Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
What is going on with the failed to mine dev fee?
|
|
|
Can anyone share hashrate of Sapphire R9 Fury on mixed with RX 480 rig. I get 395 sols with 1140/500 stock bios on 17.1.1 drivers. Shall I get better performance of 16.3.2 ?
The RX 4 series works better with 16.x drivers. I cant speak for the Fury, never had any.
|
|
|
use msi afterburn. i've been able to lower the 290x to 125 watts average as per gpu-z. In my case i'm more worried on the fan noise so this voltage lowering brought the temp to the mid 60s and the fan to 60%, this while maintaining the sols at 337 to 347
What you see on gpuz is not the total power consumption of the card. 125w for the gpu only is possible but with the rest of power components on the pcb the real consumption is much more(about 200w). Check with wattmeter if you don't believe. Agreed, but the numbers for the GPU are still absolute so any savings you see on GPU level are still 'real' power savings. In theory this is true but it is possible that only the asic power is dropping while the rest of the package is going up to make up for it. Use hwinfo instead of GPUz, it will show you multiple power readings. You can usually add the core power and "GPU Chip Power" together and thats your actual at the wall wattage. (your results may vary!) Basically there is more than core voltage, asic values and TDP. These are the things commonly thrown up on these forums because they are the easiest to understand/adjust.
|
|
|
Do you undervolt/overclock your Nano? I have Fury's and would like to drop my power draw. What's your settings?
nothing! off the box on Windows 10 (Pro) install 15.12 drivers set power limit 50% i don't play with volts or OC of the Nanos i get electricity pretty cheap like € 0,05 per kW (normal consumer pay like € 0,23 per kW) I also have cheap power, but I would still like to run 6 x Fury on a 1300w PSU. That's why I'm wanting to undervolt them. use msi afterburn. i've been able to lower the 290x to 125 watts average as per gpu-z. In my case i'm more worried on the fan noise so this voltage lowering brought the temp to the mid 60s and the fan to 60%, this while maintaining the sols at 337 to 347 Noob question. Does afterburner write to Bios or does it alter the wattage on software load? What do you set to lower the power? Powerlimit or actual mv offset? Afterburner does not change the bios. Some cards you can lower the core voltage with it and you can adjust the power limit on most, if not all cards to some extent.
|
|
|
There is big red warning on flypool : can not send to z adresses...
Its blue now
|
|
|
Hi! Just got a Gigabyte 1060 6GB Gaming a few days ago, miner works fine Maybe I've been away from Nvidia too much time but I can't figure out why boost clock won't jump to full when I start the miner, it jumps only to 1595 Mhz, mining only 265 sol, but if I start a web browser like Firefox it will jump to 2114, mining at 308-315 sol depending on memory oc Is it a driver issue? I'm using the latest one That is because some program is blocking it. Try to shut down everything ( even from your tray) and it will go back up. For me this happens when i have crhome on, or GOG console for example. Yeah, usually this happens to my when I have chrome open. open the nvidia control panel and in the "manage 3D settings", change power management mode to maximum performance (adaptive should work too). The default is power saving for some reason.
|
|
|
hi guys.
has anyone experienced problems with connection after adding a new card?
I had 2 cards (R9 280x and R9 Fury) running fine on flypool (ssl), latency was about 30-70ms, then I added a RX 470 to the setup and it basically stopped getting any accepted shares, shares were being found but they were never accepted. When a share was accepted latency was something crazy like 4000 or 5000ms and then finally after 2 minutes I ended up getting a connection lost message.
I switched the cards around and reinstalled drivers and everything seems stable, but latency is still pretty high at around 300ms with a few peaks at 1000+ms.
do you think this is something to do with the miner or is it hardware related?
set your diff higher and see if that helps. Flypool default is 2000.
|
|
|
How does a GTX 1060 3GB beat my RX 480 with this algo by 20sol/s? My RX 480 gets ~230 range 228 - 237 and my GTX 1060 3GB gets ~250 range 244 - 258
lots of reasons have been discussed. Simple answer would be look at the base core clock for both cards. 1060 is higher.
|
|
|
OK, how much for a 10% faster miner?
