There is a web application which creates for each user its own account in wallet. Main problem is the bitcoin daemon with time becomes slow and almost does not load new blocks from network.
I reckon the reason is the huge number of "move" RPC command (which transfer coins from main account to user's account). In these conditions Bitcoin daemon uses more than 50% of CPU and 30% of MEM.
Main problem is how to force daemon to load new blocks. Any suggestions?

[rescan]

My wallet was corrupted. Now when I am running the wallet (using "--daemon" flag) it says:"Warning: error reading wallet.dat! All keys read correctly, but transaction data or address book entries might be missing or incorrect."
I have already tried to put "-rescan" flag - gives me the same result.
I am using Ubuntu 14.04. Few days ago there was entire server crash or at least mysql crash. Anyway I have one week backup. What if I replace current "wallet.dat" by backuped "wallet.dat". Will this fix the wallet?

Look at the code below from bitcoinj (core\src\main\java\com\google\bitcoin\params\MainNetParams.java):

Code:

proofOfWorkLimit = Utils.decodeCompactBits(0x1d00ffffL);

And look at the code from bitcoin qt wallet (src\main.cpp):

Code:

static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 32);

I assume that in second case bnProofOfWorkLimit consists of 32 "0" and 224 "1" (000000...000000000011111111111111111111....11111111).
So I don't have an idea how to get first case "0x1d00ffff" from second case?
P.S. I have looked in "uint256.h". It wasn't helpful.

Look at the code below from android bitcoin wallet:

Code:

proofOfWorkLimit = Utils.decodeCompactBits(0x1d00ffffL);

And look at the code from bitcoin qt wallet:

Code:

static CBigNum bnProofOfWorkLimit(~uint256(0) >> 32);

I assume that in second case ProofOfWorkLimit consists of 32 "0" and 224 "1" (000000...000000000011111111111111111111....11111111)?
So I don't have an idea how to get first case "0x1d00ffffL" from second case? In binary "0x1d00ffffL" is 11101000000001111111111111111.
P.S. I have looked in uint256.h. It wasn't helpful.
P.S.S. Can anyone answer for sample what exactly should I put here "Utils.decodeCompactBits(0x1d00ffffL);" in case "~uint256(0) >> 27" ?

I gonna to create web app. Bitcoins will be game coins. So how to implement sending of won bitcoins from server (wallet on the server) to player's address?

I have modified bitcoinj to some altcoin network. But I have a question. Why do coins receive from different adresses (I am using one client for windows with one adress to send coins). Is it also normal for bitcoin network?

What is "checkpoints" file structure http://i59.fastpic.ru/big/2013/0928/f0/6c9c27c2adbb2a178be2cc294aed35f0.jpg ? I mean what kind of data should be put here? Do any docs about exist?

I'm trying to use SeedPeers.java in android app for connection to bitcoin network. But it doesn't look normal. I can see in ddms only "Peer died" or "connection timed out": http://i58.fastpic.ru/big/2013/0922/90/d002e868d692611371894ba100c11490.jpg
What is the problem if the "seedAddrs" is online?

First look in screenshot number one of davlik debug monitor server after running Bitcoin Wallet: http://piccy.info/view3/5090102/7074a1d99a96e67bdbea36a04073c21f/orig/
I suppose, that is normal work of Bitcoin Wallet.
Then I modified bitcoinj and bitcoin-wallet a little bit. I changed bitcoinj\core\src\main\java\com\google\bitcoin\kits\WalletAppKit.java (line 104):

Code:

vPeerGroup.addPeerDiscovery(new SeedPeers(params));

instead

Code:

vPeerGroup.addPeerDiscovery(new DnsDiscovery(params));

and bitcoin-wallet\wallet\src\de\schildbach\wallet\service\BlockchainServiceImpl.java (line 406):

Code:

private final PeerDiscovery normalPeerDiscovery = new SeedPeers(Constants.NETWORK_PARAMETERS);

instead

Code:

private final PeerDiscovery normalPeerDiscovery = new DnsDiscovery(Constants.NETWORK_PARAMETERS);

Look in screenshot number two of davlik debug monitor server after running Bitcoin Wallet to see the result: http://piccy.info/view3/5090104/aaf257fbd618863b16ed99ffb2263e66/orig/
I think, that is not normal work of app because you can see only "Peer died" and "Connection timed out".
So my question is: does class SeedPeers work correct? Maybe, it is not fully implemented?
P.S. Nonetheless, it could still work correct. I just don't have an opportunity to send or receive bitcoins to test Bitcoin Wallet with "SeedPeers" class instead "DnsDiscovery" class. So if you can do that, please do.
P.S.S. I'm not sure it is Bitcoin Wallet problem or bitcoinj problem.