Show Posts
|
Pages: [1]
|
......
Take this opportunity to expose the following anomaly, comparing the blocks mined in MPH and the blocks paid in my transaction history, I see that there are missing blocks, no listed mined blocks in my transaction history, what is happening here?
Did you see that problem only with ethereum mining? Didcsomebody mining monero noticed something strange? Thanks I have only noticed it in the ETH mining and on several times, but it seems strange and worrying, could the moderator of the MPH group explain this? Thanks. My MPH Transactions hystory https://imgur.com/fDy6WCOMined blocks MPH https://imgur.com/4kDCIEWAre you using auto switching feature? Maybe your miners switched to ETC at that time? Please check that. If you want us to investigate in detail, please contact us via contact@miningpoolhub.comNo, I am not using the auto switching feature, I have it always disabled. I will write to your email address for more details. Thanks for your attention.
|
|
|
......
Take this opportunity to expose the following anomaly, comparing the blocks mined in MPH and the blocks paid in my transaction history, I see that there are missing blocks, no listed mined blocks in my transaction history, what is happening here?
Did you see that problem only with ethereum mining? Didcsomebody mining monero noticed something strange? Thanks I have only noticed it in the ETH mining and on several times, but it seems strange and worrying, could the moderator of the MPH group explain this? Thanks. My MPH Transactions hystory https://imgur.com/fDy6WCOMined blocks MPH https://imgur.com/4kDCIEW
|
|
|
Is there an issue with Ethereum? Stats and shares don't seem to be counted, though rate is showing up properly.
PPLNS Target 92377646 Round Shares [Submitted shares since last found block (ie. round shares)] Est. Shares 122,440,831 (done: 0%) Your Valid 0.0000 Your Invalid 0.0000 (0.00%) ETH Estimates Block 0.00000000 Fees 0.00000000 Donation 0.00000000 Payout 0.00000000 Network Info Difficulty 2,054,216,375,173,661.00000000 Est. Avg. Time per Block 14 seconds Current Block 8012593
That happens when the current block, in this case 8012593, is not being mined by MPH, so every time a block is not mined by MPH it will appear an equal information with everything in zero. Take this opportunity to expose the following anomaly, comparing the blocks mined in MPH and the blocks paid in my transaction history, I see that there are missing blocks, no listed mined blocks in my transaction history, what is happening here?
|
|
|
Hi MPH,
There is some issue with the ethereum backend?, I don't see the share, payouts, and block finded.
regards.
|
|
|
Hi,
The Coinmine web portal and eth.coinmine.pl doesn't work, are servers down too?
Thank you.
|
|
|
Guys,
I lowered number of confirmation needed for Decred payout so now it should be processed within an hour or so.
feeleep
Hi, is coinmine eth mining pool web site down? Thank you.
|
|
|
Further speed improvements are very difficult, indeed. I have been experimenting with a different algorithm, but that is (currently) still slower than the current one. Though there is still more room for optimization there.
I plan to release an update on the current algorithm that should bring a small improvement, probably by the end of the week.
Hi Optiminer, some update of the current algorithm on the road?
|
|
|
My setting:
Rig 1; MOBO1 : Gigabyte z97 Gaming 7 LGA 1150 CPU: Intel Celeron G3250 LGA 1150 RAM: 4GB (2600 MHz) Windows 10
with -i 8 GPU's 3 x MSI AMD R9 390 8GB, 1081/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 390 H/s) 2 x XFX AMD R9 390X 8GB, 1112/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 410 H/s) 1 x ASUS AMD R9 390 8GB, 1091/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 395 H/s)
Rig 2: MOBO: MSI Z97 Gaming 5 LGA 1150 CPU: Intel Celeron G1840 LGA 1150 RAM: 4GB (2600 MHz) Windows 10
With -i 8 GPU's 1 x MSI AMD R9 390 8GB, 1081/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 380 H/s) 1 x Gigabyte AMD Gaming G1 R9 390 8GB, 1065/1500 (speed with CM V12.1 = 388 H/s) 2 x XFX AMD Rx 480 Rs 4GB, 1400/1720 (speed with CM V12.1 = 290 H/s)
All running very well
|
|
|
Excellent Claymore, go ahead!!
|
|
|
|