But anyway if we are talking about moderate gambling then we can consider first of all having other diversions other than gambling. Because if all you have is gambling to turn to when you are stressed, bored or whatever then you are likely to fall into an addiction sooner or later. Gambling should only be one of the activities you spend few of your minutes in instead of spending all your time in.
Yes, if you only rely on gambling for entertainment, it will clearly lead to addiction rather than enjoyment. For me, I need to have other forms of entertainment that can take my mind off gambling when I lose. Gambling activities should not be done for too long. When you have been losing for a long time, you will want to chase your losses, so it is better to gamble a little and find other activities that are more beneficial. |
|
|
|
but what about those not so expensive casino or betting sites? there’s usually no air conditioning unit, it’s small and cramped but there are still people who go there to bet maybe because the desire to bet is higher than their desire for comfort
They are not usually looking for comfort but for big wins, even if it means sacrificing comfort in a casino that is cramped and has no air conditioning. I can't imagine going to a casino like that. You would probably sweat profusely and feel short of breath, as you said, because it is cramped. It's not about entertainment but about forcing yourself to gamble. Don't be surprised if there are people like this, and they don't care at all; perhaps the majority of them are from the lower class. |
|
|
|
karena pemerintah hanya melihat pasar crypto Indonesia itu hanya sekedar "lahan basah" yang bisa menghasilkan pajak bagi Indonesia. Sudah berapa kali presiden jokowi dulu mengatakan cryptocurrency dan blockchain, tapi saya kira itu cuman sekedar omon-omon saja.
Ya nyatanya memang begitu sekarang, jadi lahan basah untuk narik pajak sebanyak-banyaknya dari transaksi crypto yang terjadi. Bahkan sekarang indonesia bisa di katakan melek crypto dan makin banyak pengguna crypto, sehingga lebih banyak pajak yang didapat. Pemerintah belum ada tindak lanjut nyata soal bagaimana perkembangan crypto dan penerapannya. Yang jadi fokus pemerintah sekarang cuman regulasi aja dan bahkan per 1 Agustus 2025 Pajak Transaksi Kripto naik lagi sebagaimana yang sudah diatur dalam Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) Nomor 50 Tahun 2025 pajak untuk penjualan aset kripto di exchanger lokal naik dari 0,1% menjadi 0,21% dari nilai transaksi dan penjualan yang dilakukan exchanger luar dikenai pajak 1% yang sebelumnya 0,2%. Nah sekarang Pembeli tidak lagi dikenai Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) sejak perubahan regulasi ini di sahkan. Anak jokowi juga dulu pernah bilang pas saat debat akan gejot hilirisasi digital, siapkan ahli blockchain, siapkan ahli kripto - mana kok sampai sekarang gak muncul malah pajak di naikin.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q3VeyP2DOUUKalau soal urusan lahan basah Indonesia memang gerak cepat dalam naikin nya terutama dalam pajak kripto yang terus naik per 1 Agustus 2025 seperti om katakan dan hanya regulasi nya saja yang terus di atur sedangkan para ahli nya kami tidak melihat, apalagi sampai mengembangkan sesuatu dalam kripto seperti nya gak ada. |
|
|
|
|
The Wolfbet signature campaign ended a few weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
|
You won't get rich with a modest salary while basic needs continue to increase, especially if you can't control yourself, then your money will continue to run out, especially if you buy unnecessary items.
Now it's better to improve your skills so you can get a side job, thereby increasing your monthly income. At least you'll have something to set aside for investment, rather than saving money that will continue to lose value due to inflation.
The big problem now is that prices are rising while salaries remain stagnant.
Perhaps this is due to economic instability.
|
|
|
|
Will you take another risk on Manchester United today? Chelsea is better than Manchester United.
I don't know if the advantage at Old Trafford will excite the home team's game. I'm still a bit skeptical considering how bad their game has been, so many people still doubt them when they face Chelsea later.
I myself don't want to take any risks in betting, it's better to just watch it.
