True adoption . This seems like a realllly nice example of a project that has a true purpose in utilizing the blockchain .

Glipp project entered the startup competition :
https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@libertarianec/blockchain-platform-waves-launches-startup-competition-within-icohub-org-incubator
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1tF4geg1ihc3Of6lK3-dovyHK0uOIkAKR6Ecj7cwip7c/edit#gid=0

I read that WavesGO team helped him burn his tokens .

Glipp was a verified token on 23th of june 2017 : https://mobile.twitter.com/xenohuntero/status/878256107486986240

He also said WavesGO team was helping him with his website .


So probably waves/wavesGO team knows more about this project and the person/team behind it ?

If you happen to own Waves , you can earn some money by Leasing to our Blue Magic Waves node .

Leasing means you give more power to a Full Node to Mine/Forge blocks .
For Waves owners , leasing is a simple process (see Howto on our site) . Also , you keep 100% control of your funds while leasing .
WCT token drops will keep coming in too , just like it would be when not leasing .

The one and only difference compared to not leasing : leasers earn Waves tokens and MRT (Miner reward tokens)

So all i can say is :
On your mark . Get set … Lease ! Wink


More info on our website http://www.bluemagicwaves.info/ .
(We pay out 100% of WAVES fees and MRT tokens , so we keep 0% for ourselves)

Join our community on Telegram if you want .

If you happen to own Waves , you can earn some money by Leasing to our Blue Magic Waves node .

Leasing means you give more power to a Full Node to Mine/Forge blocks .
For Waves owners , leasing is a simple process (see Howto on our site) . Also , you keep 100% control of your funds while leasing .
WCT token drops will keep coming in too , just like it would be when not leasing .

The one and only difference compared to not leasing : leasers earn Waves tokens and MRT (Miner reward tokens)

So all i can say is :
On your mark . Get set … Lease !


More info on our website http://www.bluemagicwaves.info/ .
(We pay out 100% of WAVES fees and MRT tokens , so we keep 0% for ourselves)

Join our community on Telegram if you want .

haha yes . Except that Siacoin is NOT a shitcoin

Do you mean the trollbox ?

I try that but polo isn't really helpful there either . They keep spamming in chat that ticket escalation is suspended and that mods currently don't accept ticket requests .

Currently ... . Right .

Let me briefly explain what has happened .
So I am trying to withdraw Siacoin from Poloniex . There wallet is constantly "temporarily disabled" , so when it's not I try to withdraw coins . In total I have made 6 attempts up till now to withdraw :

1 attempt succeeded .
2 attempts are showing Complete:Error with no Txid , but the siacoin is lost from my poloniex wallet .
3 attempts are showing Complete with a Txid , but the Txid is not known to the Siacoin network and coins are lost from my poloniex wallet .

Here you can see that only 1 transaction came through :

https://explore.sia.tech/hash.html?hash=209cad516a7b6a3ab0382bdd3466d4db26075f05d388bf70f8b555cb2a17ec0c9f0de82d1180

Look at my screenshot and you'll see the following : the GREEN rectangle shows the 1 transaction that is OK . The RED rectangle shows the 5 transactions that are not ok . Yet , the coins from the 5 NOT ok transactions are lost and are not in my poloniex account anymore . Nor are they in my wallet (address 209cad516a7b6a3ab0382bdd3466d4db26075f05d388bf70f8b555cb2a17ec0c9f0de82d1180) as you can see in the link above .

Screenshot :



I have created 2 tickets now since 26th of May , and did not get any response from Poloniex support .
I have also created a ticket to up my withdrawal limit (on 22th of May) because for me 25k $ is painfully slow . They don't react to that ticket either .

Let this be a warning for everyone that is currently trading on Poloniex , as well as for new people looking for an exchange to trade on .

If someone would have any idea to unstuck/find the coins myself in some way , i'd be very interested to hear your possible solution .

Here is an example of another transaction i did :

15BTC
Size    22695 (bytes)
126 inputs
fee 1 satochi/B
Processing time : 9 minutes .

