Bitcoin Forum
September 29, 2023, 08:19:21 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 25.0 [Torrent]
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
1  Economy / Reputation / Suspicious accounts in Games and rounds on: March 03, 2021, 05:29:42 PM
During the competition in the " | Guess Total Wagers" thread Archive, I noticed that some participants edited their answers synchronously, every time when a new answers appeared in the topic. Then I checked the registration dates of all accounts in the thread and found that several profiles were created on the same month. Moreover, the registration dates of several profiles differ by only a few minutes.

Registration dates (this profiles list is far from complete, most likely):
February 02, 2017, 02:35:16 PM - peter0425
February 09, 2017, 01:34:03 PM - TravelMug
February 09, 2017, 10:25:39 PM - MiteLit
February 09, 2017, 10:27:53 PM - ornabldo
February 09, 2017, 10:30:41 PM - BattalgiaTR
February 09, 2017, 10:38:48 PM - s0nicwall
February 28, 2017, 03:11:32 PM - franklin9
February 28, 2017, 03:29:18 PM - USSENT
February 28, 2017, 03:43:39 PM - OVOBTC

It must be said that registration date alone is an insufficient argument to accuse someone of cheating, but this factor can be served as a motive for deeper investigation and finding other connections.

TravelMug & peter0425

From the records about the winners of the last 20 " Guess Total Wagers" contests, it is known that TravelMug has won five contests and peter0425 has won two.

When I learning that TravelMug and peter0425 accounts were registered a week apart and they changed their passwords on the same day in June 2018, I decided to take a closer look at these profiles and it turned out that their owner(s) speaking Filipino [1][2].

Sometimes TravelMug and peter0425 were registering in signature campaigns, within a few minutes:
1. Digital Developers Fund (DDF) Signature and Avatar Campaign (Archive)
2. Enigma Catalyst - Build Your Crypto Hedge Fund | Signature campaign (Archive)
3. Social Signature & Avatar Campaign (Archive)

Thoughts about connections between TravelMug and peter0425 have been in the air for quite some time. In 2017 there was the investigation of campaign manager DarkStar_ about these accounts.

Can't be 100% sure that both of these accounts belong to the same owner, but much probably they may be coordinated together.

It is worth to note that five profiles from the list above, including TravelMug, were registered on the same day, on February 9, 2017. Other profiles from the list have also a lot of similarities.

The same names on different sites:

Chelsea 1 - 0 Manchester United
First Goal : 55"
username : RistilaK

Pizza and pasta so picking italian

username :- RistilaK

American Food
username :- harrehyyy2



Arsenal 0 - 2 Man City
First Goal time: 36'
FJ username: lecrunch

chinese, I like the incredibly diverse flavors chinese food offer

username :- lecrunch

Close "woke up" dates:

Sep 01, 2019, 06:54:03 AM - u=954482 - MiteLit - woke up
Aug 29, 2019, 03:42:06 PM - u=954486 - s0nicwall - woke up
Aug 29, 2019, 03:40:09 PM - u=954484 - BattalgiaTR - woke up
Aug 22, 2019, 02:09:53 PM - u=954483 - ornabldo - woke up

Sep 07, 2018, 01:21:56 PM - u=954483 - ornabldo - woke up
Sep 05, 2018, 09:45:54 AM - u=962678 - OVOBTC - woke up

Aug 10, 2018, 06:18:07 AM - u=962656 - franklin9 - woke up
Aug 07, 2018, 03:38:24 PM - u=954482 - MiteLit - woke up
Aug 06, 2018, 12:20:05 PM - u=962666 - USSENT - woke up

Merit sendings:

ornabldo sent 1 merit to USSENT for post
s0nicwall sent 1 merit to OVOBTC for post

In the Roobet's topic, I didn't see a rule that prohibits the use of alt accounts, but in my opinion this should be obvious, because if some profiles are controlled by one person, this gives him/her a huge advantage compared to other users and a lot of space for manipulation in contests. It would be interesting to know the opinions of other users, especially those who participated in these contests.
2  Economy / Reputation / Neg tag for opinion about laws. JohhnyUA's trust on: September 12, 2020, 09:31:02 PM
I would like to discuss the negative feedback that was sent to Legendary johhnyUA from Default Trust member bob123.

I've asked bob123 in PM on this case six months ago, but there was no response from him.

What Bitcointalk community thinks about this comment?

bob1232019-07-25ReferenceThis user doesn't care if something is legal or not.
Quote: "[...] so i don't fucking care if something is "against the law" [...]"

Check reference for context.

At first glance such statement from johhnyUA can confuse, but let me publish the message, which may explain his position.

don't fucking care if something is "against the law"

Quote out of context. I knew that one day someone will try to use it as an argument. In reality, it was about the fact that i don't accept arguments like "this is against the law" because the law is very different from country to country. In some countries "against the law" is do not kill fallen woman (in meaning woman that suck not only husband's cock) in some freedom of speech is "against the law" or freedom of existence to some nations.
And also it was in speech about "I will not follow their ToS because in my country it's against the law, ha ha" so i just told that i don't accept argument's like "this is against the law" because it's shitty statement. One day, in the future cryptocurrencies can become "against the law"

I believe that there are unspoken ethical rules that help people coexist together and build a harmonious community, as well as state laws which do not always help people, but sometimes restrict their freedom. By using cryptocurrencies in some countries, you do not violate anything, while in other countries you will be punished. So, is it right to blame people and mark them with a negative trust if they don't agree to obey such laws?

[Map: Legal Status of Cryptocurrencies]

I will also quote a well-known history researcher from Russia Yevgeny Ponasenkov about laws.

