Bitcoin Forum
November 22, 2019, 04:02:18 PM *
News: 10th anniversary art contest
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1] 2 »
1  Economy / Reputation / [Investigation] Ban Evasion / Acc connected / ?Merit abuse? on: November 19, 2019, 08:28:01 AM
I present the facts as I see them and ask that you consider my conclusions:



I was reviewing this page: http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/350580.html

when I noticed this:

Quote
Trust list for: irfan_pak10 (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (67 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h)
Back to index

irfan_pak10's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Stephen Gornick (Trust: +2 / =1 / -1) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. Maidak (Trust: +7 / =0 / -5) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ciprian220 (Trust: +0 / =1 / -3) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. carlo__ (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. CoinFoxs (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. leen93 Banned! (Trust: +0 / =3 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. farrukh (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. Zadicar Banned! (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Sell Egift Card (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. ice_man75 (Trust: neutral) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. pandukelana2712 (Trust: +3 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (2) 876 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. ZeusTrade Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. ZeusRecife Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. TradeRafael (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. RecifeCripto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~irfan_pak10's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. NEW Timelord2067 (Trust: +7 / =2 / -2) (295 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. NEW suchmoon (Trust: +15 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (35) 3263 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. NEW DarkStar_ (Trust: +38 / =1 / -0) (DT1! (27) 1058 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

you will see there are a number of banned users, and some who remarkably similar user profile names to the ones banned/not banned.



If you look at, for example, Luana Trade's feedback/trust wall, you see plenty of vouches for each-other:



The references are usually Ether TX numbers or BitCoin TX's



On TradeRafael profile page you see [Archive]

Quote
I am lord Member "Listed" and Moderator Portuguese Moon Forum Section-Moon Forum - Fórum de Discussão Cryptocurrency https://www.moonforum.net/member.php?1166-ZeusTrade - I can talk live with anyone in the world just need to contact me, Telegram @CryptoRecife; @ZeusTrade1; @ZeusTrade2; @ZeusTrade3; @ZeusTrade4: - Facebook-mensseger live https://www.facebook.com/rafaelbatista2012 https://m.facebook.com/RecifeCrypto https://www.facebook.com/groups/476630919382606 - LIKENDIN https://www.linkedin.com/in/recifecrypto - bounty0x.io/Autor: USER - Rafael Batista Da Silva "@recifecrypto" BountyGuru Cod: wW48nfVK9DwA - bountysuite User-ZeusTrade

as well as the ETH address     0xF30431d4e31e6E54d9338Eb8f54DA5eceaDc4cB4 which comes up with five full pages of results for use by the various UID's listed here.



The same thing occurs on RecifeCripto profile page too: [Archive]

Quote
I am lord Member "Listed" and Moderator Portuguese Moon Forum Section-Moon Forum - Fórum de Discussão Cryptocurrency https://www.moonforum.net/member.php?1166-ZeusTrade - I can talk live with anyone in the world just need to contact me, Telegram @CryptoRecife; @ZeusTrade1; @ZeusTrade2; @ZeusTrade3; @ZeusTrade4: - Facebook-mensseger live https://www.facebook.com/rafaelbatista2012 https://m.facebook.com/RecifeCrypto https://www.facebook.com/groups/476630919382606 - LIKENDIN https://www.linkedin.com/in/recifecrypto - bounty0x.io/Autor: USER - Rafael Batista Da Silva "@recifecrypto" BountyGuru Cod: wW48nfVK9DwA - bountysuite User-ZeusTrade





I am not for a minute suggesting that all of these UID's are connected, however, given their very similar user names and activity dates leeds me to believe that some of the users who have *not* been banned are alts engaged in ban evasion.

Quote
15 November 2010, 19:24:16 Date Registered:    Stephen Gornick

22 July 2011, 20:41:56 Date Registered:    Maidak

25 January 2014, 10:46:33 Date Registered:    ciprian220

05 May 2014, 09:46:13 Date Registered:       carlo__

20 July 2014, 00:42:41 Date Registered:    CoinFoxs

15 October 2014, 01:52:21 Date Registered:    leen93 - BANNED
23 October 2014, 22:40:53 Date Registered:    farrukh

24 November 2015, 18:33:28 Date Registered:    Zadicar - BANNED

11 January 2016, 11:45:27 Date Registered:    Sell Egift Card

10 April 2016, 03:12:28 Last Active:       farrukh

30 July 2016, 06:00:39 Last Active:       Sell Egift Card

20 March 2017, 07:34:07 Last Active:       ciprian220

13 October 2017, 02:08:21 Date Registered:    ice_man75

12 November 2017, 16:20:14 Date Registered:    pandukelana2712

2018-02-16 5:24:00 PM    CoinFoxs    irfan_pak10    20    Re: [BOUNTY] ? BITCOMO | CPA NETWORK on Blockchain- FOR SMARTCONTRACT PROJECTS

2018-03-22 11:31:08 PM    password changed   pandukelana2712

09 June 2018, 13:39:07 Date Registered:    Luana Trade - BANNED
2018-06-29 12:34:00 PM    irfan_pak10    ice_man75    22    Huh? SMART CONTRACTS DEVELOPER Huh? ??Helping you pave your way to the future!??

08 July 2018, 03:43:43 Date Registered:    ZeusTrade - BANNED
2018-07-09 7:16:54 PM    password reset via email   Luana Trade - BANNED

20 September 2018, 03:38:49 Date Registered:    ZeusRecife - BANNED
23 September 2018, 07:45:44 Date Registered:    TradeRafael
25 September 2018, 07:56:39 Date Registered:    RafaelCrypto

2019-01-16 4:59:01 PM    password reset via email   ZeusTrade - BANNED

05 February 2019, 09:43:25 Last Active:    Luana Trade - BANNED

09 March 2019, 08:06:26 Last Active:       carlo__
2019-03-12 6:06:54 AM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   ZeusTrade - BANNED
12 March 2019, 23:44:53 Last Active:       ZeusTrade - BANNED

2019-04-25 8:08:02 PM    password changed   pandukelana2712

2019-05-11 9:26:22 PM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   Luana Trade - BANNED
2019-05-13 8:25:42 PM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   Zadicar - BANNED
2019-05-15 1:06:40 AM    woke up         Maidak
2019-05-16 1:06:40 AM    woke up         Maidak
16 May 2019, 11:07:52 Last Active:       Maidak
20 May 2019, 19:30:25 Last Active:       Stephen Gornick
2019-05-30 9:48:01 PM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   leen93 - BANNED

2019-07-30 6:53:55 AM    Changed to Archived status    Autoban user   ZeusRecife - BANNED

19 August 2019, 11:52:26 Last Active:       leen93 - BANNED

03 September 2019, 12:20:24 Date Registered:    Charlie Lee - BANNED

2019-10-28 12:51:03 AM    Changed to Archived status    Nuke user   Charlie Lee - BANNED
28 October 2019, 11:02:00 Last Active:       Charlie Lee - BANNED
28 October 2019, 11:12:07 Last Active:       RafaelCrypto
28 October 2019, 11:12:26 Last Active:       ZeusRecife - BANNED
30 October 2019, 11:49:32 Date Registered:    RecifeCripto
01 November 2019, 22:54:14 Last Active:    ice_man75
12 November 2019, 15:40:33 Last Active:    Zadicar - BANNED
18 November 2019, 07:54:20 Last Active:    TradeRafael
Today at 05:10:21 Last Active:          CoinFoxs
Today at 11:33:15 Last Active:          RecifeCripto
Today at 14:55:15 Last Active:          pandukelana2712



I can't say for certain that there is merit abuse, however,

2018-02-16 5:24:00 PM    CoinFoxs gives    irfan_pak10    20 merits for    Re: [BOUNTY] ? BITCOMO | CPA NETWORK on Blockchain- FOR SMARTCONTRACT PROJECTS  - [Archive [1], [2]]

Four months later,

2018-06-29 12:34:00 PM    irfan_pak10 gives    ice_man75    22 merits for   Huh? SMART CONTRACTS DEVELOPER Huh? ??Helping you pave your way to the future!?? - which is a deleted thread. (I am waiting to hear back from @LoyceV to see if he has an archived copy of that post)

By giving ice_man75 22 merits irfan_pak10 is given one vote towards ten needed for DT1/2 - ice_man75 is then able to give ten merits to a second UID which would also count as one vote towards DT1/2

irfan_pak10 also trusts some of these UID's:

Quote
irfan_pak10 Trusts these users' judgement:
1. bugmenot (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ahmed9979 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. Nabilo Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. marcotheminer (Trust: +8 / =7 / -9) (20 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. niktitan132 Banned! (Trust: +4 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. amacar (Trust: +1 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. Smack That Ace (Trust: +2 / =1 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
8. shdvb (Trust: +3 / =3 / -0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
9. Muhammed Zakir (Trust: +6 / =1 / -0) (4 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
10. s1ng (Trust: +0 / =1 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. b4basit (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
12. kishan889 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. superSTAR777 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
14. lili song Banned! (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
15. letyouearn (Trust: +1 / =1 / -3) (12 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
16. KingZee (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) (174 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. Ume (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. pagalwana (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
19. leen93 Banned! (Trust: +0 / =3 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
20. farrukh (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
21. BTCBLOGGER Banned! (Trust: +0 / =4 / -5) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
22. katerniko1 (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
23. agustina2 (Trust: neutral) (1 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

