Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
It seems like CryptoBridge is suffering from multiple withdrawal and deposit ticket issues that they've "sent to dev" that are not being resolved. I've seen a number of people asking about old tickets being "sent to dev" multiple weeks ago and the cryptobridge staff ignore their questions.
Personally, I had an LTC deposit fail to go through on July 20. I sent it just before they did emergency maintenance and disabled deposits and withdrawals. After the maintenance was completed and my deposit still did not go through, I opened a support ticket, and was advised to wait 48-72 hours for a response.
I asked about the ticket on discord in the beginning of the following week and was informed that those were 48-72 BUSINESS hours. So I waited. Still no response.
On July 28th, over a week later, I jumped into discord again and asked about my ticket. One of the community managers had me DM him my ticket info, and after reviewing it, he informed me that he could not solve it and had to "send it to the dev team"
Around the beginning of the month, I asked in Discord how long it took the devs would take to handle a ticket, and was told to "just be patient".
But as I browsed the support channel, I noticed more and more people asking about missing deposits and withdrawals and just being brushed off by the support team. A lot of the issues seem to be from a few weeks ago, so I am just wondering if any of the tickets being sent to dev are truly being resolved, or what is going on here.
|
|
|
|
|
It seems like CryptoBridge is suffering from multiple withdrawal and deposit ticket issues that they've "sent to dev" that are not being resolved. I've seen a number of people asking about old tickets being "sent to dev" multiple weeks ago and the cryptobridge staff ignore their questions.
A lot of the issues seem to be from a few weeks ago, so I am just wondering what other people's experiences with missing deposits/withdrawals are, and if any of them are truly being resolved, or what is going on here.
|
|
|
|
|
i just seen Bitcoin went below $8000! i read on the internet that if Bitcoin goes below $8000, it will go 2 zero and we will loose all our monies! My advise is every1 to sell sell sell before you loose loose loose all you monies.
and i also readed that there is a silent civil war going on in the USa, the gov wants to took all our crypto for taxes, but other gov peeple, like the prez, wants 2 start a war on twitter.
i think we should make a twitter blockchain, and govs can be on blockchain and then they can start Fork Wars and see who can make the longest chain and win the fork war. It would be a lot cheaper i think than wars with me and you peeple.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm curious about what altcoins have the most unique or innovative use cases. And I'm NOT looking for MN coins that are going to do a DEX, add governance, or POS coins that are going to be the next Visa, or PoW coins that are going to take over Bitcoin's spot as #1. And I'm not as concerned with the actual coin as the technology / use case behind it. For example, Bitcoin itself was not the wow-factor, it was the blockchain technology behind it.
So. What's going to make me say, "Wow!"?
|
|
|
|
Over the course of my time in crypto, it seems that altcoins appear in droves, and often in topical order. And I think it's largely based on when people see a certain type of coin taking off or having more success than others at a certain point in time, they want to copy (or clone...  ) it and ride on the back of its success. So trying to ride on the back of Dash's success are now hundreds of MN coins. Of course if we could all afford a Dash masternode, I think we'd be done here So as I have been trying to expand my footprint in the MN arena, it can be almost overwhelming at times trying to sift through all the crappy MN coins (anyone up for another 80%/20% MN/POS coin with ROI so high it has its own orbit around the earth? I'm thinking we can call this one HitAndRun, or maybe LookAtThatDevGo). Some of the criteria I use to sort coins that have a few months under their belt is trading volume, size of the community, the purpose of the coin beyond the simple generic benefits of the type of coin (yes, I think we all know now that crypto-currency is decentralized and "secure"--well, except Ripple, but you know, whatever.  ). And then there's checking out the dev, to see if he's actually coding and working on the coin or just plugging away at his next clone, I mean, you know, a dev's gotta pay for his eight vacation homes somehow. What are some of the criteria you use to sift through masternode coins? Do you ever risk investing in brand-new coins, or do you stick to coins with more history?
|
|
|
|
|
When I first got into cryptocurrency last year, I started with GPU mining, but after seeing a bill or two, I also wanted a less, shall we say, economically invasive in the electric bill region form of mining. I found out about a couple different type of coins based around hard drives, which were very interesting to me.
Sia, which is traditionally GPU mined on one side with decentralized hard drive storage on the other, requiring collateral to be put up in order to "rent" your hard drive space out.
Storj, which is all about the decentralized storage side.
LBRY, which is focused on media storage, but while it can be GPU mined, I think the media storage side is just run on nodes, more like torrent streams.
And Burst, which had a different spin of actually writing "plots" to hard drives and then "mining" (aka searching) the plots to find the best deadline for a given block. I settled on Burst at the time because the potential rewards were the highest at the time. Now more recently, the dev team behind Burst is working on also adding the decentralized storage into the code, which seems to kinda throw it back into the middle of the bunch as far as use cases.
What I am wondering for those of you who have delved into this region of the crypto-world, what coin (or coins) did you pick, and why?
|
|
|
|
|
When I first got into cryptocurrency last year, I started with GPU mining, but after seeing a bill or two, I also wanted a less, shall we say, economically invasive in the electric bill region form of mining. I found out about a couple different type of coins based around hard drives, which were very interesting to me.
I got into Burst, which had a different spin of actually writing "plots" to hard drives and then "mining" (aka searching) the plots to find the best deadline for a given block. I settled on Burst at the time because the potential rewards were the highest at the time. Now more recently, the dev team behind Burst is working on also adding the decentralized storage into the code, which seems to kinda throw it back into the middle of the bunch as far as use cases.
Anyone else here into Burst or do you prefer a different "storage" coin?
|
|
|
|
|