The only laws that I admit are the laws of nature, physics, chemistry, biology, history, even sociology. They are absolute, they are objective, they are everywhere and always, they can be checked, they cannot be canceled. And if the laws are written by idiots, liars, hypocrites, satraps, tyrants, no matter who - it's all temporary and local.
3  Other / Meta / Allow newbies with merit to post images on: September 08, 2020, 12:17:15 PM
Due to abuse, newbie-posted embedded images are now disabled on these pages:
- Topic display
- Recent posts / patrol
- Previews
They're not currently hidden in PMs or on some other pages (like a user's "show posts" page), though I might change that later if it seems necessary.

Disabled images get transformed into links automatically. When the poster becomes a Jr member, the images that he tried to post previously will automatically be re-enabled (though there might be a few minutes of delay).

This extends to all past posts as well as future ones.

The restriction on posting images creates a lot of inconvenience not just for newbies who posting quality content, but also for other Bitcointalk members who cannot immediately see pictures from newbies on the forum.

If a newbie received at least 1 merit, then I suppose the probability that s/he is a spammer is low. Therefore, I believe that it is necessary to remove the Activity requirement, so that any user who received at least 1 merit could freely publish pictures.

Below are several examples when newbies with merit were unable to post images due to their low activity:
4  Other / Meta / Mass emailing to all users about the accounts recovery procedure on: March 16, 2020, 01:38:25 AM
Bitcointalk has been hacked three times over the past 10 years and, in addition to that, profiles are often become the target of different cheaters.

In December 2018 the new recovery procedure of accounts has appeared on the forum, but I'm sure that many users don't aware about this function, because it is necessary to keep reminding about it (examples: 1, 2, 3).

So I believe that for secure and develop of the community, Bitcointalk administration need to send an one-time mass emailing to all addresses, registered in the forum database, with notifications that profiles can be restored if they were hacked, and add the link to the topic "Recovering hacked/lost accounts".
5  Other / Meta / Decreasing number of forum users on: December 24, 2019, 05:24:45 PM
In Meta, tables with the merit & trust statistics are often discussing, but other important information is overlooked.

Bitcointalk has a summary where periodically published the data on how many visitors on the forum:

When you compare with previous years, then you can see that the amount of traffic on Bitcointalk fell to a breaking point.

December 2016
Unique logged-in users: 16022
Unique IPs: 133968

December 2017
Unique logged-in users: 90295
Unique IPs: 1093015

December 2018
Unique logged-in users: 32680
Unique IPs from logged-out users: 161435

December 2019
Unique logged-in users: 13727
Unique IPs from logged-out users: 94181

For the most part, I connect this fact that users are switching to much more modern, convenient and mobile platforms for communication and the Bitcointalk site needs urgent updating.
6  Economy / Reputation / Balthazar's trust on: December 14, 2019, 11:08:16 AM
I wish to know the opinion of the community, do you agree that user Balthazar justly has a negative trust, which was issued by DT member Cryptodevil in March 2017?

A DT member Cryptodevil believes that Balthazar deserves a negative tag because Balthazar was linked to the BTC-e exchange.

Balthazar himself has admitted that he was a chat moderator and technical consultant in the BTC-e, but denies that he organized this exchange.

<...> I'm definitely neither owner nor founder of this project. I was a moderator and consultant who helped with dealing some technical issues (ddos/bruteforce attacks) and that's all. <...>

Balthazar is a veteran of Bitcointalk. In 2012 he had participated in the moderators elections in Russian section. Balthazar also helps against spammers and bounty cheaters on the forum. I asked Balthazar to join the discussion but he refused.

Nonetheless, let me quote from RBC magazine from December 13, 2017:

Translation into English by Crimerussia:
During the investigation, users found that Svetleishiy and Buyanov could be connected to the exchange, they were looking for Alexey, who hid under support. But 31-year-old software engineer Alexey Demidov, who is known in the community by the name balthazar, got a lot to bear. His mining pool in 2011 was the official partner of BTC-e, and he himself served as a moderator in the chat room of the exchange (Wayback Machine and chat archive data).

However, BTC-e is not his brainchild, Demidov only cooperated with the site, the 'veteran' assured RBC, communicating with both balthazar and support. Demidov himself said that he appealed to the police in the autumn with a demand to open a criminal case under the Article Libel against those who call him the owner of BTC-e on the forums: after receiving a refusal, he complained to the Prosecutor's Office, which, he said, found signs of a crime. Now Demidov works for Russian Mining Coin Internet Ombudsman Dmitry Marinichev: in the autumn the company said that it raised $43.2 million for ICO.

Balthazar's comments from 2015 indirectly confirm he was a consultant and didn't hold a managerial position in BTC-e, also the work at BTC-e apparently wasn't his main employment.

<...> I have many examples of how good reporter became an absolutely authoritarian moderator and committed multiple abuses of power. Last one was becool at the and that was my fault. I've checked a lot of his reports and recommended him as moderator... I'll never do such mistake again. I regretted it many times and supported the cancellation of his appointment a bit later. Roll Eyes

Balthazar has banned more more than a few times from the BTC-E chat, but you said you didn't want the position anyway, so a semi vouch is there if you want it.
Yep, I'm a mod at btc-e since 2012.

It's unfortunately but I can't guarantee that I'll have enough time for full moderation because I'm already moderator of three resources. <...>

Is there at least one hard proof or official statement, that Balthazar held a senior position in BTC-e? If there is no such evidence, then do you believe it is right that average employee like chat moderator and consultant should be tagged if company management have used illegal schemes?

At first I didn't want to open this topic without Balthazar, but then I changed my mind, because I think that a negative trust must be supported by hard facts and shouldn't be controversial, otherwise it will cause discredit to the whole DT system.

