 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 »
|
http://satoshi.nakamotoinstitute.org/posts/bitcointalk/188/[url=http://It's called Satoshi's vision, the one that Roger, many early adopters, and I signed up.
That's why Gavin left, Mike Hearn quit, Coinbase walked away.
Personally, I have the feeling that I have the obligation to realize the prediction of Satoshi. But,
I understand many of you came into Bitcoin only for quick money or some magical ideas. I totally understand many of you, like Maxwell and Theymos, had your own idea and never believed any words Satoshi said.
I also understand many of you have no clue about Bitcoin, and what formed your opinion was coming from the censored sub.
But, if you ever spent time reading Satoshi's words, could you do me a favor and tell me why you saw Satoshi's vision as nothing but shit?
Thank you in advance.]
It's called Satoshi's vision, the one that Roger, many early adopters, and I signed up.
That's why Gavin left, Mike Hearn quit, Coinbase walked away.
Personally, I have the feeling that I have the obligation to realize the prediction of Satoshi. But,
I understand many of you came into Bitcoin only for quick money or some magical ideas. I totally understand many of you, like Maxwell and Theymos, had your own idea and never believed any words Satoshi said.
I also understand many of you have no clue about Bitcoin, and what formed your opinion was coming from the censored sub.
But, if you ever spent time reading Satoshi's words, could you do me a favor and tell me why you saw Satoshi's vision as nothing but shit?
Thank you in advance.Update: I hope @Theymos can tell me his opinion. In my opinion, Satoshi was great enough that he wouldn't leave this forum --- such important resource --- to a person who would betray his vision later without any resonable explanation. Although I see Theymos as Bitcoin Judas, but at least please tell me why he changed his mind. Or he saw Satoshi's vision as shit from the beginning? It's very clear in Satoshi's vision: 1st layer for the internet of money, 2nd layer for other complicated application such as smart contract.
|
|
|
|
I would like to report one massive trust abuser: Lauda He abused the trust system to spam lies against me. Evidence： https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=129761If we look at the bright side, it's an honor for me, because he/they used same lies to attack Satoshi and Gavin. Many people have been trolled by this guy so far. I don't think the trust mechanism was designed for such liars/trolls like Lauda. PS: Lauda was reported to be a scammer with several alts by many users, such as "elianite", "defcon23", "mriulian", and so on. The only reason this liar Lauda has not banned because he voluntarily spammed lies that fit the iterative the webmaster "Theymos" liked. It is also extremely likely that his account is compromised since his writing style changed dramatically since he started to slander Bitcoiners like crazy. I wouldn't trust anything coming from this liar. |
|
|
|
|
I have searched a lot, and could not find any reasonable explanation.
As for me, "BC1" would be much more anti-intuition and less user-friendly than "B1" or "BTC1".
Is there any technical reason behind Core's decision that we must use "BC1" SW addresses?
|
|
|
|
His post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1966169.0Theymos defamed Bitmain by spreading the lies about "Asicboost". Many people had shown enough technical evidences to show it's a blatant lie and Bitmain clearly stated that they were okay to see it being disabled, yet Theymos continued to spread it. Theymos defamed the UAHF by implying it's not Bitcoin, while being okay with the UASF, which has much less support than UAHF. Theymos defamed the UAHF as "controlled by a single company". Yet he had nothing to support this defamation. UAHF is open-source, and unlike UASF there will be no dictator in UAHF. I don't thank Theymos did not know how reckless the UASF was. It contradicts to everything Bitcoin stands for. UASF is, in short, "You have to follow Core's decision to split Bitcoin chain even if only Core & Theymos support it."Theymos also laughed at the failure of XT/BU/Classic. Although I don't support BU, I have to admit that BU devs are good people. At least, they did not force users to split the chain when there was no enough support, unlike notorious UASF. XT/Classic were initiated by the most respected Bitcoin devs. Without Core "flying to China too lobby miners against 8mb, later Classic plan", XT/Classic would have succeeded. Theymos, why did not you defame Bitmain when they signed HK agreement with Blockstream to dismiss XT/Classic? Satoshi explicitly told us that we should raise the blocklimit and he even wrote the code for us. Why even quotations from Satoshi are being censored by you these days? Just because it does not fit your narrative? Theymos, I know how many Bitcoiners have been banned by you in Reddit for opposing UASF, how many posts have been hidden by you for supporting SegWit2X, let alone UAHF. You have done the worst thing that the enemies of Bitcoin were expected to do. I really doubt if you are still the "theymos" in 2010. I spent much time reading old posts, and you were ever polite and respectful to different opinions. How did you become so arrogant and reckless?Mr. Theymos, censor to fork your UASF. I'll stick with Bitcoin, thank you very much. I kinda doubt that you'are actually going to stick by what you say here, but if you do, it only seems like good news. |
|
|
|
|
Sad to see Theymos became a buttcoiner.
