It's definitely a broadcast delay, it's not related to the live betting; they're two different things.
Also because, if you think about it, if they lost money or played dirty, users wouldn't play anymore, or they'd lose a lot of money.
I think it's just a delay due to the match streaming (things that happen).

I believe that 90% of users who started playing always thought they could be better or smarter than the house edge.
A recurring thought that's often fueled by the fantasy of movies, but in reality, unfortunately, you realize it's really difficult to happen—not impossible, but really, really difficult.

Like the story of the casino in Romania that paid for a slot machine bug, it still paid its users.
If I notice a bug and the casino mistakenly pays me money, I'm bound to notice it; it's impossible not to know that the money wasn't the result of a win, but of a system error.
I hardly believe something like this could happen without someone on both sides noticing.
Furthermore, if a casino reports an error, it should also provide the reason and an explanation; it can't simply say "because of an error," and we're blocking the funds.
It's not all that simple, especially if we're talking about serious, recognized, and reliable casinos.

As a fan, I've hoped, and continue to hope, for a radical turnaround. He seems to be playing better, but as I said, he doesn't have the right drive. I'm a little sad, but I want to believe.
I console myself with the win on my betting slip, guessing the Cremonese-Como match 
Never mind, on one hand, there's tears, and on the other, there's smiles every now and then.

I'm not sure what you're writing. The match has just started, but the major bookmakers say otherwise. I'm about to play for a clean draw, I'll take a chance. It doesn't matter if I guess correctly, I'll get a good result without any effort.

https://www.bwin.it/it/news/calcio/quote-como-cremonese-scommesse-pronostico-27-9-2025#:~:text=Como%2DCremonese%2C%20quote%20scommesse%20e,trova%20al%20momento%20a%206.25.

They say Como is the favorite here, so we'll see.

I'm not rich, but I try to imagine what a rich person feels. However, I absolutely don't believe a rich person doesn't suffer from pressure.
He certainly doesn't show it, but despite having a large amount of money at his disposal, he still has to be good at managing it. Money isn't infinite, and mismanagement would cause disaster, even when gambling recklessly.
Let's remember that even the rich aren't immune to illnesses, such as depression, drug addiction, and many other things. It's not a universal rule to assume that a rich person is sane.
So, a rich person who has no problems doesn't exist; it's a cliché, and it's usually the same assumption that we all have when we're unfamiliar with financial wealth.
I've dealt with rich people when I sold handmade bags, and they're usually the ones who make a fuss about the price. While an ordinary person never negotiates on the price, they never ask for discounts, the rich person, on the other hand, wants to negotiate at all costs.
I've had so much experience in business that I can say this.

You're absolutely right about the benefits; the harm is caused by those who lack self-control and those who pretend to get rich through gambling.
It could certainly happen, but it shouldn't be taken seriously; it's a game, it's meant to be fun.
If you have the time and a small amount of money to gamble, why not?
The harm occurs when you exceed that amount and spend more than you can afford.
I'm not talking about benefits, but you need to have personal rules; if you don't respect them, you cause a lot of harm.
I don't know, friend, you're looking at it too pessimistically.

Maybe they could play more young players in different matches, alternating them, giving them a chance to express themselves, and maybe they could surprise players, because they'll certainly have more enthusiasm than the veterans and could even turn games around.
Sure, they could make mistakes, but I remember Cassano. In his early days, he was a kid who was given the chance to play and make games fun, but then he got big-headed and unfortunately lost his sense of reason.
Unfortunately, all clubs are looking to win (as they should be); it's not just a desire to play; there's money at stake, and so few coaches try to play younger players.

Similar discussions have already been had, but right or wrong, an influencer makes money by promoting the things they're offering.
I see it as a perfectly normal job; sure, it should target people with age and geographic restrictions, but it's common knowledge.
The only negative thing I'd avoid from influencers is making users believe that winning is easy; this is borderline illegal because it's misleading.

An addiction is still an addiction, regardless of whether you lose money or not.
Clearly, if you lose money, the addiction is even more difficult to manage; the average gambler tends to win back what they've lost.
I consider myself a moderate gambling addict, in the sense that I never gamble for large sums, maximum $10 a week, which I don't often reach.
Sometimes, with a win, I can even play for several weeks for free.

