 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
|
I also have this error - fatal cuda error..
windows 10/ GTX1060-1070
|
|
|
|
Guys need help! On my 1070 hash rate falls. It was stable 32.1 (CC1400Mhz / CM4500Mhz), now already 30. To get the old 32, you need to raise the CC to 1600Mhz. But if you dig for example MOAC, then everything is as before 32.1 with CC1400 / CM4500. Why it happens?
DAG file, on MOAC its much smaller You want to say that on NVIDIA, as before on AMD, does the hash rate fall with increasing DAG? and it is on all maps nvidia so? it's just that everyone is silent .. why? p.s. and which driver version is better to use for PhoenixMiner 4.2c? |
|
|
|
|
Guys need help! On my 1070 hash rate falls. It was stable 32.1 (CC1400Mhz / CM4500Mhz), now already 30. To get the old 32, you need to raise the CC to 1600Mhz. But if you dig for example MOAC, then everything is as before 32.1 with CC1400 / CM4500. Why it happens?
|
|
|
|
this is laughter))). 580 can not give such a low temperature. vega cannot give such a low hashrate I merely posted a screenshot of the miner after it had been running for a few minutes. This is the result I got when running the miner. what's the point then of your screenshot ?? no useful information! such screenshots as much as you want in the paint can you do! There is plenty of useful information in that screenshot It shows how long it was running, the pool, the number of accepted shares, and even the address I was using to mine those accepted shares... No comments .. here it seems people take for idiots .. Pool: Pool, Port: 123, address: 21321321, hours 4 minutes .. super information .. |
|
|
|
this is laughter))). 580 can not give such a low temperature. vega cannot give such a low hashrate I merely posted a screenshot of the miner after it had been running for a few minutes. This is the result I got when running the miner. what's the point then of your screenshot ?? no useful information! such screenshots as much as you want in the paint can you do! |
|
|
|
this is laughter))). 580 can not give such a low temperature. vega cannot give such a low hashrate |
|
|
|
MALWARE AVOID He's proven that buy deleting all the posts claiming so and how it hashes without pool results or an internet connection.
Messages have been erased. Spam messages. Make a proof that this is a malvare, and make a verdict. Doing it without proof is pointless. We do not have to prove something to you! You have to prove to us that your miner is a really good miner, not a MALWARE! But for some reason you are not doing anything to ensure that miners believe you .. How many times in this topic have you been asked to provide real hashrate cards, with screenshots!? |
|
|
|
Why the developer himself will not put in his topic overclocking options, hashrate cards? So do all the miner developers who are actually doing the miners! It is very likely that the topic starter is just a cheater and a crook .. 11 pages of satisfied users and no useful information ..
And there is evidence from those who run this software - figures shows good, but there is no load on the core I memory cards do not work ..
Correct me if it is not.
ps developer, if you want people to believe you, please do something for this ..
Why don't you have a load on the cards? I after reboot, got work. I have a good hashrate, I decided to check on all my installations, putting in work for a week. I mine ETH, I like it. here all 12 pages all say that everything works fine, only no one has yet confirmed this! maybe you will take some screenshots to confirm that this miner really works for you? screenshot of the work of the miner, video card settings, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Why the developer himself will not put in his topic overclocking options, hashrate cards? So do all the miner developers who are actually doing the miners! It is very likely that the topic starter is just a cheater and a crook .. 11 pages of satisfied users and no useful information ..
And there is evidence from those who run this software - figures shows good, but there is no load on the core I memory cards do not work ..
Correct me if it is not.
ps developer, if you want people to believe you, please do something for this ..
|
|
|
|
580 with ppt?, isn't that only vega support ppt? how to set 580's ppt?