I wonder how many Bitcoiners have not been banned.
|
|
|
|
|
Too many Bitcoiners have been banned here and rbitcoin, only because they don't obey theymos or current Core. They even disapprove Satoshi's past words once it's different from the opinion of current Core leaders.
This censorship is very tricky, so newbies, even many veterans, can't see how severe it is.
Such censorship contradicts with the spirit of Bitcoin in all aspects. The damage is huge and done already.
Theymos refuses to step down to make apologies to the community. He even encourages evil UASF to attack Bitcoin by forcing users to kneel down to current Core.
What theymos is doing is absolutely unacceptable. Actually, theymos has become Bitcoin Judas, without any doubt.
It's time for us to Boycott Bitcoin Judas.
|
|
|
|
|
It's known to all that, at least to some extent, Bitcoin is now under control of one company with the name "Blockstream". No proposals will be formal BIP without the approval of this company. And many people believe BS is deliberately changing Satoshi's vision to their own vision, without any consensus.
So, I wonder if you believe Bitcoin can overcome this challenge?
Are we Bitcoiners in the road to serfdom of BS inevitably?
Devs usually have the only say for most opensource softwares. But for Bitcoin, at least for Satoshi's vision, Devs only have a say, instead of only say. However, practically, devs' decisions are usually seen as the only thing we shall obey. And people who refuse to obey will be smeared.
So it's worrying once malicious devs take control of Bitcoin. Those devs could spread lies to attack dissenters, and most people will accept it without hesitation. Even we have the mechanism of hashrate voting, malicious devs can tell lies to attack miners.
Malicious devs can make people believe their only proposal is the only right choice by threatening the community with lies. And a large portion of people will follow them, whatever they do. Because people think they are following experts.
So, do you believe Bitcoin can be great enough? Can the community defeat BS?
If we can, how?
(I don't think the BS patents is important. Although BS's vision will make those patents quite valuable)
|
|
|
|
|
I thought they were base in Ca, USA. (I remembered they were located in France in 2013)
But yesterday night I sent email to them and I got reply this morning. (California time 4 am.)
So where are they located? Is it a secret? There would be enormous gap between Europe company and American ones.
|
|
|
|
|
There are too many fraudsters, please be more vigilant next time.
just was careless so that was deceived by a fraudster via skype, he sent a email to me via a false "@edu" email address.
I was careless so i trusted him and then I LOST 0.35 btc.
It's because the people I met all the day are honest people, that I relax too early, and finally was cheated by such a false freshman student.
Please keep in mind that in the virtual world you should be vigilant.
Procedure:
1. He contacted with me at skype.
2. he refused to give me things first because of circumspectness, and ask me which escrow I would choose.
3. I said such a small amount didn't need to use escrow service. And now that he is a freshman student, If he can provide "@edu" email, then I can pay bitcoin first.
4. he said he would like to send email instead of receiving it. So I gave him my email address and he sent one email to me.
5. I found that email in "junk", I was careless so that I did not see the indistinctive warning about the email address by my email service. So I send 0.35 btc to him.
6. After waiting half an hour, I found that he deleted me on skype.
That's all.
|
|
|
|
|
I want to buy mtgoxbtc at 70% (I pay you real btc)
please contact me if you sell goxbtc
message
or skype: ebayren
(Sorry to mtgoxbtc holders if any insulting.)
for some people, I can be first.
or escrow or you first
larger transactions might need to be broken into smaller chunks
If you are in Beijing, China, then I can trade with you face to face.
I have traded with "ELI" for 20 BTC successfully, he is very kind.
***(I will give you some itunes gift card as some compensation if mtgox resume withdrawal in 3 months)***
|
|
|
|
|
为了交易安全以及账户安全（担心黑钱）
交易双方必须提供足够能证明自己身份的信息。
目前本人7折收购。此比例不定期变动
|
|
|
|
|
今天在好几个群听说GBL跑路了，有几个新注册的qq号在那里宣扬奇葩逻辑，让受害者别报案。
谁希望大家不报案？当然是骗子啊。
从另一方面，骗子既然注册qq号来误导大伙，说明他心里头怕啊。
大家尽快报案吧，时间长了警察就不管了。
现在时间短，真要查，一定能查到的。
让骗子进监狱。
也希望国内比特币届那些所谓的“名人”，注意自己的言行。虽然我知道你们中确实有些人想法炒作自己的名气是为了捞一笔跑掉，可我还是希望大多数人能够老老实实做好自己的事情。
莫伸手，伸手必被捉。
受害者，报案吧，有冤报冤，有仇报仇，你的钱是血汗钱。
|
|
|
|
last post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=316418.0because I didn't sell this code in last post, now I start this auction. Description: itunes 25 USD code Starting bid (Min BID): 0.075btc BIN (but it now) price: 0.150btcEnd date and time: exactly 24 hours from now. Payment methods accepted: Bitcoin Additional information: bought at bestbuy |
|
|
|
|