Slot machines are so well designed to make money and keep you hooked, if you don't have a strong character, you'll be trapped.
A recent article (link below)

https://www.fanpage.it/milano/un-uomo-ha-perso-1000-euro-in-una-notte-dentro-una-sala-slot-di-milano-che-doveva-essere-chiusa/

It even talks about slot machines recognized as legal but used outside of permitted hours, thus generating higher profits than the competition.
It still happens today, and it will always happen despite the controls. Here's a man who lost 1,000 euros in a very short time—guys, we're talking about a month's salary. Always be very careful.

Roulette is all about luck and probability, which, let's remember, isn't mathematical certainty.
I once did a test, betting only on the zero number. I counted at least 30 missed spins (where the zero didn't come up) and started betting from the 31st spin onward, betting 0.10 for 30 times (so I spent $3). After 30 spins of 0.10, if I didn't hit the zero number, I continued playing with 0.30 until I reached 18 spins.
I used this strategy considering that if you hit the zero, you win 36 times; in fact, for the first few spins, I managed to win.
Once the software detects the game, it starts missing the zero even 150 or 200 times in a row, and obviously you won't have any money left to double up at that point!
The moral of the story is that there's no strategy, just luck.

Literally shameful. A political official has a moral duty to act for his people. Apparently, this story is common everywhere in the world. We give power to someone and they leave us to starve.
A story that has been repeating itself since ancient times; we still haven't learned the lesson.
I love Bitcoin because it gives me hope for freedom—economic freedom, yes—but at least it's something.
In response to the post title, NO, I wouldn't want that anyway, especially if I chose to be a political official.
Also, I would never squander that crazy amount of money every week. I understand living the high life, but this is just too much.

Those who refuse to gamble probably know their limits and are afraid of losing their hard-earned money.
This type of person should actually be an example; they won't be influenced by something presented as a chance to win.
In any case, addiction often occurs out of necessity, and that's where the biggest mistake is made.

For those who think like me, many talk about strategy, and even those who call it a job; a gambler is simply a gambler.
Luck isn't forever, and in the long run, it could turn against you with bad luck.
To be considered good, in my opinion, a gambler must know how to manage his winnings in such a way that he can afford to play again, increasing his chances of winning and reducing his losses.
Luck will decide the rest.

In my opinion, it's so easy that you don't even realize you've become addicted to gambling.
To answer the questions, how do you know if you're addicted? You simply gamble often and always want to.
The ease is disarming.
You can certainly overcome addiction, but the desire to do so must come first and foremost from the person involved. Those who are psychologically weak clearly need
help.

If it's a marketing ploy, it's literally brilliant; if it's truly a mistake, they still honored the players' claims, regardless of the amount.
It could also be that they'll take it out on the programmers, but we can't know for sure.
There are various hypotheses, and we all know that many people write for clickbait.

Anyway, they also report 30 million here: https://www.jamma.it/attualita/bug-sulla-slot-online-il-bookmaker-garantisce-pagamento-per-oltre-30-milioni-di-euro-di-vincite-339498

If I want to make a guaranteed profit, I go to work; if I want to make a profit while having fun, I gamble.
Of course, gambling involves a profit if you win, but unfortunately, the winnings are always less than the losses.
So, by playing for fun and without any expectation of making a profit, you play for fun, and if you're lucky, you win something; if you're really lucky, you win a big one.
But if you play to make a profit, gambling is simply a great danger.

Every time I don't follow my instincts and rely on statistics, numbers, and probabilities, I immediately regret having placed a bet.
I often play on instinct and even make stupid plays (I admit it), but at least I feel satisfied. I should also add that even with senseless plays, I've managed to win a few; instinct never lies.

This story is incredible, these are serious people, this casino made a wonderful move, knowingly honoring the mistake, honoring all winnings, and this, in addition to providing tremendous publicity, increases its reputation for reliability.
We think it's lost money (definitely), but it's not a loss, it's an investment because now many players will sign up and others will play at that casino often.
Congratulations to those who enjoyed their winnings. Do they say that luck doesn't matter in gambling?