 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
|
Don't try to act like you are some kind of genuine regular person raising your various purported nonsense concerns.
have you been feeding journalists with bad info..... have you taken trolling to the next level?
Your love is fading, I can feel your love fading, Gentlemen, it is fading away from me. Because your touch, your touch has grown cold, as if someone else controls your very soul. (Could it be Nyarlathotep?) Disheartening. |
|
|
|
start worrying if the price goes below $400 and especially if it stays below $400 for any significant period of time..
Anything above $500 is bullish because it's only a little over a month ago that the price went above $500 for the second time since September 2014.
Exactly! We're probably going into 500s, but I'm OK with that  You gentlemen completely restored my confidence; now I'm not worried at all |
|
|
|
Anything above $500 is bullish because it's only a little over a month ago that the price went above $500 for the second time since September 2014.
Exactly! We're probably going into 500s, but I'm OK with that |
|
|
|
For those who are not updated to the bitcoin price well I just post these for additional information of others And now it reached again the barrier of $700 in https://www.bitstamp.net/ And the current price now is $702.94 as what we expect it will increase and increase until the halving. So come on just wait and relax. It will reach its highest price this time.  Cheers! Thanks for the tip, OP, my longs just got liquidated @ $655. |
|
|
|
Crosspost. Because explains our current price predicament  Doesn't explain shit. The article is a miss-mash of bullshit piled upon bullshit, and even likely purposefully misaligned connections in terms of timelines, causative effects and creating incorrect associations. The current price correction likely does not have anything to do with any of the items stated in the article, and bitcoin was likely due for a correction, since the price had shot up from $630 to $705 in the past few days. Looks like it's shooting back down |
|
|
|
Didn't realize he's still posting (not so much in here anymore though). Always felt he was wrong on a number of things in here, stubbornly so unfortunately, but still added the occasional insight, and quite some rigor when it came to modeling (DAE dino graphs?). Agreed. It's funny though, that somebody who is the opposite of bitcoin's economical values target audience, and is "extremely sceptical" of it, is arguing to make it into something more of his liking. Such hubris, much faceplant... >somebody who is the opposite of bitcoin's economical values target audience What's "bitcoin's economical values target audience"? For that matter, what's "economical values"? Did you mean "economical" as "like economic, but makes people giggle"? (Think using "tragical" in place of "tragic," e.g. "Bitcoin's tankening to $650 a few minutes ago was quite tragical.") Roughly put, I would say that it is people who like dislike inflationary money. Of course there are other properties of bitcoin that some people might value, but I believe the 21M is the crux. Please spare me the technical "but bitcoin will be inflationary x more years" nitpicking. As far as economical goes, not everybody lives in an English-speaking country Lambsie, but good for you that you can still giggle about something like that. >Roughly put, I would say that it is people who like dislike inflationary money. So people who don't have a clue about economics, or why the world economy works exclusively on fiat currencies? >there are other properties of bitcoin that some people might value, but I believe the 21M is the crux. Feel free to invest in BBQ coin. Or Beanies, for that matter. The value of both depends on artificial scarcity. >not everybody lives in an English-speaking country Sure. And that's why I see it as my noblesse oblige to educate the underprivileged. P.S. New low hit as I type. How tragical |
|
|
|
Didn't realize he's still posting (not so much in here anymore though). Always felt he was wrong on a number of things in here, stubbornly so unfortunately, but still added the occasional insight, and quite some rigor when it came to modeling (DAE dino graphs?). Agreed. It's funny though, that somebody who is the opposite of bitcoin's economical values target audience, and is "extremely sceptical" of it, is arguing to make it into something more of his liking. Such hubris, much faceplant... >somebody who is the opposite of bitcoin's economical values target audience What's "bitcoin's economical values target audience"? For that matter, what's "economical values"? Did you mean "economical" as "like economic, but makes people giggle"? (Think using "tragical" in place of "tragic," e.g. "Bitcoin's tankening to $650 a few minutes ago was quite tragical.")  |
|
|
|
TL;DR Bitcoin Uncensored hosts face legal action over Perianne Boring interview. Slow news day.  Bitcoin enthusiasts stick it to The Man by alienating Big Business and needlessly making another enemy. More at 11. |
|
|
|
|
^WTF was that? Why does the recorder app on my shitty phone have better production values than that ... whatever that is? Had speakers on, soon as that Benny Hill music kicked in at, like +20dB, panicked; tried to close the page, to get that helpful Clippy pop-up "are you sure you want to navigate from this page?" pop-up all the malware sites use.
Technologists! Why not at least put it up on YouTube?