All AMD GPUs since some time use PPT - I was setting them for my old HD7950 when I was still mining w/ it. Process is exactly the same as for Vega. Create one using ODNT (or download one if you're feeling lazy and don't mind applying mystery settings to your GPUs), then just double click the reg file. I'm assuming you're talking Windows - the Linux process is a little more involved. Btw, PPT was required for vega early on, because you couldn't properly undervolt w/o it. Same was not true for polaris, so using PPTs is more of a process choice (unless being used for more 'under the hood' things like modifying fan tables) Very interesting. Could you tell us more about what PPT and ODNT are? I am very concerned about the energy efficiency of my RX488 .. And how did you manage to raise the memory frequencies so high, with such a low voltage, the memory probably gives a lot of errors in this mode? My RX488 works 1100/2025 @ 855 and gives 30.5hash .. above, I cannot raise the memory frequency at such a voltage that the card would work without memory errors (HWinfo). How can I do the same in the windows? |
|
|
|
For anyone else using the old PBE one-click samsung straps (aka generaleramon's ubermix 3.2) on RX 4/5XX 8gb GPUs, and seeing subpar ETH h/rs due to the tight timings limiting mem clock frequencies... I've been able to get my samsung 580-8s more in-line w/ the microns (~32.5 MH/s) by loosening a couple settings which then allow raising the mem clock (combined w/ a REF increase i use on all my 580s):
--REF 10 --RC 70 --RFC 157 (from REF 5, RC 65, RFC 136)
mclock 2145-2185 (from 2085-2145)
other relevant bits:
cclock 1175, 806mv, phoenixminer, and ubuntu 18.04 + amdgpu-pro 18.50 (though windows should behave similarly)
You could prob get to ~33+ w/ a 1200-1250+ cclock, while I may have slightly overshot on the loosened timings. But as usual, I'm more interested in efficiency than max h/rs.
Also, mclock is still a bit limited, as i believe CL (currently 21) would need to be relaxed to get to 2200+ MHz -- which as i understand, can't be done w/ the tool atm.
excellent, how can you lower your 580's voltage to such a low level with a 1175 frequency, core and memory voltage all at 806mv, that's impressive, how to lower, thanks No tricks - i just set them that way (I use ppts, but that's prob not necessary.) Not all cards can do the same - my range on 580s for ethash is 800-837mv, though I haven't been super-detailed on tuning all of them, so the range could be lower/tighter. Also, proper cooling can help a lot... More heat = more power use, and not just because of higher fan speed. I have mostly sapphire nitros, w/ a fair amount of spacing between GPUs (enough for ~120mm fan between each) and some decent airflow which keeps my temps in the low-mid 40s mostly. Could you take a couple of screenshots of HWinfo, MSI Afterburner? It just all sounds somehow not believable .. |
|
|
|
|
Rigs 1070 and p106, Bminer 15.3.0 shows good speeds, but the pool shows 15% less ..
|
|
|
|
|
on my 1066, in previous versions, they gave 2.8 each .. and in version 15.1.0 they, with the same settings, give 2.3 each
|
|
|
|
Switched for test from Gminer and on my settings it's a bit faster.
1060 3gb pl 50%, +180 core, -502 mem
29-30sol/s with 55w/card
Is this something from the realm of fantasy .. can you confirm your words with at least screenshots? Sure, here it is:  One of my home heaters  hmm, I wonder .. how did you achieve such low power consumption? what voltage? My 1066 below 68vatt can not .. Power limit max to the left and -mem is important too. It's all. It depends on cards, some do 29-30sol at this settings some other rigs 27-28sol. Can't check voltage atm ill post you later. Hi stolarzz, Yarik47 we also managed to get pretty good Sol out of 1060 3GB. We've reported here https://miniz.ch/features/We limited pwr to 60W, and have different settings than what stolarzz reported. We may be able to try different settings soon, maybe it can get better. Thanks for sharing this with everyone! Cheers What does limited pwr to 60W mean? PL in MSI Afterburner? But PL in MSI Afterburner I have 55 to 1070, with a core frequency of 1580, but this is at least 110 watts! |
|
|
|
this is Photoshop? I also have 1070, but the power consumption of your cards, at the core frequency, is just fantastic .. what settings, how? |
|
|
|
Switched for test from Gminer and on my settings it's a bit faster.
1060 3gb pl 50%, +180 core, -502 mem
29-30sol/s with 55w/card
Is this something from the realm of fantasy .. can you confirm your words with at least screenshots? Sure, here it is: One of my home heaters hmm, I wonder .. how did you achieve such low power consumption? what voltage? My 1066 below 68vatt can not .. |
|
|
|
Switched for test from Gminer and on my settings it's a bit faster.
