.

Thank you for the detailled answer.
So, whole traffic for a VPN/proxy would be 15GB per month, or I have I missed any detail?

Hi,

this sounds interesting. What is the total/monthly transferlimit and can I use this 24/7/365, or limtited time? RDP/VPN/Proxy possible?

Short review about the service after 5 hours testing:

My first test was with Win 10 from middle europe. I only tested the win-software, that offers a vpn-solution and not the browser-plugin.

With my first speed tests I thought it is a normal service compared with other vpn-providers I use at the moment. From my 100 mbit I got about 50-55 mbit with the servers from .nl .de and also from .ru. This is an experience I have also with mullvad and ivpn with servers in the same country (not .ru). But after changing the protocol from udp to tcp (what slows down my connection with other providers) I got really great speed with 83 mbit at the .nl server and .72 mbit at the .de server. To change protocol you have to change the connection mode from default to backup. Even in the stealth-mode I get higher speeds with the servers. => Speed is really good compared with ivpn and mullvad and is similar to the speed I get with airvpn.

What will be interesting is, how it is able to connect with a very restrictive firewall. I can test this in two days at a company I work. If interested, I can write the results. At this company I have no chance with the normal openvpn-setup, and with the most clients I tried, it worked not with pptp, ipsec, only with sstp.

Back to the software: It is simple designed, but it has the features you need (what would be good, but is not essential: actual speed, speed diagram, autmatically ping tests to find the best server, overview over the traffic at the servers, or: look at the airvpn-client). The IP-leak-protection works as it should be. I tested it with changing AP, lost wifi and fresh wakeup from sleepmode. It only needs a few seconds to restart, but in the meantime all traffic is blocked. Only thing, what could be done better: With the software viscosity I do not loose the connection after a short wifi disconnect, with windscribe it needs some seconds to reconnect.

After this short time testing:

Software and server speed are great. It performs better than ivpn, mullvad and similar to airvpn, at the moment a little faster than airvpn. From this site it is a must have. Only problem: This is not an old company with a lot of experience in the community how they protect their customers. The jurisdiction is a 5-eyes-country and in this business you need a good reputation and trust. But time will show.

Your Website and your description was not detailled enough. You never said which part of the chain are your servers. Now I understand your concept. If you look at the concept of JonDonym, they own all servers in the chain and that was the reason why I asked about it.

But if you only control the exit-server the cascade before is the "public" I2P-network with all the performance-issues. It is more secure, because I really do not have to trust you, the only thing you can do, is to combine username with visited sites, but you can not see my IP.

I would like to test the speed and software. Please PM me and I will send some monex.

Thank you very much for this statement. 

Back to the concept: Do I understand your concept, that you own the entry- and exit-points? So I think it is the same marketing as "multihop" vpn-providers, which solves some problems, but not the main problem: You need to trust the operator.

For example: If you look at the FAQs from Jondonym: https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/faq-jondo.html#1b
"A Mix Operator can only determine a relationship between the incoming and outgoing connections to his mix server and must, in fact, do this to ensure that the data packets were correctly transferred. If the user uses a mix cascade consisting of more than one independently run mix, the mix oerator of one single mix in the chain cannot determine a relationship between the user and the websites visited. For this reason, we especially point out that the "Dresden" mix cascade is for test purposes and is run solely by members of the TU Dresden. Whoever uses this cascade is protected from external observation, but the TU Dresden could theoretically observe everything."

But it could be, that I do not understand your concept correct. Can you please explain the difference to this Jondonym, or TOR?

frei

Hi Pkzone,

your service sounds really interesting. I have two questions:

- Speed: At the moment I use two different vpn-providers and chain them with an openvpn-tunnel in a openvpn-tunnel. The speed drop is from 80 MBit to 50 Mbit, which is OK for me, because I route through 2 different countries. Did you make any speedtests?

- Security: You write, that your service is more secure, because: "we log but what will we get from logging OpenVPN servers, all we see in your log is: “Client from 127.0.0.1 connected to 127.0.0.1”, it’s because that we use I2P and I2P provides you with anonymity." (http://exooqgycf4hbfevw.onion.link/for-geeks/)
But you have the control of all the servers, so I think it is possible for you and your team to get a connection from the real IP to the exit IP, or?

But if you need an additional customer: PM me, I would like to test your service (and have enough BTC)
You have here at the forum not a lot of feedback Why do you not discuss your servie/idea at https://www.reddit.com/r/VPN/ ?

frei