in 2013, the bitcoin condition that affected the value of bitcoin was very good, Germany legalized bitcoin and considered "private money", zipzap services increased the volume of bitcoin for 2014, 12000 restaurants in US received transactions using bitcoin, and ebay also received services for bitcoin transactions.

and that is a positive condition that can make bitcoin have a higher value, and in reality, bitcoin creates graphics better than in 2012.

and today, we see that many positive conditions, but do not affect bitcoin to create bullish, what happens with bitcoin?

a few days ago Ripple prices increase sharply and stabilized above $ 0.31. This Ripple positive zone makes Ripple can increase again to a value of $ 0.34 in a fast time, so it can create short-term fast fluctuations.

on Wednesday, September 19, 2018, Ripple announced that they signed PNC 2.17% Bank, a big bank in the top 10 in America. they have more than 8 million consumers.

PNC gets xCurrent product from Ripple, and PNC will use the xCurrent platform for each of their productions.
and the advantage for Ripple is to make liquidity, xRapid is always alive.

We know that Russia is a country that limits crypto like China and India. but the OTC bitcoin platform that relies on global exchange to collect liquidity into the Russian crypto market with 1.5-2% for commissions.
and the result is hundreds of thousands of dollars in daily profits.

I want to know your opinion, will India and other countries that limit crypto also have the same cycle as Russia?

members of the USA government different in response to the crypto world, some members choose to make strict rules and some choose to support crypto, the SEC rejects the Bitcoin ETF but does not give a response to US lawmakers who have Bitcoin.

I think it's not objective, if the SEC wants to ban bitcoin ETF, I think the SEC must ban and confiscate bitcoin from every USA resident, including USA lawmakers.

because many from the USA lawmakers that have lots of Bitcoin.

remember again, at January that peter predicted bitcoin would fall sharply, but he also saw that bitcoin has the potential to persist for a long time. and it happens today.

to whom else would you believe?

I am very happy if there is a country in which there is a culinary company or a restaurant that receives payments with bitcoin, although in the country prohibits bitcoin.
like in bali, there is a restaurant that receives payment with bitcoin, but a few days ago I watched a show on television that the security forces closed the restaurant.
why are the security so evil? they only use it for food payments, not for criminals. or do they equate bitcoin payments as a crime? it's very unreasonable.
what do you think about it ?

today bitcoin is still below, with the current condition, which one is more advantageous? between baghodler and newhodler?
please answer it with reason.