As far back as week one irfan_pak10 has most of these users on his trust list:  (no BBCODE for that page, sorry)





Each and every time one of the users who gives irfan_pak10 trust is banned, there is another UID added to the list of users' who trust irfan_pak10 mostly the next week, or, very soon afterwards:

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-12_Tue_19.34h/350580.html

Quote
10. Luana Trade (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-05-11_Sat_05.45h/350580.html

Quote
10. pandukelana2712 (Trust: neutral) (697 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
11. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: -128: -7 / +0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-05-18_Sat_06.23h/350580.html

Quote
7. Zadicar Banned! (Trust: neutral) (9 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
13. ZeusRecife (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-06-01_Sat_14.47h/350580.html

Quote
5. leen93 Banned! (Trust: -2: -1 / +0) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-06-29_Sat_06.02h/350580.html

Quote
5. CoinFoxs (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-01_Thu_16.47h/350580.html

Quote
14. ZeusRecife Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-03_Sat_08.36h/350580.html

Quote
15. TradeRafael (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-02_Sat_07.33h/350580.html

Quote
16. NEW RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
17. NEW Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: awaiting update) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
18. NEW RecifeCripto (Trust: awaiting update) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)





ice_man75 trusts just one person:

Quote
Trust list for: ice_man75 (Trust: neutral) (23 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h)
Back to index

ice_man75 Trusts these users' judgement:
1. irfan_pak10 (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (67 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

ice_man75 Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


ice_man75's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~ice_man75's judgement is Distrusted by:
-


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

CoinFoxs http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/357196.html

Quote
Trust list for: CoinFoxs (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -1) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h)
Back to index

CoinFoxs Trusts these users' judgement:
1. irfan_pak10 (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (67 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. actmyname (Trust: +17 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (15) 824 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

CoinFoxs Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


CoinFoxs's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ZeusTrade Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ZeusRecife Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. TradeRafael (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
7. RecifeCripto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~CoinFoxs's judgement is Distrusted by:
-


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

farrukh http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/389071.html

Quote
Trust list for: farrukh (Trust: +0 / =0 / -2) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h)
Back to index

farrukh Trusts these users' judgement:
1. irfan_pak10 (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (67 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

farrukh Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


farrukh's judgement is Trusted by:
1. irfan_pak10 (Trust: +7 / =1 / -0) (67 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~farrukh's judgement is Distrusted by:
1. achow101 (Trust: +6 / =0 / -0) (DT1! (14) 1902 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)



Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

ZeusTrade http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/2265479.html

Quote
ZeusTrade's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ZeusRecife Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. TradeRafael (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. RecifeCripto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

ZeusRecife http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/2399137.html

Quote
ZeusRecife's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ZeusTrade Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. TradeRafael (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. RecifeCripto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

TradeRafael http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/2403687.html

Quote
TradeRafael's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ZeusTrade Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ZeusRecife Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
6. RecifeCripto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

RafaelCrypto http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/2405692.html

Quote
RafaelCrypto's judgement is Trusted by:
1. Luana Trade Banned! (Trust: #  +0 / =0 / -7) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. ZeusTrade Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
3. ZeusRecife Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
4. TradeRafael (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
5. Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Charlie Lee http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/2674886.html - am posting the whole thing as they were only active for little more than two weeks before being banned:

Quote
Trust list for: Charlie Lee Banned! (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h)
Back to index

Charlie Lee Trusts these users' judgement:


(I actually can't post the entire list as it exceeds the 64,000 characters limit)

Charlie Lee Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


Charlie Lee's judgement is Trusted by:
1. RafaelCrypto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Charlie Lee's judgement is Distrusted by:
-



Trust list: backscratchers: users agree, they trust or distrust each other.
Trust list: backstabbers: users disagree, one user trust the other, while the other distrust him.


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.

Same with RecifeCripto http://loyce.club/trust/2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h/2705061.html - a near identical list from the looks of it by a weeks old account.

Quote
Trust list for: RecifeCripto (Trust: neutral) (0 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP) (created 2019-11-17_Sun_12.33h)
Back to index

RecifeCripto Trusts these users' judgement:


(Same with this one in that it excees the 64,000 character limit)

RecifeCripto Distrusts these users' judgement:
-


RecifeCripto's judgement is Trusted by:
-

~RecifeCripto's judgement is Distrusted by:
-


Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust.





It appears to me that irfan_pak10 is attempting to slowly build a merit ring to give himself access to DT1/2 through the above mentioned UID's some of whom have been banned.
2  Economy / Reputation / [FLAG] Novaexhange.com on: September 26, 2019, 05:30:14 PM
My flag is against


who are owners or part owners of novaexchange.com who have announced they are closing and that users can only withdraw if they have verified via their KYC process.

I have tried multiple times to verify myself via their convoluted KYC process, however they at first ignored my comments, then simply said to email them which went un-responded.

Their official thread Nova Exchange [Archive] has had no response since the 18th of July when I posted that I could not verify myself via their KYC process.

I've seen comments that I am not the only one to be unable to verify via KYC, so I am left with no option other than to create a flag.

*edit*

A question came up in a seperate thread asking if you knew what their terms were, why did you still sign up (but not complete the KYC process) ? Well, on novaexchange's website they had tiers for signing up, tier one was user name (plus AFAIK email which gets verified) - you can sign in and view the trading floor, but can't trade.  Tier two you register (user name+email) and can then upload crypto and trade *but* you cannot withdraw unless you complete the KYC - most importantly, you are given 12 months from when you first register to complete the KYC process.

There are at least two emails that have been sent by nova to customers, unlike the website which has kept quiet about it, the email says (and I kid you not)

Quote
- Starting from October 28th until November 27th, there will be an equivalent to 0.0001 BTC custody fee charged at the time of the withdrawal request.


- Starting from November 28th until December 19th, there will be an equivalent to 0.005 BTC custody fee charged at the time of the withdrawal request.


- Starting from December 20th until January 27th, there will be an equivalent to 0.01 BTC custody fee charged at the time of the withdrawal request.


- From January 28th 2020 onwards the Nova website will be closed and users will have to get in touch with us to claim their assets.


- The custody fee will increase by 0.005 BTC every month on the 28th onwards.

Given they are dragging the chains to confirm people, until wouldn't you know it? You have to pay an additional fee to withdraw your coins...

novaexchange has varied the terms of use of their website, they should allow all users to withdraw our funds without charge especially given some of us are documented as having tried to complete their registration/KYC process and been unable to complete the process.



I would be interested to hear if novaexchange.com has sought a legal opinion as to whether or not their course of action would stand up to scrutiny in court.
3  Economy / Lending / Timelord2067's Timely Test and Main-neT LighTning Loans to a "T" on: September 13, 2019, 01:36:09 AM
Timelord2067's Timely Test and Main-neT LighTning Loans to a "T"

I am starting a Lightning Loan thread with near identical conditions to the one that LoyceV recently locked.

Locked: LoyceV's Legendary Little Lightning Loans

Quote
Loan
No collateral required.
Amount: 0.1 mBTC (0.0001 BTC, or 10,000 satoshi).
Duration: one week.
Interest: 1% (0.001 mBTC (=0.000001 BTC or 100 satoshi)).
Conditions: Members (and higher) without red trust on DT2 all account ranks can apply.

To apply
1. Make sure you have inbound capacity.
2. Post a Bitcoin Lightning Network payment request for 0.1 mBTC. Make sure it doesn't expire too soon (in case I'm not online).
Repayment
3. When you want to pay back, let me know and I'll post a payment request.

Disclaimer
Self-moderated to stop spam from users who don't read and ask for a on-chain Bitcoin loan.
I reserve the right to reject or accept users as I please.
This topic is experimental, if it works out I might add Larger Lightning Loans later.
Don't take a small loan to get positive feedback, join to try the Lightning Network  Smiley

Challenge
Help me add more sensible words (starting with a T) to the title Grin



As well as the above conditions, the following are to be noted: (last modified 16th October, 2019 dot point seven)

  • Loan repayment to be seven days from when the loan is funded. E.G. I advise the loan was funded at three fifteen A.M. on Monday, then you are obliged to repay by three fifteen A.M. the following Monday.
  • Main-net loan:

    Amount: 0.1 mBTC (0.0001 BTC, or 10,000 satoshi).
    Duration: one week.
    Interest: 1% (0.001 mBTC (=0.000001 BTC or 100 satoshi)).