Edit: typo
7  Economy / Reputation / Hacked or sold profiles tagged by Veleor on: October 07, 2019, 07:05:14 AM
In this thread I will be publishing a list of the accounts, which have a number of signs that they had changed hands. Such profiles will get tags from me with the reference to this topic.

I'm going to explain here why I decided that the certain accounts have changed ownership. The current holders of the tagged profiles can speak out here.

Compromised profiles:

User ID      Rank                  Name
#454          Hero Member        Babylon
#12229       Hero Member        kr105
#19710       Sr. Member          Klausi
#20577       Sr. Member          iamzill
#30033       Legendary           hashman
#36821       Sr. Member          Ten98
#43159       Hero Member        hxtop
#44649       Legendary           glendall
#49366       Hero Member        pieppiep
#59625       Hero Member        humanitee
#64851       Member               Werner
#70355       Sr. Member          Impaler
#79231       Sr. Member          HappyScamp
#80719       Full Member          miTgiB
#84172       Sr. Member          Gontxi
#98209       Sr. Member          evilscoop
#129815      Sr. Member          Room101 Update from 13 May 2020: "Room101" account has been returned to the original owner.
#130822      Sr. Member          naRky
#136764      Sr. Member         byteminr
#140923      Sr. Member         Arksun
#144388      Sr. Member         dr_chen
#147643      Sr. Member         BongaManollo
#160032      Sr. Member         madcoin
#188559      Member              JoseSan
#200649      Sr. Member         campeck
#206234      Hero Member       badjacks99 Update from 28 Feb 2020: "badjacks99" account has been returned to the original owner.
#208354      Sr. Member         edutBTC
#220403      Sr. Member         Bitinator
#222038      Hero Member       S4VV4S
#228032      Full Member        presidentcoin
#240466      Sr. Member         paulk11087
#246683      Hero Member       flyer88
#252599      Sr. Member         sgi02
#292131      Sr. Member         andyge
#298422      Sr. Member         jackflag
#303082      Sr. Member         OmarGsPools
#318863      Sr. Member         tuanvie
#320403      Sr. Member         Umbrella Holdings
#326125      Sr. Member         PryptoMontreal
#360034      Sr. Member         virtfund
#387743      Sr. Member         BitTeo
#401787      Sr. Member         baldur odinson
8  Other / Meta / Suggestion for improving custom trust network on: September 30, 2019, 06:39:55 PM
Two buttons could be added into place under the avatar:

Add to the trust list
Exclude from the trust list

This is how it might look:

I believe that such function may come in handy, since the majority of members probably don't want to be bothered with the custom trust settings.

I donít know whether it was proposed earlier or not, but I saw a similar idea in this topic.
9  Economy / Reputation / Negative feedbacks and limitation period of accounts tradings on: September 28, 2019, 12:44:57 AM
I think that Default Trust members must reach a common understanding in the question of tagging for accounts tradings and the statutes of limitations for this type of action.

Sometimes accounts dealers have been forgiven and in other cases members got negative feedbacks for the same thing.

More concretely, DT1 member The Pharmacist said that he is not tagging users for accounts tradings which occured before 2016:

<...> As a preemptive answer, he apparently bought the account before account selling became a sin around here, and I'm definitely not going to give him a neg for it.  Nor am I going to remove him from my trust list for that or for the plagiarism, which he (the current owner) likely didn't do.

<...> That was 2015, dude.  The account buying problem was nowhere near as bad as it has since become, and account dealers didn't start getting tagged until 2016

But on the other hand, DT2 member Lauda wrote that s/he doesn't care in what year trading actually was:

I don't care what year it was when you come at me with bullshit in order to create a false defense for your past actions. This is a play out of the CH-book, and I won't let it slip. If anyone counters, I'll counter the counter: Say no to account dealers. To make matters worse, it was bought primarily for shitposting which he has been doing. No thanks.

In my opinion, DT members should agree among themselves on this matter to prevent controversial situations.
10  Other / Meta / 60 linked newbie profiles - ban evasion on: September 25, 2019, 06:59:47 AM
Tens of alt newbies accounts are simultaneously posting in the same bounty campaigns and evading from the ban.

60 Accounts Connected:
Salim ALI
small1small (banned)
365bct JON
Crypto Dreem (banned)
Zin Son
Kma deno (banned)
Bct 9t (banned)
Coin.maker (banned)
Q plus09
bman8001 (banned)
Rich davit
espnlover09 (banned)

Example of consecutive posting: (Archive)

Tokens sendings to the same wallet

I. Atomic Wallet tokens transactions:

These addresses can be found in the bounty spreadsheet:

