both the concept and the site are very confusing
so you suggest we answer our own questions and then enticing others to buy the answer based on a sample we provide?
or we browse the questions posted by others and provide our own answer to that, without any guarantee to get paid?
there are many free QA like yahoo answers etc.
what makes you think ANYONE would want to become a paid customer,i.e. waste his time to post a question and then wait for an answer god knows for how long,then pay for some snippeted answer he is not even sure correct or not
I'll definitely try to optimize the site. I agree that it can be a bit confusing.
So if someone asks you a question, you can provide the answer with an Answer.Market link and hope that they buy it. Your reputation sending it to them and the quality of your sample will influence whether they buy it or not. I would put yourself in their shoes and consider if it's worthwhile or not.
But since it's just a sample and an "answer", it can really be any task. Photoshopping something, writing a small bit of code, or anything that can be a link or fit into text.
In hindsight, "answer" market may have not been the best name. Maybe task market, or something. But I think it would be most used in individual forums where people want to pay people for things.
I have this on Reddit and Voat:
https://www.reddit.com/r/answermarkethttps://voat.co/v/answermarketDoes that make more sense?