    Test-Net loan:

    Amount: 1.0 mBTC (0.001 BTC, or 100,000 satoshi).
    Duration: one week.
    Interest: 1% (0.01 mBTC (=0.00001 BTC or 1000 satoshi)).
  • Please set your requests to a six hour duration as I may not be online at the same time as you.
  • Please use the format:  [code]<your lightning payment request>[/code]  as I have found some requests don't copy properly if posted without the [code][/code] tags.
  • If you don't repay me on time then I reserve the right to open a scam accusation against you.
  • I will not be giving merits or positive trust/feed back wall reviews, nore am I asking for any merits or trust/feedback reviews in return
    (unless I open a scam accusation against you when I'll freely splash some Red Paint ™ on your Trust/Feedback Wall)
    • I may decline a loan application if you have other outstanding loans.
    • From time to time, I may limit the number of open loans to ten on each of the lightning (test and main-nets) while I am rebalancing my inbound capacity.
    • I have inbound capacity of BTC 0.01 on the main-net node ACINQ.  If possible, it might speed up your repayment if you have this node on your channel list.
    • On the testnet I have numerous channels open, so will leave it up to you which channel to open.
  • If you are unable to make a payment due to connection fail, then:

    • I will send two additional payment requests (one each for the three mobile devices that I have Lightning Networks on) choose one and repay one of the three (not all three).
    • If you are still unable to make a repayment, then I will send you a block chain wallet address to make payment on.
    • If you are still unable to make a repayment (we're talking less than one whole dollar here) then I reserve the right to open a scam accusation against you.  If we have been communicating in open forum then I will take this into consideration as the LN is a very fickle beast.
  • Due to the small loan size, it is preferred that split repayments are not accepted to ensure you do not short change your repayment obligations.
    • PM's for loan applications will be ignored.
    • Late payment advice via PM will be ignored unless I have asked you in this thread to PM me. (again, we're talking BTC 0.000101 which is valued at here).
  • Has been rolled into 11b.
  • I reserve the right to open a scam accusation if you don't repay test-net bitcoins that I have loaned you as they were loaned to you to and you agreed to repay them with the relevant interest.



Updated terms:

  • 16 Oct 2019 Dot point 9iii If we have been communicating in open forum then I will take this into consideration Dot point 12 now becomes 11b.
  • 28/Sep/2019 Dot point 7a - I may decline loan if you have other outstanding loans.
  • 22/Sep/2019 Clarified dot points 10 (prefer no spilt payments) and 13 (right to start a spam accusation)

Daily bump.

Am around for next couple of hours if people want to submit lightning loan applications.
4  Economy / Reputation / [FLAG] COINMAN1 u=911630 on: September 05, 2019, 11:13:18 AM
So the [Flag] is pretty simple, there are numerous Red Trust Wall notes about COINMAN1 u=911630 scamming and there are outstanding scam accusations.


Although coinman1 was Last Active:    16 August 2019, 15:52:30, the last actual post was on the 23 March 2018, 07:59:11.

I don't believe that "coinman1" is necessarily in control of the account.  Here's why:

https://www.coindesk.com/25-year-old-to-plead-guilty-to-running-unlicensed-crypto-exchange [Archive]

25-Year-Old Bitcoin Seller Faces Life Sentence for Unlicensed Exchange

Byline: Wolfie Zhao Aug 26, 2019 at 06:00 UTC Updated Aug 26, 2019 at 11:06 UTC


Quote
A 25-year-old man from Westwood, Los Angeles, has plead guilty to federal charges for having exchanged up to $25 million in cash and crypto without a license and anti-money laundering program.

Kunal Kalra, also known as “Kumar,” “shecklemayne” and “coinman was indicted on Friday for allegedly trading cash and crypto for individuals including drug dealers, partially via his bitcoin ATM kiosk.

An announcement from the U.S. Justice Department last Friday said Kalra, who is expected to make his first court appearance next month, has agreed to plead guilty to the charges.

The release alleges Kalra ran an unlicensed crypto exchange business from May 2015 through October 2017. He admitted in his plea deal for having exchanged bitcoin for cash from criminals including drug dealers who obtained the cryptocurrency from selling narcotics on the darknet.

The justice department went on to say that without implementing an anti-money laundering program, Kalra facilitated such type of transactions with a commission while knowing the proceeds came from drug trafficking.

As part of the investigation, the law enforcement seized about $889,000 in cash from Kalra and about 54.3 bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, worth more than half-million dollars. The announcement said the maximum penalty Kalra could face is to serve a life time behind bars.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/westwood-man-agrees-plead-guilty-federal-narcotics-money-laundering-charges-running [Archive]

Byline: Department of Justice U.S. Attorney’s Office Central District of California FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, August 23, 2019


Quote
Westwood Man Agrees to Plead Guilty to Federal Narcotics, Money Laundering Charges for Running Unlicensed Bitcoin Exchange and ATM

          LOS ANGELES – A Westwood man has agreed to plead guilty to federal criminal charges for owning and operating an unlicensed money transmitting business where he exchanged up to $25 million in cash and virtual currency for individuals, including Darknet drug dealers and other criminals, some of whom used his Bitcoin ATM kiosk.

          Kunal Kalra, 25 – who was also known as “Kumar,” “shecklemayne” and “coinman” – was charged today in a four-count criminal information filed in United States District Court and is expected to make his initial court appearance next month. Pursuant to a plea agreement also filed today, Kalra agreed to plead guilty to four felonies: distribution of methamphetamine, operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, laundering of monetary instruments, and failure to maintain an effective anti-money laundering program.

          This is believed to be the first federal criminal case charging an unlicensed money remitting business that used a Bitcoin kiosk.

          According to the court documents, from May 2015 through October 2017, Kalra knowingly operated a virtual currency exchange business where he exchanged U.S. dollars for Bitcoin and vice versa. Kalra charged commissions for exchanging dollars for Bitcoin, and he only dealt with high-volume customers willing to exchange at least $5,000 per transaction. Kalra admitted in his plea agreement that he exchanged Bitcoin for cash from criminals, including those who received Bitcoin from selling narcotics on the Darknet.

          Kalra established bank accounts in the names of others, including fake businesses, which allowed him, for a time, to conceal his illicit business activities, court papers state. Kalra also admitted to operating a kiosk – essentially an ATM – where his customers could exchange Bitcoin for cash and vice versa. Kalra profited from every transaction conducted on the ATM. Customers who sought to do an exchange using this ATM were not required to provide their identities and Kalra did not install a camera or implement any features requiring customers to identify themselves, the plea agreement states.

          Kalra also admitted that in 2017 he exchanged approximately $400,000 in cash for Bitcoin for an undercover agent who contacted him online and later met him in person on multiple occasions at a coffee shop in Los Angeles. The undercover agent told Kalra that his virtual currency were proceeds of drug trafficking, and Kalra continued with various transactions, according to the plea agreement.

          In June 2017, Kalra sold nearly two pounds of methamphetamine to an undercover law enforcement official in exchange for $6,000. Kalra and the undercover agent later met at a coffee shop in Signal Hill to exchange $50,000 in Bitcoin for cash, which the undercover agent represented to Kalra was the proceeds of the sales of the methamphetamine that Kalra had sold to the agent, the plea agreement states.

          Law enforcement seized nearly $889,000 in cash from Kalra’s bank accounts and vehicle, as well as approximately 54.3 Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

          The maximum possible sentence Kalra could receive for these charges is life in federal prison.

          Kalra also faces federal criminal charges in San Antonio, Texas, that were filed earlier this month. That case alleges Kalra conspired to commit money laundering for a drug trafficking network that sold fraudulent prescription tablets, including some laced with methamphetamine and fentanyl. In the plea agreement filed today, Kalra agreed to plead guilty to those charges in Los Angeles federal court.

          This matter was investigated by the Drug Enforcement Administration, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s Homeland Security Investigations, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, IRS Criminal Investigation, and the Los Angeles Police Department. The Federal Bureau of Investigation assisted with the investigation.

          This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Puneet V. Kakkar of the International Narcotics, Money Laundering, and Racketeering Section.



COINMAN1 u=911630 's known wallet address had over 7.6 BTC pass through it: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/14fsh84VQ8gWMETMrG8iyZ9Bbzi5zNFc6H

In both quotes the name "Coinman" is mentioned.  While we have no way of knowing for certain that COINMAN1 u=911630 is actually Kunal Kalra the time frame's are consistent with coinman1's activities and going offline after the scam accusations commenced.  It's possible that a Government official has been logging into the COINMAN1 u=911630 while Kunal Kalra has been in custody (hence my wondering if the account has been compromised)



In either case the COINMAN1 u=911630 account has unsettled scam accusations and I believe a flag is warranted.
5  Economy / Reputation / [Flag] DT ring creation discussion / merit abuse / collusion to harm BCT on: September 04, 2019, 07:51:40 AM
My flags are against the following users:

  • [Flag] Vispilio for having obtained merits though deception - Vispilio is Latin for NIGHT THIEF [Google Translate]
  • [Flag] wolwoo for wanting to inflict harm among many active users
  • [Flag] ekiller for wanting to ...buy BTC with Paypal and became the fraudster
  • [Flag] El-cezeri  - for participating in the merit abuse listed in the Alt accounts and signature abusing on Local forum thread
  • [Flag] Kalemder  - for participating in the merit abuse listed in the Alt accounts and signature abusing on Local forum thread
  • [Flag] gospodin for distributing the merits gifted by Vispilio in the manor Vispilio has instructed them to do so (gospodin is Russian for Mister [Google Translate])
  • [Flag] PHI1618 - for likewise distributing the merits obtained by deception to strengthen their circle of merits (PHI1618 is a golden number as well as some other uses for user names etc [Bing]

These threads listed are to be read in conjunction with this thread.