#1490 0xC8FCa676904C4b88B49d15622817CA102660Fc30 - lodcoling
#1496 0x65DA3C8D7aAF7cE96D1B9b98d5b019Af0C63ab6d - Dr.Nina
#1497 0x4d585450c15c8D44Cdf1FA43701e24fe43145E61 - DavitRoi
#1498 0x7D2494cd69EB5d5907Bc0C3125e754Ae0e71B054 - genlocy
#1575 0x5cd56a4054aaC473BAd9D05fDC480411E3B1F5F5 - rahimali69
#1421 0xf444c9497C8F9BaCdCBC417446787C7Dd9a103Ad - Zin Son
#1499 0xC0c832043e7322310B8A196530893c854518581E - lpvp508
#1414 0xD4a419073168B16E85DcBB07213546b6bb5a3Ed7 - gonlavy
#1416 0x4B451A50ac78DD85ff4476d0F48D17edba0F783e - playboytalk
#1417 0x54487b99a6182b0661c3DC5c35454A76DA334F3b - needmoney09
#1418 0xeD33a8626BEC016D903522724e77a42AD8Da1653 - Donkill
#1415 0xC385A6aB5F914c5468d6EA5f52ecBECf20CdCc49 - Salim ALI
#1420 0x1bD4aD40a5d12c949749290589efa63A8d07C90B - member11
#1422 0xbFDBB4e3c74d61Ded46f6cE185d8f8C960Fb6110 - espnlover09
#1426 0xbb17907e5b3b01D0a6540AAf23ACDAE4a0d9fB06 - Rich davit
#1574 0x1Bf88cB90B85b4965816467dCA37Ea4718A604c0 - Q plus09
#1395 0x92869f4de9C45ef21714FE70fc8776cD79b273A8 - ICT.KOMOL
#1394 0xe29593bb7F2AD02c4B3d7a1b55f98fcD6381d8d2 - fariakamal
#1393 0xFbc48AC49Aa648f9843b6f6B445C3cb29B1C8A12 - 2fun2
#1392 0x65A4B31799e8d612099438f1464f31aeE00C4432 - siulykhanom
#1391 0xF6d913d5185338B08EEFbb4b3A4F25025819Be01 - SamirhasanN
#1390 0x54ebe00583C6f8fd7E48C09c219BfFdEf8547b60 - validme2
#1403 0x26E34d7541701a8235A0A80c88775649FEa54aD7 - AfterA
#1402 0x7312C074AAf005e5DAEa62E4f3e47b19574c2E5d - Visualman
#1401 0xf19b17dfA491838E037a4E3177d321F62301F194 - Ithinku
#1398 0x74085Cf282E49621CF6836D08D136108a45CF065 - EcorTrectH
#1397 0x2Edfd15511080F21862A9974Cd49C375d69Ba1B0 - Gooodness
#1396 0x8B37fD4825d34911a2Fd70EA4cD5540439133f04 - LatestMember
#1389 0x42428118ECfc107a76e424D1b3956200A1DF7022 - Bitc00in
#1388 0x618E30c02A162139d8093C14f4784828D9E4fc77 - small1small
#1573 0xa69b6F9EA840382d3c04F7C9D572c3CC9248b6E0 - Need_tO
#1387 0x994670B31beB0C7C40F387590ECe5c262AA197F7 - 1_correct_1
#1386 0x2B1B94F7113D4e2BB4dfdD4BF4752D1dF720b9c3 - CaptchA_PorT
#1385 0x935c452607B0719bcb39Dfa55e7FcE4b068Ea34b - SearcH_Q
#1413 0x4eddE7685fC535BD29F6802cd9BB502dcd62d39e - Ab.UseD
#1412 0xc9Af4d327311A40620445de612Af118e944d04Cd - before_1
#1411 0x452F056f0e50b4052F983EC9db49592EbA991E1F - Java.Script
#1410 0xd42Ce1ee86B29c0E6713c67250B534b946939A53 - adiba97
#1409 0x354fB3CB562B5D1B4148409b9986BdBc66514715 - bestgraphicsolution
#1408 0x170Fc5665c906AED6Aa60C601522AEc1b0C1bEb0 - peggy10x
#1406 0x2537908B6e443F1d4a7D32BE7AB834C42514B4B9 - carolina.paula
#1407 0xE95473654b684EfA6Af0cbf8d68Bc6e6A14F67B8 - helenrma
#1405 0x6FEbF491F0E7403172D2ab3601a2cE8C4f38DF72 - rachelBTC
#1400 0xc7FCFd35a2672B1d9c0242D5cBC799dB62D24f18 - rosarlian
#1404 0x1B8C58653CfAEF3Acee068E6DcDaf1eDaae88240 - susanne18
#1399 0xa4dCaE9230A8d59C2B0DFdfF7938Aa37730674EA - olaemi
#1424 0x3237ee4B1595E0e0453E1bEA2402791A90244d2e - Kma deno
#1423 0x8221b9F6DA40a95AE6A00eD2CEFD449db60956f0 - Bct 9t
#1419 0xb4735F66bc0e63b8bD94c09E2b22a54e74D40662 - Crypto Dreem
#1425 0xcD0BD92Ac6b5464C75E7D30e00a5581F5c970D7E - Coin.maker
#1563 0xE1AB5171FbA6A176948DD9A151a3e64Fd491B581 - bman8001

II. DigitalBits tokens transactions:
Bounty spreadsheet:

#634 0xbFDBB4e3c74d61Ded46f6cE185d8f8C960Fb6110 - espnlover09
#627 0xE1AB5171FbA6A176948DD9A151a3e64Fd491B581 - BEMAN09
#625 0x3237ee4B1595E0e0453E1bEA2402791A90244d2e - kkmadeno
#635 0xbb17907e5b3b01D0a6540AAf23ACDAE4a0d9fB06 - Rich davit
#631 0xC385A6aB5F914c5468d6EA5f52ecBECf20CdCc49 - Salim ALI
#630 0xeD33a8626BEC016D903522724e77a42AD8Da1653 - Donkill
#629 0x54487b99a6182b0661c3DC5c35454A76DA334F3b - needmoney09
#636 0x4B451A50ac78DD85ff4476d0F48D17edba0F783e - playboytalk
#391 0x65DA3C8D7aAF7cE96D1B9b98d5b019Af0C63ab6d - Dr.Nina
#653 0xC0c832043e7322310B8A196530893c854518581E - lpvp508
#431 0x8221b9F6DA40a95AE6A00eD2CEFD449db60956f0 - BCT99T
#430 0xf444c9497C8F9BaCdCBC417446787C7Dd9a103Ad - Zin Son
#643 0xcD0BD92Ac6b5464C75E7D30e00a5581F5c970D7E - coin,maker
#429 0x5cd56a4054aaC473BAd9D05fDC480411E3B1F5F5 - rahimali69
#426 0x4d585450c15c8D44Cdf1FA43701e24fe43145E61 - DavitRoi
#428 0x7D2494cd69EB5d5907Bc0C3125e754Ae0e71B054 - genlocy
#390 0xC8FCa676904C4b88B49d15622817CA102660Fc30 - lodcoling
#392 0x1Bf88cB90B85b4965816467dCA37Ea4718A604c0 - Q plus09