I didn’t bet on this week’s match, but if I had, I probably would’ve lost again, haha. Yesterday, I was pretty optimistic about Chelsea. They looked productive in their last few matches, so I thought they had a good shot this time. But that red card for Sánchez in the 5th minute really made things tough for them from the start. Even Man United also got a red card later, Chelsea only managed to score one goal and this is not enough to save the game. Hahaha, we often bet on Manchester United, but in the end, they still lose.  Yeah, we never expected the match to turn out like this, but Manchester United still won - you know how arrogant Manchester United fans in Indonesia are when they win. Lol Btw, Arsenal vs. Manchester City ended in a draw, and Martinelli managed to equalize the score. In the second half, I saw Manchester City parking the bus because Arsenal kept pressing them relentlessly. |
|
|
|
Btw, congratulations on Manchester United win last night, as it was a very important victory. The game changed drastically after Sanchez red card, followed by Casemiro, which resulted in both teams being reduced to 10 men.
After being level at 10 players in the second half, Chelsea managed to add another goal, but if Chelsea hadn't received a red card early on, they probably wouldn't have lost. The Red Devils fans are happy that their team won. Today is a big match, and don't be surprised if Arsenal and Man City go head2head things will be very heated.  Arsenal 1.93 - 3.75 Manchester City. Here, The Gunners are the favorites with a significant odds difference, but I predict this could end in a draw. I feel justified in betting on BTTS yes at odds of 1.65.  |
|
|
|
The longer we play, there are always 2 possible outcome. Whether it will bring us into deeper loss or it will give us a nice win eventually. It is all about luck. What is wrong is when we force ourselves or we are over confident that we will win big eventually which make us forget about the worse case.
Most people lose more when they play longer than they win. They may occasionally play for a long time and get good results, but luck is not something you can count on every day. In gambling, losing is a certainty. That's pushing yourself too hard—being overconfident in a game that relies on luck rather than skill. This is the worst case scenario, where they will lose a lot. |
|
|
|
A famous athlete, especially one with many followers, will find it easier to get their account restored when they encounter problems—this is not surprising because if, for example, Durant made negative comments about Coinbase, it would have a huge impact. In the article, Durant is described as an early investor in Coinbase with his company “Thirty Five Ventures,” so it is only natural that KD would receive a special response directly from the CEO of Coinbase. |
|
|
|
many investors are misunderstandiing the advice "only invest what you can afford to lose."
This simply means that you shouldn't invest with money for your important needs or basic needs, rather, you should only invest with the extra cash i.e your discretionary income to enable to hodli for long and wouldn't give a fuck if the price dips or if you don't make profits in the long run. When you invest with caution since you know that bitcoin is a volatile asset and profit is not a guarantee in future, you will not only focus on investing in bitcoin, you will also try to diversify into other assets like bond, shares, equity and cash equavilents. Yes, this is just a term where investing should not use money for basic needs, so in that sense, investing is with what you can afford to lose—it doesn't mean gambling, it's just that the money you invest is for the long term and you shouldn't cash it out in the near future, even though I'm sure bitcoin won't drop to zero. Diversification is indeed a good strategy—some investors have already done this; they don't just focus on Bitcoin but also on other assets that are considered stable. |
|
|
|
I am curious what is the one thing that you will never bet with? I am not talking about life because I think almost everyone will say that already but instead I am talking about other things. Like your house, your car or maybe some weird thing like your favorite shirt or the mug your father gave you. Those kinds of things. It would be interesting to see how people value different things within the metrics of gambling.
You know the answer to that question, Would you sell your basic needs to gamble? Would anyone say they'd sell their car to gamble? You know that too. There are people who risk their wives and girlfriends, but I don't know what kind of morality that is. Anyway, gambling should only be played with money if you have money, play, if you don't, don't. Don't even think about betting on your other needs. It is excessive to risk something completely immoral, such as your wife or girlfriend, so I would say that people who do this are a little stressed. Perhaps people who gamble away their cars or property do so because I have seen several times in local news and heard from friends that they had to sell their cars and houses just to gamble, and some of the money was used to pay off debts incurred from gambling. It's a little crazy for people to do this kind of thing. |
|
|
|
So much drama at Old Trafford both teams are playing with 10 players but Chelsea had their own red too quick and Manchester United took it as an advantage leading Chelsea by 2 goals before casemiro was sent off after giving Manchester United the second goal, second half will be a different game since they are now level in players Chelsea early red card affected them, Manchester United will defend so hard to get this win to keep the job of Amorim safe. Manchester United 2-0 Chelsea still HT.