On the 15th of June 2019, Vispilio begged for merits on the grounds that the listed posts were worthy of being merited.  As I detail in that thread, immediately prior to that occurring, Vispilio began adding UID's to his DT trust list.  (These people appear to be for the most part real and not alts, so there is a collusion going on).  Once Vispilio received the 95 merits he has handed the lion's share out to the following users:

  • El-Cezeri    16    49
  • gospodin    9    24
  • Kalemder    11    21
  • PHI1618    3    20

"The trust lists" thread began on the 23rd of August 2019 and since that time the main players have been adding users into their DT trust list.

Why is this of concern?
 Apart from the fact that Vispilio obtained merits through deception and not distributing them as he claimed he would, the rhetoric being used in the second thread is concerning in that they are colluding to cause havoc in the BitCoinTalk thread:

Examples include:

[Post 13 Archive]


 Ben bu foruma ilk üye olduğumda,

Paypal ile BTC satın almak isteyip dolandırıcı muamelesi gördüğüm günleri özler oldum bu DT muhabbetlerinden sonra.

[Google Translate]

When I first became a member of this forum,

After these DT conversations, I wanted to buy BTC with Paypal and became the fraudster.



[Post 40 Archive]

Ben de ekledim hocam sizi.
İlk sayfadaki posta ara ara ekleme yapıyorum, nedir yani şurda 3-5 kişiyiz, hemen herkes az çok birbirini tanıyor. Hakkaten bile isteye aldatmaya, zarara sokmaya çalışan pek görmedim aktif kullanıcılar arasında..
Distrust olayına sonra bakıcam mobilden yazıyorum şu an...

[Google Translate]

I added you, my teacher.
On the first page, I do occasionally add mail, so there are 3-5 people, almost everyone knows each other more or less. Indeed, even willing to deceive, trying to inflict harm among many active users ..
After the Distrust case, I'm writing from my mobile right now ...



Over the week-end my trust list changed to look like this: http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-31_Sat_06.04h/131361.html



trendcoin may have exposed themself as being an extended part of this merit abuse circle as with marlboroza who "just happened to pick that same time to add me to his distrust list" which I'm sure he'd say if asked.  



marlboroza is a native of Croatia [Archive] judging by his earliest posts:

kako se dobije viši rang? broj postova ili?

[Google Translate]

how to get a higher ranking? number of posts or?

This last week Vispilio removes his "trust" in Lauda http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-31_Sat_06.04h/982288.html



the same week s/he is asked repeatedly if s/he is Lauda:

goraset [Archive]

Ben yaptığımın doğru olduğunu savunmuyorum, o zaman acemiydik , işi yeni öğneniyorduk,  böyle hatalar yaptık ama karşılığında negatif trustun ağır olduğunu düşünüyorum sadece, herhangi bir bounty konusuna girin, yüzlerce makale plag dan elenir, ama  hatta benim yazdığım birsürü makale direkt linkiyle kopyalanıp gönderiliyordu. Bunlara karşı yapılan işlem sadece en fazla bounty den elemek  oldu. Bir tanesine negatif trust verildiğini duymadım.
Birine bir sebepten negatif trust veriyorsan benzer hareketi yapan tüm hesaplara aynısı yapmalısın , eğer yapmıyorsan ,bu hareket kişiye özel algılanır. Ki bende öğle algıladım, o dönem bouty kovalayan yüksek rank li türk hesaplarını bir şekilde saf dışı bırakmaya çalışıyorlardı. Bende nasibimi aldım.
 theymosun   bile distrust listesinde olan  lauda  eklenebiliyorsa ben fazlası ile eklenebilirim diye düşünüyorum. Birini tek bir olaya göre yargılamazsın, bir bütün  olarak değerlendirirsin.
Kaldı ki neg trust alan biri eklnememez diye bir kaide yok, sonuçta bu ekleyenin kişisel görüşü,  yine de ekleyene de çıkarana da teşekkür ediyorum, bir alınganlığım yok . Sadece durum tespiti yaptım, baskı sonucu kaldırmışlardır diye sende doğrulamışsın zaten dediğimi.


Esas ben lauda yı dt listene niye eklediğinin cevabını verirsin diye bekledim, ama nedense o konuya hiç girmedim, Lauda senin güvenini kazanacak ne yaptı acaba. 15 haziran dan beri dt listende
http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-24_Sat_08.13h/982288.html


[Google Translate]

Quote
I waited for you to answer why you added lauda to your dt list, but somehow I never got into that, I wonder what Lauda did to gain your trust. In your dt list since 15 June
http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-24_sat_08.13h/982288.html

(the 15th of June is when Vispilio starts their merit begging thread)

Vispilio deflects attention away from the accusation of being Lauda by putting myself up as the new target of the groups' distrust.

Vispilio is again asked about being Lauda:

bobit to [Archive]

Yalnız goraset in sorduğu sorunun cevabını ben de duymak isterim açıkçası.

[Google Translate]

However, I would like to hear the answer to the question that goraset asked.

Vilpilio answers

Yalnız goraset in sorduğu sorunun cevabını ben de duymak isterim açıkçası.

3 mesaj yukarıya bak

...

3 posts see above

Which is strange becuase the third post above talks about owlcatz distrusting these people: [Archive]

Ekledim bende o garip komplocuyu.

Ama hayret ediyorum. Sathoshi'nin kurduğu forum bu değil. Trust ve merit sistemi tamamen değiştirmiş tüm havayı. Sonuçta ortada sadece komplocu piskopatlar kalacak. Diğer tüm üyeler küsüp sıkılıp gidecek. Çoğu eski üyeyi burda bulamıyor olmanın sebebi de bu hava demek ki.

İlk zamanlar, aleni bir local forum düşmanlığı düşünmek saçma geliyordu. Ancak loyce.club'da bakın, bizim yerel forumda ilk 150 giren herkesi bir şekilde distrust listesine almışlar. Yine inanmak istemeyip, başka üyelere baktım yok. Adamlar resmen isim isim tespit etmişler. Bu duruma gülsem mi ağlasam mı tam karar veremedim.

Yoruma kesinlikle katılıyorum, o kadar saçma bir durum için uğraşıyorlar ki, insanın lanet olsun bu düzene deyip gidesi geliyor. DT seçilmiş olan arkadaşlar şuan ne kadar saçma bir ortamın içinde kaldığımızı biliyorlar, muhtemel potansiyeli olan arkadaşlar da yakında öğrenirler.

Mesela bakalım Kalemder hocayı kimler distrust yapmış.

~Kalemder is Distrusted by:
1. klaaas (Trust: +11 / =0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. owlcatz (Trust: +38 / =0 / -1) (DT1! (25) 224 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

Bu arkadaşlar genelde bizden herkesi yapmış, biraz daha yükselince diğerleri de geliyor.

[Google Translate]

For example, let's see who made Kalemder teacher distrust.

~ Kalemder is Distrusted by:
1. Klaaas (Trust: +11 / = 0 / -0) (31 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
2. owlcatz (Trust: +38 / = 0 / -1) (DT1! (25) 224 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)

These friends usually made everyone of us, a little higher when others come.

So, let's look at the Trust list for: klaaas http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-31_Sat_06.04h/147451.html



it goes over the page. klaaas removed their entire distrust list over this last week-end...

Likewise, owlcatz removed 25 of their distrust this last week-end: http://loyce.club/trust/2019-08-31_Sat_06.04h/313016.html




All the users I'm flagging and others in their discussion groups all removed by Owlcatz in the same week-end that they in turn distrust me.



LaudaM/Lauda is from Croatia:

Moderator https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1116199.0 [Archive]

Quote
Hello.
I've volunteered as a moderator for the Croatian subsection. I've been pretty much given a green light and have been advised to ask for approval of the community (seems very reasonable).
I would like to become a forum moderator because, I feel like I could help a bigger group of people that are asking for information in addition to making some modification to the section itself. As a moderator I'll continue being positive and engaging and more active in the community (local board; which I previously have not) and keep the subsection clean by moving and ordering threads. I will always be neutral and I'm going to ensure that members follow forum rules and guidelines.

If you have anything against me being a moderator, please post below (possibly in English so that theymos can read it and decide).

Note: This is not a discussion about the need for a moderator, hence the self-moderated thread (admins can see deleted posts anyways).