III. VANTA token transactions:
Bounty spreadsheet:

#131 0x8221b9F6DA40a95AE6A00eD2CEFD449db60956f0 - Bct9t
#229 0xb4735F66bc0e63b8bD94c09E2b22a54e74D40662 - CryptoDreem
#158 0xE1AB5171FbA6A176948DD9A151a3e64Fd491B581 - bman8001
#846 0xbb17907e5b3b01D0a6540AAf23ACDAE4a0d9fB06 - Richdavit
#342 0xbFDBB4e3c74d61Ded46f6cE185d8f8C960Fb6110 - espnlover09
#877 0xC385A6aB5F914c5468d6EA5f52ecBECf20CdCc49 - SalimALI
#655 0x1bD4aD40a5d12c949749290589efa63A8d07C90B - member11
#296 0xeD33a8626BEC016D903522724e77a42AD8Da1653 - Donkill
#719 0x54487b99a6182b0661c3DC5c35454A76DA334F3b - needmoney09
#803 0x4B451A50ac78DD85ff4476d0F48D17edba0F783e - playboytalk
#395 0xD4a419073168B16E85DcBB07213546b6bb5a3Ed7 - gonlavy
#609 0xC0c832043e7322310B8A196530893c854518581E - lpvp508
#1158 0xf444c9497C8F9BaCdCBC417446787C7Dd9a103Ad - ZinSon
#831 0x5cd56a4054aaC473BAd9D05fDC480411E3B1F5F5 - rahimali69
#379 0x7D2494cd69EB5d5907Bc0C3125e754Ae0e71B054 - genlocy
#822 0x1Bf88cB90B85b4965816467dCA37Ea4718A604c0 - Qplus09
#264 0x4d585450c15c8D44Cdf1FA43701e24fe43145E61 - DavitRoi
#299 0x65DA3C8D7aAF7cE96D1B9b98d5b019Af0C63ab6d - Dr.Nina
#601 0xC8FCa676904C4b88B49d15622817CA102660Fc30 - lodcoling
#937 0x65A4B31799e8d612099438f1464f31aeE00C4432 - siulykhanom
#1062 0x54ebe00583C6f8fd7E48C09c219BfFdEf8547b60 - validme2
#33 0x26E34d7541701a8235A0A80c88775649FEa54aD7 - AfterA
#1081 0x7312C074AAf005e5DAEa62E4f3e47b19574c2E5d - Visualman
#473 0xf19b17dfA491838E037a4E3177d321F62301F194 - Ithinku
#326 0x74085Cf282E49621CF6836D08D136108a45CF065 - EcorTrectH
#397 0x2Edfd15511080F21862A9974Cd49C375d69Ba1B0 - Gooodness
#574 0x8B37fD4825d34911a2Fd70EA4cD5540439133f04 - LatestMember
#947 0x618E30c02A162139d8093C14f4784828D9E4fc77 - small1small
#720 0xa69b6F9EA840382d3c04F7C9D572c3CC9248b6E0 - Need_tO
#11 0x994670B31beB0C7C40F387590ECe5c262AA197F7 - 1_correct_1
#191 0x2B1B94F7113D4e2BB4dfdD4BF4752D1dF720b9c3 - CaptchA_PorT
#901 0x935c452607B0719bcb39Dfa55e7FcE4b068Ea34b - SearcH_Q
#136 0xc9Af4d327311A40620445de612Af118e944d04Cd - before_1
#486 0x452F056f0e50b4052F983EC9db49592EbA991E1F - Java.Script
#30 0xd42Ce1ee86B29c0E6713c67250B534b946939A53 - adiba97
#141 0x354fB3CB562B5D1B4148409b9986BdBc66514715 - bestgraphicsolution
#787 0x170Fc5665c906AED6Aa60C601522AEc1b0C1bEb0 - peggy10x
#429 0xE95473654b684EfA6Af0cbf8d68Bc6e6A14F67B8 - helenrma
#194 0x2537908B6e443F1d4a7D32BE7AB834C42514B4B9 - carolina.paula
#828 0x6FEbF491F0E7403172D2ab3601a2cE8C4f38DF72 - rachelBTC
#983 0x1B8C58653CfAEF3Acee068E6DcDaf1eDaae88240 - susanne18
#751 0xa4dCaE9230A8d59C2B0DFdfF7938Aa37730674EA - olaemi
#861 0xc7FCFd35a2672B1d9c0242D5cBC799dB62D24f18 - rosarlian
#449 0x92869f4de9C45ef21714FE70fc8776cD79b273A8 - ICT.KOMOL
#883 0xF6d913d5185338B08EEFbb4b3A4F25025819Be01 - SamirhasanN
#352 0xe29593bb7F2AD02c4B3d7a1b55f98fcD6381d8d2 - fariakamal
#12 0xFbc48AC49Aa648f9843b6f6B445C3cb29B1C8A12 - 2fun2
#148 0x42428118ECfc107a76e424D1b3956200A1DF7022 - Bitc00in
#24 0x4eddE7685fC535BD29F6802cd9BB502dcd62d39e - Ab.UseD

Several of these accounts also have the same social media profiles and BTC addresses:

Bitcointalk username: Donkill
Twitter url:
Facebook url:
Telegram username: @Donkill01


