 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
on average I have around 2,5%, however do you know the benchmark for it?
|
|
|
|
those don't look convenient at all comparing to wisdom (when it was working properly I mean). at the end of the day there's a lot of charts at blockchain info however they haven't come up with an idea to combine hashrate and difficulty so that people could see where things going. I guess wisdom's problem is related to segwit implementation cos there was a week or so in september when the chart stopped updating at all. imo it got back up by some happy coincidence, don't think it's because somebody recalled that they need to maintain this service. |
|
|
|
I see you've been bragging about those 10 btc in escrow, but let's see if it DOES actually make sense: assuming you are a new market player and so have a relatively small amount of customers, your cap of simultaneously mixed coins is 100 btc (for simplicity) and that's where exit scam happens (for whatever reason, we are just assuming here). And let's say there were 100 people where everyone was mixing a single coin, which means that if the escrow will be WILLING to collaborate and allocate funds proportionally then everyone gets 0.1 btc.
Does only for me this thing look ridiculous and proves absolutely nothing? Keep in mind that we have an optimistic 1 to 10 ratio here (escrow/mixer), so if the real turnover is higher than you'll probably get like a few satoshis or so from the escrow.
Good luck with establishing trust but imo this is not the right way of doing it.
1:10 ratio for BTC10 and BTC100, yes, it is not balanced. But the thing is; everyone is free to mix small amount several times if they are doubting a mixing service, not only this one (does not intend to defend this site). But, a mixer service actually doesn't need to escrow funds, in this case just for insurance but you said this is not the right way of doing it? Maybe you should mentioned about the right way to do it. There is another mixing service which doesn't escrow their funds at all, only based on their trust in this forum. On the other hand, every mixing service could manage to collect fees from all of transactions which is profitable without have to scam people, trust is more valuable than BTC1 at a time or BTC10 in different time frame how many times has it already been mentioned? the same way as the original service did |
|
|
|
lol dude why do you care so much about this thread? |
|
|
|
|
I see you've been bragging about those 10 btc in escrow, but let's see if it DOES actually make sense: assuming you are a new market player and so have a relatively small amount of customers, your cap of simultaneously mixed coins is 100 btc (for simplicity) and that's where exit scam happens (for whatever reason, we are just assuming here). And let's say there were 100 people where everyone was mixing a single coin, which means that if the escrow will be WILLING to collaborate and allocate funds proportionally then everyone gets 0.1 btc.
Does only for me this thing look ridiculous and proves absolutely nothing? Keep in mind that we have an optimistic 1 to 10 ratio here (escrow/mixer), so if the real turnover is higher than you'll probably get like a few satoshis or so from the escrow.
Good luck with establishing trust but imo this is not the right way of doing it.
|
|
|
|
"Joinmarket - Coinjoin that people will actually use" It's been 2,5 years since this topic was started and my only question is simple: haven't you yet understood that people will NOT actually use something that doesn't have friendly UI? I like this whole project and idea behind it, however being someone without basic coding background I find this thing quite challenging to deal with  RTFM yeah good luck in accomplishing anything with such an attitude |
|
|
|
"Joinmarket - Coinjoin that people will actually use" It's been 2,5 years since this topic was started and my only question is simple: haven't you yet understood that people will NOT actually use something that doesn't have friendly UI? I like this whole project and idea behind it, however being someone without basic coding background I find this thing quite challenging to deal with |
|
|
|
|
Maybe you guys are withdrawing like 10 cash-satoshis I don't know but the BCH withdrawal still doesn't work for me. Admin, are you going to tell me what's going on here cos things start getting sketchy.
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Cash withdrawal will be available starting Sep. 1.
It's Sep. 3 already and I still can't withdraw, when will you unlock BCH withdrawal? Maybe you are shorting the entire bankroll and waiting for the rate to drop back to 300$?!
|
|
|
|
|
"Could not withdraw due insufficient information about estimateFee"
When will you fix it?!
|
|
|
|
|
What's happened to the difficulty chart? Are you fixing it any time soon? (as well as the exchange rate of the calculator that is bound to dead btc-e)
|
|
|
|
|
What's going on with the site, guys? Current bankroll says undefined btc and my balance is 0? Any public announcement regarding this situation?
|
|
|
|
Wow, this statement is just full of bullshit tbh. The only logical explanation for me to read this is that LE took control over that account as well as the mixer itself and then wrote that stupid as hell post. Bitcoin is a transparent non-anonymous system by design, huh? Who told you that ffs? Have you ever looked into white paper? I'm quite dubious about that, because when you search for key words it gives you 0 (!) results for the word "transparent". However it has a separate chapter called "PRIVACY" where bitcoin is compared to traditional banking system and you can clearly see that Satoshi was striving to break the link between individuals and transactions as much as possible. Second, your point about criminals. In the first place you were offering money laundering service. Did it really take you so much time to realize the target audience for this?! I mean, REALLY?!! If you were THAT much narrow-minded then I don't believe a person like you would be smart enough to arrange that site. Anyway, I hope that the team behind bitmixer is in good health and they were let go  . |
|
|
|
you missed the point...pm an offer or run along, I'm not here to argue with you or debate. "Willing to accept your miners as a gift"
Although, if a handout is what you're after then this is not the right place. please, don't take my words out of the context. he wanted to buy R4 and S9, while we here are talking about S7. the difference is significant... anyway pm'ed you. |
|
|
|
|
So you ask $2000 (I took away the PSUs cost) for 22,42 TH/s which equals ~90 dollars per 1 TH/s. Dear isoneguy, have you seen bitmain's prices for the latest generation ASICs? I guess you should, cos your price for used miners from old generation is a total rip-off with a difference of only 20 bucks per TH/s comparing to the new S9s. Would you mind reconsidering the price for this list? (I'm quite interested in these ones for the really fair bulk price) Otherwise good luck with the sale.
|
|
|
|
|
how much do you ask for the whole list of miners?
|
|
|
|
Trying to play at the moment, logged in correctly without issues but when placing my bets nothing happens.
I have this message displayed "Connection was lost. OFFLINE, reconnection in x sec" and when seconds countdouwn reach 0 it restarts from 10.
Apparently no one is betting and also no one chatting and I don't see the field to chat displayed where it usually is.
Is it only here or anyone else experiencing same problems?
Same here. The roulette points at 0 and doesn't move  |
|
|
|
|
I guess a topic with the subject like "Willing to accept your miners as a gift" would be as successful as this one.
|
|
|
|
If you look at the hashrate numbers, it increased from 2,411,623,656 GH/s on 10th January to 2,812,940,600 GH/s you need a lot of miners to make this jump. Bitmain started to sell its new T9, its possible that one of the bigs farms received a lot of these new miners. Also Bitmain could start mining on its new farm.
Those numbers still look moderate if we compare them with the growth in prices all of a sudden. This is just the beginning of a new era in mining, we are possibly heading towards a considerable amount of high-quality mining where it will be impossible for an average miner to even think of it. what kind of prices are you talking about? |
|
|
|
|
