|
[02:28am] lolstate: Hi, ThickAsThieves. Have you had any contact with Danny (CEO of Neobee) or any of the other members of the Neobee management team before or after their delisting from Havelock?
[02:29am] lolstate: Hi, mircea_popescu. Have you had any contact with Danny (CEO of Neobee) or any of the other members of the Neobee management team before or after their delisting from Havelock?
[02:29am] assbot: [MPEX] [S.MPOE] 13443 @ 0.00084504 = 11.3599 BTC [-] {2}
[02:29am] lolstate: TAT, mircea_popescu.
[02:30am] lolstate: Why are you so silent?
|
|
|
|
MintSauce, so cute.  [01:53am] lolstate: Hi, TAT. Have you had any contact with Danny (CEO of Neobee) or any of the other members of the management team before or after their delisting from Havelock? [01:54am] zoinky left the chat room. (Ping timeout: 252 seconds) [01:54am] lolstate: Hi, MP. Have you had any contact with Danny (CEO of Neobee) or any of the other members of the management team before or after their delisting from Havelock? --- Ref: TAT = ThickAsThieves MP = mircea_popescu |
|
|
|
^Hello new friend, how's tricks? Danny, I'd like to say thank you for stepping in to to help sort out this mess. I realise you working with Jon improves the odds of the return of my coins. If no one had stepped in to lend a hand, I doubt I'd get anything back.  So this guy shilled for at least ActiveMning, BitFunder and Neobee and now gives life lessons? Only on Bitcointalk. It's raining tossers! Only on Bittalk. |
|
|
|
^Hello new friend, how's tricks? Danny, I'd like to say thank you for stepping in to to help sort out this mess. I realise you working with Jon improves the odds of the return of my coins. If no one had stepped in to lend a hand, I doubt I'd get anything back. Did I say tosser?! Acute, I would have asserted tosser^tosser ~ a google. Floating points may vary. Wanker. |
|
|
|
...
It is sad but it doesn't excuse your lack of due diligence.
...
jimmothy, why in the world would i do due diligence on something that is clearly a scam at first glance, and something no sane person would *think* of investing in? My due diligence was satisfied right after I stopped laughing and threw another coffee-ruined keyboard into the trash. You're still thinking that strangers are here to help you. That may have been the case once, when the idiot crumbs (bless his misguided egalitarian soul) tried to present you with logic and facts and shit, only to be called a troll and B Why do you spend hours days here then? For fun? Don't you have something better to do than trolling? Are you not crumbs? Well said, Jimbo. MintChop/Crumbs is an ugly persona, bereft of all (and necessary) time optimisation skills. I do shudder when contemplating the wasted hours it pours into its posts. Maybe it's its way of rallying against the inevitable heat death we all face. Lol, what a tosser. |
|
|
|
Best would be to start a new modded thread and link to this one as historic reference, for those who want to check how things progressed.
I agree. The forum mods are either unwilling or unable to kick off the mentalists, so I'd accept a modded thread as a compromise. Edit: Even better would be a moderated thread on LMB, but I wouldn't want any developer effort beyond 1 hour to be sidetracked from rolling out the business for this. |
|
|
|
Two A-bombs didn't stop them. They won. |
|
|
|
Danny, I didn't post before now because I figured you had more important things to do than check the thread. What you have done for your company and Bitcoin is inspirational. We will see others take up the flame, apply their own spin, yet no one can deny 2014 is when it all kicked off. In Cyprus! Well done! |
|
|
|
+1 good eye sir
Yet, -1 for humour. A good comedic rule of thumb: don't edit your post after someone has run with the punchline. It tends to kill the joke. |
|
|
|
my respect.
Mine evapourated when he doubled down with the stormtrooper. |
|
|
|
The branch is ready
Very nice. By far more attractive than a typical high street bank branch. |
|
|
|
Perhaps you mean the ECB rather than the EU?  They are essentially the same thing i.e. anti-democratic, wealth-confiscating 20th Century constructs not suitable for today's flatter world. If they could adapt to bitcoin, I suppose they would, but it will be beyond them, not least because they can't understand it. |
|
|
|
Huh. You couldn't make this stuff up. I wonder if the EU is the dinosaur and bitcoin is their extinction event.  |
|
|
|
Sorry but that read like an answer from someone who doesn't wish to disclose the number.
Data protection covers the rights of individuals, not the right to disclose 'yes we have done many/hundreds/thousands of euros/transactions'.
Do you honestly expect many people signing up for classes with XBT at this point? Be realistic. Not at all -- making the uni deal little more than a publicity stunt. Any sensible investor would assume UNic have sold precisely one course place for bitcoin. It's all about price discovery. That's why exchanges exist - so people can buy and sell NEOBEE on a free market, the naked lunch be damned. |
|
|
|
OP delivered! Very nice photos. Congratulations to Danny and team. Do we think we'll have claims this is all CGI? |
|
|
|
Sure, there's a bit of room for ambiguity, but not much
I agree, although where there is the potential for a little wiggle room, we should acknowledge it and encourage people to explore the possibility. My take has always been Bitcoin was ambitious beyond belief. It attempts to bootstrap a technology, protocol, currency and monetary revolution in one. It's actually incredibly impressive that in 5 years it appears to be coming close to realising this goal. If it only achieved 1/4 of its aim, it will be an outstanding success. |
|
|
|
> My point again was if you say bitcoin is intended as a weapon to damage central banks like Paul Krugman did, then you are using loaded words to appeal to people's ideology and preconceived belief system Whether Satoshi sat down to create an explicity weaponised technology is up for debate. You can’t deny, though, that Bitcoin is an implicitly weaponised system - its successful uptake will damage central banking, possibly fatally. The Krugmans of the world recognise this, imo. Recently, there was a video interview with Kruggers on Bloomberg or CNBC when he actually sounded as though he was in despair when forced to acknowledge that Bitcoin had not yet died. I think he said something about ‘we’ (refering to him and his cronies) not understanding why ‘it’ (refering to bitcoin) was still around when his theories don’t allow for it. I read his latest NYT piece as a lame attempt at one of the first shots across our bow. They are starting to adopt the ‘then they fight you’ mode.  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