A. username:  needmoney09
 B. username: farhan.dalvi.902
 C. telegram username:  @needmoney09
 D. twitter username : @needmoney09

Telegram Username:-@Farhan0078600
Twitter Username:-@fzdalvi788600
Facebook Username:-farhan.dalvi.902

#Proof of registration
Facebook Profile Link:-
Twitter Profile Link:-
Telegram Username:- @Farhan000786

Proof of joined post
Twitter account URL:
BTC address: 153nFto8NDnqQhpxaX25GPgVX8oNRY8uKh

#Proof of Authentication
Your USER ID:  2A1842D
Your BTC address: 153nFto8NDnqQhpxaX25GPgVX8oNRY8uKh
Your Twitter Account Link:
Your @Telegram username: @needmoney09




11  Other / Meta / Forum bug: invalid information in user's profile on: September 17, 2019, 11:05:09 AM
Account damniatx_ has 669 Posts and 336 Activity, but for some reason the Last Active shows as "Never".

Profile damniatx_ has 0 Merit but somehow gave 1 merit for this post.

All credit to lovesmayfamilis
12  Other / Meta / Increase privileges of local moderators on: August 04, 2019, 11:43:43 AM
At present, there is a limit for local moderators that they can only ban Newbies with less than 28 Activity, which can be achieved in a month of active posting.

Some spammers in local boards (especially those who knowing about this feature) may not blatantly violate the rules at first, but upon reaching the 28 Activity they would receive some discretion and could bring much chaos to the entire local section.
Considering the workload of the global moderators and admins, the local spammers become practically invulnerable for a while, since decision regarding them is often a drawn-out process. For example, the incident with korner's accounts in the Russian section.

There is a suggestion that local moderators have been able to ban Newbies independent of Activity, or increase the existing limit from 28 to 56 Activity.
13  Other / Meta / (Solved) Scammer with over 80 accounts spamming in the Russian section on: July 25, 2019, 09:58:58 AM
Farm, which involves more than 80 profiles, spamming on the forum and published fake payout reports in Russian HYIPs.

Edit: The most of multiaccounts are banned now.

I reported about this case in the Russian section before, but this had no effect - dozens of multiaccounts continue spamming on the forum, mainly in the Russian subsection "Tpeйдepы".

All multiaccounts bumping topics of member LVL F. Although LVL F says it's not him who doing this, but his "brother".

Message in Russian:
Mepиты. Mepиты нa этиx 2 aккayнтa я пepeдaл, нo нe мoим aккayнтaм. Этo aккayнты бpaтa, oн зaнимaeтcя мoим пpoдвижeниeм.
Фepмa. Фepмa ecть.
Merit. I have sent merit on these 2 accounts, but they're not mine. It's my brother's accounts, he is promoting me.
Farm. Yes, there is a farm.

LVL F answered in Russian that multiaccounts were posting fake payout reports in HYIPs for increase of Activity.

Для yвeличeния aктивити, чтoбы в aккayнтax былo paзнoe кoличecтвo.

List of multiaccounts

Date Registered:                   Name:

April 06, 2018, 06:54:38 AM Lordsergey

April 13, 2018, 03:24:56 PM gordoooonfreeman
April 13, 2018, 03:35:06 PM btcmaster214
April 13, 2018, 03:42:42 PM onroen

April 16, 2018, 11:47:27 AM lekajupob
April 16, 2018, 11:51:12 AM umbacarda
April 16, 2018, 11:54:43 AM vovavosyachenko
April 16, 2018, 11:58:56 AM artafon

April 19, 2018, 08:25:03 AM zunedix
April 19, 2018, 08:34:36 AM caruneon
April 19, 2018, 08:41:02 AM batey
April 19, 2018, 08:44:42 AM monobi

April 24, 2018, 08:24:01 AM emilput

June 04, 2019, 11:13:42 AM sveir
June 04, 2019, 11:27:02 AM hojeda

June 07, 2019, 07:19:00 PM zerd
June 07, 2019, 07:28:39 PM Nickylot343

June 08, 2019, 04:04:18 AM TEROZ
June 08, 2019, 04:14:07 AM IIgorII

June 09, 2019, 07:14:56 AM Gerodot TT

June 10, 2019, 08:53:59 AM Oleg7
June 10, 2019, 09:10:13 AM White WIZARD777

June 11, 2019, 07:01:07 AM I Mafia
June 11, 2019, 07:08:12 AM Veselchak 1111

June 12, 2019, 06:50:53 AM RussianBlockchain Support
June 12, 2019, 07:00:37 AM CrYpTo DiMaSiK

June 13, 2019, 03:46:17 AM szuve
June 13, 2019, 04:21:17 AM dhu_45

June 14, 2019, 04:37:47 AM Di11er
June 14, 2019, 04:41:37 AM 4yIIuK

June 15, 2019, 06:34:11 AM NeFFe.X
June 15, 2019, 06:38:14 AM Black Joker

June 16, 2019, 03:20:23 AM CKa3o4HuK
June 16, 2019, 03:26:08 AM Jostkiy

June 17, 2019, 04:43:06 AM Random nick
June 17, 2019, 04:46:02 AM Angel_543

June 18, 2019, 03:15:10 AM Ya.LeGeNDa
June 18, 2019, 03:19:21 AM Artem Boy

June 19, 2019, 03:18:08 AM Mr.Pizer
June 19, 2019, 03:23:06 AM Qriz

June 20, 2019, 03:47:08 AM Google Recaptcha
June 20, 2019, 03:52:07 AM GDEYAEST

June 21, 2019, 03:14:24 AM World Owner
June 21, 2019, 03:18:12 AM Zloy-Uchitel

June 22, 2019, 03:50:28 AM Mr Jissus
June 22, 2019, 03:54:24 AM VoVa_a_ti_kto

June 23, 2019, 05:56:34 AM MenagerForAll
June 23, 2019, 06:00:41 AM Samurai 3_2_1

