Lowest number or #19 please. for 1st item

lowest number for 2nd item please.

Awesome work - comme toujours.

One lowest number or #18 for me please.
Awesome work Sir liquid. Love the design - comme toujours!

And happy to see the 60 mm again.

PS: If more than 1 avail (I doubt it though), I'll take 2 (any number). Always happy to have extra squirrels for barter towards projects I missed out on before.

Please count me in. Thanks for these cheerful Christmas raffles.

33 - Kryptowerk

Das klingt nach einem klassischem Scam. Würd da nicht zu viel drauf geben.
Und selbst wenn das realistisch wäre, würde der coin nach kurzer Zeit entdeckt und die Gesamthashrate so anziehen, dass die Profitabilität wieder stark absinkt.

21 - Kryptowerk

ty

I agree with that, I'd also be down for a 15 PH/s or maybe even as low as 10 PH/s run that takes maybe up to a week. Pissibly in run 54?
Maybe pricing for this low amount of Hashing-power is also slightly better?

Let's see what willi's take on this idea is first.

Okay thanks for the clarification. You wrote
Thus I didn't check this thread until today.
But now I see this was probably addressed to Abiky directly, not to all of us. My bad.
Will provide all details within the next 24 h.

I thought I'd go ahead and give this a friendly bump.
The project seems still alive, just not here on the forum.

With my basic technical understanding this seems very promising, but I wonder if there is any chance this can ever become truely mainstream, similar to Electrum wallet for example. Just download a full functioning software with one click and either participate for "join-coining" your own BTC or provide a joincoin-node to make some tiny income for the coin-joins of others.
Anyone knows if there are any plans to in that direction?

Thanks for the warning and updates @nelson4lov

Soon I can start an info thread with a list of all the Ledger f-ups that happened over the years. It's getting longer and longer.

I'm not up-to-date with all these web3 dApp stuff - what actually is affected here? Are we talking about swap-dApps and Defi-stuff or anything else?
Also, does this only affect tokens on the Ethereum chain or also others?

Hi, saw my name pop up in the unpaid list - I was waiting for your pm, haven't received one yet.

Or should I just use current CMC rate + shipping cost and send you the details of the transaction etc? Just let me know how you want to proceed, thanks.

2 - Kryptowerk

Thanks you, 2stout!

Ein neuer Tag, ein neuer Run. 53 ist ne komische Zahl, glaube Prim und auch sonst ziemlich ungerade. Das sollte eigentlich klappen diesmal.

Und ja, bitte mein Speedvoting wieder auf 20 PH/s drosseln, gefällt mir doch deutlich besser, wenn sich der Run etwas länger beobachten lässt als beim letzten Mal.
Merci Dir @willi9974

Ahhh, yes indeed, that was Atomic! Unstoppable, Trust, Atomic! So many buzzwords but I tend to mix them up.
As you correctly stated, a closed source wallet is generally speaking to be avoided. Nobody can verify (look inside) what is actually happening, so it's just a massive possible attack vector for potentially stealing user funds.

Mühsam und Eichhörnchen und so. Aber immerhin, stets schön ein neues Besti zu sehen.
Und natürlich auch sehr freundlich, dass wieder ein paar Extra-Miner dazugeschaltet haben.

Wie lange denkst Du können wir noch feuern in dieser 25 PH/s Runde? @willi9974

Personally I think the easiest and most secure option is to publish it here and/or via pastebin.

If somebody wants to build a tracker (website, app etc) on top of that data, that's great but not necessary.
Problem with any website is, that it can go down again or can be manipulated. Problem with pdf are certain security concerns, afaik pdf is a format that can enable malicious fishing or even hacking attempts - so some malicious actor could create a pdf with the same name and try to spread it.

I couldn't agree more with this statement (marked in bold). If privacy is the default, then there is no way to flag/cencor certain coins and we have a fully fungible system, even better than cash in many ways.




Is that so? I thought there are already decentralized versions of mixing protocols available - or is this indeed something technically impossible: A decentralized mixing solution? Source for your statement please.

I recently stumbled upon Daniel Schmachtenberger, a macro-economist, macro-ecologist, philosopher and much more.
He's given plenty of interviews and talks that can be found on youtube and other platforms.

Most interesting to me is his way of connecting the dots in an ever increasingly complex world (thus the "macro" in most of his titles). One of his main claims is that by trying to solve a problem (locally) new ones emerge because the focus was too narrow, which in return often creates more (level 2, 3 etc) problems that in the long run make the solution to the initial problem void (or let's call it -EV).

In any case, the reason I mention this here in the Bitcoin forum, is his view on fiat money, the ongoing printing of money and the underlying exponential growth rate that will inevitably result in catastrophy. Daniel claims this is not sustainable in the long run and we are approaching planetary boundaries: The planet's resources are finate and linear and thus are starting to be unable to fulfill the exponential rate of growth. One of the main drivers of this system we are all entangled in is the current currency system we use, which enables this insane increase in monetary supply: the central bank controlled fiat money.

I'd highly recommend to check out some of his talks, you can give it a start with this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kBoLVvoqVY&t=260s


If you have any insights on Daniel Schmachtenbergers theories and thoughts or his stance in regards to the fiat system as one of the main drivers for some of societies biggest challanges right now, feel free to discuss and comment. Input in regards of similar thinkers like Daniel is also most welcome.
I resere the right to remove any random OT posts or ramblings, so don't bother with spam please.

Lowest # set available please (if 1 digit, otherwise 21/21 please)!

Now, this is a cool looking project and moon themes are generally a good thing when done well. Excited to see these IRL.

These are very nice coins, I think one or two good photos might help with the interest.
Wish these were Bitcoin-loaded and themed, they would be SO MUCH more popular. VIA is just so niche and tbh, even though I got the coins because they are nice silver with a wonderful design and hologram, I have no idea what's going on with that cryptocurrency.

Just checked, seems they had a 10x price increase over the last 7 days: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/viacoin/
What the heck was going on there?

btw, if you can't post pics, just throw in the link and I'll repost them for you. Or buy a copper membership.

True, I just checked wallet scrutiny and it is listed as a very solid and secure one there.
I was thinking about another one that stole customer funds, can't remember which one that was right now, about 10 months or so ago. But quite likely it was closed-source, not like unstoppable wallet, which is open-source.