No one expected that Chelsea's red card would affect their game, giving Manchester United a 2-goal lead. In the second half, they will play with 10 men, just like Chelsea. This will determine whether Chelsea can come back from this deficit. They should be able to, but it's unclear how the second half will play out. It looks like Chelsea will put up a fight. |
|
|
|
Last week, I took a risk by picking Manchester United, but this match won't be a repeat . Manchester United are in poor form and need to find a solution to improve their strategy. With a club with many injured players, they can lose 3-0, so it will be even more difficult against Chelsea. As we know, Chelsea have excellent goal productivity at the moment, I think United defense will need to be playing extra hard to stop Chelsea attacks. Will you take another risk on Manchester United today? Chelsea is better than Manchester United. I don't know if the advantage at Old Trafford will excite the home team's game. I'm still a bit skeptical considering how bad their game has been, so many people still doubt them when they face Chelsea later. I myself don't want to take any risks in betting, it's better to just watch it. |
|
|
|
As an amateur bettor, I was really impressed to see your large bets and win 4 out of 4. WOW...  If I understood correctly, these are all separate odds. It's a real shame that you didn't combine them all, the profit would have been significantly higher. But, okay. Seems like a smart tactic.
It seems like these were all single bets. If the bets had been combined into a parlay, the risk of losing would have been greater because if 1 out of 4 lost, the whole thing would have failed. |
|
|
|
|
It is a fact that rich people gamble in large amounts and choose small odds, so the profits will be different from betting small amounts, which will yield small profits.
First, understand this:
The higher the bet, the greater the risk of loss.
If you bet a small amount, then you are prepared to lose a small amount.
Would you dare to bet large amounts even if you were rich?
My answer is no, because I don't want to take greater risks in gambling.
|
|
|
|
|
I have received several bonuses from BC.game via email in the form of codes, and the amounts vary no deposit is required.
The requirement is 35x wagering- you may not be able to meet this wagering requirement because it is too high and the bonus balance will run out before you can cash it out. At least until now, no one has been able to meet this requirement.
|
|
|
|
|
The point is just to get as many affiliates as possible, right? By registering at the casino you recommend, then using your referral and getting a personal bonus even though you don't know how much the bonus is.
But what is clear is that there are requirements where those who use your referral must deposit and bet.
|
|
|
|
I never encounter any deposit delay whenever I hit big profit. There’s just some point that withdrawal has some delay like 30 minutes since it’s being approved by an admin but no issue at all despite my account is still not KYC verified.
I've never experienced any delays in withdrawals at Casinopunk, probably because the withdrawal amounts are low, so it's quick, but I don't know if, for example, large withdrawals require admin approval, which would mean a slightly longer wait. You will have no worries on withdrawal here even with huge amount if you are not involved on malicious activity.
Yeah, as long as you're not doing anything dangerous, there's really nothing to worry about. |
|
|
|
This right but since scam is not moderated in the forum the scam accusation board is full of fake scam accusations from user that either scammers or trying to get a refund after losing their money using lame excuses against the casino.
I don't know... Nowadays, there are many false accusations because there is no concrete evidence, so it is difficult to determine whether the accusations are true or not - now most of the accusations keep coming from beginners. There’s also some user that is good on fabricating evidence so that board is now full of unreliable report although there’s still some case there that worthy to follow.
It seems that there are still many cases like this. We are lucky that there’s still some user like @holydarkness that relentlessly covering that board to resolve serious issues with proof.
Same - I salute him for continuing to solve problems and helping non-stop. It seems that he should be appreciated for continuing to help people with valid accusations. |
|
|
|
Barca - Newcastle should be a very competitive game but let's be honest, Barcelona most likely will score at least 3 goals and win the game but I do see Newcastle being able to score aswell.
BTTS yes is likely to be a good bet in this match. Newcastle will be playing at home, so they will have the advantage in front of their fans, but Barcelona will not be an easy opponent for the hosts, especially since Barcelona often scores many goals - a sign that there will be more than 3 goals, in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
