Show Posts
I should post this, with respect to rdewilde stating to not quote out of contect. I did also read in that Slack conversation that Huey and the Ionomy team were going to make more information public, which is a step in the right direction. I do feel that they damaged the project heavily by not releasing that transparent information in the beginning.
But any form of transparency is better than none.
But any form of transparency is better than none.
With respect, poor communication and transparency has been a point that has consistently been brought up both by people here and their own users on their slack and forums going back to XPY.io. Every few months they say 'we'll try and do better!' and then a further three months will pass without any official information.
Whilst I'm sure the subscribers to Ionomy appreciate the gesture, i very much doubt they will be better in the future.
I think mharter is giving them the benefit of the doubt, which I don't agree with. As you just illustrated, the proof is in the pudding. They have said they will be more transparent many times but fail to do so.
Edit: and that post is deleted. I guess he/she didn't want to give them the benefit of the doubt after all.
I deleted it cause I didn't want to get involved in an argument.