Pozdrav. Nisam mislio da napišem sve ponovo na hrvatskom, jer se nadam da svi mogu razumjeti tekst iznad. Ukoliko netko ima pitanje ili mu nešto nije jasno slobodno neka pita ili mi se javi putem privatne poruke.
Također ukoliko netko ima nešto konkretno protiv mene molio bih da obrazložite svoje razloge, a ne samo da napišete da se ne slažete s ovime. Mislim da će hrvata biti mnogo više definitivno kada Bitcoin dosegne novu razinu, te da će biti veća potreba za moderatorima.

~Lauda  Smiley

marlboroza is from Croatia (see above)

I'm not suggesting there's any connection between LaudaM/Lauda and marlboroza (goodness me no - perish the thought)  Roll Eyes but it's uncanny that the so-called ring master (Vilpilio) is accused of being Lauda then locks that thread three hours later and two other UID's (owlcatz and klaaas) both remove their trust of the merit-go-round abuse network.  I can't see any connection between these five users other than the timing of their trust modification this last week.

http://loyce.club/trust/2019-07-13_Sat_08.22h/101872.html nine days after this: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5161689.0;all

@theymos @suchmoon @LoyceV @darkstar_ @EFS
6  Economy / Reputation / 100% of Quickseller's Flags are false. on: July 17, 2019, 03:27:56 AM
It's not looking too good for Quickseller [Trust] [BPIP] having Flagged (21 type one + 1 type 3) Flags that offer no proof.  100% of Quicksellers Flags are false.

http://loyce.club/trust/flags/50.html



These twenty-one flags cite the one thread: [dox'ed]James Volpe TheGamber aka moreia aka many others is an alt of dzeros (there's no actual doxing, just BTC TX from one wallet to another wallet as proof that is quickly rebuffed)

Quote
7 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged TheGambler (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

8 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged dzeros (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

10 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged moreia (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

11 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Spodermen (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

12 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Plutonium (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

13 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged silvercane (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

14 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Gambler_appeal (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller, killyou72. Opposed by nobody.

15 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged NextPonzi (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

16 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged NextPonziV2 (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

17 Active. Quickseller flagged fastponzi (type 1, see why). Supported by pandukelana2712, Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

18 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged bit-dividends (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

19 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Bit-Dividends.com (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

20 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Crypterest (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

21 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged CryptoSplit (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

22 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged dmugetsu (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

23 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged Fiiasco (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

24 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged InvestCryptos (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

25 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged BtcGains (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

26 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged kerimk2 (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

27 Active. Quickseller flagged BitcoinPonzi.io (type 1, see why). Supported by pandukelana2712, Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

28 Insufficient support. Quickseller flagged sergiom Banned! (type 1, see why). Supported by Quickseller. Opposed by nobody.

Quickseller in his OP claims there are

Quote
Known alts:

(snip) <--- details removed due to thread being in the "investigation" section

(total of 20a lot of known alts)

But as some-one who knows a thing or two about alts, I can't find any references linking any of the UID's listed to anyone else.



Pamoldar (who?) and then Quickseller both flag  ky94PjDw - Pamoldar as a Type 1, Quickseller as a type 3 Flag.

Quote

Not to be outdone Steamtyme starts a type two flag against ky94PjDw

I haven't encountered a flag that "expires" already, but here is one...  

Quote
36 Expired. Steamtyme flagged ky94PjDw (type 2, see why). Supported by dbshck, redsn0w, Steamtyme. Opposed by nobody. -

All three of these flags reference @theymos' thread Trust flags as "proof" of their flags.  Only trouble is ky94PjDw is not mentioned in either the OP or the first page (TL;DR the rest) so in this instance, all three, Pamoldar (type one), Steamtyme (type two) and Quickseller (type three) flags are fake.



Quickseller's type 3 flag against ky94PjDw is interesting in that he would have been directly affected financially ... (what ever the correct wording is) from his trade with ky94PjDw - but the thread "proof" isn't there.



100% of Quicksellers Flags are false.  I know people such as @Vod and @Suchmoon (and a whole lot more) are going to want to sink the boot in, however, I just ask that you don't indulge that person with lengthy responces.  It's Flag abuse in the most blatant kind that @theymos needs to stamp out.
7  Economy / Reputation / Lauda creating flags against random people linked to threads not related. on: July 04, 2019, 03:30:36 PM
So far I've come across three flags Lauda has created whereby the thread is not the subject of the flag or the UID isn't even mentioned in the thread.

http://loyce.club/trust/flags/35.html

304 Active. Lauda flagged xolxol (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. - Lauda appears to have engaged in Trust (Flag) abuse after xolxol posted this in their thread.

294 Active. Lauda flagged proudhon (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by nobody. - proudhon makes one post which is replied to by another poste of the thread in a civil manor. (If the thread is so bad, how come the OP wasn't flagged??)

288 Active. Lauda flagged Khaos77 (type 1, see why). Supported by Lauda. Opposed by Khaos77[/size]. - Khaos77 doesn't even post in the thread and is not mentioned.



I don't have time tonight to review more of Lauda's Flags, but to me it seems he is using the Flag system to punish others.  What's @theymos' position on the creation of Flags?

8  Economy / Reputation / Timelord2067 - funds held by me 2019/20 on: June 25, 2019, 02:08:39 AM
I am currently holding the following funds on behalf of the following persons/groups within BCT:

WalletAmountWho for?
1KnownMk3gj3DnxLnU9sazk6Lnpj8DoEWaKnown Alts thread
1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziwKnown Alts thread
1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6Known Alts thread

Total amount held by me BTC 0.019 which is valued at



Signed messages:

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is Timelord2067 on the 13th of May 2019.
I have created Vanity Addresses 1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziw and 1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6 for use in the Known Alts Mk III thread for donations to support the team of investigators as they see fit to distribute the donated funds from time to time.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1AhuQTWMu185kWFmiUHhmTTVYjKR7BfirW
HyKTRcWWpccGwT3pWlD87sQjxqpVr0ebFF3xnqlWyDuOF07xy9GAzajSJoHcQs9IgRKKaPtKgnj/GMAQXWifIU4=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Code:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
I have discussed with Hhampuz a resolution to the Lutpin Flag June 2019 and consider the issue to be resolved and will not mention the issue from this point forward.
If I close (lock) the Known Alts Mk III thread started by me I will immediately transfer all remaining donated funds held by me to the next thread starter after they post a donation address in a Mk IV Known Alts Thread.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1AhuQTWMu185kWFmiUHhmTTVYjKR7BfirW
H7kW6A606w6lULzyddkYC0flw3f8jmR/WnhsrzmIgXxwB2u0uM0yO1fhNpFF1ME0MK0KrXeClRBAOuVlItebyMQ=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----



I will keep thread locked but will update thread with new posts whenever any transactions out of these wallet addresses occurs.



House keeping:

  • 28/Sep/2019 - updated text total being held by me from BTC 0.017975 to BTC 0.019
9  Economy / Reputation / [Flag] Lutpin - Known Alt Donation funds. on: June 24, 2019, 09:27:14 AM
I am creating a Red Flag against Lutpin today after having tried without success for the last few weeks to have Lutpin hand over the donation funds for the Known Alts thread that have been donated to the wallet address 1KnownF41AXkhgry3wNTHJ7NZM6jo1Kohy which at the time of writing this has a balance of 0.017975 BTC.

The Known Alts thread has had three incarnations:

Mk I   - 65 pages, 1,287 posts
Mk II  - 73 pages, 1,441 posts
Mk III - 79 pages, 1,575 posts (and counting) with less than 24 hours between the first and second and then less than 24 hours between the second and third thread's creation.  

Lutpin claims both the Lauda created thread and the thread I started are not the same as the first thread created by mexxer-2 as a primary reason for not handing over the donation funds.

@mexxer-2 created the first thread and locked it abruptly, @Lauda created the second thread and locked it abruptly so I created a third thread - but as yet see no need to lock it.

At some early stage after when mexxer-2 created the first thread the aforementioned wallet address 1KnownF41AXkhgry3wNTHJ7NZM6jo1Kohy was created for donations.  Lutpin was the person holding the funds.

Two separate payouts occurred with one payout being mostly to Lutpin himself and the second payout was to an unspecified wallet address with no explanation forthcoming.

At the start of May 2019 I created two wallet addresses for donations to be made after a brief discussion amongst the active contributors where it was agreed I would hold onto donated funds.  ON the 13th of May I put out an appeal to whomever held onto the original donation funds to transfer them to the new wallet address signing a message.

02 June 2019, 11:09:47 I sent Lutpin a PM requesting the funds be sent over.

Greetings from Australia.

In this post [Archive] I posted the wallet address 1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6 that I will manage after it was agreed that I could manage the donations to the Known Alts of any-one thread.

In this post [Archive] maxxer-2 states that you manage that wallet address, so could you please forward the entire funds from 1KnownF41AXkhgry3wNTHJ7NZM6jo1Kohy to 1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6 at your earliest convenience please?

I couldn't help but notice this:



will that cause an issue with the funds being sent?

Regards,

But received no reply.

