Show Posts
It would keep everything in the public. Example: Member A receives feedback from Member B. Member B leaves feedback back to Member A and points to their trust dispute thread so members who are willing or unwilling to deal can find out what's going on a little better. Also, other members can conclude for themselves if the feedback was added fairly and adjust their trust list accordingly.
Looks like trust has become pretty popular as of late. Many members trusting others they shouldn't and others not dealing with users who have questionable feedback. Not singling any users or the default trust list out either, I see questionable (both positive and negative) under the untrusted feedback section a lot too.
or... just let things play out in the Meta section?
Wouldn't be very smart to run up your post count or post to get paid from your sig in this thread. No need to repeat others (slightly rewording what someone else just said) or post useless replies, remember Mods visit this section and will probably know what you're up to
I'll be honest, when they first went public I had two accounts to get around their limits (most were doing it at the time, couldn't find anything in their TOS against it). First week of November comes and I'm told I could only have one so I picked and they closed the other. I provided my real information through their identification process, used the same debit card and never charged back.
