Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 09:46:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Particl is a decentralized privacy platform built for global P2P eCommerce #PART on: March 24, 2017, 03:54:39 PM
I think there is no reason you wouldn't swap.  But, I will be curious what the Particl Dev team does with the SDC tokens they receive in the swap.

For example, the current swap appears to have allocated sufficient space for all SDC holders to swap for PART if they want to.  But, some will inevitably fail to do so.  Others just may not want to.  What happens to them when the swap is over?

Also, if the Particl Dev team sells the SDC they receive as part of the swap, there will still be 6 million+ SDC tokens out there circulating.  But, for the new owners of SDC who buy from the Particl Dev team, it would appear that there will be no Umbra, no messaging, no support, no platform, etc.  Essentially, they're left holding the bag.

The SDC Dev team apparently developed tools like Umbra, secure messaging, etc. for ShadowCash, then took those ShadowCash tools and used them to regain SDC and some additional BTC that they could sell.  This all may be perfectly legit if they just burned the SDC they receive as part of the swap rather than trying to sell it to others.  Perhaps that's their plan?

What happens in 2 years if funding runs dry for PART?  It's just unclear why a dev team is entitled to take tools explicitly advertised for one platform and use them for another.  If they can do that now, why can't they just repeat the process in 2 years?

All of the questions you ask are answered on the official website in FAQ section: https://particl.io/#faq

In short:

  • If you have SDC, swap them. After the swap, those SDC that haven't been swapped will be useless. To solve the problem with lost coins etc. on the SDC chain, those will be on the PART chain distributed like this: 80%
     to participating community members (according to how much % of the supply they swapped) and the rest 20% to dev fund. By not swapping you're essentially donating to those who did.
  • Devs published the addresses (both SDC and BTC) that hold the funds during this swap, so you can see the funds aren't sold/dumped right away: here's SDC one and BTC one (again, copy-pasting everything from the website)
  • Swapped SDC will be left staking to keep the network secure (not sure how long though)
  • What happens when funds run dry? You can ask the same devs who worked last 2.5 years for free on Shadow Project.. also, there will be more funding rounds (again, see website)

I think it would be good if they staked it, better if they burned it.  But, I don't see that addressed in the FAQ.  

I did see the transparency with the SDC and BTC contribution addresses.  https://explorer.shadow.cash/address/SUaqjDUwAuVKnmWUX5tgU3fK1PkmbdfVCD  

That's a good step.  Any idea what the 14 million SDC that preceded this new project were used for?  "Sent: 14,452,857.40998045 SDC"  Possibly just reflects transitions between staking and non-staking SDC?

Regardless, they're close to their goal, so good for them.  Don't think I'll be joining you all on this one.  Best of luck!
2  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Particl is a decentralized privacy platform built for global P2P eCommerce #PART on: March 23, 2017, 12:27:38 AM

No. The ShadowCash project is now complete. Particl is a new project. The same project team from Shadowcash is working on Particl.

But, what was the ShadowCash project?  It's described here: https://umbra.shadowproject.io  It included Umbra, chat, Tor-backed connectivity, encrypted messaging, etc., all built around ShadowCash.  Here's a sample from the project description: "UMBRA uses ShadowCash as its underlying currency. It goes beyond other digital currencies to make transactions invisible to the public eye, but still nearly seamless for users, who can conduct their business privately anywhere in the world."

Isn't this just taking the platform that was "ShadowCash/Umbra" and recycling it for Particl?

What platform will be left for ShadowCash token holders who don't want to swap?
I ask why not swap? Sdc gonna keep going down no? Either lose money or swap?

I think there is no reason you wouldn't swap.  But, I will be curious what the Particl Dev team does with the SDC tokens they receive in the swap.

For example, the current swap appears to have allocated sufficient space for all SDC holders to swap for PART if they want to.  But, some will inevitably fail to do so.  Others just may not want to.  What happens to them when the swap is over?

Also, if the Particl Dev team sells the SDC they receive as part of the swap, there will still be 6 million+ SDC tokens out there circulating.  But, for the new owners of SDC who buy from the Particl Dev team, it would appear that there will be no Umbra, no messaging, no support, no platform, etc.  Essentially, they're left holding the bag.

The SDC Dev team apparently developed tools like Umbra, secure messaging, etc. for ShadowCash, then took those ShadowCash tools and used them to regain SDC and some additional BTC that they could sell.  This all may be perfectly legit if they just burned the SDC they receive as part of the swap rather than trying to sell it to others.  Perhaps that's their plan?

What happens in 2 years if funding runs dry for PART?  It's just unclear why a dev team is entitled to take tools explicitly advertised for one platform and use them for another.  If they can do that now, why can't they just repeat the process in 2 years?
3  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Particl is a decentralized privacy platform built for global P2P eCommerce #PART on: March 22, 2017, 10:56:20 PM

No. The ShadowCash project is now complete. Particl is a new project. The same project team from Shadowcash is working on Particl.

But, what was the ShadowCash project?  It's described here: https://umbra.shadowproject.io  It included Umbra, chat, Tor-backed connectivity, encrypted messaging, etc., all built around ShadowCash.  Here's a sample from the project description: "UMBRA uses ShadowCash as its underlying currency. It goes beyond other digital currencies to make transactions invisible to the public eye, but still nearly seamless for users, who can conduct their business privately anywhere in the world."

Isn't this just taking the platform that was "ShadowCash/Umbra" and recycling it for Particl?

What platform will be left for ShadowCash token holders who don't want to swap?
4  Bitcoin / Electrum / Re: No Seed No Google Authenticator on: February 05, 2017, 02:08:18 AM
Hello:

I set up my Electrum wallet long ago on an OS I rarely use and I no longer have the seed.

I do, however, have the wallet password.  I can transfer funds in and see all private keys.  I can also open the wallet file.

But, apparently I created the wallet with 2FA.  If I try to transfer funds out, it asks for a Google Authenticator code.  I have never set up or used Google Authenticator.  As a consequence, the transaction sits with 1/2 signatures and never completes.  I've edited the wallet file to set 2FA to 'false' but no luck.

Any help on either recreating the seed with the password, or finding another way to transfer funds out.

2FA wallets utilize a 2 of 3 multi-signature wallet and without at least 2 signatures, you will be unable to send funds. When you create a wallet with 2FA, the seeds you get give you 2 out of the 3 private keys so you can restore the wallet without the need for the 2FA. Unfortunately, without the seed or the 2FA, I don't think you'll be able to gain access to these funds.

Thanks.  Lesson learned.  It's funny, I had a piece of paper with a seed and password right next to the computer with the Electrum wallet.  I then transferred some BTC only to learn later that the password and seed were to a different Electrum wallet on a different OS.  I got lucky with the password but, alas, not enough.  Live and learn.  I appreciate the help.
5  Bitcoin / Electrum / No Seed No Google Authenticator on: February 05, 2017, 01:07:09 AM
Hello:

I set up my Electrum wallet long ago on an OS I rarely use and I no longer have the seed.

I do, however, have the wallet password.  I can transfer funds in and see all private keys.  I can also open the wallet file.

But, apparently I created the wallet with 2FA.  If I try to transfer funds out, it asks for a Google Authenticator code.  I have never set up or used Google Authenticator.  As a consequence, the transaction sits with 1/2 signatures and never completes.  I've edited the wallet file to set 2FA to 'false' but no luck.

Any help on either recreating the seed with the password, or finding another way to transfer funds out.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!