Wenn ich bspw einen Coin auf Börse A kaufe, muss ich der Börse Informationen meiner Geldmittel offen legen.
Überweise ich nun diesen besagten Coin auf Börse B, will diese alle Informationen zur Herkunft des Coins und ebenfalls, mit welchen Geldmitteln dieser erworben wurde.

Ist das zwischenzeitlich "Normalität" auf allen Börsen und vor allem, ist das rechtens? Man hat doch bereits auf Börse A und der Bank die Hosen runter gelassen, kann man sich nicht darauf berufen?

Hi there ,
to extract the BCCs from my old core wallet, I transferred my BTCs to a new core wallet and export the private keys for the 8 existing addresses of my old core wallet. The import of the private keys into ElectronCash could be successfully carried out. However, the amount of BCCs represented in the ElectonCash Wallet does not match the previously transferred amount of BTCs in the new Wallet by about -10% (all transferred BTCs were already in the old Wallet as of August 1.).
For further testing I have imported the private keys into an Electrum Wallet. In Electrum I am on 0 BTCs, just like in the Core Wallet. The amount I transferred to the new core wallet does not match about -10% of my actual BTCs also.
I notice that ElectronCash and Electrum represent already transferred amounts in a different way and doesn't list some of the transfers at all. I exported all transfers for the Electrum and Core Wallet and imported them into Excel, compared and calculated them. Both wallets calculate absolutely correct, but the Core Wallet has a lot more entries, which is probably why this different credit has been created.
Nevertheless, the old Core Wallet only knows 8 addresses, which were all successfully exported and then imported into another Wallet.
Does anyone have any idea how such a difference in the wallet can occur?