Let's do a shameless promo here  :

CoinPayCard.net[/b]]CoinPayCard.net

The CoinPayCard is an anonymous Virtual Visa® Debit Card that can be used to make online and offline purchases, worldwide.

Available card plans:

1. Basic       | $2.000 monthly spend limit     Price: $99 yearly
2. Premium  | $5.000 monthly spend limit     Price: $249 yearly
3. Platinum  | $10.000 monthly spend limit   Price: $499 yearly

Card funding fees:
USDT: 4% + $1.50

More cryptocurrencies coming this week.

Advcash launched a couple of cards (Crypto world, and Global UnionPay) and then stopped shipping the cards. The last time I checked, they said they'll be available again soon. Maybe you can check their site or reach out to them for an ETA.

These are very good limits. I do not use bank cards at all and do not have bank accounts, I use only alternative solutions. The best solution that I found in my country is a card of one payment service, which allows you to withdraw no more than 1,780 euros per day, and no more than 10,700 euros per month. It is a pity that the Binance card is not available for me, so I have to use only such solutions. I used Advcash until 2018, it was probably the most convenient card for both shopping and travel, but it was also limited for my country. Residents of the European Union, of course, have a wide variety in the choice of crypto cards, this is a definite plus for them, there is plenty to choose from.

I'm looking for a debit card solution, but since I'm not EU/US citizen my options are close to none. Services are either scams, not operational or forever stuck in launch phase (like wirex/advcash). To make things harder all card-benchmarking sites care little about listing eligible countries or describing verification procedure steps per service. Most card services on the other hand are, of course, secretive about eligible country list, constraints in functionalities per country and verification steps, because they are very glad to take your personal documents and only after tell you the bad news. So, it's reallty tough to test them.

Big threads about debit cards here are extremely west-centric so they also care very little about the above.

VCC is not an option for me since I mostly need ATM withdrawals.

For Crypterium I think it's also not clear if it's operative.


EDIT: Now I also see, the ATM withdrawal functionalty for Crypterium is limited to only a few countries.

I think Advcash is a good alternative especially for Europeans since it is cheaper than the card available for the rest of the countries in the world.
Otherwise there is Neteller but honestly I am not sure if you can spend directly crypto deposited there with their mastercard or you have to use a third party service for deposit.

You are right, the "average Joe" will have a hard time to find the connection on their own they have to get a court order or something like that. However there are two problems you will face in the future.

1. When Coinbase gets hacked (not a matter of if, but when) their database could be published by the hacker and it would be free for everyone to see. It may even end up one some chain-analysis website like walletexplorer.com where people can easily search an address and see all the linked transactions.

2. When you end up sending bitcoin to a destination that breaks Coinbase's ToS and they shut down your account and seize your funds.

Are you aware that what you withdraw/send from centralized exchanges is the coins you or others have sent?
If you deposit and then withdraw, there's even a chance that the withdrawal will be from your deposit address.
Since Coinbase is not a mixer, sending to the various customers have a good chance to link them.
This is how I see it.

If you're doing something that will get you into trouble with law enforcement, then they will easily make coinbase or almost any other centralized service give up the full list of your customers. But if this isn't a problem for you, you can use some other centralized service as a "wallet" like an exchange or a casino. From the outside it would look like all your customers are receiving money from that service. But the withdrawal fees are generally pretty high regardless of the actual network fees. And exchanges could probably close your account for such activity, because they will see that the account clearly isn't used for trading.

A better solution is to use coin control to have no more than 1 output (aside from change) and immediately mix your change outputs and never used unmixed inputs.

This is in direct contradiction with your question! Every single transaction you have sent using Coinbase are already linked together and to your account and your identity. It would be trivial for anyone with legit beef to acquire the link too.
That goes with any other centralized services.

I'm thinking of the problems that could occur with your inquiry. The first is that you need to have balances on separate addresses to have a different fund source. It would be another step to have an internal transaction first before sending, so it may be straining for you. The second is that having a web-based wallet can be prone to hacking. It's better to have a more secure wallet for that.

Maybe develop something like that. Automatically send it as an internal transaction first before sending it out, etc.

You can use BTCPay integrated with Payjoin [1] to make your transaction will not linked with each other, but you need to host yourself to run BTCPay with some requirement 4GB RAM and 500GB hard drive [2]

But the problem of BTCPay with Payjoin transaction is most of wallet still doesn't support Payjoin, because your customer should use a wallet that support Payjoin or the transaction will be linked.

---

[1] https://docs.btcpayserver.org/Payjoin/
[2] https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5259548.0

There are a couple of solutions, all the payments can be done from the same address if you use a Mixing service, just put the payment address on the mixer output and that should do the magic.

Another option is to use another exchange with low fees or a casino to make the payments as a site withdraw.

I do not recommend staking on anything that has not a long lasting record of real use for the network, since staking is just about getting rewarded for the safety of a network and that only makes sense if the network has sufficient transactions to  make it even worth being secured. Many people are confused with words such as "dividends" or "returns" but the truth is that value cannot be generated without user willing to use the underlying network. How many use cases are already in place for the network of your choice? Probably none.

Personally, I can recommend stacking as a great tool for holders. Your coins don't just sit in your wallet, they bring you even more coins.
Compared to trading, this is a wonderful form of earnings that reduces your risks to some extent, because the more holders, the less likely the price will fall.

If you have less than 32 ETH in your bag, you can use the staking pool service. But still be careful and smart in choosing a trusted pool, because this does not guarantee 100% security.
You can start staking and participate in supporting the launch of ETH 2.0 and get profit periodically by staking ETH here (for those who have less than 32 ETH): https://beaconcha.in/stakingServices

The site is a direct Ethereum recommendation, which is if you go to the page : https://ethereum.org/en/eth2/staking/#stake , and click on the See staking services link

For those who do not have 32 ETH on their balance, Binance has prepared a similar program for staking https://www.binance.com/en/eth2 But we must remember that the more ethereum is used in staking, the lower the APY. But I am repelled from such staking by the lack of an opportunity to sell coins at high and buy at a low price.

We will redistribute 100% of all on-chain rewards to our users.

The on-chain staking income will be distributed in the form of BETH to your Spot account on a daily basis.