On the 6th of June 2019 I asked if anyone was in contact with Lutpin who holds onto the donation funds.  Joel_Jensen offered to send a message, however, no message in reply by Lutpin.

On the 17 June 2019, 14:35:35 I posted in the known Alts thread that I had tried contacting Lutpin and I noted that he had been online multiple times after my initial PM to him.

Both in a PM the next day and in the Known Alts thread Lutpin has claimed the Mk II and III threads are not the same as the Mk I thread but won't elaborate.  Lutpin also states the funds are his to do with as he sees fit.

Given Lutpin is in dispute with mexxer-2 over money owed by mexxer-2 to Lutpin I asked how the two could discuss the funds being distributed, but got no reply.

Lutpin in two separate PM's has made veiled threats about what kind of retaliation he will take should I proceed to give him a Red Flag (type 3) as well as again dangling the promise of paying me "As a sign of good will" [7], [8] from the Known Alts "donation funds as a recognition of your valued contributions".

Lutpin doesn't want to discuss the donation funds for the thread that was closed two and a half years ago, nore does he want to hand over the funds to anyone else.

ON the 18th I posted a lengthy breakdown of the events that have transpired in the Known Alts thread and it was another three days later that Lutpin finally responded.

he has no intention of responding to the request
I did so in my previous post, I told you I won't hand over the funds.

he has no intention of justifying his actions.
My previous post has a lengthy explanation of my decision.
You might not like it, you might disagree, but it's there.

At that time I'll have to step up my depute if no response occurs.
Do whatever you think is necessary.
Just keep in mind that you're not in the right here, and any action you take might amount to a violation, eg if you attempt to start a flag.



Lutpin has again been online in the last three days, but has not handed over the donation funds even though he admits I am an intended recipient and the consensus of the current contributors is that I be tasked with holding donation funds.

Because I am an intended recipient and on behalf of the other contributors I am left with no choice but to create this Red Flag Type 3.

So Lutpin, please forward the remaining 0.017975 BTC (less *appropriate* transaction fees) from the wallet address 1KnownF41AXkhgry3wNTHJ7NZM6jo1Kohy to the wallet address 1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6 [Signed] as previously requested.


The following is a "live" balance:
which is valued at


1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziw
1KnownXXXNtrjT539vAWckYqWi77jgUXs6
10  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / [List] VanityGen Wallet Generation - threads, how to & links on: June 06, 2019, 07:02:18 AM
W.I.P. [List] Vanity Wallet Generation - threads, how to & links



[Downloads] | [How To's] | [Discussion Threads] | [External Links]

This is a thread to list the various vanity wallet generation threads with links on how to and downloads of various programs.

First off you'll need a really really good quantum computer PC graphics card, or the PC's CPU depending on what you want to do.



[Downloads] | [How To's] | [Discussion Threads] | [External Links]




[Downloads] | [How To's] | [Discussion Threads] | [External Links]
(Portions copied from samr7's thread)

How do I import the private key into bitcoin?

If you wish to spend coins received on a vanity address created by vanitygen, you must import the private key into a bitcoin client.  There are two popular methods of doing this with the standard Satoshi bitcoin client:

    Use the importprivkey command.  To do this, select Help -> Debug Window, and in the window, on the bottom line, enter importprivkey <privatekey>, e.g.

Code:
importprivkey 5J4XJRyLVgzbXEgh8VNi4qovLzxRftzMd8a18KkdXv4EqAwX3tS

Jackjack's pywallet script is an all-in-one tool that directly modifies the wallet.dat file.  This works with a normal, unpatched bitcoin client, but does require Python with the bsddb package.



[Downloads] | [How To's] | [Discussion Threads (note, if it says [Archive] chances are the thread is defunct)] | [External Links]





[Downloads] | [How To's] | [Discussion Threads] | [External Links]

11  Economy / Reputation / Known Account Sellers Mk I (2019 Q3) Red Paint ™ [Flag] applied or required on: May 22, 2019, 04:05:52 AM
Known Account Sellers List - A list of known account sellers... Mk I
Still un-moderated - still hunting Ass' and their alts.

I've noticed there's a disjointed approach to tagging BitCoinTalk account sellers, some people will create a thread identifying an account seller and either tag that account, or won't actually tag them instead offering up the account sellers/scammers in the hope DT's will do the job.

In post two I'll be listing the various Ass' along with who have tagged them or, if they are in need of Red Paint ™ - It will be a given I've tagged them myself, however as I'm not on the DT list, feel free to tag these accounts.

e.g.

  • Name - Tagged by BS Cs


If someone has a Known Alt then those alts will be listed together along with who has listed them.



But other people have started lists...

True, but they usually start a list of ones they have tagged themselves, or in the case of LTU_btc started a list but didn't even tag the Ass' themselves.



While this is not a self moderated thread, it is on the other hand asked that you refrain from discussions outside the scope of this thread.

You're welcome to use the following Submission Form for any Ass' you find.

Code:
[b]BCT Name[/b]: (name)
[b]BCT UID[/b]: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=987654321
[b]Red Paint ™ applied or required[/b]: (names of DT that have posted Red Paint ™)
[b]Ass' Thread Link[/b]: BCT URL



Threads you'll likely find asses...

12  Economy / Reputation / Not sure what to make of this: two mnightwaffle loans from (fullypak/klf) on: May 17, 2019, 06:43:51 AM
mnightwaffle starts a loan thread on the 21 July 2016, 08:03:58 and secures a BTC 0.1965 loan from fullypak that was funded here with repayment to be made to wallet address 1Cqd4L45LMVL2BmizDUzmPiNit6nhCQmdY. On the 30 July 2016, 17:38:17 mnightwaffle states that he has repaid ($110) 0.1377 sent to 1Cqd4L45LMVL2BmizDUzmPiNit6nhCQmdY via this TX. s/he then posts

Quote
Amount due: 0.078 (approx $51)

The OP was edited on the 04 August 2016, 080:54:17

Quote
Edit
Repaid 8/3/2016
THX

When?

There are no TX for 0.078 from any wallet address to 1Cqd4L45LMVL2BmizDUzmPiNit6nhCQmdY before or after the 4th of August 2016.

However, at the same time mnightwaffle is locking the tread fullypak sends mnightwaffle BTC 0.062 in this TX which is about a third of the amount mnightwaffle had repaid a few days earlier... BTC 0.062 at the time was worth $33.26

The TX 7d8208e3ea946945875d46a5570a445ff744d796c927bd223b4377f0b10b0b6d appears in this thread 03 August 2016, 08:07:00 where mnightwaffle is asking to buy $124 (min $25) - fullypak facilitates a sale the same day.  Neither thread mentions the outstanding BTC 0.078 owing on the loan.



fullypak is identified as a scammer in the known alts thread having multiple alts who are claiming in the same signature campaigns.  One of these alts is klf who engages in a mock exchange with fullypak in a bitgold to bitcoin thread.

In this bitgold to bitcoin thread fullypak claims klf is his best customer with this TX as proof of transaction sending BTC 0.6 to klf's wallet address 1C3dHBqsciQvvsa2c6BUvW9H3U23fy83tT. klf's post is post number four.  Posts two and three are by roadbits who uses wallet address 1BeWdcxCQ2em1HcN4gPvAjCqmmYz5omsfp in this signature campaign post.

Wallet [27d639b5fa] contains the following wallet addresses:

Code:
1Cqd4L45LMVL2BmizDUzmPiNit6nhCQmdY 0.00000598 15 435367  <--- fullypak
1C3dHBqsciQvvsa2c6BUvW9H3U23fy83tT 0.         48 496710  <--- klf
18ySABh1vMk5jFunSaYFvz2dkMCLHPFBwa 0.         43 406107
12hvTp8tbwQJtVxEQ7VvZEj9Nq9cb12exA 0.         24 377244
1LeG1NN72dVahGBL6jaG8YPxRNGBwQAk3X 0.         19 406244
1BeWdcxCQ2em1HcN4gPvAjCqmmYz5omsfp 0.         13 421108  <--- roadbits
1ErMGaLqkmoJCoCXE1Dbwjn1yGD3CPsdF9 0.         7 421108
13w9MkFTPQZX4NHmA319Ho2i4xVnTwgkzc 0.         2 387844
16AcDsWDGxsZJvBQzDw1jCVyURgKAJ9QYJ 0.         1 406102

  • fullypak uses wallet address 1Cqd4L45LMVL2BmizDUzmPiNit6nhCQmdY
  • klf uses wallet address 1C3dHBqsciQvvsa2c6BUvW9H3U23fy83tT
  • roadbits uses wallet address 1BeWdcxCQ2em1HcN4gPvAjCqmmYz5omsfp

all three talk to each-other in the bitgold to bitcoin thread that fullypak started with claims they have done trades with each-other.  Obviously they can't have as they are alts.



