Of course this is a scam. Look at it. They've made NOTHING. The total number of coins is gonna be huge. (it's already huge)
The pitfalls of their idea of parallel processing are too big to ignore.
The whole point of the blockchain is that every miner/computer in the network is working on the same chain, as to verify everything again and again.
If you try to do this parallel... Well, just thing about it. It's no longer a blockchain, but multiple chains.

I've done a lot of threaded C++ programming using Qt libraries. And I can tell you one thing, doing things parallel opens a ton of new problems.
The vulnerabilities will be everywhere.
And seeing that they haven't even made it? I can only say, stay away!

The only thing EOS is, as of know. Is a huge collection of fancy words.
Words I'm not even sure they understand themselves. I would love to see an explanation of how they're gonna program this.
Not all these fancy words, but actual documentation on how the parallel processing is gonna work.

Because I think they have no intention of actually doing it.
Most likely all your money will be gone, and nothing will be made.

Last thing I want to say is this.
I'm 100% for decentralization. But this is not decentralization guys!

They want to centralize everything in EOS. That's centralization!!!
I don't understand how people buy into this.
It must be because most people do not understand how a computer works.

I am developing a miner monitor in C++ using Qt framework! Call it overkill if you want, but it uses virtually no resources. I've added support for EWBF api just a few minutes ago. (not yet on github, will add tonight or tomorrow.) And I'm looking into Claymore api now, so I'll start by looking at your JS
It's still early development, but it works. My program is here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1905294

I've been looking at zpool.ca api, and it doesn't look like it has support for current miner hashrate.
However if you have som addresses I can check with? There's no public list on the pool, like it usually is.

You can donate from inside my program.. But I'll add donation addressed to the first post

Binary and source updated to v0.0.2 with dwardpool support.. I'll look into zpool.ca next..

I'll look into dwarfpool now.. Does it have an API? If so it shouldn't be too hard..

reserved.

Hello every one!

I've had some trouble recently where my miner was mining, but the pool didn't register.
I lost hours of mining time, in total it amounts to days, even when I thought the miner was running.
Since computers are meant to work for us, I created a watch guard that never sleeps.

Introducing...

MinerWatch v0.0.2
Made with C++ using Qt5, virtually no computer resource consumption.

Minerwatch checks your chosen worker's hashrate by sending a API call to your pool.
Minerwatch then puts the hashrate received from the pool neatly into a chart.
You can then see your hashrate live, and all the way back to when MinerWatch was started.
It will automatically restart your miner when it is bellow or equal to chosen hashrate.
When you start your miner, it will wait 10 minutes before a low-hashrate trigger will restart miner.

Any miner should work considering these conditions are met:
- start from .exe
- .bat file in single line format: <program> <arg1> <arg2> <arg3> etc..

Currently supports these pools/coins combinations:
- Nanopool ZCash and Ethereum
- Ethpool ethereum
- v0.0.2 added dwarfpool eth and zec

Windows 32bit binary: http://s000.tinyupload.com/index.php?file_id=78544909251193418632
Source code: https://github.com/stibog/MinerWatch/
Program should work in Linux too, but I haven't compiled it yet.

Screenshot of program:


If you like my program, and it earns you extra coins, please consider to donate.
Donations will go to making more code. I'm also working on a Qt based ZCash wallet, and a Qt based Poloniex interface.

BTC - 16YhAJTpepry3UNezXmHxGGASYKo31csao
ZEC - t1ZdNd3DB6JDznisbNhHxuEK5kyEF5G5avV
ETH - 0x1B74929CaEB99cF17FD603F734ccE9Df9b752Bd7

What pool are you mining on now? And what results did you get with your test?

I've been mining on coinmine.pl for a long time. Seeing the earnings being quite the same as calculated earnings on cryptocompare, mostly they've actually been higher.
The last three days I've received less than half my normal daily earnings. (calculated from the HIGHEST daily network hashrate)
I expect there to be variance, but more than half of my normal earnings gone? Some days I've even had 3x what I've had the last days.
So yesterday I decided to check if there's a difference between coinmine and nanopool in payouts.

I let my 1070 gtx OC (450 sol) mine on nanopool, and my 1060 6gb OC (306sol) mine on coinmine.

Then I took the last 24 hour results and divided by 450 and 306 respectively.
The results are as follows:

Coinmine : 0,00057049 ZEC per 24 hours, for each SOL hashrate.
Nanopool : 0,00078567 ZEC per 24 hours, for each SOL hashrate.

306 SOL currently equals:
Mined/day
ZEC 0.02965
And the last 24 hours I got 0.014xx ZEC from having the 1060 6gb running undisturbed.
I feel there's something fishy going on!

Coinmine payed me 27,3% less than Nanopool.
Please everyone do your own tests. My uncle has also had his payments reduced significantly the last few days. I've totally lost my trust in this pool.