The 5BTC transaction probably might go through with a higher transaction fee . I can do that .

But how about the 30BTC one .
Blockchain sais transaction rejected by our node because it has more than 250 inputs . The transaction is less than 1M in size . So even if i would put a ridiculously high transaction fee , it will never be processed , right ?

I'm afraid I will want to sweep the paper wallet in the future , then getting some kind of error messing the wallet up and losing the bitcoins on it .

Not sure which road I should take to get the amount properly on there .

I'm always checking on https://bitcoinfees.21.co/#fees to see which fees to use .
As these transactions were not urgent , I used 1sat/B . It had a timeframe of 0-300 minutes next to it at the time .

I used for other slow transactions of fex 20BTC also 1sat/B and they didn't have any issues .

For the 5BTC one i'll just wait some longer . I could use a bigger transaction fee eventually if that's the problem .
The 30BTC is problematic though , don't think any transaction fee will get it through . So I don't know what to do about it .

I don't think the 30BTC transfer is OK . After a 9 hour wait nothing happened .
I could submit it , but if i check fex on blockchain it sais :
"Transaction rejected by our node. Reason: The Maximum number of inputs in a single transaction is 250"

The 5BTC transfer is not doing to good either . Even though it only has 232 inputs . The transaction can be found online , but after 9 hours still no confirmations .

They both show up in bitcoin-QT as unconfirmed transactions .

What would be my best option to send 35BTC to the paper wallet ? 1BTC each time ? 35 transactions ?
I don't want to get in trouble when i want to sweep this paper wallet in the future !

Thank you for trying to explain

Transaction ID cf784d45981d21dd57e7c5439b3736ce274ef158e476a4050aaef4512807d5ee-000


I know about the different transactions not adding up to 1 total , but why would bitcoin-QT say it is too large .
I am doing a small transaction here . What if I would want to buy an airplane or an expensive car with my BTC and all my incoming transactions are coming from my online store which all have small transaction amounts .
I will have to go make thousand transactions of 1 BTC to the seller ? This can't be right .



So you think sweeping my paper wallet will not have this problem of "transaction too large" in the future , because it only has 2 inputs ?

I tried sending 35 BTC to a paper wallet , and got an error in bitcoin-QT saying "Transaction too large" .
So i tried sending 30 + 5 . That did actually work . Transaction sizes were 80.862kB for the 30Btc , and 41.685kB for the 5Btc .

Both transactions (30+5) are showing up in my Bitcoin-QT unconfirmed .

2 questions :
- How can a transaction be too large , and will this give me any problems when i try to sweep this paper wallet in the future .
- When I check the receiving address it only mentions a 5BTC pending amount . It does not mention the 30BTC .
What could be the issue ?

I completely understand now . Thank you .

I am using the original bitcoin core 12.1 .

The wiki sais : "However, the GUI in the default client does not display them in the address book, therefore a recommendation is to backup wallet.dat every 50 transactions"
I guess I am using the default client (?) and this is probably why I don't see these transactions in my transaction history , hence the confusion ?

Hi Lutpin , thank you for your help . Very interesting .

I'm not sure I fully understand the principle , even after reading that wiki page .
Does this mean every time i sent money i have to keep an eye on the added amount so i can recover it ?
I have done a transaction in the past where also funds were added : https://blockchain.info/nl/tx/df10ea0023eac09f2c6f3a95387119b3a463bfc175066ade8227c4957f45d74e

It was an extra 0.01000034 BTC . So i need to recover those myself ?

So i tried to send an amount of 0.001433 BTC with 0 fee .
The amount being 0.001433 BTC as you can see . The transaction is not really important to me , so i just left it being unconfirmed .
2 days later i suddenly notice my wallet balance has shrunk by an extra 0.01000503 .


I have no idea what this extra 0.01000503 BTC next to the original amount (0.001433 BTC) is doing there .

Hopefully someone more knowledgeable than me has a guestimation of what's going on .