In the first part of this post I show a loan between mnightwaffle and fullypak that was never repaid in full with a follow-up sale from fullypak to mnightwaffle just days later.

on the 20 August 2016, 12:57:48 mnightwaffle starts a new loan thread this time asking for a $50-$200 btc loan @ 10% - 2 weeks @DarkStar_ asks for a signed message, however curiously that post no longer exists... Twenty minutes later klf comes to the rescue and 69 seconds later mnightwaffle accepts klf's loan offer sending BTC 0.35 to mnightwaffle with the repayment address being 1C3dHBqsciQvvsa2c6BUvW9H3U23fy83tT which is the same wallet address from the fake bitgold to bitcoin transaction between fullypak and klf.

mnightwaffle in post six claims the "2nd Loan fulfilled by zazarb"

However...

The very same day mnightwaffle sends BTC 0.336777 TO zazarb via this TX

The two transactions firstly from klf and secondly to zazarb are on this page of mnightwaffle's transactions via wallet address 1MPGDzR91uMdGanKvZVK4vHjHXGeKJNZo8 - the loan from zazarb was begun on the ninth of August 2016 and paid back on the 17th with the funds from klf.  mnightwaffle then repays klf

Effectively, mnightwaffle first sells bitcoin to zazarb then takes out a loan from zazarb then takes out a second loan to repay zazarb all in the space of one month.



Let's go back to that first loan from fullypak - fourteen hours after receiving the loan from fullypak mnightwaffle sells to zazarb bitcoin which can be seen on this page of mnightwaffle's transactions TX

On the one hand you have the known scammer fullypak/klf/roadbits fabricating transactions with each-other to boost their trades in their thread, on the other hand mnightwaffle appears to be taking out loan after loan simply to pay off the previous loans with one loan being purported to have been paid, but in actual fact wasn't. klf makes no mention of the 0.078 owed to their alt fullypak nore are there any transactions in mnightwaffle's transaction list that come close to that amount in that time-frame.



So, what am I looking at?
13  Economy / Exchanges / Cryptopia - ONLINE ARTICLES related to hack & theft of funds 2019 (non discussion thread) on: January 16, 2019, 01:13:51 AM

ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
I thought I might start a list of online articles about Cryptopia's most recent hack and theft of funds.  The main thread for Cryptopia can be found here: Cryptopia Cryptocurrency Platform Services and Development was started by TripleHeXXX - That thread is the main Cryptopia thread, this is a thread for online articles concerning the hack and theft in 2019.

Unless otherwise stated, all times in Aqua are NZ (GMT +12) and in blue are NZDST (GMT+13)

Latest News: 2019 | Class Actions | Summary: STOLEN & Frozen | Liquidators Grant Thornton    
From Twitter:



It is a security issue.

Given how long ongoing discussions about Mt Gox and Cryptsy etc have gone on for, I am formatting the page into monthly sections.  Feel free to post your links found using the form below:

Code:
[b]Website[/b]: (url)
[b]Title[/b]: (please copy the page's title to here)
[b]Byline and Date[/b]: (the author of the article and the date listed on the page)
[b]Archive link[/b]: (please use [url=http://archive.today/]archive.today[/url] or similar to archive the article.)


Image via elementus.io



Via coingeek.com



Via digitaloceanspaces.com
Image via ambcrypto.com
Investigations have put the loss (theft) at upwards of $13Million US$ - in post number three I have attempted to gather together the various amounts into a concise table (and it's a work in progress)

Totals in post #3:

Total Stolen (identified by elementus.io) - $15,951,237
Total Stolen (known - identified above LTC etc) - $ 943,660

Total Frozen (known) - $59.54 (in $USD) PLUS
Total Frozen (known) - BTC 372.54 ~ $1,459,270.07


Total (hot/cold) uncertain - BTC 313.6 ~ $ 1,156,855.96

equates to

$ 8,644,779.19 USD worth of Crypto confirmed as being on Cryptopia at the time of hack and theft. (Note, this is not the confirmed amount of stolen funds, see above)


Neither Lafu nor myself are employees of Cryptopia. Nor are we authorized to make any statements on their behalf.  There is no official representation of Cryptopia on Bitcointalk as they only consider discord and twitter as official media channels.

As a client of the exchange I probably have more $ at risk than most.

You are correct that their staff have instructed not to make any statements. Most are on leave as the offices are considered a crime scene.

A reminder that Lafu and xtraelv are not employees of Cryptopia http://archive.fo/bq7DY#selection-5393.0-5401.139 and as such please limit the number of enquiries you make to them as they cannot respond to individual requests for information.



I'm not sure I'll include twitter / facebook etc posts, but am happy to include links to any offsite support groups.


===

Class Actions:


Liquidators: Grant Thornton

Quote
Media enquiries, please contact:

Claire Cicchini   
Acumen Republic
E ccicchini@acumenrepublic.com
Cryptopia customer enquiries, please contact:

E liquidation@cryptopia.co.nz



Suggestions and feedback welcome (and suggestions of where to move the thread to).
14  Economy / Reputation / Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2019 Q4) on: December 08, 2017, 03:48:32 AM
[User Generated Mk III] - Known alts of anyone Mk III + Mk II + Mk I


Known Alts of any-one - A user Generated List Mk III
Still un-moderated - still hunting scammers and their alts.

Donations can be made to: 1KNoWNMK34nGWz2sJy1JzihZdLCGTKcziw

Jump to: Submission Form | Known Alts thread Mk II Mk I | BCT PGP/GPG Public Key Database | Resources | Additional Resources | Google Spread Sheet (read only) | Level of awesomeness | Hall of Shame | History of thread | Trust Survey | Donations | BCT Threads: Scam Accusations, Reputation, Currency Exchange | Mk III Wink | Last Updated 8th July 2018

Submission Form for posting:

Anyone who would like to post their finds in this thread are to use this form:

Code:
[color=brown][b]n Accounts Connected:[/b][/color]

(Where possible put UID's in numerical order keeping these UID's on the one line) [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=#]Username[/url], [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=#]Username[/url], [url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=#]Username[/url] (and so on).

[b][color=#0a80b1]Proof:[/color][/b]

(your proof - Please provide substantial proof that the accounts you listed are owned by one and the same person. Either explain the connection here or link to the explanation.) Ensure you use an archive service such as archive.is to capture a permanent record of the proof.

[b][color=teal]Related Addresses:[/color][/b]

(any BitCoin (or other alt coins) that connect the UID's - can include such things as Twitter accounts or other Social Media Accounts - List any addresses you have seen the person use. Best: One address per line. Also, use [code ] and [/code ] please.

[i]Miscellaneous:[/i]

Any other comments you may have belong here.




Resources:


Level of awesomeness:

actmyname (5/14) | ahmedjamal1998 (3/7) | Al Pacino Jr (/) | ALTALTALTALTALT (2/5) | altbuster (1/10) | Alts Hunter (1/2) | anu1908 (2/12) | apoorvlathey (1/2) | ArkiCrypto (1/5) | Avirunes (4/11) | BeEvil (11/214) | BitRentX (2/5) | BlackMambaPH (1/2) | CarlosCorreia (1/22) | cheater detector (63/456) | Coffee Team (1/2) | Coiner_ (/) | coinlocket$ (8½/73) | c0ldbrewz (1/15) | Coolcryptovator (1/2) | DarkStar_ (2/4) | DGulari (/) | EraserHead[EH] (1/tba) | Glomerulus22 (2½/5½) | Goliafin (1/2) | HCP (6/15) | helltop (1/3) | hilariousandco (¼/1) | HugeBlack (¼/3) | iasenko (2/5) | ibminer (/) | ICHIOCHA (1/2) | jamalaezaz (1/2) | Joel_Jantsen (1/2) | joniboini (2/4) | julerz12 (1/2) | lapongetiasuu (2/10) | Lauda (1/2) | LeGaulois (2/4) | loughlin (½/1) | LoyceV (2/8) | marlboroza (21/181) | marketone is big scamer (1/tba) | minifrij (/) | MrLitex (2/16) | owlcatz (1/4) | P2Pfinder (1/9) | Panda Trump (/) | pantheraio (5/24) | philipma1957 (/) | Pmlimits666 (1/3) | primeer (/) | pugman (1½/9½) | Rakeshdobar1 (1/4) | RJX (/) | r_victory (1/2) | sabine80 (3/10) | SFR10 (2/9) | shewasfourteen (1/2) | StopMult (2/4) | subSTRATA (/) | Sylon (1/2) | TagaMungkahi (2/5) | TalkStar (_/_) | The Pharmacist (/) | TheQuin (2/8) | TheUltraElite (6½/20½) | trinaldao (/) | Trrrast2 (1/2) | TwiceNayeon (1/2) | TwitchySeal (1/10) | vlad230 (3/8) | Vovan4ik772 (1/2) | wh1stleblower (1/4) | yahoo62278 (½/2) | Zapo (3/13) | zazarb (/) | Zackgeno96 (1/5) | zool2003 (1/6)  

How do people feel about your find numbers changing colour to signify a Higher Level of Awesomeness TM?