Is there a TL;DR? Stupid woman says stupid things about stupid things?
|
|
|
|
^Timely, and topical. Much journalisms. Just the facts, Ma'am. I realize some parvenu douche serial entrepreneur and technologist Andreas M. Pumpendumpolos extolling the virtues of our digital gold is far more newsworthy, but I take the good with the bad |
|
|
|
Bears like you failed to grab cheap btc and now they are trying to bring down btc price by any means. This article is bullshit. Its author is someone from Mike Hern`s camp. Btc`s growth is unstoppable. You seem to think bears are the opposite of holders, which they're not. Real bears will do the opposite of what you think they do -- they *help* you pump the shit out of BTC, feed your mania, and only when your hysterical optimism crescendoes & BTC crests? That's the ideal entry point for shorts. |
|
|
|
As i am from country where bitcoin is stated to be a illegal currency so, its ok to earn form small services and signature campaign here and hold my bitcoins ?
I need some suggestions ?
I love bitcoin and i can't leave it !
1. Never ask strangers from the internet for legal advice. 2. No, it's probably not legal, but without knowing which country you're from, it's hard to tell. 3. You'll probably be fine unless you run around in I <3 BTC T-shirts, and stopping people in the street to sell them your bitcoins. 4. Feel free to ignore (2) & (3), because (1) |
|
|
|
the miners and the big exchangers are forming a gang. so, BTC belongs to them.
"Gang" is such a loaded word. The miners are free to cooperate with each other and with exchange owners. No racketeering laws in Bitcoin, that's outmoded statist thinking. If cooperation serves the miner's rational self-interest (maximizes their monetary profit$), that's what they should do. cartels(biz gang) means monopoly and price manipulation. this is what is happening. all the BTC trades are manipulated. if you are good with this then it's without ...words Of course unregulated markets are manipulated, that's why anti-monopoly laws (i.e. intrusive government regulations interfering with free market) were created by adults NannyState in the first place. The whole point of Bitcoin is to make it impossible for jackbooted statist thugs to interfere with the divine workings of teh Invisible Hand via threats of violence. Bitcoin is working exactly as it was meant to, which is to say becoming a plaything of the rich expressing the will of the Economic Majority |
|
|
|
the miners and the big exchangers are forming a gang. so, BTC belongs to them.
"Gang" is such a loaded word. The miners are free to cooperate with each other and with exchange owners. No racketeering laws in Bitcoin, that's outmoded statist thinking. If cooperation serves the miner's rational self-interest (maximizes their monetary profit$), that's what they should do. |
|
|
|
Re BTC [...] Everything is going according to schedule, so to speak
It's sure isn't going according to what the Chinese miners thought was the the schedule. But you're not wrong, so to speak. |
|
|
|
Other than hodling impressive sums of BTC, what, precisely, could these people do? I mean, they can tank the market price by dumping their coins (hurts them as much as it hurts anyone else), or order way too much pizza for the pool owners they don't like... Anything else? |
|
|
|
Interestingly, garbage collection is one of the more intricate problems in many computing systems.
XD
I remember something about zombies, orphans, children, orphan zombie children... I had to kill, but couldn't kill zombies... *nix is creepy and depressing @BlindMayorBitcorn: About 15 times. In my life (excluding stuff that I mentioned). |
|
|
|
My forum rank is irrelevant. You and your alt may have been spamming up this forum for years, scratching out penny shavings (which you turn around and lose to the same gambling sites you pimp), but this don't turn your shit into Shinola.
Please stay on topic, or better still, delete your post and spam some other sub.
Your forum rank is very much relevant. You are brand new this forum and your insulting people who have been here for years. Are you telling me that years of whoring yourself out to gambling websites and shitting up this forum with signature spam has earned you the right to post off-topic replies & insult new users? I respectfully disagree. |
|
|
|
What a load of shit. Must try harder young shill.
Here you are, scratching out a few satoshis by shilling shit gambling sites in your signature and avatar (what's it like, whoring yourself out for chump change?), and you got the nerve to call someone else a shill  Unless you have something more than your eye-raping ads & feeble ad hominems to add to the thread, please refrain from posting in the future. He is a hero with over 600 activity, your a newbie with 14. Just by looking at his activity and rank, you can tell he contributed a lot more to the forum than you. You need to get out. Also, 777 coin pays pretty damn well to their hero members. First, take your signature spamming elsewhere, you are doing the same shit the other signature whore was reprehended for: Contributing nothing of substance and whoring a sig. Spamming your sig all over the forum is not contributing, it's pretty much the opposite of contributing. You are a newbie who has done nothing be insult people for no reason. Someone with common sense posted a reply, and you went off topic talking about his signature. My forum rank is irrelevant. You and your alt may have been spamming up this forum for years, scratching out penny shavings (which you turn around and lose to the same gambling sites you pimp), but this don't turn your shit into Shinola. Please stay on topic, or better still, delete your post and spam some other sub. |
|
|
|
|
