Bitcoin Forum
May 29, 2024, 06:58:53 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Prioritize your own transactions in bitcoind - Block generation? on: May 25, 2011, 08:14:16 PM
This pull request has all you need:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/97

All transactions for addresses in the wallet are included for free even if normal rules require a fee.

Thank you very much!
2  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Prioritize your own transactions in bitcoind - Block generation? on: May 25, 2011, 07:46:08 PM
modify the .cpp so every transaction gets 1 priority?

I don't want to alter the priority of other transactions (fees & freebies), I just want to guarantee that my own sends are included for free when I successfully generate the block.
3  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Prioritize your own transactions in bitcoind - Block generation? on: May 25, 2011, 07:33:20 PM
I'm curious as to whether or not bitcoind currently has any method for prioritizing its own transactions for picking which transactions to include in the block it is attempting to generate.  I would like to avoid paying the 0.01 fees for new inputs/large transactions, and have the hashing power to do so in what I consider a reasonable time frame.

If it can not, has anybody made a modification bitcoind to do this sort of thing?
4  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / bitcoind including transaction fees regardless of size? on: May 11, 2011, 01:40:31 AM
I sent a few transactions out recently through bitcoind, and every single one has produced a 0.01 fee, even when the average size of the transactions is 250 bytes (they almost always only had 1 input).

How can I disable the transaction fee when sending smaller amounts?  I'm not that concerned about speed, and I don't like the idea of having a payout of 0.25-0.3 BTC being sent with a 4-5% fee attached.
5  Bitcoin / Mining / Re: pushpoold - Any way to test that it's actually working? on: May 08, 2011, 07:17:02 AM
Spoke too soon!  About 15 minutes after making this post I solved a block with the private pool!
6  Bitcoin / Mining / pushpoold - Any way to test that it's actually working? on: May 08, 2011, 05:56:08 AM
I've been working on setting up a private pool for myself and a few friends (combined we're around 25-30 gHash/sec).  I got pushpool compiled and running, blkmon running to make sure long polling is active and working properly.

I'm testing it on my cluster of computers (~5 gHash/sec).  It's been running a bit over 30 hours now, so on average I would've found something at current difficulty, but I know luck can always screw you over.

My only concern is whether or not pushpool is actually sending/submitting proper work to my GPUs.  They're submitting shares and I've run some calculations based on the share database timestamps (share count during time frame * 2^32, divided by time frame in seconds), which is giving an approximate gHash equal to what I've expected.

Extra info edit:  About 1 in 200 shares submitted to pushpoold are forwarded to bitcoind, log file returns:  PROOF-OF-WORK submitted upstream.  Result: false.  Not sure if that has any additional meaning.
7  Bitcoin / Mining / Linux vs Windows for Dedicated Mining on: April 18, 2011, 02:44:05 AM
I've got a machine almost built running dual 5870s (was $100-150 cheaper than 1x 5970 for slightly more output).

Does the OS have any effect on the hash rates?  If Linux is faster, would running a GUI linux distro instead of command line have much/any effect?  I'm looking at either Windows 7 x64 or Ubuntu.  I have some spare keys for Windows 7, so the cost of the OS isn't a factor.

UPDATE/EDIT:  If it matters, I may add on a third and/or fourth GPU to the system later.  Running a 1k watt PSU in the rig right now with ample space and airflow.
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!