June 24, 2019, 09:07:45 AM BSUVT
June 24, 2019, 09:14:35 AM TsagBEG

June 25, 2019, 10:39:33 AM Marco Polo 2
June 25, 2019, 10:47:38 AM Lamborghini Aventador

June 26, 2019, 03:16:13 AM ElitaxXx
June 26, 2019, 04:15:57 AM CCSRT

June 27, 2019, 04:47:51 AM uoa
June 27, 2019, 04:52:48 AM BTR TDR

June 28, 2019, 09:13:34 AM Asgard 8
June 28, 2019, 09:22:15 AM Mon ster

June 29, 2019, 07:30:30 AM Legendary Yuriy
June 29, 2019, 07:39:57 AM KIMROD

June 30, 2019, 01:06:22 PM Samuy
June 30, 2019, 01:10:03 PM Misha71a263

July 01, 2019, 05:37:32 PM PeRFEcT GaMeR
July 01, 2019, 05:44:56 PM TopMan7386283829125537

July 02, 2019, 04:13:09 AM #wowowowowowowowow
July 02, 2019, 04:16:45 AM Rata ta

July 03, 2019, 03:32:58 AM Red_Devil
July 03, 2019, 03:37:00 AM KAAYER

July 04, 2019, 03:55:01 AM JF7eFGD
July 04, 2019, 04:00:16 AM #Crypto Police

July 05, 2019, 02:41:05 PM 5HEDAV5
July 05, 2019, 02:44:52 PM XSTWH

July 06, 2019, 03:14:38 PM X U B I
July 06, 2019, 03:23:11 PM KING OF THE WORLD

July 07, 2019, 06:51:22 PM kenguaaa
July 07, 2019, 06:57:06 PM X Bitcoin X

July 08, 2019, 09:40:32 AM LVL F support

July 09, 2019, 03:24:43 AM Your Boss
July 09, 2019, 03:33:30 AM Red728954326753

July 10, 2019, 06:56:43 PM Karo1990
July 10, 2019, 07:02:56 PM Alejandro2

July 11, 2019, 07:40:20 PM Mak064
July 11, 2019, 07:45:42 PM Crypto_trader228

July 13, 2019, 07:20:44 PM GennadiyRUS
July 13, 2019, 07:28:04 PM I am Varki
14  Local / Юристы / Биржа LiveCoin. Красный флаг и вопрос о соглашении on: July 09, 2019, 05:58:58 AM
Интересует мнение экспертов, есть ли нарушение соглашения со стороны биржи LiveCoin с юридическй точки зрения?

Прошу высказаться в теме: Флаг Бирже LiveCoin - ваше отношение

1 июля 2019 года профиль представителя биржи LiveCoin был отмечен на форуме красным флагом со следующей формулировкой:

izooomrud alleges: LiveCoin violated a casual or implied agreement, resulting in damages, in the specific act referenced here. LiveCoin did not make the victims of this act roughly whole, AND it is not the case that all of the victims forgave the act. It is not grossly inaccurate to say that the act occurred around July 2019. No previously-created flag covers this same act, unless the flag was created with inaccurate data preventing its acceptance.

Клиент, который разместил данный флаг, требовал от LiveCoin, чтобы ему открыли вывод для монет MONA. Однако, получив отказ, клиент стал обвинять биржу на различных ресурсах, в результате ему заблокировали кабинет.

Комментарий клиента

<...> Биржа заблокировала мой аккаунт БЕЗ объяснения причин, хотя сами утверждают, что сначала выносят предупреждение.
Через неделю я решаю сам, что был заблокирован за публикацию сообщений тех. поддержки, которые я удалил о чем им было сообщено.
Прошло еще несколько дней и они сообщили мне, внимание - я должен сам искать в их правилах причины своей блокировки! <...>

Комментарий сотрудника LiveCoin

Все взаимоотношения биржи и клиентов регулируются пользовательским соглашением, которое пользователь принимает перед регистрацией. Невозможно зарегистрироваться, если вы не согласны с условиями соглашения. Однако, в редких случаях возникают ситуации, когда пользователи игнорируют и злостно нарушают условия соглашения.

При первых нарушениях мы ограничиваемся предупреждениями, но в случае повторных нарушений аккаунт действительно может быть блокирован для проверки. Но даже в этом случае, пользователю предоставляется возможность вывода средств, после удаления всей недостоверной информации и после полного устранения последствий. В некоторых случаях, службой безопасности может быть запрошена верификация.

Именно это и произошло с аккаунтом данного пользователя. Пользователь обратился в тикеты с требованием открыть вывод средств по MONA, что как вы знаете невозможно в связи с атакой на сеть монеты и отказом разработчика от ответственности. После того как пользователь получил ответ в тикетах,  он начал распространять лживую информацию, публично обвиняя биржу в мошенничестве, вводя других пользователей в заблуждение и очередное его сообщение является тому подтверждением.

Пользователь открыто идёт на конфликт, игнорируя предложенные варианты решения вопроса. Ранее пользователь сообщил что вся информация нарушающая условия соглашения удалена, но при проверке выяснилось что её стало гораздо больше. Дальнейшее обсуждение данного вопроса будет вестись только с пользователем и только после устранения всех последствий.