1060 3gb pl 50%, +180 core, -502 mem
29-30sol/s with 55w/card
Is this something from the realm of fantasy .. can you confirm your words with at least screenshots? |
|
|
|
FTW: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:12,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:12,0,440 -setPowerTarget:12,51
SC: nvidiaInspector.exe -setBaseClockOffset:2,0,100 -setMemoryClockOffset:2,0,420 -setPowerTarget:2,64
1.06 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.1 Sol/s
89.6 watts
SC @ 100,420,64
43.2 Sol/s
92.7 watts
1.07 stats:
FTW @ 100,440,50
45.9 Sol/s
90.2 watts
FTW @ 100,440,51
46.2 Sol/s
91.7 watts
SC @ 100,420,67
44.3 Sol/s
98.5 watts
I tied 1.07 with the original OC settings on the SC cards but power draw went up and sols went down so i tried other settings of higher power to see what happens. efficiency just went down. i also tried lower power settings, eff still decreased. I decided to use 1.06 on the SC cards and 1.07 on FTW cards.
Unfortunately I'm unable to achieve 5-10% performance increase as stated in 1.07 notes. from 1.06 at 50% power to 1.07 at 51% power sol's went up little under 3% but power also went up little over 2%. 1.07 on the FTW cards at 51% PL is about the same efficiency as 1.06 at 50% PL
still need to do more comparisons at higher pl
Could you take a screenshot ?! I just can not get the card to work under such conditions as you write? Your FTW has a base frequency of 1067MHz! + 100=1700MHz, at such a frequency and a minimum PL, the card works at least 780Mv, and it can not be 90W . |
|
|
|
Zminer777
Version 1.06 more productive Sol/W ..
Version 1.06 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 230Sol ~ 530W ~ 0.43Sol/W
Version 1.07 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 240Sol ~ 600W ~ 0.38Sol/W
Is it possible to make a special version with new features, but with the old performance?
whats your OC settings? your efficiency should not be so low. which make/model of your 1070s? I run my EVGA 1070 FTW at little over .50sol/w and the EVGA SC at about .465 sol/w which I have found is max efficiency for both cards using my most stable oc settings of 100/440 for the FTW cards and 100/420 for the SC cards. especially at high difficulty efficiency becomes more important. low efficiency ?! then tell me how much your 1070 consumes, what is the temperature and RPM of the cooling system? It matters to me how my cards work! My 1070 consume ~ 105W and give ~46Sol/s (5x46 = 230)! they heat at the same time 52-54C(38% RPM)! 1.06: EVGA FTW are 45 sol/s @ 89.57w EVGA SC are 43.2 sol/s @ 92.75w Haven't used 1.07 yet Can I get your exact settings, preferably with screenshots? Core frequency and memory? Voltage and PL? It is interesting to know how you achieved such low power consumption, 90W. |
|
|
|
Zminer777
Version 1.06 more productive Sol/W ..
Version 1.06 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 230Sol ~ 530W ~ 0.43Sol/W
Version 1.07 - 5x GTX1070 ~ 240Sol ~ 600W ~ 0.38Sol/W
Is it possible to make a special version with new features, but with the old performance?
whats your OC settings? your efficiency should not be so low. which make/model of your 1070s? I run my EVGA 1070 FTW at little over .50sol/w and the EVGA SC at about .465 sol/w which I have found is max efficiency for both cards using my most stable oc settings of 100/440 for the FTW cards and 100/420 for the SC cards. especially at high difficulty efficiency becomes more important. low efficiency ?! then tell me how much your 1070 consumes, what is the temperature and RPM of the cooling system? It matters to me how my cards work! My 1070 consume ~ 105W and give ~46Sol/s (5x46 = 230)! they heat at the same time 52-54C(38% RPM)! 1.06: EVGA FTW are 45 sol/s @ 89.57w EVGA SC are 43.2 sol/s @ 92.75w Haven't used 1.07 yet I do not understand then your question about low rates .. you have the same and lower .. can I take screenshots? |
|
|
|
|
