People see that Nexus knows several delays: tritium was announced for 2017. Satellite for march 2019.
There is any roadmap, any usecase

Good project but only on whitepaper.

 

The market cap says otherwise.

No, you misunderstood the rule. The cost of storing data is equal to the amount of data you want to store in bytes. How much 1 byte costs depends on the market conditions on exchanges.

Example:

1 megabyte of byteball bytes costs 100 USD on exchanges. The cost of storing 1 megabyte of data in the byteball system is equal to 100 USD.

1 megabyte of byteball bytes costs 1000 USD on exchanges. The cost of storing 1 megabyte of data in the byteball system is equal to 1000 USD.

How much a harddrive costs doesn't matter here.

It is a measure of the utility of the storage in this database, and actual users will have their opinion on what is a reasonable price for this.  If the price of byte rises above what you think is reasonable for your needs, you will find ways to store less bytes, therefore you need to buy less bytes, demand decreases, and the price falls.  This is negative feedback, common for all goods/services whose demand is driven by need, not speculation.

However Zerocoin's advantage over Zerocash are as follows:
a) While still retaining the basecoin and a lot of the Bitcoin core code, it is a lot easier to integrate to existing Bitcoin merchants/etc.
b) Although Zerocoin's proofs are larger and occupies more storage space, the computational requirements to generate a private transaction are many times faster. Zcash requires large amounts of RAM and minutes of computational time. Zerocoin requires seconds to use and is not memory intensive. Basically Zerocoin uses more storage space but is computationally much less intensive.
c) Parameter generation for both Zcoin and Zcash requires a trusted setup but Zcoin's parameters are arguably less controversial. (https://github.com/zcoinofficial/zcoin/wiki/Parameters-in-set-up-phase-for-Zerocoin-in-ZCoin)
d) Most importantly is that in Zcoin, total supply is still visible so if there's a flaw and someone is secretly creating coins for themselves, this can be much more easily detected. With Zcash, because everything is hidden, if a flaw is exploited, it may be almost impossible to detect!
e) Zerocoin's tech is more peer reviewed and better understood than Zcash's. Zcash's use of zero knowledge proofs uses ZK-Snarks which very few people understand. Even Zooko himself admits he doesn't understand it (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6RLjcGVUnw&feature=youtu.be&t=17m30s). Note that Zerocoin's paper was only like 15 pages. Zcash's paper is more than 50 pages so Zcash's is considerably more complex which means more things that can go wrong. This is why Zcash had to spend so much money on multiple security companies auditing on its critical components and bugs (including some serious ones have been found). A security audit is also not fool proof as the DAO exposed and which is why Zcash also uses multiple companies to audit.