10BTC would be enough. Sure you can I actually think I could get 25% faster performance, but would only promise 10% to play it safe. It would be even easier for Wolf to do it given his expertise with GCN assembler, but he seems to be having more fun doing other stuff. Can Claymore also do that? None of Claymore's miners (eth, zec, xmr) seem to use GCN assembler, even though people like Wolf and Realhet have been doing miner kernels in asm for at least a couple years now. https://realhet.wordpress.com/gcn-asm-groestl-coin-kernel/Yeah yeah, all talk and no code. Theoretical code makes people no money. Zec is least profitable to mine now anyway. Theorizing is fine, but is worthless for bashing, and often theoretical speed != reality. If it is as awesome as you say, you would write it. What is the point of hyping up theoretical vaporware you have no intentions to write, just to try to discredit others? Is your theoretical skill over 9000? claymore has said from the beginning for someone else to make a miner better than his and he will lower dev fee and/or beat theirs. So instead of talking a big game, just make it. Then you can say whatever you want.
|
|
|
Stock GTX 1070 = 360 Sol/s @ 150 W OC GTX 1070 (clock @ 2050, mem @ 4500) = 410 Sol/s @ 170 W Efficient GTX 1070 (TDP 50%, mem @ 4500) = 330 Sol/s @ 95 W dead AMD its near Nvidia rules 35% more expensive for 35% more hash. We know. You are not unleashing secrets here...
|
|
|
v9.2:
- improved speed for some cards up to 7% (depends on card model). About 330H/s on stock 390X, 235H/s on stock RX480, 300H/x on stock Nano. - several bug fixes and minor improvements.
All my 480s and 470s with my "silent roms". Great work for Polaris! -Power consumption reduced by about 5-7% -heat reduced per card about 5C on 470s and up to 10C on 480s -hash increased by 5% average Thanks man, this is what I was hoping for over huge speed increases for old cards. Also since switching to encrypted, never had one rig drop for 3+ days now.
|
|
|
I will release new version in 1-2 days. Not all cards will get speedup, but at least Hawaii and Polaris will.
Will you gives us a heads up on the Polaris power consumption increase (if any)?
|
|
|
Since most of the posts are now becoming the same thing and blaming the miner for card(s) going down or whole system crashing until one or more cards are removed with v8,9,9.1 I figured I would try to clear this up.
There have been posts saying check your psu and such but that is clearly not getting the point across. Each version of claymore uses slightly more power so there are really only a handful of issues to check before posting for the majority of the issues here. 1. PSU wattage load 2. PSU ripple suppression 3. PSU voltage regulation at different load variations 4. Bad risers and other cables. (Least likely if still working in other versions) 5. Incorrectly configuring windows
All PSU are created slightly different even at the same rates wattage and having way more watts than you're using doesn't mean you're running your psu at a better efficiency.
If you're using a multi gpu setup you need to use a gold or higher rated PSU. The evga super nova / super flower leadex series have great ripple suppression. Keep each PSU at at maximum of 80% load and keep it cool!
There is much more I could get into but it would require knowing each rig full hardware config.
|
|
|
Claymore has a full mining speed from the start(v1) .no one sees but my? He simultaneously works with pools and exchanges and zcash team. Look at the Poloniex pump and dump and release of new miners (time) His job is to prevent too large price decrease.Price now is unreal high. There is no race.everything is pre-planned. Slow start is over.There is still one final release,and that's it. One more pump and price go down.(because he does not hurry with the latest version) Game is over.
And....it's happening
you know, could just walk away from zec.
|
|
|
Looking at how all the big pools hashrate is going up ... 9.0 seems to be given to the first batch of testers....
implying claymore writes all the miners for the world.
|
|
|
How many miners and which graphics cars are finally out of work due to high electricity? Just curious and patiently waiting for this shit to start correcting itself. Best wishes hold until Feb 2017
|
|
|
When the version 9.0 Since this is windows only, claymore will have to skip right to version 10.
|
|
|
Has anyone intercepted the miner network packets? I have a 480 running at 180 as reported by the miner but as reported by the 24 hour average by the pool the average is 162. I'm switching pools to identify where the thief is. There's about 10 sols missing.
When the dev fee connects it does not count towards your sol/s numbers.
|
|
|
At least on a low end cpu i-0 provides the highest hashrates on 4.0. Thanks Claymore! No complaints about fee whether Eth miner or Zcash. EVER!
Confirmed on Pentium G3240. i-0 Getting 75-80 with both rx470s and 480s under 50% cpu. Changing to i-2 lowers H/s by 5-15 and at least 75% cpu use at all times. Thank you Claymore, you deserve the fee for your work!
|
|
|
|