Переписка клиента с техподдержкой LiveCoin, опубликованная в русскоязычном разделе:

Та же переписка, опубликованная в англоязычном разделе, но приложено больше скриншотов:

Пользовательское соглашение LiveCoin:

Пункт о неразглашении:

Клиент гарантирует, что он не будет разглашать информацию, полученную в ходе общения с Поддержкой Сервиса, по любым каналам связи. Нарушение данного правила, ведет к блокировке счета без выплаты денежных средств.

Также в соглашении биржи есть пункт о законных правах пользователей:

Ничто в настоящих Условиях не влияет на законные права пользователей.
Ничто в настоящих Условиях не исключает и не ограничивает ответственность любой из сторон за мошенничество, смерть или телесные повреждения, вызванные неосторожностью, нарушением законов, или любой другой деятельностью, которая не может быть ограничена или исключена законным образом.

Нарушила ли соглашение биржа LiveCoin, как это указано во флаге?
15  Other / Meta / Make Trust flags visible in all sections on: June 21, 2019, 05:48:08 AM
Considering that members getting Trust flags when there is a hard evidence only,

so I propose to make Trust flags visible throughout the forum, because other users must remain vigilant at all times in communication with such members.

16  Other / Meta / Troll abuses self-moderated topics in Russian local on: June 16, 2019, 05:42:15 PM
In Russian section there is a troll korner that constantly creates self-moderated threads, in which he systematically deletes all posts after a while. Such behavior is totally destroying the discussion.

On this week user 'korner' erased all comments in his several self-moderated topics and now they're not available:
[archive] Запросы на удаление бесполезных тем
[archive] Каково быть модератором?
[archive] Рeaбилитaция прoвинившиxcя пoльзoвaтeлeй
[archive] Взаимное снятие негативного траста

This issue has been reported before:

Suggestion: Forbid to delete comments of staff in self-moderated topics.

Moderators messages are often contain important information and their removal can have negative effects.

For instance, member 'korner' deleted posts of two Russian moderators in his self-moderated topic:

I also want to note that korner is evading the ban now. Moderators, please take some measures.

Please, ban account "korner", since he violates the rules by ban evasion and trolling.

Accounts Connected: korner, (Banned)


1. korner admitted that he used profile "".

<...> Кaк клaccнo я пoвeceлилcя и пoyгapaл c вac изoбpaжaя "". <...>

<...> I had so much fun and laughed at you by posing as "". <...>

2. The same dates of changed passwords in both profiles.

kornerSecurity/Moderator Log
08/25/2018 9:04:57 AM     password changed
10/27/2018 5:08:48 AM     password changed - Security/Moderator Log
08/25/2018 08:32:37 AM     password changed
10/27/2018 05:28:53 AM     password changed
17  Economy / Reputation / Multiaccount bounty cheater. Green Trusted member involved on: May 13, 2019, 04:08:03 PM
Linked senior accounts, including green trusted profile, are participating in the same signature campaign.

4 Accounts Connected: Killerpotleaf, high110, yingfeng, SoloV


#Proof of authentication

Joined Campaigns: Signature
Bitcointalk username: Killerpotleaf
Huobi Russia UID: 67734178
Telegram username: @solo_v

Twitter profile link:
Facebook profile link:
Bitcointalk profile link:;u=64542

# Proof of Authentication
Campaign: signature
Bitcointalk name: high110
Profile Link:;u=118908
Telegram Name: @solo_v
EosBet Address: EOS7snL6h9bXdp8vDMAYgijjcGzCSymj872PiNXdHLkBbmvhtdAqo

#Proof of Authentication
1. Bitcointalk username : yingfeng
2. Telegram username : @solo_v
3. ETH wallet address : 0x39230b2760A86FBF361890Fd356a33Ff2a544aF7
4. Campaign : Signature campaign

Telegram Username: @solo_v
Participating in:  Signature
ERC-20 Address: 0x0E34C890b328C5a483a4e9909D8Dab43313751a0

Tokens sendings to the same ETH wallets.




#318 | 0x54000a06dA134BD237cdf141E528FE67FCE290be | high110




#318 | 0x54000a06dA134BD237cdf141E528FE67FCE290be | high110


Related Addresses:
Telegram Name: @solo_v

Most likely that accounts Killerpotleaf, high110 and yingfeng have been sold or hacked in autumn 2017, considering gaps and changed languages in their post history.
18  Other / Meta / Theymos, please share the list of banned accounts for BPIP and LoyceV websites on: April 07, 2019, 11:32:06 PM
The BPIP and LoyceV websites are often used by people when they want to know if Bitcointalk profile is banned.
However, many banned users shown as active there.

[...] If they were processed before I started parsing the security log, then BPIP wouldn't have recorded them.  There is no all time security log I can download.

Unlike Mods, users can't see if someone is banned. It's a waste of everyone's time to report plagiarism or other abuse if the user is banned already. [...]

Unfortunately, I don't have a complete list of all banned accounts.  If a data dump becomes available, I'll use that.
19  Other / Meta / Remove avatars of banned members on: February 23, 2019, 12:42:22 AM
A lot of banned profiles are continue promoting companies in the avatars, so many irrelevant ads have accumulated on the forum.

Therefore avatars of banned members perhaps should be removed, along with the signatures (credits to suchmoon).

Edit: I suggest to replace avatars of blocked accounts with the default image.
20  Other / Meta / Prevent banned users from changing profile data on: February 21, 2019, 06:24:06 AM
Today I found out that banned users can edit their profiles data.

Recently, in the Russian section I've reported about 17 connected accounts and after that an email address with my nickname has appeared in one of these profiles.
I want to note, this is not my email address.


You can learn from that profile '' was Nuked in January 2019.

1/8/2019 12:48:01 PM Changed to Archived status Nuke user

I think that users should be prohibited from changing any data in their profiles after they have been banned.
Pages: [1] 2 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!