Hall of Shame:

quickseller (-1/-2) | KeithBeeCham (*/*) | reagannn (*½/*) | aTriz (*/*) |







History:

Credit where credit is due, many thanks to mexxer-2 and Lauda and also Lutpin for starting the two previous threads. (Have I missed thanking anyone?)  And thanks also for the PM's of support; I look forward to reading posts in the not too distant future.

Show your support:

Add the following to your banner or signature:

Code:
[url=https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.0][b][color=#0a80b1]Known Alts of any-one[/color] - [color=#f8ae23][i]A User Generated List[/i][/color] [color=#c81c8f][sup]Mk III[/sup][/url]

which will look like this:

Quote

^^
-<(@)>-

||_||
||+||
||=||
//||_||\\

We're watching you...


15  Economy / Reputation / [Flag Request] DirectBet.EU closed shop and walked away with bets in play. on: July 12, 2017, 02:08:15 PM
No one else seems to have started a thread about DirecBet.EU closing shop and walking away with bets in play http://archive.is/KaESc#selection-429.0-435.14 , so I'll start one here.

Their UID here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=207436

*edit* 13th of June 2019

I have created a Flag Request here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=76 - please support it.
16  Other / Beginners & Help / [Guide] Broadcast Your RAW Transaction BTC & Alts coins on: May 29, 2017, 02:24:35 AM
I've compiled a short list of websites that will broadcast your raw transaction
Last edited 10/07/2018 22:30 (GMT +10)

BitCoin (1MB block variety)

Not working at the moment:


There are also three services that will process your TX transaction / accelerating transaction (additional payment may be required):

Caveat Emptor - Let the buyer beware.
As with any online service, do your own due diligence.


Not working at the moment:


Other related services:


Further reading:


Command Line Options:
You can also use the

Code:
resendwallettransactions

command in your BitCoin Core /  wallet

Push directly to the network by contacting nodes via a simple code. Basically the "Sending a transaction: tx" part of bitcoins hard way article.

( Bitcoins the hard way: Using the raw Bitcoin protocol - http://www.righto.com/2014/02/bitcoins-hard-way-using-raw-bitcoin.html )

People who run Bitcoin Core nodes can also use the sendrawtransaction rpc command to broadcast any transaction which they have the hex for.



BitCoin CASH (variable block size variety)


Other related services:


Further reading:

Command Line Options:

BXT is a clone of BitCoin Core and can push via the

Code:
resendwallettransactions

or

Code:
sendrawtransaction
    (more information as it comes to hand...)




Other BitCoin Derivatives:

https://bcx.info/tx/send



Other Altcoins:





Suggestions and comments welcome and please leave a message with any other URL's that you find.

[/list]
17  Other / Meta / Who will be the first user to reach 10,010 activity? on: January 18, 2017, 01:59:29 PM
Just a little bit of lighthearted fun for a change; Who will be the first user to reach 10,010 activity?

Activity 10,010 will take 715 fortnights and equates to roughly 27.5 years

Some members have been here since 2010, so will come up to 7.5 years with just another 20 years to go very soon.  I myself have been here for about 3.5 years with activity 1022 have chalked up just on 10% of the time. There are actually a few UID's that have alread chalked up 10,000 posts, so all they would have to do is log back in once per fortnight for the next 20 years and post just once per fortnight from now on.

Can you make it?  Will the forum still be here?  Will BitCoin?  Time will tell.

(With apologies to defaced 's thread Legendary one day? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1226681.0 )
18  Other / MultiBit / Portable Apps version of MultiBit ( 0.5.17 ) - update please? on: September 02, 2016, 12:09:48 PM
This is the only reference to PortableApps.com in this whole section...

Hi Roland,

Thanks for your feedback.

MultiBit is quite easy to run off a USB drive, you just have to copy a few files around. There is a 'how-to' here:
http://multibit.org/help_runFromUSBDrive.html

I would like to have a version that integrates smoothly with PortableApps.com as that is a very good environment for USB drives. I have looked at what it entails and it is various configuration files etc. It is a bit of work but would be worth doing I think.

If you are happy to move a few files around it does not take very long to set MultiBit up for a USB drive. In some of my tests I create a temporary directory, copy in a blockchain, create a multibit.properties, run the test with the 'MultiBit runtime' I just created, then throw it all away. It is that easy.

This link http://portableapps.com/search/node/multibit has the only references to MultiBit on the PortableApps website.

The only version ported to PA is 0.5.17 - Is there anyway an updated version of MultiBit can be ported to PortableApps please?
19  Economy / Scam Accusations / BLEUTRADE.COM - Bordering on scammy behavior on: July 23, 2016, 02:52:38 AM
Am planting a sign post here in the Scam Accusation thread for anyone who didn't see it in the reputation thread:

BLEUTRADE.COM - Not responding to communication from its users https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1546459.0

I'll lock this thread for now so that it can continue to be discussed as a reputation issue, but, given that it's been twelve days since I started the other thread, and still no response from Bleutrade.com, I'm starting to feel this is starting to look like scammy behavior on their part.
20  Economy / Reputation / BLEUTRADE.COM - Not responding to communication from its users on: July 11, 2016, 01:09:26 PM
BACKGROUND:

There are two BleuTrade.com threads:


The second thread directly links to the first in it's OP.

I joined BleuTrade.com due to my ongoing involvement with SexCoin which had been voted and also paid to be listed on BleuTrade.com

BleuTrade listed quite a few Alt coins and, after a while, launched it's own internal coin as ownership of the actual Exchange.  Their launch of the coin was sudden and those in the know cornered the market and began to pump the price up.  Every four hours payouts occurr to those who own the internal BlueTrade coin and like everyone else, I began to gather quite a few Alt coin dust amounts.



After a while of trading, BleuTrade.com decided to remove some coins including SexCoin from their listing.  They had been trying to establish a fiat to Crypto exchange but I am uncertain where that led.  I don't think they were able to get approval for it.

Over time BleuTrade.com has withdrawn many more Alt coins, quite a few had been paid to be listed, I haven't heard of an Alt coins being refunded their listing fees.

At some point, I withdrew my coins (that I could) from BleuTrade.com and the account has more or less remained dormant for many months.



I very recently went to make a trade with xetsr for 0.04 and set about withdrawing from an online wallet.

Need $35 BTC ASAP. Have PayPal.

Send me a message.

Have PM'ed you.

https://blockchain.info/tx/eaf7715b1204da7067e7f6058ef0fe2adfa363879347acb24173bb8d326a835f

Through inattention on my part, I'd previously set the Wallet Address to 1A7mL77ZxR1EU7rhfyiTEbs6A5EN5BZbSy and the BTC 0.04070352 were sent to my BleuTrade.com Wallet Address.

Anyone with a keen eye will see that I previously sent this Wallet Address funds from my Wallet Address 1AhuQTWMu185kWFmiUHhmTTVYjKR7BfirW which I signed a while ago.

https://blockchain.info/tx/94e98458b8046d1b770b26fefefc879827ddbb2a3400fecfcebcee0301a95d7b

As you can see the funds were withdrawn out as soon as they went in, so I'm unsure if this is standard practice of BleuTrade.com to use any Wallet Address funds to payout other user's withdrawls, or, they were parked in an off-line Wallet for use later.



It took me an hour or two to work out where the fund went, when I realised they had gone to BleuTrade.com I tried to log-in, but got the error message:

Quote
A security code was sent to your email. For safety you need to enter the code

No such email has ever arrived and it is now more than one week since I first tried to re-login.



I posted a message on the second BleuTrade OP

Hello,

I tried to log into Bleutrade just now (it's been a while) I get the following message:

Quote
A security code was sent to your email. For safety you need to enter the code

Only thing is there are no emails being sent.

Can you look into this for me please? (Same user name as here)

and sent a PM to Bleutrade https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=515389

Nearly two days later, I cross posted the message to the original thread:

Am cross posting to this thread too (and PM the OP of this thread also)

Hello,

I tried to log into Bleutrade just now (it's been a while) I get the following message:

Quote
A security code was sent to your email. For safety you need to enter the code

Only thing is there are no emails being sent.

Can you look into this for me please? (Same user name as here)

Thanks - hope to hear from you soon.

and also sent a PM to RodrigoHenrik https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=155369 ,

However, as you can see from both threads, I have not received a response either on the threads or in PM's.  In fact others have started commenting that they too are unable to access funds, or, their deposits have gone missing.



I am stopping short of making this an outright scam accusation, but I feel that the longer this goes on, the more it is hurting BleuTrade's reputation and so am posting it in the Reputation thread.

My only question is do I red flag both their accounts?  Should I wait and see? 

Before anyone asks:

Look into spam folder.

I have never had any problem, moreover support is fast and responsive. really, no joking.

Not in the spam folder, have sent a PM to their account here at same time I posted above and so far no response.

Is there any way to contact the customer service, the balance of my wallet is not correct, I tried sending mail, twitter and private letter bitcointalk.org, but not get any response 


no, and i see they have delisted a few more coins in the past month, again without no notice given. 



Thanks for reading.
Pages: [1] 2 »
Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!