This is not practical or all the other cam sites would cut their operational costs by 80%. WebRTC "works" (and by that, I mean it technically passes data, with up to 100% [yes, 100%, not a typo] overhead).

When certain users (who is streaming content to others) closes their tab.. your users are going to black out for a second or two. I am sure you are aware in cam sites there are people joining and disconnecting multiple times per second.

Also, most (ie, pretty much all except people in South Korea) residential internet connections cannot upload 720p in real time. Forget about 1080p.

Finally, it introduces significant latency (can be up to 10-20 seconds, especially the peer you are getting the data off is on 3G, is on Tor, etc)..

Will there also be a hashing stats page with some graphs just like peta?

Which wallet address can we monitor in order to view the earnings?


Alot of ppl did not believe there was any hashes being done before the 15th but you managed to get it even a week earlier.

Cheers and have a nice Belgian beer like Trapist, just to celebrate a succesfull IPO.

*IF* you can find a Bitcoin business (going back to my blog post from today) that will increase your Bitcoins, then it's an awesome deal.

The reality is that for a "Bitcoin business" to truly be a "Bitcoin business" they need to have very few fiat overheads. 99.9% of the businesses that think they're "Bitcoin businesses" really aren't. The investors would do better off (from a fiat perspective) just holding their coins, and they wouldn't run the risk of losing them through goxxing/ineptitude/etc.

Wars have always been fought for profit, even the Crusades.  Also, what democracy has US overthrown lately?

As far as being an accomplice, sure.  There was a guy once who ranted about sharing and loving your neighbor, but he got nailed to a big cross, so that sort-a fizzled.  Great idea, capable d00d, didn't work out.  Might of helped if they knew his personal info, but that's a whole different debate

Anyhow, taxes are unpleasant, but that's what mankind came up with instead to help us plod along.  It ain't that bad, OP, you'll get used to it.

Key word: potentially

Here in the bitcoin world that means you are almost guaranteed to lose your coins.

If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.

I'm an investor with plenty to invest.

But nearly every single thing out there is garbage.  So almost nothing touches my money.  Even if it looks mildly legitimate, I probably won't put a dime into it.  For me to want to put money in it I have to be convinced that the risk of scam & getting goxxed is very low while site profitability makes sense on both the investors/owners ends.

So short story is, your question is kind of ridiculous.  Bitcoin is fairly high risk. Investing in a bitcoin company is higher risk.  If you are ok with that, then go ahead and put it in the best place, if you aren't, then don't.  The market will naturally mature in the mean time if its meant to or it will decay.  The larger profitability and risk will be present in the earlier markets.

But... it's "the largest evil"?  To plagiarize Voltaire, "compared to what?"

That attitude changes after a couple of bad investments or after observing the large number of outright scams and inept management teams here.

Where have you lived OP, other than US?

Re. knowing the identity of the people you send money to:  It helps sometimes.

It answers the question you asked in the title of this post regarding why investors demand personal info. We aren't breaking the law demanding that information, and we aren't responsible for SEC compliance on their behalf. Which is why there's (thankfully) plenty of non-US businesses to invest in:)

If you're in the US, you may want to consider joining all the bright people that are getting out.